Analyzing the role of rural place brand and good mental imagery of agriculture in the development of rural technological innovation system

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of geography and rural planning, Faculty of Geographical Sciences and Planning, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

10.22059/jhgr.2024.367200.1008643

Abstract

Extended Abstract
Introduction
The creation, diffusion, and utilization of technology are carried out in a framework called the rural technological innovation system (RTIS), which seems not to have been formed in the villages of Taft County. One of the reasons for not forming this system can be seen in the bad image of the villages and the future of life in the villages in the minds of the villagers, especially the rural youth. The lack of a good image of the village and economic activities in the villages has caused demographic challenges (immigration and the emptying of the villages from knowledgeable people), centralization, and the marginalization of the villages in the field of innovation and technology. Meanwhile, improving the mental image of the village will bring environmental attractiveness to the target audience of the rural technological innovation system, including idea makers, technologists, farmers, and other actors. The presence and concentration of these people in the village, while stimulating the neighboring villages, will provide the basis for creating inter-local competitions. Also, improving the place identity in the village will increase the self-confidence of the villagers, and this place identity, known as the beating heart of place branding, will motivate the villagers to use technology in agricultural activities.
 
Methodology
This research, using a qualitative method and the Grounded Theory technique, examines the role of the village place brand and a good mental image of agriculture in the development of the rural technological innovation system of Taft County. Qualitative data were collected through interviews with 18 people, including experts in technology, rural development, and agriculture, who were selected by the snowball method. The main question of the interview was, "Does the place brand of the village and a good mental image of agriculture play a role in the development of the rural technological innovation system?" The interview process continued until theoretical saturation was reached. Theoretical saturation occurred when the interviewee could not add a new component or the components he introduced were repetitive or overlapped with other components. The written texts of the interviews were entered into the MAXQDA-2020 software, and after open coding and axial coding, content analysis and categorization were done on them. This stage's output was identifying 23 codes, which were categorized and named according to the meaning derived from each code.
 
Results and discussion
The results of the interviews show that the agricultural sector does not have a proper brand and image, and it is necessary to create a positive image of this sector in society's minds. Thus, one of the expectations that the rural technological innovation system must be able to respond to is stimulating and guiding the perceptions and feelings of the rural community and drawing a positive mental image of being in the village and working in the agricultural sector. The research results show the media's important role in improving the village brand and forming a good mental image of the village and agricultural occupation. However, the interviewees believe that the content transmitted to society by the media currently does not have the power to create a good image of the villages. In some cases, it has even destroyed the place brand of the villages. One of the assumptions in this context is that the government deliberately shows a negative image of the agricultural sector. Iran is facing a severe shortage of water resources, and the agricultural sector accounts for the country's most significant water consumption. Therefore, the government is trying to reduce the number of people who engage in traditional farming and wastewater resources by creating a negative image of the agricultural sector. Nevertheless, despite the limitations and problems it faces, the agricultural sector in Iran can play an essential role in the gross domestic product and food security if the plans and policies are rethought.
 
 
 
Conclusion
In the paradigm model presented in this research, items such as "difficult geographical conditions," "media advertisements," "customary system and traditionalism," "difficulties of agricultural occupation," and "lack of infrastructure and facilities" are the causal conditions of creating a negative image. Also, items such as "traditional rural management system," "extreme centralism," "youth migration," and "weak educational system" have been introduced as intervening factors in the formation of these causal conditions. This model shows that if the presented strategies are implemented, the cycle of creation, diffusion, and utilization of technology in villages can be accelerated through a rural technological innovation system. The formation of this system will provide the conditions for the development of the ecosystem of innovation and the use of technology in the villages. While reducing the difficulties of the agricultural job, it will bring about a reduction in costs and an increase in income. Such a situation will increase the attractiveness of villages and agricultural jobs for the young and innovative population.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved the content of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.
ABSTRACT
One of the reasons for not forming a rural technological innovation system can be seen in the bad image of the village and the future of life in this place in the minds of the villagers, especially the rural youth. This bad image has led to demographic challenges and marginalization of the villages in the field of innovation and technology. In fact, the lack of success in the place branding of villages and the weakness in creating a good image of the village and activities in the agricultural sector have reduced the attractiveness of life in the village and activities in the agricultural sector. This research analyzes the role of village place brands and good mental imagery of agriculture in the development of rural technological innovation systems in the irrigation systems of Taft County by qualitative method and using the Grounded. The research results show that the agricultural sector does not have a proper brand and image, which is a challenge for the formation of the rural technological innovation system. In the paradigm model presented in this research, the difficulties of working in the agricultural sector, media advertisements, and the lack of necessary infrastructure and facilities are mentioned as the causal conditions for creating a negative image of the village and agricultural occupation. Also, some factors, such as drought and traditional rural management systems, have played an intervening role in worsening the current situation. Based on this model, if strategies such as promoting the place brand and improving the mental image of the village and the agricultural sector are used, it will create attractiveness for actors and stakeholders, especially technologists and farmers, and also accelerate the cycle of creation, diffusion, and utilization of technology in the village irrigation system.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Acharya, A., & Rahman, Z. (2016). Place branding research: a thematic review and future research agenda. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 13(3), 298-317. doi.org/10.1007/s12208-015-0150-7
  2. Amini, A. (2019). Land use Intensification in Rural Farming Systems: Components and Determinants, Journal of Rural Research, 10(2), 276-293. doi.org/10.22059/jrur.2019.276852.1335. [in Persian].
  3. Anholt, S. (2010), Places: Identity, Image and Reputation, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke. doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-27149-4
  4. Basouli, M., Asadi, AM., Boroumandzad, Y., Oveysi, L & Oveysi, MA (2022). Semantic mapping of the mental image of urban tourists, journal of tourism and development, 10(4), 19-29. doi.org/10.22034/jtd.2020.236020.2060. [in Persian].
  5. Blichfeldt, B. S., & Halkier, H. (2014). Mussels, Tourism and Community Development: A Case Study of Place Branding Through Food Festivals in Rural North Jutland, Denmark. European Planning Studies, 22(8), 1587–1603. doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.784594
  6. Boisen, M. (2015). Place Branding and Nonstandard Regionalization in Europe. In: Zenker, S., Jacobsen, B. (eds) Inter-Regional Place Branding. Springer, Cham. pp 13-23. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-15329-2_2
  7. Chan, C., & Marafa, L. M. (2013). A review of place branding methodologies in the new millennium. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 9(4), 236–253. doi.org/10.1057/pb.2013.17
  8. De San Eugenio-Vela, J., & Barniol-Carcasona, M. (2015). The relationship between rural branding and local development. A case study in the Catalonia’s countryside: Territoris Serens (El Lluçanès). Journal of Rural Studies, 37, 108–119. doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.01.001
  9. Escribano, M., Gaspar, P., & Mesias, F. J. (2020). Creating market opportunities in rural areas through the development of a brand that conveys sustainable and environmental values. Journal of Rural Studies. 75. 206-215. doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.02.002
  10. García, M., Horlings, L., Paul, S & Xavier, S. (2013). Place branding and endogenous rural development. Departure points for developing an inner brand of the River Minho estuary. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy. 9 (2). 124-140. 10.1057/pb.2013.10.
  11. Giovanardi, M., Lucarelli, A., & Pasquinelli, C. (2013). Towards brand ecology: An analytical semiotic framework for interpreting the emergence of place brands. Marketing Theory, 13(3), 365-383. doi.org/10.1177/1470593113489704
  12. Goldstein G. A. Carpenter G. S. (2021). Legitimately luxurious: Creating authentic luxury brands.Business Horizons. Advance online publication. doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2021.09.002
  13. Gross, M. J. (2016). Harnessing place branding through cultural entrepreneurship. Tourism Management, 54, 136–137. DOI:10.1057/9781137465160
  14. Gulisova, B. (2021). Rural place branding processes: a meta-synthesis. Place Brand Public Dipl, 17,368–381. DOI:10.1057/s41254-020-00187-y
  15. Gupta, S., Malhotra, N. K., Czinkota, M., & Foroudi, P. (2016). The local brand representative in reseller networks. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5712–5723. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.046
  16. Habibi, RS (2008). Mental images and the concept of place. Journal of Fine Arts, 35, 39-50. DOI:10.22034/jtd.2020.224085.1997. [in Persian].
  17. Heirani, H., Bagheri Moghadam, N., Ghodsi pour, S.H., Vatani, A., Tabatabaeian, S.H. (2017). Technological System Analysis by Emphasizing the Role of Contextual Factors; Case Study: Underground Gas Storage Technology. Journal of Science & Technology Policy, 10 (1), 1-16. DOI:10.22034/jstp.2018.10.1.539419. [in Persian].
  18. Karachyna, N., Vakar, T., Moroz, Y., Semtsov, V., & Vitiuk, A. (2020). Territorial Branding as an Instrument for Competitiveness of Rural Development. Applications of Management Science, 97–114.  DOI:10.1108/S0276-897620200000020021
  19. Kavaratzis, M. (2005). Place Branding: A Review of Trends and Conceptual Models. The Marketing Review, 5(4), 329–342. DOI:10.1362/146934705775186854
  20. Lorenzini, E., Calzati, V., & Giudici, P. (2011). Territorial brands for tourism development. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(2), 540–560. DOI:10.1016/j.annals.2010.10.008
  21. Marsden, T., & Smith, E. (2005). Ecological entrepreneurship: sustainable development in local communities through quality food production and local branding. Geoforum, 36(4), 440–451. DOI:10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.07.008 
  22. Martin, E., and S. Capelli. (2017). Region brand legitimacy: Towards a participatory approach involving residents of a place. Public Management Review, 19 (6): 820–844. doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1210908
  23. Mohr, S & Hohler, J. (2023). Media coverage of digitalization in agriculture - an analysis of media content, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 187, 122238. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122238
  24. Nguyen, A., & Özçaglar-Toulouse, N. (2021). Nation branding as a market-shaping strategy: A study on South Korean products in Vietnam. Journal of Business Research, 122, 131–144. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.029
  25. Papadopoulos, N. (2004). Place branding: Evolution, meaning and implications. Place Branding, 1(1), 36–49. doi.org/10.1177/00472875231168620
  26. Pederson, S.B. (2004). Place branding: Giving the region of Øresund a competitive edge. Journal of Urban Technology, 11(1): 77–95. DOI:10.1080/1063073042000341998
  27. Pfeiffer, J., Gabriel, A. & Gandorfer, M. (2021). Understanding the public attitudinal acceptance of digital farming technologies: a nationwide survey in Germany. Agriculture and Human Values, 38(1), 107–128. DOI: 10.1007/s10460-020-10145-2
  28. Regional Water Company of Yazd. (2019). Compatibility program with Deficiency of water in Yazd province [in Persian].
  29. Reynolds, l., Koenig-Lewis, N., Doering, H., Peattie, K. (2022). Competing for legitimacy in the place branding process: (re)negotiating the stakes. Tourism Management, 91, 104532. DOI:10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104532
  30. Yazd Statistical Yearbook. (2016). Statistics Center of Iran. [in Persian].