نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه گیلان
2 استادیار ژئومورفولوژی بخش جغرافیا، دانشکدة اقتصاد، مدیریت و علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه شیراز
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Network Analysis Community Relations of Water Resources Beneficiaries In Order to Urban Optimize Management (Case Study: Palm Groves in the Eastern Part of the Fadami city – Darab- Fars)
Abstract
How to manage of water resources in the agricultural field in Iran is a matter that should be decided with the participation of farmers and water users. In this regard, the analysis of stakeholder relationships and the identification of key actors or actors among the exploitation of water resources as a participatory management arm particularly where water resources are used jointly, it can play an important role in the success of water management partnerships and optimization. This research attempts to analyze the relationships among agricultural water utilities using the network analysis approach in the Palm Groves in the Eastern Part of the Fadami city – Darab- Fars. First, the exploiters were classified based on economic characteristics, age and ownership, and then analyzed with the network analysis model, relationships and various indicators. The results show that about 54.51% of the users of the water resources in the region studied had social relations with others. Also, some operators have the most connection with others or " Out Degree " among operators, which places their position in the network in a state of authority. The findings of this research will be effective in identifying actors with a central position that play a key role in the program's optimal water management action plan; Because key and powerful people can play a role as the executive arm of government actors as local leaders and social powers in organizing participatory water resources management.
Introduction
Water is a limited and precious resource and must be managed both for immediate needs and for long-term economic and environmental sustainability. With the effects of climate change now a reality, and increasing demands for water, sound policies are required to ensure a sustainable supply of water for present and future generations.
Our water comes from rivers, streams, and lakes (surface water) and water held under the ground in aquifers (groundwater). The NSW Office of Water is responsible for the strategic management of the State's freshwater resources. This involves: setting water policy, developing statutory water sharing plans, negotiating interstate and national water agreements, determining how available water is allocated to water users, particularly during times of drought, approving the extraction, use and trade of water, monitoring the quantity and quality of water extractions, monitoring the ecological health of our aquatic ecosystems. Much efforts in water resource management is directed at optimising the use of water and in minimising the environmental impact of water use on the natural environment.
Successful management of any resources requires accurate knowledge of the resource available, the uses to which it may be put, the competing demands for the resource, measures to and processes to evaluate the significance and worth of competing demands and mechanisms to translate policy decisions into actions on the ground.
For water as a resource this is particularly difficult since sources of water can cross many national boundaries and the uses of water include many that are difficult to assign financial value to and may also be difficult to manage in conventional terms. Examples include rare species or ecosystems or the very long term value of ancient ground water reserves. This research attempts to analyze the relationships among agricultural water utilities using the network analysis approach in the Palm Groves in the Eastern Part of the Fadami city – Darab- Fars. First, the exploiters were classified based on economic characteristics, age and ownership, and then analyzed with the network analysis model, relationships and various indicators.
Methodology
The research method in this study is the field survey. Documents and quantitative research has two parts located at the library to collect documents through the study of literature. In the quantitative that includes field surveys, data collection tools is questionnaire, The population, exploitation of water resources in the eastern part of the city of palm groves Fadami, Darab city were 25 individuals who were administered a questionnaire matrix to determine the relationships between them. The theory and analysis of network and application Yosynt the most practical application in the analysis of relationships and using lattice is the density, temperature, reciprocity, transferability, E_I etc. for analysis and a variety of graphs to display is used.
Results and discussion
The results showed that the index of density, 26% of farmers in the field of water resources are related to the relatively poor looks. Links reciprocity index showed that 21% of farmers, mutual and reciprocal relationship with each other. The transferability of social relations regional water resource utilization was 14/42% respectively. Means to connect the unit to a third party, which looks relatively good value. Points out that both the transport index is greater, greater network stability. Index EI beneficiaries in the social relations of water resources in the study area for the network based on income groups at 0/383 or 38/3%, based on an area of palm groves 0/338 or 38/3%, based on age groups 0/218 or 21/8%, respectively. The relationship between people and between the center and periphery of 35/7 of 21/1 percent. In addition, the 25 farmers surveyed, 19 central and peripheral are 6 people. It should be the center and the periphery closer to each other, because each of these values to zero, fragility and isolation more networks.
Conclusion
The findings related to social status of water resources in the study area shows that, Overall, approximately 54/51% of water resources in the study area have relationships with others and 19/79 percent of the other operators have been invited to cooperate and respect. It also detailed some operators such as BN, MH, MGH, JM Most of communicating with others, or "Exit" among beneficiaries hold that the situation in their position of authority and influence others in the network has.
Keywords: Community Relations, network analysis, water operators, optimal management, Fadami
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
11. Bastani, S. and Raisi, M., 2011, Network analysis: the network approach in the open source community, Journals of Iranian Social Studies, No 2, PP. 32-59 (In Persian).
12. Bindra, S. P.; Hamid, A.; Salem, H.; Hamuda, Kh. and Abulifa, S., 2014, Sustainable integrated water resources management for energy production and food security in Libya, Procedia Technology, vol. 12, PP. 747-752.
13. Borgatti, S. P.; Everett, M. G. and Freeman, L.C., 2002, UCINET for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies. Available at: www.casos.cs.cmu.edu/publications/papers/DisasterResponse.
14. Brandes, U. and Erlebach, Th., 2005, Network analysis- Methodological foundations, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 289p.
15. Bullen, P. and Onyx, J., 1999, Social Capital: Family Support Services and Neighbourhood and Community Center in New South Wales, Family Support Services Association and Sydney, Avialable at: http://www.mapl.com.au/A12.htm.
16. Burt, R. S., 1992, Structural holes: the social structure of competition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.320p.
17. Burt, R. S., 2004, Structural holes and good ideas1, American journal of sociology, Vol. 110, No. 2, PP. 349-399.
18. Cai, P. Y.; Huang, H. G.; Yang, F. Z.; Sun, W. and Chen, B., 2009, Investigation of public's perception towards rural sustainable development based on two-level expert system, Expert Systems withApplications, Vol. 36, No. 5, PP. 8910-8924.
19. Cárcamo, F.; Flühmann, R. and Gaymer, F., 2014, Collaboration and knowledge networks in coastal resources management: How critical stakeholders interact for multiple-use marine protected area implementation, Journal of Ocean & Coastal Management, Vol. 91, PP. 5-16.
20. Chandler, J., 2008, Introduction to Network Theory. American Marketing Association, Available at: www.marketingpower.com. 220p.
21. Farahani, H.; Ainali, J. and Abdoli, S., 2013, Evaluate the role of social capital in the development of rural areas (Case Study: Mashhad district Mighan city of Arak), Journal of Applied Geographical Sciences, Vol. 13, No. 29, PP. 27-50 (In Persian).
22. Farshi, A. A.; Kheyrabi, J.; Siadat, H.; Mirlotfi, M.; Darbandi, S.; Salamat, A.; Entesari, M. and Sadat, M., 2003, Irrigation water management on the farm,Tehran: Iranian National Committee on Irrigation and Drainage press (In Persian).
23. Freeman, L. C., 1980, The gatekeeper, pair-dependency and structural centrality, Journal of Quality and Quantity, Vol. 14, No. 4, PP. 585-592.
24. Ghorbani, M. and Dehbozorgi, M., 2014, Stakeholders’ Analysis, Social Power and Network Analysis in Natural Resources Co-Management, Journal of Range and Watershed Managment, Vol. 67, No. 1, PP. 141-157 (In Persian).
25. Ghorbani, M., 2012, The Role of Social Network in Utilization Mechanism of Rangeland (Case Study: Taleghan Region), Ph.D Thesis, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, 430p.
26. Ghorbani, M.; Azarnivand, H.; Mehrabi, A. A.; Bastani, S.; Jafari, M. and Nayebi, H., 2013, A new approach in policy-making and planning collaboration management of natural resources, Journal of Range and Watershed, No, 4, PP. 553-568 (In Persian).
27. Hanneman, R. A. and Riddle, M., 2005, Introduction to social network methods, California: University of California Riverside, 310p.
28. Hanneman, R., 2001, Introduction to Social Network Methods, California: University of California, Riverside.
29. Haythornthwaite, C., 1996, Social network analysis: An approach and technique for the study of information exchange, Library and Information Science Research, Vol. 18, PP. 323-342.
30. Howarth, S. E. and Lal, N.K., 2002, Irrigation and participation: Rehabilitation of the Rajapur project in Nepal, Irrigation and Drainage Systems, Vol. 16, PP. 111-138.
31. Jatel, N., 2013, Using social network analysis to make invisible human actor water governance networks visible – the case of the Okanagan vallay, A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of master of arts in the college of graduate studies (Interdisciplinary Studies) the University of British Columbia.
32. Lienert, J.; Schnetzer, F. and Ingold, K., 2013, Stakeholder analysis combined with social network analysis provides fine-grained insights into water infrastructure planning processes, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 125, PP. 134-148.
33. Moore, M. L.; Porten, S.; Plummer, R.; Brandes, O. and Baird, J., 2014, Water policy reform and innovation: A systematic review, Environmental science & policy, Vol. 38, PP. 263-271.
34. Nava Bakhsh, M.; Attar, S. and Abolhasani, S. R., 2012, Network policy approach: to deepen the idea of social capital into state analysis, Journal of Socioal Development Studies, No. 2, PP. 7-21 (In Persian).
35. Newig, J.; Günther, D. and Pahl-Wostl, C., 2010, Synapses in the network: learning in governance networks in the context of environmental management, Ecology and Society, Vol. 15, No. 4, P. 24.
36. Newton, K., 2001, Trust, SocialCapital, Civil Society and Democracy, International Political Science Review, Vol. 22, No. 2, PP. 201-214.
37. Plickert, G.; Cˆot´e, R. R. and Wellman, B., 2007, It’s not who you know, it’s how you know them: Who exchanges what with whom?, Social Networks, Vol. 29, PP. 405-429.
38. Pretty, J. and Ward, H., 2001, Social Capital and the Environment, Journal of World Development, Vol. 29, No. 2, PP. 209-227.
39. Salmani, M.; Taghipor, F.; Ramezanzadeh Lesboei, M. and Jalili Parvaneh, Z., 2008, Check the dimensions of social capital (civic participation, social interaction and trust) in Rural Development (Case Study: Villages orchards and Brvn- city Ferdows), Journal of Geography and Regional Development, No. 12, PP. 23-45 (In Persian).
40. Stein, C.; Ernstson, H. and Barron, J., 2011, A social network approach to analyzing water governance: The case of the Mkindo catchment, Tanzania, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Vol. 36, PP. 1085-1092.
41. Suzuki, E.; Takao, S.; Subramanian, S. V.; Komatsu, H.; Doi, H. and Kawachi, I., 2010, Does low work place social capital have detrimental effect on worker’s health?, Social science and Medicine, No. 70, PP. 1367-1372.
42. Taleb, M.; Mirzaie, H. and Naderi, A., 2012, Evaluation of the role of public participation in rural development projects (Case study: combining plans in rural areas), Community Development (Rural and Urban Communities), Vol. 4, No. 1, PP. 1-18 (In Persian).
43. Van Eeten, M. J. G.; Loucks, D. P. and Roe, E., 2002, Bringing actors together around large-scale water systems: participatory modeling and other innovations, Journal of Knowledge, Technology, and Policy, Vol. 14, No. 4, PP. 94-108.
44. Wasserman, S. and Faust, K., 1994, Social Network Analysis, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, PP. 28-59 (Chapter 2: Network data and collection).
45. Yazdani, M.; Jafarian, V.; Damavandi, A. and Nayebabasi, M., 2013, Security and Global Water Management, Challenges and Solutions, Journals of Forest and Range, No. 95 and 96, PP. 7-18 (In Persian).
46. Zahra, S. A. and George, G., 2002, Absorptive capacity: A reveiew, reconceptualization, and extension, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 27, PP. 185-203.
)