Explaining the pattern of hydropolitic challenges and its impact on economic security (case study: Bushehr province)

Document Type : Extracted from the dissertation

Authors

1 Department of Political Geography, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran.

2 Department of Natural Geography, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

10.22059/jhgr.2023.347570.1008530

Abstract

Extended Abstract
Introduction
Based on the arid and semi-arid region of the south of the country, Bushehr province receives a large part of its water needs from the water resources of the neighboring provinces of Fars, Kohgiluyeh, and Boyer Ahmad, with successive droughts and little and irregular rainfall; thus it is facing a water challenge. Due to the existing conditions and the reduction of water resources in the neighboring provinces, there is a possibility of water cuts, conflicts, and hydropolitical tensions. Lack of water, in addition to its effect on economic security and creating local and regional tensions, the development process of this province faces a problem. It is expected that if this trend continues, the province will face more hydropolitical challenges in the future. The current research aims to explain and evaluate the hydropolitical challenges of Bushehr province and its effect on the economic security of the province. This research seeks to answer the following question:
-What are the hydropolitical challenges of Bushehr province and what is its effect on the economic security of the province?
 
Methodology
In terms of the purpose, the present research is applied in terms of exploratory nature and in terms of mixed data, which means that in the qualitative phase of the research, semi-structured interviews with experts in the field of water and political geography, as well as indirect observation (reading of texts), were used. In the quantitative phase of the research, a survey study was used to collect data. Then, based on the organized themes of the qualitative phase, a researcher-made questionnaire was designed in the form of a five-point Likert scale, and after validation and reliability, 165 experts in the field of water and political geography of Bushehr province were selected using the multi-stage cluster sampling method. Completed Finally, after coding, extracting and using SPSS26 and Smart-PLS statistical software, the research data were tested and interpreted in two sections: descriptive and inferential.
 
Result and discussion
The research findings have been made in two parts as qualitative and quantitative. In the qualitative part, after reviewing the texts and semi-structured interviews with experts in the field of water and political geography, they have been analyzed. After discovering and enumerating, the conceptual model of Bushehr province's hydropolitical challenges and economic security of Bushehr province has been drawn. In the quantitative section, after coding, the data obtained from the questionnaire were extracted and transferred to SPSS26 and Smart-PLS software and were analyzed and interpreted in two parts: descriptive analysis and inferential analysis. The independent variable of hydropolitical challenges of Bushehr province is above the average level with 45.466 (with a test average or cut-off line of 36), and the dependent variable of economic security with 80.392 (with a test average or cut-off line of 63). Therefore, it indicates that the amount of hydropolitical challenges in Bushehr province is relatively high because this rate is higher than the standard level determined based on the total number of questions. The second and third hypotheses of the research have been confirmed at the error level of 0.01. However, the first hypothesis has not been confirmed, considering that the T test value is below 1.96.
 
Conclusion
The descriptive findings of the research show that the independent variable of Bushehr province's hydropolitical challenges with an average of 45.466, and its dimensions include extra-provincial hydropolitical challenges with an average of 6.406 and intra-provincial hydropolitical challenges with an average of 39.060 and the dependent variable of economic security with an average of 80.3925 in the statistical population under investigation is above the test average or the cut-off line. Therefore, they are not in a favorable situation because their level is higher than the standard level determined based on the total number of questions measured by the variables. The inferential findings of the research also show the first hypothesis of the research, "There is a significant effect between extra-provincial hydropolitical challenges and the economic security of the province," according to the T value of 0.848 is less than 1.96 and its significance level is more significant than 0.05. As a result, this hypothesis is rejected. The second hypothesis of the research, "there is a significant effect between intra-provincial hydropolitical challenges and economic security of the province," its T value is 3.220, which is greater than 2.58. Therefore, its significance level is smaller than 0.01. As a result, the second hypothesis is confirmed. The third hypothesis of the research, "there is a significant effect between extra-provincial hydropolitical challenges and intra-provincial hydropolitical challenges," its T value is equal to 3.04, which shows that its significance level is smaller than 0.01. As a result, the third hypothesis is also confirmed. According to the findings obtained from the evaluation of the research model, the research's general hypothesis that Bushehr's hydropolitical challenges affect the economic security of the province is confirmed.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
 We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

Keywords

Main Subjects


اطاعت، جواد؛ ذکی، یاشار و کریمی، حسن. (1397). هیدروپلیتیک نیل و تأثیر آن بر روابط ژئوپلیتیکی میان مصر، سودان و اتیوپی (با تأکید بر سد رنسانس). مجله پژوهش‌های جغرافیای سیاسی، 3(2)، 68-39.  https://doi.org/10.22067/pg.v3i10.75353
بهرامی‌جاف، ساجد؛ جان‌پرور، محسن؛ تک‌روستا، مریم؛ ذوقی بارانی، کاظم و موسوی، میرنجف. (1402). نگرشی نو به مفهوم و ابعاد هیدروپلیتیک. مجله پژوهش‌های جغرافیایی انسانی، 55 (1). 78-61. doi: 10.22059/JHGR.2021.326878.1008343
پاک‌زاد، فاطمه و پاک‌زاد زهرا. (1396). بررسی وضعیت هیدروپلیتیک ایران. چکیده مقالات همایش دیپلماسی آب و فرصت‌های هیدروپلیتیک غرب آسیا، دانشگاه خوارزمی، 8 اسفند، تهران.
جداری عیوضی، جمشید. (۱۳۸۰). جغرافیای آب‌ها. چاپ نهم، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
حافظ‌نیا، محمدرضا. (1396). اصول و مفاهیم ژئوپلیتیک. مشهد: انتشارات پاپلی.
ذکی، یاشار و رشیدی، مصطفی. (1395). سیاست آب در حوزه آبریز کارون بزرگ و چالش‌های هیدروپلیتیکی ناشی از آن. فصلنامه نگرش‌های نو در جغرافیای انسانی، 8 (4)، 59-43. dor: 20.1001.1.66972251.1395.8.4.4.4
ذکی، یاشار و ولیقلی‌زاده، علی. (1394). مقیاس‌های فضایی در جغرافیای سیاسی (مفاهیم و نظریه‌ها). تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران، چاپ دوم.
زارعی، بهادر. (1391). بنیادهای نظری جغرافیای سیاسی (با تأکید بر اسلام و ایران). تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
شرکت سهامی آب منطقه‌ای بوشهر. (1399). گزارش وضعیت منابع و مصارف سالانه منابع آب استان بوشهر در سال آبی 99 ـ 1398، دفتر مطالعات پایه منابع آب.
شرکت سهامی آب منطقه‌ای بوشهر. (1400). سیمای آب استان بوشهر، دفتر مطالعات پایه منابع آب.
شهبازی، نجفعلی؛ فروتن رمی، علی و صادقی عمروآبادی، بهروز. (1400). شفافیت و امنیت اقتصادی؛ تحلیل کارکردی سازمان‌های اطلاعاتی. فصلنامه مطالعات راهبردی، 24 (4)، 15-114. dor: 20.1001.1.17350727.1400.24.94.6.4
کاویانی راد، مراد. (1397). امنیت زیست‌محیطی ایران. تهران: انتشارات پژوهشکده مطالعات راهبردی.
کاویانی راد، مراد. (1395). چالش‌های هیدروپلیتیک؛ امنیتی شدن آب در ایران، روزنامه شرق، سال چهاردهم (2760).
کاویانی راد، مراد و صدرانیا، حسن و نصری فخرداود، صدیقه. (1401). تأثیر بحران کم آبی بر مناسبات هیدروپولیتیک ایران و عراق. فصلنامه آمایش سیاسی فضا، 4 (2)، 125-112. dor: 20.1001.1.26455145.2022.4.2.5.7
کردوانی، پرویز. (۱۳۸۱). منابع و مسائل آب در ایران. تهران: انتشارات سمت.
مسیبی، محمد. (۱۳۷۸). دیباچه‌ای بر منابع آب. اصفهان، اردکان اصفهان.
ولایتی، سعدالله. (۱۳۸۳). جغرافیای آب‌ها. انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی مشهد.
 
Refrences
Bahrami jaf, S., JanParvar, M., Takrousta, M., Zohqi barani, K., & Mousavi, M. (2023). A new approach to the concept and dimensions of ydropolitics. Journal of Human Geographical Research, 55 (1), 61-78. doi: 10.22059/JHGR.2021.326878.1008343 [In Persian].
Bushehr Regional Water Joint Stock Company. (2019). Report on the status of resources and annual consumption of water resources in Bushehr province in the water year 2018-2019. Office of Basic Studies of Water Resources.
Bushehr Regional Water Joint Stock Company. (2021). Bushehr province's water landscape, office of basic studies of water resources.
Etaat, J., Zaki, Y., & Karimi, H. (2018). Hydropolitics of the Nile and its influence on the geopolitical relations between Egypt, Sudan and Ethiopia (with an emphasis on the Renaissance Dam). Journal of Political Geography Research, 3 (2), 39-68. https://doi.org/10.22067/pg.v3i10.75353 [In Persian].
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservables variables and measurement error,Journal of HighTechnology Management esearch,11(1),137-153. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Hafeznia, M. (2016). Principles and concepts of geopolitics. Mashhad: Popeli Publications. [In Persian].
Han, X., & Webber, M. (2020), Assembling dams in Ghana: A genealogical inquiry into the fluidity of Hydropolitics. Political Geography, 78, 102-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.102126
Jadari Eivazi, J. (2001). Geography of waters. 9th edition, Tehran: Tehran University Press.. [In Persian].
Jankielsohn, R. (2012). Defining hydropolitics: The politics of water in South Africa. Southern Journal for Contemporary History37(1), 123-141. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC133155
Kaviani Rad, M. (2015). hydropolitical challenges; Water security in Iran. Sharq newspaper, 14th year (2760). [In Persian].
Kaviani Rad, M. (2017). Environmental security of Iran. first edition, Tehran: Publications of the Research Institute of Strategic Studies. [In Persian].
Kaviani Rad, M., Sadrania, H., & Naseri Fakhr davood, S. (2022). The impact of the water shortage crisis on the hydropolitical relations between Iran and Iraq. Space Political Analysis Quarterly, 4 (2), 112-125. dor: 20.1001.1.26455145.2022.4.2.5. [In Persian].
Kehl, JR. (2011). Hydropolitical Complezes and Asymmetrical power: Conflict, Cooperation, and Governance of International River Systems. Journal of World Systems Reseach, American Socioligical Association, 17 (1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2011.429
Kordavani, P. (2002). Water resources and issues in Iran, Tehran: Samt Publications. [In Persian].
Kulish, A., Petrushenko, M., Reznik, O., & Kiselyova, E. (2018). The relations unshadowing in business activities: The economic and legal factors of security at the macroeconomic level. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(1), 428-436. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(1).2018.40
McQuarrie, P. (2003). Water Security in the Middle East: Growing Conflct Over Development in the Euphrates-Tigris Basin, Trinity College, Dublin. 
http://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/publications/abst_docs/related_research/MacQuarrie2004.pd
Mosayyebi, M. (1999). An introduction to water resources. Isfahan, Ardakan, Isfahan. [In Persian].
Mustafa, D. (2007). Social construction of hydropolitics: The geographical scales of water and security in the Indus. Vol. 97, No. 4, Oct., Geographical Review, Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.2007.tb00408.x
Pakzad, F., & Pakzad, Z. (2017). Investigating Iran's hydropolitics situation. abstract of the papers of the conference on water diplomacy and hydropolitics opportunities in West Asia, Khwarazmi University, 8th of Esfand, Tehran. [In Persian].
Rai, S., Wolf, A., Sharma, N., & Harinarayan, T. (2016). Hydropolitics in Transboundary Water Conflict and Cooperation. River System Analysis and Management, 1, 353-368. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-1472-7_19
Shahbazi, N. A., Forootan Rami, A., & Sadeqi Amrabadi, B. (2021). economic transparency and security; Functional analysis of intelligence organizations. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 24, (4), 114-15.
Turton, A., & Henwood, R. (2002). Hydropolitics in the developing world: a southern African perspective, first published by African Water Issues Research Unit Centre for International Political Studies (CIPS) University of Pretoria, South Africa. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC88096
Valayati, Sad Aduleh. (2004). Geography of waters. Publications University of Mashhad.
Wysokińska, Z. (2013). Transition To a Green Economy in The Context Of Selected European And Global Requirements For Sustainable Development, Comparative Economic Research, 16(4), 203-226. doi:10.2478/cer-2013-0034
Zaki, Y., & Valiqolizadeh, A. (2014). Spatial scales in political geography (concepts and theories). Tehran: Tehran University Press. [In Persian].
Zaki, Yashar and Rashidi, Moustafa. (2015). Water policy in the Great Karun watershed and the resulting hydropolitical challenges. New Perspectives Quarterly in Human Geography, 8 (4), 43-59. dor: 20.1001.1.66972251.1395.8.4.4.4 [In Persian].
Zarei, B. (2011). Theoretical foundations of political geography (with emphasis on Islam and Iran). Tehran: Tehran University Press. [In Persian].