نگرشی نو به مفهوم و ابعاد هیدروپلیتیک

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Political Geography, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

2 Department of Political Geography, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Political Geography, Imam Hossein University, Tehran, Iran

4 Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

Abstract

Introduction

Geopolitical knowledge, through its field of study, which is a combination of geography and political science, examines the role of geographical sources of power and the use of these sources in the relations between actors. In fact, geopolitical knowledge is based on the two pillars of the geographical sources of power and the relations of the actors. Therefore, in geopolitical knowledge, the relations between the actors are realized based on the geographical sources of their power (Janparvar, 1396). Life and survival are the highest values of creation. Habitat and habitat all make sense in connection with water. But the challenge is that only 2.5 percent of the world's fresh water and only half of this amount is available to humans (Kaviani-Rad et al., 1399: 86). This small amount is also very heterogeneously distributed in the world. On the other hand, the expansion of urbanization, population growth and the expansion of inefficient agriculture have led to the threat of existing freshwater resources (Araqchi, 2014: 93). In the last hundred years, per capita global water consumption has grown 9-fold (Dellapenna, 2001: 209). Despite unprecedented changes in the political geography of the world, in most parts of the world, water has always been a key element in the foreign policy of countries. Numerous examples of conflicts between countries can be cited, including the issue of restricting water resources (for example, Turkey, Iraq and Syria with surface and groundwater pollution of the Danube River in Europe).

research method

The main method of this research is descriptive-analytical due to its theoretical nature. Accordingly, in this research, an attempt has been made to provide a general picture of the concept and nature of hydropolitics and on the other hand to explain the dimensions of hydropolitics. In this research, library and internet information has been used to collect information.

Research Findings

The concept of hydropolitics

Among the important issues in the field of hydropolitics are numerous and sometimes non-transparent conceptualizations. Studies on the conceptualizations that have been made of hydropolitics seem to be such that, while lacking transparency and comprehensibility, it has not been able to show the relationship between hydropolitics and geopolitics in a logical way. Based on this, it seems that if we consider the relationship between geopolitics and hydropolitics in general, the definition of hydropolitics should be in a way that is consistent with the definition of geopolitics and on the other hand is in a way. Which, while being transparent, can also be understood. If we consider the definition of geopolitics as geopolitics is the knowledge, acquisition, productivity and preservation of geographical sources of power in transnational, national, regional and global relations; In other words, geopolitics is the knowledge of designing and reviewing the strategies of actors to achieve benefits and goals based on geographical sources of power (Janparvar, 1396: 28). Based on the relationship between geopolitics and hydropolitics, hydropolitics should be conceptualized as follows:

Hydropolitics is the knowledge, acquisition, efficiency and conservation of water and related issues as a geographical source of power in transnational, national, regional and global relations; In other words, hydropolitics is the knowledge of designing and reviewing actors' strategies to achieve water-based interests and goals and related issues as a geographical source of power.

Hydropolitical dimensions

As a rule, there are different views and perceptions in the field of hydropolitical forms, some of which were mentioned above and analyzed. It seems that in order to have a systematic and complete hydropolitical attitude, studies in the field of hydropolitics can be conducted in the form of three dimensions.

The first dimension: water as a geographical source of power

In the first dimension of hydropolitical studies, water should be studied as a geographical source of power in the form of four sections as follows.

The second dimension: water-based relationships

In the second dimension of hydropolitical studies, water as a geographical source of power in the form of four sections should be studied as follows.

Dimension 3: Water-based strategies

In the third dimension of hydropolitical studies, water as a geographical source of power in the form of two parts should be studied as follows.

Conclusion

The purpose of this research, which is fundamental in nature, is to provide a favorable and appropriate approach for institutionalizing the concept of hydropolitics. Therefore, in this research, using a descriptive-analytical method, a new model and attitude to the concept and dimensions of hydropolitics have been presented. Among the important issues in the field of hydropolitics are numerous and sometimes opaque conceptualizations. Studies on the conceptualizations of hydropolitics show that most of what has been written, while lacking transparency and comprehensibility, has not been able to logically show the relationship between hydropolitics and geopolitics. Based on this, it seems that if we consider the relationship between geopolitics and hydropolitics in general, the definition of hydropolitics should be in a way that is consistent with the definition of geopolitics and on the other hand is in a way. Which, while being transparent, can also be understood. If we consider the definition of geopolitics as geopolitics is the knowledge, acquisition, productivity and preservation of geographical sources of power in transnational, national, regional and global relations; In other words, geopolitics is the knowledge of designing and reviewing the strategies of actors to achieve interests and goals based on geographical sources of power (Janparvar, 1396: 28). Based on the relationship between geopolitics and hydropolitics, hydropolitics should be conceptualized as follows: Hydropolitics is the knowledge, acquisition, efficiency and conservation of water and related issues as geographical source of power in transnational, national, regional and global relations; In other words, hydropolitics is the knowledge of designing and reviewing actors' strategies to achieve water-based interests and goals and related issues as a geographical source of power.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. اطاعت، جواد و ورزش، اسماعیل. (1391). هیدروپولیتیک هیرمند: دلایل، آثار و پیامدها. پژوهش‌های جغرافیای انسانی، 44(80)، 193-212.
  2. بهرامی‌جاف، ساجد. (1401). طراحی الگوی مناسبات ژئوپلیتیکی ایران و ایالات‌متحده آمریکا. رساله دکتری، رشته جغرافیای سیاسی، به راهنمایی محسن جان‌پرور، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد.
  3. جان‌پرور، محسن. (1396). ژئوپلیتیک برای همه. چاپ اول، انتشارات انتخاب، تهران.
  4. جان‌پرور، محسن و قربانی سپهر، آرش. (1396). ژئوپلیتیک شهری. چاپ اول، تهران: انتشارت انجمن ژئوپلیتیک ایران.
  5. حافظ‌نیا، محمدرضا. (1396). اصول و مفاهیم ژئوپلیتیک. چاپ پنجم، مشهد: انتشارات پاپلی.
  6. دیانت، محسن؛ درج، حمید و قادری، ابراهیم. (1398). تأثیر هیدروپلیتیک زاب کوچک بر روابط سیاسی ایران و اقلیم کردستان عراق. فصلنامه پژوهش‌های سیاسی جهان اسلام، 9 (2)، 158-131.
  7. ذکی، یاشار و نجفی، سجاد. (1399). تعیین راهبردهای هیدروپلیتیکی ایران در حوضه آبریز اروند. پژوهش‌های جغرافیای انسانی، 52(4)، 1529-1549.
  8. عراقچی، سید عباس. (1393). دیپلماسی آب، از منازعه تا همکاری. فصلنامه سیاست جهانی، 3 (4)، 119-91.
  9. عزتی، عزت‌الله. (1396). ژئوپلیتیک. چاپ دوازدهم، تهران: انتشارات سمت.
  10. گل کرمی، عابد و کاویانی‌راد، مراد. (1396)؛ تأثیر محدودیت منابع آب بر تنش‌های هیدروپلیتیک (نمونه موردی: حوضه آبریز مرکزی ایران با تأکید بر حوضه آبریز زاینده‌رود). فصلنامه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی محیطی، 28 (1)، 134-113.
  11. مجتهدزاده، پیروز. (1396). جغرافیای سیاسی و سیاست جغرافیایی. چاپ هشتم، تهران: انتشارات سمت.
  12. مجتهدزاده، پیروز. (1398). فلسفه و کارکرد ژئوپلیتیک در عصر فضای مجازی. چاپ چهارم، تهران: انتشارات سمت.
  13. Agnew, J. (2003). Geopolitics: Re-visioning World Politics. New York.
  14. Bahrami Jaf, S. (2022). Designing a pattern of geopolitical relations between Iran and the United States of America. Ph.D. dissertation, political geography field, under Mohsen Janparvar, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. [In Persian].
  15. Black, J. (2016). Geopolitics and the Quest for Dominance. Publication of Indiana university press. Bloomington, Indiana 47405 USA.
  16. Cohen, S. B. (2014). Geopolitics The Geography of International Relations. Third Edition. Published by Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, Maryland, USA.
  17. Diyanat, M., Darj, H., & Ghaderi, E. (2019). The Hydropolitical Impact of Little Zab on the Political Relations between Iran and the Iraqi Kurdistan Region. Journal of Political Research in the Islamic World, 9 (2), 158-131. [In Persian].
  18. Etaat, J., & Varzesh, I. (2012). Hydropolitic of Hirmand: Reasons, Results, and Outcomes. Human Geography Research, 44(80), 193-212. [In Persian].
  19. Ezzati, E. (2017). Geopolitics. Twelfth edition, Tehran: Samat Publications. [In Persian].
  20. Gol Karami, A., & Kavianirad, M. (2017). The effect of water resources limitation on hydro political stresses (Case study: Central catchment area of Iran with emphasis on Zayandehrud catchment area). Journal of Geography and Environmental Planning, 28(1), 134-113. [In Persian].
  21. Hafeznia, M. R. (2017). Geopolitical principles and concepts. Fifth edition, Mashhad: Papoli Publications. [In Persian].
  22. Han, X., & Webber, M. (2020), Assembling dams in Ghana: A genealogical inquiry into the fluidity of Hydropolitics. Political Geography, 78, 102-126.
  23. Hosseinpour Pouyan, R. (2013); Explain the geographical and geopolitical components of Rawabs in geopolitical regions. Geopolitical Quarterly, 9 (2), 203-161. [In Persian].
  24. Janparvar, M. (2017). Geopolitics for all. First Jap, Tehran: Select Publications. [In Persian].
  25. Janparvar, M., & Ghorbani Sepehr, A. (2017). Urban geopolitics. First edition, Tehran: published by the Iranian Geopolitical Association. [In Persian].
  26. Jensen, S., & Kushniruk, A. (2016). Boundary objects in clinical simulation and design of eHealth. Health Informatics Journal, 22, 248-264.
  27. Kaplan, R. (2012). The Revenge of Geography. (New York: Random House, 2012).
  28. Kehl, JR. (2011). Hydro political Complexes and Asymmetrical Power: Conflict, Cooperation, and Governance of International River Systems. Journal of WorldSystems Research, American Sociological Association, 17 (1), 1-12.
  29. Kenzie, E. S., Parks, E. L., Bigler, E. D., Lim, M. M., Chesnutt, J. C., & Wakeland, W. (2017). Concussion as a multi-scale complex system: an interdisciplinary synthesis of current knowledge. Frontiers in neurology, 8, 5-13.
  30. Martignago, G. (2011) A Comparative Analysis of Save, Tisza, Dniester Transborder Water River Basin Management Agreements and Cooperation Politics and Thir Impact on the Enhancing of Mutual Understanding and the Wellbeing of People Involved. Ph.D. Dissertation,29.
  31. Moisio, S. (2019). Geopolitics of the Knowledge-Based Economy. Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informal business.
  32. Mojtahedzadeh, P. (2017). Political geography and geopolitical politics. Eighth edition, Tehran: Samat Publications. [In Persian].
  33. Mojtahedzadeh, P. (2019). Geopolitical philosophy and function in the age of cyberspace. Fourth Edition, Tehran: Samat Publications. [In Persian].
  34. Ó Tuathail, G. & Dalby, S. (1998) The Geopolitics Reader. (London: Routledge, 1998).
  35. Rai, S., Wolf, A., Sharma, N., & Harinarayan, T. (2016). Hydropolitics in Transboundary Water Conflict and Cooperation. River System Analysis and Management, 1, 353–368.
  36. Rogers, S., & Crow-Miller, B. (2017). The politics of water: a review of hydro political frameworks and their application in China. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 4(6), e1239.
  37. Turton, A., Henwood, R. (2002). Hydropolitics in the developing world: A southern African perspective. South Africa: African Water Issues Research Unit CIPS, pp. 1- 269.
  38. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2007). Hydropolitical vulnerability and resilience along international waters: Latin America and the Caribbean. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
  39. Wolf, A. T. (2007) Conflict and cooperation along international waterways. Water Policy 1(2),251–265.
  40. Zaki, Y., Najafi, S. (2020). Determining Iran hydropolitics strategies in Arvandrood basin. Human Geography Research, 52(4), 1529-1549. [In Persian].