<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>دانشگاه تهران</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>پژوهشهای جغرافیای انسانی</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2008-6296</Issn>
				<Volume>45</Volume>
				<Issue>3</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Content Analyses of Rural Sustainable Development Position in After Islamic Reveloution Plans</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>تحلیل محتوایی جایگاه توسعه پایدار روستایی در برنامه¬های بعد از انقلاب اسلامی</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>19</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>38</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">35243</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jhgr.2013.35243</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>عبدالرضا</FirstName>
					<LastName>رکن الدین افتخاری</LastName>
<Affiliation>دانشیار جغرافیا و برنامهریزی روستایی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0009-0008-9198-7862</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>حمدالله</FirstName>
					<LastName>سجاسی قیداری</LastName>
<Affiliation>استادیار گروه جغرافیا، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>طاهره</FirstName>
					<LastName>صادقلو</LastName>
<Affiliation>استادیار گروه جغرافیا، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0001-5046-5891</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2011</Year>
					<Month>10</Month>
					<Day>11</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Extended Abstract&lt;br /&gt;Introduction&lt;br /&gt;Changes in internal and external environment, especially in global arena, including&lt;br /&gt;globalization, information society, make constantly rural communities faced with threats and&lt;br /&gt;opportunities. Utilization of these opportunities and commuting the threats into opportunities is&lt;br /&gt;just possible by a suitable planning. In fact, the vulnerability of rural societies may be resulted&lt;br /&gt;from natural and unnatural phenomena (humanity, technical and managemental issues) in&lt;br /&gt;economic, social and environmental phases. This may introduce developmental gap among&lt;br /&gt;socities and might be resulted from macro planning and management of rural araea. In other&lt;br /&gt;words, the developmental gap in rural socities indicates survey lines available in actual situation&lt;br /&gt;of rural in macro (national) planning process because of sustainability. This results in a lag of&lt;br /&gt;national developmental process based on new paradigm. Therefore, appropriate plans and&lt;br /&gt;strategies based on key principles of sustainable development can be effective. By a strategic&lt;br /&gt;approach to plans and their flexibility it would be possible to convert threats into opportunity&lt;br /&gt;and also introduce sustainable rural development as a purpose of planning for development. The&lt;br /&gt;purpose of the plans is to enhance the industrial sector of economy for high technology capable&lt;br /&gt;to export, such as the electronics industry, consumer products industry, industrial processing of&lt;br /&gt;non-timber forest products, construction materials and chemical industry. Key industrial areas&lt;br /&gt;will be established gradually along the main communication routes. The villages will be  &lt;br /&gt;developed for traditional production with an aim to increase employment and exports.&lt;br /&gt;Accordingly, rural managers and planners in different levels of decision making, by continued&lt;br /&gt;assessment of macro and micro development plans, could adopt goals and principle of&lt;br /&gt;sustainable development with current condition of rural communities. In this framework,&lt;br /&gt;evaluation of the position of rural planning in national planning system, based on sustainable&lt;br /&gt;development principles and spatial justice in economic, social and environmental dimension&lt;br /&gt;over national territory, is inevitable requisite for sustainable rural development management and&lt;br /&gt;planning.&lt;br /&gt;Methodology&lt;br /&gt;In this paper, we first tried with Descriptive – depletion methodology to extract the principles&lt;br /&gt;and theoretical base of rural sustainable development planning and its indicators for content&lt;br /&gt;analysis measurement after the Islamic Revolution development plans in Framework of&lt;br /&gt;organizational excellence Evaluation model (EFQM). Result of the assessment in this method,&lt;br /&gt;by traceing and analysis of strengthes and improving the fields of institute structure (Here is the&lt;br /&gt;same village) that suggest improvement of planning process and its function it is possible to&lt;br /&gt;modify the future path. The EFQM Excellence Model is a non-prescriptive framework based on&lt;br /&gt;nine criteria. Five of these are ‘Enablers’ and four are ‘Results’. The ‘Enabler’ criteria cover&lt;br /&gt;what an organisation does. The ‘Results’ criteria cover what an organisation achieves. ‘Results’&lt;br /&gt;are caused by ‘Enablers’ and ‘Enablers’ are improved using feedback from ‘Results’. The&lt;br /&gt;Model, which recognises how many approaches to achieving sustainable excellence in all&lt;br /&gt;aspects of performance is available, is based on the premise that: Excellent results with respect&lt;br /&gt;to Performance, Customers, People and Society are achieved through Leadership driving Policy&lt;br /&gt;and Strategy, that is delivered through People. Other criteria are related to result and function.&lt;br /&gt;To use this method, there are various ways such as questionnairy method, workshop method,&lt;br /&gt;metrix method and preform method. In this paper the questionnairy method have beeb selected.&lt;br /&gt;This method is similar to the content analysis method, because based on available document in&lt;br /&gt;various fields of empowerment makers this could obtain the results to which access is just&lt;br /&gt;posible in ideal condition. Then, 14 questionnaires from 30 designed questionnaires completed&lt;br /&gt;by experts and elites in rural development and planning field have been applied as the base of&lt;br /&gt;analysis.&lt;br /&gt;Results and Discussion&lt;br /&gt;Results of the analyses indicate that consideration to rural sustainable development principles&lt;br /&gt;have increased in plans after Islamic Revolution, especially in 4th development plan. But, this&lt;br /&gt;attention to sustainable development based on EFQM model, in all dimensions is lower than the&lt;br /&gt;average. This fact indicates that enabling factor is not correctly known among policymakers and&lt;br /&gt;planners for sustainable institutionalization, and executive management does not have sufficient&lt;br /&gt;capacity for sustainable implementation. &lt;br /&gt; </Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">تغییر در محیط درونی و بیرونی، به ویژه در عرصه های جهانی ما نند جهانی شدن، همواره&lt;br /&gt;جامعه ی اطلاعاتی و جوامع روستایی را با تهدیدها یا فرص تهایی روبه رو می کند. به همین دلیل&lt;br /&gt;تدوین برنامه های مناسب و براساس اصول توسعه ی پایدار ، می تواند یکی از راهکارهای&lt;br /&gt;اساسی و مؤثّر در این زمینه باشد. در این چارچوب ارزیابی جایگاه برنامه ریزی روستایی در&lt;br /&gt;برنامه های ملّی، بر اساس اصول توسعه ی پایدار و عدالت مکانی در ابعاد اقتصادی، اجتماعی و&lt;br /&gt;محیطی در پهنه ی ملّی، برای مدیریت و برنامه ریزی توسعه ی پایدار روستایی یک ضرورت&lt;br /&gt;اجتناب ناپذیر است. بر این اساس، در این نوشتار تلاش شد تا با روش شناسی تحلیلی &lt;br /&gt;توصیفی، ابتدا اصول و مبانی نظری برنامه ریزی توسعه ی پایدار روستایی و شاخص ها ی آن&lt;br /&gt;استخراج و به منزله ی معیارهای تحلیل محتوایی برنامه های توسعه بعد از انقلاب، در چارچوب&lt;br /&gt;قرار گیرد. سپس پرسش نامه ای طرّاحی و در اختیار EFQM مدل ارزیابی تعالی سازمانی&lt;br /&gt;خبرگان و متخصصان حوزه ی برنامه ریزی و توسعه ی روستایی قرار گرفت که از مجموع 30&lt;br /&gt;پرسش نامه، 14 مورد از آنها مبنای تحلیل قرار گرفت. نتایج به دست آمده از تحلی لها نشان داد&lt;br /&gt;که با وجود افزایش سطح توجه به توسعه ی پایدار روستایی در برنامه های بعد از انقلاب که&lt;br /&gt;بیشترین آن در برنامه ی چهارم توسعه مشاهده می شود، اما این توجه بر اساس ساختار مدل&lt;br /&gt;تعالی سازمانی، در تمام ابعاد پایین تر از میانگین است و نشان م یدهد که در برنامهها، عناصر&lt;br /&gt;توانمندساز در باور خط مشیگذاران و برنامهریزان برای نهادینه کردن پایداری ب ه درستی&lt;br /&gt;شناخته نشده است و مدیریت اجرایی از ظرفیت لازم برای اجرای پایداری برخوردار نیست.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">توسع هی پایدار</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">توسع هی روستایی</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">برنام ههای توسعه</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">تحلیل محتوایی</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">مدل ارزیابی</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">.EFQM</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jhgr.ut.ac.ir/article_35243_b175d7621b125020bec85e7165144da9.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
