نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استاد گروه جغرافیا، دانشگاه تهران
2 استادیار گروه جغرافیا، دانشگاه تهران
3 دانشجوی دکتری برنامهریزی شهری دانشگاه تهران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Introduction
Housing as one of the stellar biological needs of human beings has attracted a major theoretical, technological, and materialistic attentions of many researchers. During history, meeting this need and its quality has been dependent on cultural, environmental, historical, economical, and technological conditions. World population and urban life's intense increase more than 50 % and it is expected to increase more than 68 % by 2050. This turned the challenging problem of housing into a crisis. This problem is of greater importance in developing countries due to the fact that their societies are mainly constituted by low-Income (middle-class) people. In Sanandaj, in addition to the situation we see the national level of housing sector that is due to population growth and intense urban life growth. In the region, other factors like general level of income have caused shortage of house especially among weak people who are about 35% of the population there.
In housing market, there are a lot of related economical indices such as family saving, cost and income, profitability rate of land and housing market, land and house price and productivity of housing production factors. This study tries to probe into principal economic reasons of increased gap between offer and demand in housing sector in Sanandaj.
Methodology
The study is an applied research conducted through a descriptive-analytic method. To collect data, we have used library-based and field method for the needed data. The data have been gathered through formal sources like Iran Census Center and Iran Central Bank.
Results and discussion
Changes in housing quantity have been considered for studying housing market and influential economic condition of this sector. Based on the obtained results, the gap between housing offer and effective demand is increased since 1976 so that the ratio of number of families to number of houses is reduced from 1.0015 in 1976 to 1.15 in 2006. Furthermore, house shortage rate in Sanandaj in comparison with the number of families, without considering demolition rate, is 10760 units.
Land and house price, and lease cost are significant indices for analyzing supply and demand in housing market. Annual growth of land in the abovementioned period of time (1976-2006) is 31.15% while cost experienced 25% growth.
By comparing house and land cost rate growth and inflation growth rate, it is possible to perceive the importance of house in economical transactions which can also lead to brokerage growth. During this period of time, land, house, and leasing cost growth rate have been always more than inflation rate (17.4).
At the same time, Sanandaj families' income growth rate in this period has increased to 16.6 which can be interpreted as a huge gap between potential and effective demand in a 28% growth in land price and a 31% growth in housing price. Family saving as a main source of renting house with a fixed price of has been always negative except in four years; whereas, banks loans , on the average, in the last ten years has decreased from 67% to 10.6% in 2002.
The average bank loan is increased from 81 million Rials in 2002 to 192.6 million Rials in 2010. The other main index is the economical profitability of land market in comparison with the profitability rate of house construction market in which we have witnessed an annual growth in both of them. However, at the end of the period, the profitability rate of house construction is 5 times more than that of the land. The productivity rate of renting house has been studied based on the interpretation of the factors. Therefore, the productivity rate of capital with a fixed rate has been positive. The growth rate of added value in housing sector in this period, on average, has been 30.25; that is, for any Rial investment, there is a 30.25 Rial added value. Also, the productivity rate of land that was 1.017 units in 2002, has remarkably reached 2.55 units in 2010. The productivity rate of work force is increased from 5.2 in 2002 to 22.9 in 2007. In other words, any work force has provided 22.9 million Rials added value in housing sector. Its average annual growth has been 34.5 during this period.
Conclusion
Results of the study have demonstrated that housing has not been a problem by 1976. However, at the end of the period, 1976-2006, we have encountered, first, a problem called houselessness and house-badness specifically in obliterated fabrics in Sanandaj city, and second, a house shortage of 15% of in its inventory. Based on the obtained results from housing economic indices and its financial production mechanism, accentuation on family savings for its financial renting seems fruitless. The continuous growth in house price with its remarkable added value can indicate that by omitting and reducing land price, the cost of house construction will be transmitted to the other sources and methods of house financial provisions such as bank facilities growth to 80% for house purchase and construction, deposit loans, tax exemption, and activating financial sources of the private sector. We can also pace towards social housing production methods, rent on the condition of owning and eventual construction.
کلیدواژهها [English]
10. Habibi, S. M., 1994, Providing Shelter or Providing Settlement Appropriate Enviroment, A Collection of Articles of Housing Development Policies Seminar in Iran Ministry of Housing Development, Land and Housing Organization, PP. 379- 391. (In Persian)
11. Habibi, M., and Ahari, Z., 1995, An Analysis on Urban Housing Reseearch in Iran, A Collection of Articles of 2nd Seminar of Housing Development Policies in Iran, Ministry of Housing and Urban Development, University of Ttehran, 1995, PP.136-150. (In Persian)
12. Hadizadeh, M., 2003, Margain Settling and Solution for Organizing it Globally, Ferdosi University Publictions, 1st Edition, Meshad. (In Persian)
13. Heidari, Ch., Tabaazgami, R., S. Kh, 2010, The Role City Development Straegy (C.D.S) in Urban Low-Income Groups Housing Provision Policies a Case Study of Rasht, Human Geography Research, Quarterly, No, 73, Fall, 2002, PP. 59-82. (In Persian)
14. Johe, C., 2010, A Practical Guide for Conducting Housing Profiles, Supporting Evidence-Based Housing Policy and Reform, UN Habitat, Nairobi.
15. Karami, A., 2007, Study on Housing Market Pricesin in Iran Based on Government Policies, Tabbire Eghtesad Research Institate, 1ST Edition, Tehran. (In Persian)
16. Khiabani, N., 2003, Influential Factors of Iran Housing Price, Housing Economics Quarterly, Land and Housing National Organization, No. 34, PP. 46-53, Tehran. (In Persian)
17. Khodai, Z., Mireh, M., 2011, A Review on Global Experience Of Housing Provision Of Urban LOW- INCOME Groups, The 1st Conference of Urban Economy, Ferdosi University, Meshad.
18. Majedi, H., 2009, Studying Urban Land And Housing Policies In Iran, Urban Economics Quarterly, 1st Year, No.4 Tehran, Pp.20-31.
19. Malpezzi, S., 1990, Urban Housing And Financial. Markets: Some International, Funding Communiy Initiatives, London: Earthscan.
20. Mireh, M., 2009, Policies Andpattern Ofhousing Planning of Drban LOW- INCOME Groups, Case S Tudy: Qom, Doctrate Dissertation of Urban Planning Under Superrvision Ofdr, Keramatollah Ziari, Faculty Ofgeography, University of Tehran. (In Persian)
21. Rafiei, M., 2000, Urban Housing Towads Local Planning, Municipality Monthly, No.19, PP. 26-40.
22. Tibaijuka, A., 2010, Housing as a Strategy for Poverty Reduction, UN Habitat (The Global Urban Economic Dialogue Series), Nairobi.
23. www.census.gov./population/popclkworld.
24. Yazdani Borujeni, F., 2003, Housing Investment Market, Backgrounds and Frameworks, Housing Economics Quarterly, No. 34, Fall, 2003, PP. 4-17. (In Persian)
25. Zhang, Q., X., 2011, Housing Finance Mechanisms in Mexico, UN Habitat, The Human Settlement Finance Systems Series. Nairobi.
26. Ziarati, K., Mahdnezhad, H., Parhiz, F., and Aghajani, M., 2010, Study of Housing Condition of Low- Income Groups and Estimating Low- Income Groups Housing (Case Study: Hormozgan Province), Geographical Researches Quarterly, No. 98, Article No. 739, Fall, PP. 29-55. (In Persian)
27. Iran Census Center, 2011, Introductory Results of General Census of People and House, Tehran. (In Persian)
28. Iran Census Center,1976, The Results of General Census of People and House, In Kurdistan Province, Sanandaj, Tehran. (In Persian)
29. Iran Census Center, 1986, The Results of General Census of People and Hous, In Ku Rdistan Provincie, Sanandaj, Tehran. (In Persian)
30. Iran Census Center, 1996, The Results of General Census of People and House, In Kurdistan Province, Sanandaj, Tehran. (In Persian)
31. Iran Census Center, 2006, The Results of General Census of People and House, In Kurdistan Province, Sanandaj, Tehran. (In Persian)
32. Iran Census Center, 2001-2011, Family Costand Income Census Project, Tehran. (In Persian)
33. Iran Census Center, 2002-2011, A Ten- Year Census Annual Book of Kurditan Province, Tehran. (In Persian)
)
