کیفیت مکان سوم و نقش آن در بهزیستی ذهنی و اصالت وجودی مطالعه موردی: فضای عمومی ارگ کریم‌خان شیراز

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسنده

بخش جغرافیا، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران

10.22059/jhgr.2026.399772.1008826

چکیده

ویژگی­های شیوۀ زندگی مدرن ایجاب می­کند که افراد به جز مکان­های اول و دوم، مکان­های دیگری – تحت عنوان مکان­های سوم- برای گذران وقت، زدودن تنش های زندگی روزمره، و تقویت روابط اجتماعی داشته باشند. فضاهای شهری عمومی از جمله مکان­های سوم مهمی هستند که علاوه بر ارتقاء سطح بهزیستی ذهنی و احساسی، به نظر می­رسد می­توانند کیفیت تجربه خودشناسی را بهبود ببخشند. پژوهش حاضر در زمره­ی تحقیقات کاربردی و توصیفی- تحلیلی است که با مطالعۀ داده­های حاصل از پرسشنامه برای یک نمونه 390 نفری به بررسی کیفیت مکان سوم و اثر آن در بهزیستی ذهنی و اصالت وجودی پرداخته است. جامعه آماری تحقیق افراد 18 ساله و بزرگتر ساکن در شهر شیراز است که با هدف بهره­مندی از کارکردهای مکان سوم، حداقل یک بار در فضای عمومی پیرامون ارگ کریم­خان حضور داشته­اند. تحلیل داده­ها با استفاده از نرم­افزار SPSS و آزمون­های آماری شامل ضرایب همبستگی، تحلیل رگرسیون چندگانه، تحلیل واریانس یکطرفه و آزمون T تک­نمونه­ای انجام شده است. یافته­های پژوهش نشان داد که کیفیت مکان سوم در هر یک از ابعاد سه­گانۀ آن از سطح متوسط بالاتر است. سطح بهزیستی ذهنی و اصالت وجودی نیز بالاتر از سطح متوسط ارزیابی شد. نتایج حاصل از تحلیل رگرسیون نشان داد که کیفیت مکان سوم اثر مثبت و معناداری بر بهزیستی ذهنی و اصالت وجودی دارد به طوری که بیش از 58 درصد از واریانس بهزیستی ذهنی و 46 درصد از واریانس اصالت وجودی به وسیله­ی واریانس کیفیت مکان سوم تبیین می­شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Quality of Third Place and Its Effect on Subjective Well-being and Existential Authenticity: A case study of Public Space of Karim Khan Citadel, Shiraz

نویسنده [English]

  • Raana Shaykh-Baygloo
Department of Geography, Faculty of Economics, Management & Social Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
چکیده [English]

ABSTRACT
The characteristics of modern lifestyle require that people, in addition to the first and second places, have other places, called third places, to spend time, relieve the tensions of daily life, and strengthen social relationships. Public urban spaces are important third places that, in addition to enhancing subjective and emotional well-being, seem to improve the quality of the self-discovery experience. The present study is an applied, descriptive-analytical research that examined the quality of the third place and its effect on subjective well-being and existential authenticity, using questionnaire data from a sample of 390 people. The study's statistical population comprises people aged 18 and older living in the city of Shiraz who have been in the public space around the Karim Khan Citadel at least once, to benefit from the functions of the third place. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS software and included correlation coefficients, multiple regression analysis, One-way ANOVA, and One-sample T-test. The findings of the study showed that the quality of the third place in each of its three dimensions is higher than the average level. The levels of subjective well-being and existential authenticity were also evaluated as higher than the average. The results of the regression analysis showed that the quality of the third place has a significant and positive effect on both subjective well-being and existential authenticity, accounting for more than 58% of the variance in subjective well-being and 46% of the variance in existential authenticity.
 
Extended Abstract
Introduction
The characteristics of modern lifestyle require that people have other places to spend time, relieve the tensions of daily life, and strengthen social relationships, in addition to the first place (home) and the second place (workplace). Such places are called third-places and include a wide range. For example, parks, coffee shops, sports clubs, entertainment centers, shopping centers, restaurants, etc. Public urban spaces are important third-places that, while simple and unpretentious, are affordable for leisure time and open to all citizens. In addition to improving the level of subjective and emotional well-being, third-places can enhance the quality of the experience of self-discovery, which has been conceptualized as “existential authenticity.” It is worth noting that the relationship between third-places and quality of life, welfare, well-being, and related concepts has been less studied. In particular, research on the effects of third-place quality on subjective well-being and existential authenticity is scarce and limited. Given the importance of the subject, the present study has investigated the effect of third-place quality on subjective well-being and existential authenticity, and, in this regard, the public space of the Karim Khan Citadel in Shiraz has been considered a case study.
 
Methodology
The present study is an applied and descriptive-analytical research that investigates the quality of the public space of the Citadel of Karim Khan in Shiraz, focusing on its role in subjective well-being and existential authenticity. In order to collect the required data, in addition to library studies, the field method -questionnaire- was conducted. The study's statistical population comprises people aged 18 and older living in Shiraz who have been in the public space around the Citadel of Karim Khan at least once, with the aim of benefiting from the functions of the third-place. The questionnaire was completed at the Citadel of Karim Khan using a simple random sampling method. Overall, 410 questionnaires were completed, of which 390 were valid and usable. The research questionnaire included questions about the general characteristics of the individuals and their views on the items related to the main variables of the research, including the quality of the third-place, subjective well-being, and existential authenticity. In this study, the "quality of the third-place" was conceptualized as a three-dimensional construct including "physical and functional attributes", "sociability and pedestrianism", and "beauty and meaning", each of which was operationally defined through 7, 5, and 4 items, respectively. The variables "subjective well-being" and "existential authenticity" were also defined based on 6 and 5 items, respectively. Data analysis was performed using SPSS software and statistical tests, including correlation coefficients, multiple regression analysis, One-way ANOVA, and One-sample T-test.
 
Results and discussion
The findings of the study showed that the quality of the third-place in each of its three dimensions is higher than the average level. The levels of subjective well-being and existential authenticity were also found to be higher than the average. The effect of third-place quality on subjective well-being and existential authenticity was examined using multiple regression analysis. The results of the regression analysis showed that the quality of the third-place, with a regression coefficient of 0.767 and an adjusted coefficient of determination of 0.585, has a significant and positive effect on subjective well-being, and the variance of the quality of the third-place can explain 58.5% of the variance of subjective well-being. It is worth noting that among the three dimensions of the quality of the third-place, “physical and functional attributes,” with a standard beta coefficient of 0.558 - has the most significant effect on subjective well-being. The findings also showed that the quality of the third-place, with a regression coefficient of 0.681, has a significant, positive effect on existential authenticity, explaining 46% of its variance. According to the results, there is no statistically significant difference between the effect coefficients of the independent variables, i.e., the three dimensions of the quality of the third-place. The result of One-way ANOVA showed that there is a significant relationship between the frequency of presence in the place and subjective well-being, so that the level of subjective well-being in the group that has experienced presence in the environment of the Karim Khan Citadel more than ten times is significantly different from other groups, higher than them. Regarding the existential authenticity variable, the results showed that there is a significant difference between the group of people who have visited the Karim Khan Citadel more than ten times and the groups who have visited once and three to five times, so that the average value of the existential authenticity variable in the group who have visited more than ten times is higher than the other two groups.
 
Conclusion
As an interesting example of a third-place, the area around the Karim Khan Citadel in Shiraz was studied, and its effect on subjective well-being and existential authenticity was confirmed. As mentioned, third-places include a wide range of places with different scales and functions. The management system of some third-places is personal and private, such as shopping malls, cafes, clubs, restaurants, and the like. In contrast, a group of third-places are public urban spaces whose management is attributed to public institutions such as municipalities. The degree of inclusion of users of these public spaces is much wider than that of other third-places mentioned, so that people from different socio-economic statuses can easily use them without any special restrictions and often without paying any fees. Such spaces are particularly valuable for improving the quality of life and advancing social justice. According to this study's findings, it is recommended to improve environmental quality and access to public urban spaces, including the area around the Citadel of Karim Khan in Shiraz.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Third place
  • Public urban spaces
  • Subjective well-being
  • Existential authenticity
  • Shiraz
  1. حیدری، محمدتقی؛ رسولی، محمد؛ شریفی، زانیار و محرمی، سعید. (1402). تبیین مؤلفه­های مطلوبیت فضای شهری در تحقق حق به شهر مطالعه موردی: شهر ارومیه. فصلنامه پژوهش­های جغرافیای انسانی، (3)55، 46-31. Doi:10.22059/jhgr.2022.340609.1008468
  2. خیابان­­چیان، نگار؛ حبیبی، کیومرث و سعیدی، مهدی. (1403). آینده­پژوهی مفهوم مکان در پیاده­راه­سازی (مورد پژوهی: خیابان­های مرکزی شهر همدان). معماری و شهرسازی پایدار، (1)12، 248-231. doi:10.22061/jsaud.2024.10925.2233
  3. رمضانی، مریم؛ قره بگلو، مینو و مولایی، اصغر. (1401). نقش مکان­های سوم در ارتقای حس تعلق شهروندان مورد مطالعه: از میدان ولی عصر تا چهاراه خیابان ولی عصر تهران. رهپویۀ معماری و شهرسازی، (2)1، 76-61. doi:10.22034/rau.2022.562032.1011
  4. زندیه، مهدی؛ دیاب، جعفر؛ محمدی لورون، محمد و حسینی سده، سید امیرحسین. (1402). بررسی فعالیت­های اجتماعی و تفریحی در بستر محوطه اطراف ارگ کریم­خان زند. دهمین همایش ملی مطالعات و تحقیقات نوین در حوزه علوم جغرافیا، معماری و شهرسازی ایران، تهران.
  5. عدالت، طاهره و پژواک، فضل­اله. (1396). بررسی عوامل تأثیرگذار در تبدیل فضای اجتماعی به المان و نشانه شهری از منظر هویت و خاطره جمعی در شهر شیراز؛ نمونه موردی: ارگ کریم­خانی و دروازه قرآن. مدیریت شهری و روستایی، (49)16، 97-77.
  6. ورمقانی، حسنا و پاک­زاد، شادی. (1402). از چمن تا میدان پارک؛ تطبیق ارزیابانه مانایی مکان­ها در مرکز محلات و میدان پارک­های شهر همدان. فصلنامه پژوهش­های جغرافیای انسانی، (4)55، 178-155. http://doi.org/10.22059/JHGR.2022.344022.1008498
  7. Baloglu, S., Busser, J., & Cain, L. (2019). Impact of experience on emotional well-being and loyalty. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management28(4), 427-445. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2019.1527269
  8. Baum, F., & Palmer, C. (2002). ‘Opportunity structures’: urban landscape, social capital and health promotion in Australia. Health promotion international17(4), 351-361. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/17.4.351
  9. Brajša-Žganec, A., Merkaš, M., & Šverko, I. (2011). Quality of life and leisure activities: How do leisure activities contribute to subjective well-being?. Social indicators research, 102(1), 81-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9724-2
  10. Deb, M., & Lomo-David, E. (2021). Determinants of word of mouth intention for a World Heritage Site: The case of the Sun Temple in India. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management19, 100533. doi:10.1016/j.jdmm.2020.100533
  11. Edalat, T., & Pezhvak, F. (2018). Investigating the Influencing Factors in the Conversion of Social Space to Element and Urban Symbol from the perspective of identity and collective memories in Shiraz. Urban and Rural Management, 16 (49), 77-97. [In Persian]
  12. Erce, V., Kusakci, A. O., & Amiri, M. H. (2025). Evaluating urban square management success: A model for urban public spaces in Istanbul. Urban Governance5(2), 191-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2025.05.008
  13. Finlay, J., Esposito, M., Kim, M. H., Gomez-Lopez, I., & Clarke, P. (2019). Closure of ‘third places’? Exploring potential consequences for collective health and wellbeing. Health & place60, 102225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102225
  14. Frumkin, H. (2003). Healthy places: exploring the evidence. American journal of public health, 93(9), 1451-1456. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1451
  15. Fu, X. (2019). Existential authenticity and destination loyalty: Evidence from heritage tourists. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 12, 84-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2019.03.008
  16. Guite, H. F., Clark, C., & Ackrill, G. (2006). The impact of the physical and urban environment on mental well-being. Public health, 120(12), 1117-1126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2006.10.005
  17. Heydari, M. T., Rasoli, M., & Sharifi, Z. (2023). Explaining the Desirability Components of Urban Space in Realizing the Right to the City Case Study: Urmia. Human Geography Research Quarterly, 55 (3), 31-46. http://doi.org/10.22059/JHGR.2022.340609.1008468 [In Persian]
  18. Hickman, P. (2013). “Third places” and social interaction in deprived neighbourhoods in Great Britain. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment28, 221-236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-012-9306-5
  19. Khiabanchian, N., Habibi, K., & Saidi, M. (2024). Future research of the "concept of place" in the pedestrianization of the central streets of Hamadan city. Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Urban Design, 12(1), 231-248. doi:10.22061/jsaud.2024.10925.2233 [In Persian]
  20. Jeffres, L. W., Bracken, C. C., Jian, G., & Casey, M. F. (2009). The impact of third places on community quality of life. Applied research in quality of life4, 333-345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-009-9084-8
  21. Jiang, Y., Ramkissoon, H., Mavondo, F. T., & Feng, S. (2017). Authenticity: The link between destination image and place attachment. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 26(2), 105-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2016.1185988
  22. Johansson, M., Sternudd, C., & Kärrholm, M. (2016). Perceived urban design qualities and affective experiences of walking. Journal of Urban Design21(2), 256-275. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2015.1133225
  23. Latham, A., & Layton, J. (2019). Social infrastructure and the public life of cities: Studying urban sociality and public spaces. Geography Compass13(7), e12444. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12444
  24. Lee, J. H., & Tan, T. H. (2023). Neighborhood walkability or third places? Determinants of social support and loneliness among older adults. Journal of Planning Education and Research43(2), 240-253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X19870295
  25. Li, X., Kozlowski, M., Salih, S. A., & Ismail, S. B. (2025). Evaluating the vitality of urban public spaces: perspectives on crowd activity and built environment. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research19(3), 562-583. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-01-2024-0009
  26. McCabe, S., & Johnson, S. (2013). The happiness factor in tourism: Subjective well-being and social tourism. Annals of tourism research, 41, 42-65. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2012.12.001
  27. Mehta, V., & Bosson, J. K. (2010). Third places and the social life of streets. Environment and behavior, 42(6), 779-805. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916509344677
  28. Newman, D. B., Tay, L., & Diener, E. (2014). Leisure and subjective well-being: A model of psychological mechanisms as mediating factors. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(3), 555–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9435-x
  29. Oldenburg, R. (1999). The great good place: Cafes, coffee shops, bookstores, bars, hair salons, and other hangouts at the heart of a community. Da Capo Press.
  30. Qi, J., Mazumdar, S., & Vasconcelos, A. C. (2024). Understanding the relationship between urban public space and social cohesion: A systematic review. International Journal of Community Well-Being7(2), 155-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-024-00204-5
  31. Ramezani, M., Gharehbaglou, M., & Molaei, A. (2022). The Role of Third Places in Enhancing Citizens’ Sense of Belonging. Study Case: From Valiasr Square to the Intersection of Valiasr Street, Tehran. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 1(2), 61-76. doi:10.22034/rau.2022.562032.1011 [In Persian]
  32. Rosenbaum, M. S., & Dickens, J. M. (2025). Commentary: the social impact of third places on business, communities and well-being. Journal of Social Impact in Business Research1(2), 70-78. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSIBR-11-2024-0049
  33. Samavati, S., Desmet, P. M., & Ranjbar, E. (2025). Happy urban public spaces: a systematic review of the key factors affecting citizen happiness in public environments. Cities & health9(1), 112-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2024.2358600
  34. Thompson, S., & Kent, J. (2014). Connecting and strengthening communities in places for health and well-being. Australian Planner51(3), 260-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2013.837832
  35. Tolbert, C. M., Irwin, M. D., Lyson, T. A., & Nucci, A. R. (2002). Civic community in small‐town America: How civic welfare is influenced by local capitalism and civic engagement. Rural Sociology67(1), 90-113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2002.tb00095.x
  36. Tumanan, M. A. R., & Lansangan, J. R. G. (2012). More than just a cuppa coffee: A multi-dimensional approach towards analyzing the factors that define place attachment. International Journal of Hospitality Management31(2), 529-534. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.07.012
  37. Van Orden, K. A., Bower, E., Lutz, J., Silva, C., Gallegos, A. M., Podgorski, C. A., ... & Conwell, Y. (2021). Strategies to promote social connections among older adults during “social distancing” restrictions. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 29(8), 816-827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2020.05.004 
  38. Varmaghani, H., & Pakzad, Sh. (2023). From Chaman to the Park-Square; Comparative Evaluation of Durability Places in the Center of Neighborhoods and Park-Squares in Hamadan. Human Geography Research Quarterly, 55 (4), 155-178. http://doi.org/10.22059/JHGR.2022.344022.1008498 [In Persian]
  39. Wang, N. (1999). Rethinking authenticity in tourism experience. Annals of tourism research, 26(2), 349-370.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(98)00103-0
  40. Wang, Y. C., Liu, C. R., Huang, W. S., & Chen, S. P. (2020). Destination fascination and destination loyalty: Subjective well-being and destination attachment as mediators. Journal of Travel Research59(3), 496-511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287519839777
  41. Yu, C. Y. (2025). Neighborhood walkability, third place engagement, and their impact on physical activity and social capital for older adults living alone and with others. Journal of Aging and Health, 08982643251323301. https://doi.org/10.1177/08982643251323301
  42. Zandieh, M., Diab, J., Mohammadi Loron, M., & Hoseini Sedeh, S.A.H. (2023). Study of social and recreational activities in the area around the Karim Khan Zand Citadel. 10th National Conference on Modern Studies and Research in the Field of Geography, Architecture and Urban Planning of Iran, Tehran.  [In Persian]
  43. Zhang, T., & Yin, P. (2020). Testing the structural relationships of tourism authenticities. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 18, 100485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2020.100485