Model for assessing the level of Pedestrianism Livability in neighborhood units: A case study of Madi Niasram, Isfahan metropolis

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of geographical sciences and planning, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

ABSTRACT
The growth of urbanization, increased density, and car-oriented development have led to a decline in the quality of life within cities. In response, various theories have been proposed to achieve urban sustainability, among which the concept of livability stands out as one of the most comprehensive. This study integrates the theories of livability and pedestrianism to introduce a novel framework titled the “Pedestrianism Livable Pattern” aimed at assessing the quality of life in neighborhood units. The research is fundamentally developmental in nature, employing a descriptive-analytical approach. Methodologically, it combines both qualitative and quantitative techniques within a correlational framework. The qualitative phase includes literature review and document analysis, while the quantitative phase involves fieldwork, questionnaire distribution, and statistical analysis. The study population consists of residents living along the margins of the Madi Niasarm stream, from which 390 individuals were selected using Cochran’s formula to complete the questionnaire. Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling with the partial least squares (PLS) approach. Findings indicate that the Pedestrianism Livable Pattern can be examined through four dimensions: social, physical, environmental, and economic-managerial. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed a satisfactory model fit within the study area. Consequently, the proposed model applies to other urban spaces. Furthermore, the prioritization of planning components for full implementation of the model in the Madi Niasarm area includes, in order: urban self-sufficiency, public spaces, culture and education, public transportation, physical quality, environmental sustainability, social factors, managerial factors, urban landscape, safety and security, economic factors, and pedestrianism.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Cities around the world today face numerous problems, including pollution, resource depletion, species extinction, class differences, poor housing, insecurity, and economic issues, all of which were previously absent and have led to their destruction, erosion, and unlivability. The presence of cars has led to a decrease in the presence of citizens in public spaces and a lack of attention to pedestrians. It has transformed a city designed for human use into one dominated by cars. The main question that arises is how to make cities more livable and environmentally healthier. In order to achieve sustainability, various theories have been proposed, the most comprehensive of which is the livability theory. The current study combines theories of livability and pedestrianization to introduce a new tool called "Pedestrianism Livable Pattern" for assessing neighborhood unit quality of life. Therefore, the objectives of the present study are primarily to combine the two theories of livability and pedestrianization and to present indicators of the Pedestrianism Livable Pattern. Then, the presented models will be examined in the margin area of Niasarm, and finally, the development strategies of the studied area will be presented based on the defined model.
 
Methodology
The study is of a fundamental-developmental type, employing a descriptive-analytical approach that combines quantitative and qualitative methods. It is a correlational type, utilizing library studies and document reviews in the qualitative part, and field methods, questionnaire completion, and statistical analysis in the quantitative part. The research population includes citizens living in the margin of Niasarm, from whom 390 people were selected to complete the questionnaire based on the Cochran formula. The collected data were analyzed using the structural equation modeling method with the partial least squares approach.
 
Results and discussion
The Pedestrianism Livable Pattern was examined through four social, physical, environmental, and eco-managerial models in the area. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the defined model has a good fit in the area.
The use of structural equation modeling allowed for a comprehensive study of the issue, providing a suitable opportunity for comprehensive planning and determining priorities for future programs based on assigned importance. Components that are ranked higher are of greater importance and should be at the forefront of planning and policymaking. Considering these priorities will enable greater success in a shorter time, and if the plan is fully implemented, it can be used as an implementation model for other axes.
 
Conclusion
The network of Madies in Isfahan city, characterized by its linear nature, favorable climatic conditions, and desirable vegetation, presents a suitable option for serving as a pedestrian walkway for both residents and tourists, as well as creating a space for citizens to enjoy leisure activities. In the present study, we investigated the feasibility of implementing a Pedestrianism Livable Pattern in the Niasarm area of the streets and evaluated this area in terms of the level of defined indicators.
Based on the results, the presented model can be used in other urban spaces. Also, the planning priorities for the full realization of the model in the physical area of Niasarm include the development of public spaces, urban self-reliance, culture and education, public transportation, environmental sustainability, physical quality, social factors, management factors, pedestrianization, urban landscape, safety and security, and economic factors, respectively.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
 We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Al-Thani, S., Amato, A., Koç, M., & Al-Ghamdi, S. (2019). Urban Sustainability and Livability: An Analysis of Doha’s Urban-form and Possible Mitigation Strategies. Sustainability, 11(3), 786. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030786
  2. Allam, Z. (2020). Seeking Liveability Through the Singapore Model. In Urban Governance and Smart City Planning (pp. 45–76). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83982-104-220201004
  3. Atef Elhamy Kamel, M. (2013). Encouraging walkability in GCC cities: smart urban solutions. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 2(3), 288–310. doi:10.1108/sasbe-03-2013-0015 
  4. Ahmed, N. O., El-Halafawy, A. M., & Amin, A. M. (2019). A Critical Review of Urban Livability. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2019.v8n1p165
  5. Battista, G. A., & Manaugh, K. (2018). Stores and mores: Toward socializing walkability. Journal of Transport Geography, 67, 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.01.004
  6. Bo, F., Danlin, Y., & Yaojun, Z. (2019). The livable urban landscape: GIS and remote sensing extracted land use assessment for urban livability in Changchun Proper, China. Land Use Policy, 87, 104048. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104048
  7. Beames, A., Broekx, S., Schneidewind, U., Landuyt, D., van der Meulen, M., Heijungs, R., & Seuntjens, P. (2018). Amenity proximity analysis for sustainable brownfield redevelopment planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 171, 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.12.003
  8. Balsas, C. J. L. (2021). Exciting walk-only precincts in Asia, Europe and North-America. Cities, 112, 103129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103129
  9. Beatley, T., & Newman, P. (2013). Biophilic Cities Are Sustainable, Resilient Cities. Sustainability, 5(8), 3328–3345. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5083328
  10. Benitez, J., Henseler, J., Castillo, A., & Schuberth, F. (2020). How to perform and report an impactful analysis using partial least squares: Guidelines for confirmatory and explanatory IS research. Information & Management, 57(2), 103168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.05.003
  11. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  12. D’Orso, G., & Migliore, M. (2020). A GIS-based method for evaluating the walkability of a pedestrian environment and prioritised investments. Journal of Transport Geography, 82, 102555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102555
  13. EIU (Economist Intelligence Unit), 2011. ⟨www.economistgroup.com⟩.
  14. Farkas, B., Wagner, D. J., Nettel-Aguirre, A., Friedenreich, C., & McCormack, G. R. (2019). Evidence synthesis - A systematized literature review on the associations between neighbourhood built characteristics and walking among Canadian adults. Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in Canada, 39(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.24095/hpcdp.39.1.01
  15. Forsyth, A. (2015). What is a walkable place? The walkability debate in urban design. URBAN DESIGN International, 20(4), 274–292. doi:10.1057/udi.2015.22 
  16. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  17. Gehl, J. )2011(. Life between buildings: using public space. Island Press, Washington, DC
  18. Gonzalez-Urango, H., Inturri, G., le Pira, M., & García-Melón, M. (2020). Planning for Pedestrians with a Participatory Multicriteria Approach. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 146(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000585
  19. Guzman, L. A., Peña, J., & Carrasco, J. A. (2020). Assessing the role of the built environment and sociodemographic characteristics on walking travel distances in Bogotá. Journal of Transport Geography, 88, 102844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102844
  20. Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027
  21. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
  22. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.
  23. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  24. Hassan Alwan, K., & Waheed Hadi, D. (2021). Measuring pedestrian quality standards: a case study of Al-Khourng walkway and Al-Rawan Street. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 754(1), 012024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/754/1/012024
  25. Hassan, D. K., & Elkhateeb, A. (2021). Walking experience: Exploring the trilateral interrelation of walkability, temporal perception, and urban ambiance. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 10(3), 516–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.02.004
  26. Iman, T. I. F. (2021). Mapping of Livability Assessment in Recreational Public Space: A Case Study of Titiwangsa Lake Gardens, Kuala Lumpur. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 887(1), 012030. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/887/1/012030
  27. Jomehpour, M. )2015(. Assessing the livability of the new and old parts of Tehran, munic- ipality districts 22 and 10 of Tehran. OIDA Int. J. Sustainable Development. 8 (09), 87–96.
  28. Kante, M., & Michel, B. (2023). Use of partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) in privacy and disclosure research on social network sites: A systematic review. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 10, 100291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100291
  29. Kovacs-Györi, A., & Cabrera-Barona, P. (2019). Assessing Urban Livability through Residential Preference—An International Survey. Data, 4(4), 134. https://doi.org/10.3390/data4040134
  30. Koohsari, M. J., Hanibuchi, T., Nakaya, T., Shibata, A., Ishii, K., Liao, Y., Oka, K., & Sugiyama, T. (2017). Associations of Neighborhood Environmental Attributes with Walking in Japan: Moderating Effects of Area-Level Socioeconomic Status. Journal of Urban Health, 94(6), 847–854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-017-0199-1
  31. Lowe, M., Whitzman, C., Badland, H., Davern, M., Aye, L., Hes, D., Butterworth, I., & Giles-Corti, B. (2015). Planning Healthy, Liveable and Sustainable Cities: How Can Indicators Inform Policy? Urban Policy and Research, 33(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2014.1002606
  32. Liu, J., Nijkamp, P., Huang, X., & Lin, D. (2017). Urban livability and tourism development in China: Analysis of sustainable development by means of spatial panel data. Habitat International, 68, 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.02.005
  33. Liang, Y., D’Uva, D., Scandiffio, A., & Rolando, A. (2022). The more walkable, the more livable? -- can urban attractiveness improve urban vitality? Transportation Research Procedia, 60, 322–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.12.042
  34. Mouratidis, K., Peters, S., & van Wee, B. (2021). Transportation technologies, sharing economy, and teleactivities: Implications for built environment and travel. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 92, 102716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102716
  35. Mehta, V. (2008). Walkable streets: pedestrian behavior, perceptions and attitudes. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 1(3), 217–245. doi:10.1080/17549170802529480 
  36. Martino, N., Girling, C., & Lu, Y. (2021). Urban form and livability: socioeconomic and built environment indicators. Buildings and Cities, 2(1), 220–243. https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.82
  37. Mattson, J., Brooks, J., Godavarthy, R., Quadrifoglio, L., Jain, J., Simek, C., & Sener, I. (2021). Transportation, community quality of life, and life satisfaction in metro and non-metro areas of the United States. Wellbeing, Space and Society, 2, 100056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wss.2021.100056
  38. Mohapatra, Mr. R. R. (2022). Sustainable Urban Development and Livability. MET Management Review, 09(02), 05–11. https://doi.org/10.34047/MMR.2020.9201
  39. Norouzian-Maleki, S., Bell, S., Hosseini, S.-B., & Faizi, M. (2015). Developing and testing a framework for the assessment of neighbourhood liveability in two contrasting countries: Iran and Estonia. Ecological Indicators, 48, 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.07.033
  40. Okulicz-Kozaryn, A. (2013). City Life: Rankings (Livability) Versus Perceptions (Satisfaction). Social Indicators Research, 110(2), 433–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9939-x
  41. Paul, A., & Sen, J. (2020). A critical review of liveability approaches and their dimensions. Geoforum, 117, 90–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.09.008
  42. Park, Y., & Garcia, M. (2020). Pedestrian safety perception and urban street settings. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 14(11), 860–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2019.1641577
  43. Pandey, R., Garg, Y. K., & Bharat, A. (2013). Understanding Qualitative Conceptions of Livability: An Indian Perspective. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 02(12), 374–380. https://doi.org/10.15623/ijret.2013.0212064
  44. Pampanga, D. G., Majid, M. R., & Johar, F. (2015). Appropriate Urban Livability Indicators for Metropolitan Johor, Malaysia via Expert-Stakeholder Approach: a Delphi technique. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v2.n4.98
  45. Parker, J., & Simpson, G. D. (2018). Public Green Infrastructure Contributes to City Livability: A Systematic Quantitative Review. Land, 7(4), 161. https://doi.org/10.3390/LAND7040161
  46. Rigdon, M. L. (2012). An Experimental Investigation of Gender Differences in Wage Negotiations. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2165253
  47. Saelens, B. E., & Handy, S. L. (2008). Built Environment Correlates of Walking. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 40(7), S550–S566. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817c67a4
  48. Speck, J., (2013). Walkable city: how downtown can save America, one step at a time, First paperback edition. ed. North Point Press, a division of Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York.
  49. Singh, M., Arora, V., & Kulshreshta, K. (2024). Towards Sustainable Cities. Practice, Progress, and Proficiency in Sustainability, 212–233. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-6567-0.ch011
  50. Saadawy, N. A., & Hady, S. I. A. (2022). Gated Community Walkability Design Efficiency Model. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 10(5A), 189–213. https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2022.101410
  51. Sofeska, E. (2017). Understanding the Livability in a City Through Smart Solutions and Urban Planning Toward Developing Sustainable Livable Future of the City of Skopje. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 37, 442–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2017.03.014
  52. Seles, E., & Afacan, Y. (2019). Exploring the Relationship Between Health and Walkability. Open House International, 44(1), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-01-2019-B0006
  53. Sustainable cities and communities. (2022). The Sustainable Development Goals Report, 48–49. https://doi.org/10.18356/9789210018098c015
  54. Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11), 2322–2347. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0189
  55. Shamsuddin, S., Hassan, N. R. A., & Bilyamin, S. F. I. (2012). Walkable Environment in Increasing the Liveability of a City. Procedia. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 50, 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.025
  56. Shuaib, A. S. M., & Rana, M. M. P. (2022). Questing a walkable city: a case of urban neighbourhood walkability environment in Bangladesh. Journal of Place Management and Development, 15(4), 374–395. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPMD-11-2020-0108
  57. Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Smith, D., Reams, R., & Hair, J. F. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.002
  58. Tan, K. G., NIE, T., & Baek, S. (2016). Empirical assessment on the liveability of cities in the Greater China Region. Competitiveness Review, 26(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-11-2015-0087
  59. Tan, K. G., Chuah, H. Y., & Luu, N. T. D. (2018). A Case Study on Malaysia and Singapore: Nexus amongst Competitiveness, Cost of Living, Wages, Purchasing Power, and Liveability, Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 28(2), 172–193. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-09-2017-0062
  60. Tibbalds, F. (Ed.). (2012). Making People-Friendly Towns. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203469521
  61. Valcárcel-Aguiar, B., Murias, P., & Rodríguez-González, D. (2018). Sustainable Urban Liveability: A Practical Proposal Based on a Composite Indicator. Sustainability, 11(1), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010086
  62. Vural Arslan, T., Durak, S., Dizdar Gebesce, F., & Balcik, B. (2018). Assessment of factors influencing walkability in shopping streets of tourism cities: case of Bursa, Turkey. International Journal of Tourism Cities, 4(3), 330–341. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJTC-11-2017-0071
  63. Yang, J. (2024). Construction of urban livability evaluation index system by principal component analysis combined with entropy value method. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-0936
  64. Yu, A. (2021). Walkable environment and community well-being: a case from the city of Kwun Tong. Open House International, 46(2), 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-07-2020-0099
  65. Zhu, L., Guo, Y., Zhang, C., Meng, J., Ju, L., Zhang, Y., & Tang, W. (2020). Assessing Community-Level Livability Using Combined Remote Sensing and Internet-Based Big Geospatial Data. Remote Sensing, 12(24), 4026. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12244026
  66. Alinaghipour, M., Pourramzan, I. and Molaei Hashjin, N. (2021). Explaining Environmental Livability of Rural Settlements around Rasht Metropolis. Human Geography Research, 53(1), 1-22. doi: 10.22059/jhgr.2018.255494.1007676, [in persian].
  67. Ahmadi, F., Laghaei, H., & Yazdkhasti, N. (2015). Revitalization and quality improvement of urban edges of creeks in Isfahan through lighting (case study: Farshadi Creek). Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 17(2), 153-167, [in persian].
  68. Alinajad, S. (2016). Designing Urban Spaces of Madi Canals in Isfahan with a Calm City Approach; Case Study: Linear Green Space along Farshadi Madi in Isfahan (between Standardari Street and Neshat Street), Master's Thesis, Isfahan University of Art, Faculty of Art and Architecture. Ministry of Science, Research and Technology, [in persian].
  69. Baseri Attar, M. (2021). Urban Design Agenda Focused on Child-Friendly Blue-Green Spaces (Case Study: Madi Niasarm, Isfahan). Master's Thesis, Shahid Beheshti University, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning. Ministry of Science, Research and Technology, [in persian].
  70. Dalvand, H., shaterian, M. & Haidary, R. (2021). Structural Modeling of Livability Effect on Quality of Life based on the Public Survey Case Study: Dorud City. Sustainable city, 4(1), 71-86. doi: 10.22034/jsc.2021.204123.1277, [in persian].
  71. Ekra Sardashti, A., & Sajadzadeh, H. (2021). Measuring and Evaluating the Quality of Urban Walkways from the Perspective of the Creative Urban Space; Case Study: Central Urban Walkways in Rasht City of Iran. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 14(34), 181-169. doi: 10.22034/aaud.2020.202474.2006, [in persian].
  72. Ghalehnoee, M., & Alikhani, M. (2014). Evaluation of Isfahan’s “Mâdies” as greenways, with sustainable development approach; a case study of Niasarm Mâdi. Journal of Environmental Studies, 40(4), 1067-1082. doi: 10.22059/jes.2014.53020, [in persian].
  73. Ghanbari, M., Ajza Shokouhi, M., Rahnama, M. R., & Kharazmi, O. A. (2023). Analysis of Urban Livability based on Environmental Indicator (Case Study: Mashhad Metropolis). Journal of Geography and Regional Development, 21(1), 1-33. doi: 10.22067/jgrd.2021.47188.0, [in persian].
  74. Hoseinian rad, A., Beyranvandzadeh, M., & niknami, N. (2024). Analysis and Exploration of Citizen Satisfaction with Urban Livability: A Case Study of Khorramabad City. Geography and Human Relationships, 7(1), 163-177. doi: 10.22034/gahr.2023.419581.1956, [in persian].
  75. Hashemianfar, S. A., Mehrshad, A., Heydari, M. & Mohammadi, N. (2024). Explaining the Livability of Isfahan City Based on Life City Discourse. Strategic Research on Social Problems, 13(4), 1-34. doi: 10.22108/srspi.2024.141277.1995, [in persian].
  76. Habibi, K., & Sheikh ahmadi, A. (2020). Analysis and evaluation of pedestrian-oriented policies in historical textures with emphasis on Pedestrian Streets (Case study: Southern Khayyam Pedestrian Street of Urmia. Urban Structure and Function Studies, 6(21), 111-136, [in persian].
  77. Habibi, K., Sheikh Ahmadi, A., vaisi, S., & khalighi, N. (2021). Evaluating Results of Three Walkability-Driven Policies Conducted in Urmia Historical Context (The Level of Segregation between Car- and Pedestrian-Oriented Areas). Traffic Management Studies,  16(3), 133-172, [in persian].
  78. Jamshidi, M. (2010). Urban Design of “Forgotten Green Paths” as a Way Toward Creating a More Sustainable Urban Environment; Case Study: Design of Madi Niasarm in District 1 of Isfahan (Between Shahid Beheshti Street and Saeb Square). Master’s Thesis, Isfahan University of Art, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning. Ministry of Science, Research and Technology. [in persian].
  79. Jahangir, S., saremi, H., & kalantari khalilabad, H. (2021). the principles and criteria of urban space design with the walkabality promotion approach, case study: Sanandaj city. Urban Structure and Function Studies, 8(27), 7-274. doi: 10.22080/usfs.2021.18354.1949, [in persian].
  80. Khorasani, M. A., Rezvani, M. R., Motiei Langroodi, S. H. & Rafieian, M. (2013). Surveying and Assessment of Livability in Peri Urban Villages (Case Study: Varamin Township). Journal of Rural Research, 3(12), 85-110. doi: 10.22059/jrur.2013.30233, [in persian].
  81. Kebriaeezadeh, S., Ghodduosi, J., Alesheikh, A. A., Arjmandi, R. & Mirzahosseini, S. A. (2022). Analyzing trend and factors affecting air quality in urban areas: a case study in Isfahan- metropolis, Iran. Advanced Environmental Sciences, 20(2), 171-184. doi: 10.52547/envs.2021.36064, [in persian].
  82. Kalantari-Sadigheh, M., & Mohammadi, M. (2013). Developing strategies for organizing and restoring the materials of the old texture of Isfahan city. Iranian Journal of Restoration and Architecture, 3(5), 15-32, [in persian].
  83. Kiasi, S., & Karimiazeri, A. (2021). The study of the role of physical components of walking-orientation and social sustainability in urban spaces (Case study: Shahrdari square of Rasht). Haft Hesar J Environ Stud; 10 (36):135-146, doi: 10.52547/hafthesar.10.36.10, [in persian].
  84. Kaghazadlou, Z., ladanmohadm, A., & Akbari, S. (2020). Evaluating the Impacts of Urban Landscape Quality on Pedestrian Promotion in Urban Public Spaces (Case Study of Ramian City, Golestan Province). Research and Urban Planning , 11(40), 91-106, [in persian].
  85. Khosravi, M., & Bagher Piri, M. (2018). Designing appropriate urban furniture with a walkability approach (Case study: Sadeghieh neighborhood, Tehran). Urban Management Studies, 10(33), 57–70, [in persian].
  86. Kouhjani Gouji, Z., Jolaei, Sh., & Satarivand, M. (2020). Assessment of walkability (Case study: Neighborhoods of District 1, Region 11, Mashhad Municipality). Journal of New Research in Geographic Sciences, Architecture and Urbanism, 3(25), 1–23, [in persian].
  87. Majedi, H., & Ahmadi, F. (2009). The role of Zayandehrood's tributaries (Madis) in the urban spaces structure of Isfahan city. Hoviate Shahr, 2(3), 39-50, [in persian].
  88. Mirzahossein, S., Ahmadi, M. & Zaker Haghighi, K. (2021). Estimating the livability based on the sense of place variables: A case study of Tehran metropolitan, district 1. Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR), 9(2), 361-385. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2021.312004.1385, [in persian].
  89. Mohrekesh, R., Saberi, H., Momeni, M. & Azani, M. (2019). Explaining the Effective Factors on Livability of Urban Areas of Isfahan. Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR), 7(2), 411-429. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2019.276471.1063, [in persian].
  90. Mousavi, M., Zare, A., Manochehri, A., & Ahar, H. (2018). Analysis of the sprawl of the city on urban livability of neighborhoods Case: Maragheh. Research and Urban Planning , 8(31), 1-18, [in persian].
  91. Mokhtari Malekabadi, R., Ghaffari, S. R., & Larabi, M. (2022). Investigating the Role and Position of Urban Management in Urban Branding (Case Study: Isfahan City). Spatial Planning, 12(3), 25-46. doi: 10.22108/sppl.2022.134138.1663, [in persian].
  92. Mousavi Sarvineh Baghi, E. S. (2018). Analyzing the factors affecting the enhancement of pedestrian accessibility in Islamic city neighborhoods (Case study: Neighborhoods of Mashhad). Journal of Socio-Cultural Studies of Khorasan, 13(1), 129-156. https://doi.org/10.22034/fakh.2019.91312, [in persian].
  93. Naderi Mayvan, R. A. (2024). Spatial analysis of the effect of air pollution on urban livability (Case study: Arak city). Town and Country Planning, 16(1), 87-104. doi: 10.22059/jtcp.2024.374018.670443, [in persian].
  94. Otari, M., & Shams, M. (2021). Presenting an Interpretive Structural Model of Health-Oriented Indicators to Achieve Livability (A Case Study of District One of Tehran). Environmental Planning, 55, 213–234, [in persian].
  95. Ostadi Jafari, M., Rafieian, M., & Saeideh Zarabadi, Z.S. (2021). Causal Layered Analysis in the Research of the Walkability Concept with Emphasis on the PESTEL Model (Case study: Tehran). Urban Structure and Function Studies, 8(27), 82-109. doi: 10.22080/usfs.2021.18583.1967, [in persian].
  96. Rezaei Rad, H., & Salem, R. (2016). Feasibility Study of Pedestrians Path in Central Core of Hamedan (Case study: Ekbatan, Bu-Ali, Takhti, Shohada Streets). Haft Hesar Journal of Environmental Studies, 5(17), 73–87, [in persian].
  97. Rostami, R., Mousavi, Y., Ghadimi, B. and Mirzai, K. (2021). Explaining the Effective Factors on Urban Livability Case Study: Ilam City. Journal of Sustainable city, 4(2), 107-124. doi: 10.22034/jsc.2020.197800.1100, [in persian].
  98. Sajadi, M., & Taghvaie, M. (2016). Evaluation and Analysis of Sustainable Urban Transportation Indicators. Sustainable Architecture and Urban Planning, 4(1), 1–18. [in persian].
  99. Salehi, H., Gandomkar, A., Khademolhoseini, A., & Abbsi, A. (2023). Identification and Mitigation of Urban Madies Issues in Central Regions of Isfahan: Strategies for Their Effective Organization. Geography and Environmental Planning, 34(4), 23-42. doi: 10.22108/gep.2023.132264.1483. [in persian].
  100. Seidbeigi, S., samandari, O., shahein, A. H., & behshad, M. (2023). Evaluation of human-centered pedaling in the city of Galogah. Jgs, 23(68). doi:10.52547/jgs.23.68.17, [in persian].
  101. Shokri firoozjah, P., Seid Beigib, S., kianghad, Z. & Rasouli, S.H. (2021). Spatial analysis of Small Towns in Babol Township Based on Urban Viability Indicators. Journal of Urban Social Geography, 8(1), 113-127. doi: 10.22103/JUSG.2021.2035, [in persian].
  102. Sediqi Aghdas, A., Ezzatpanah, B., & Beik Babaei, B. (2021). Evaluation of the livability status of central metropolitan areas from residents’ perspectives (Case study: Tabriz metropolis). New Perspectives in Human Geography, 13(3), 646–666, [in persian].
  103. Taheri Demeneh, M., kazemi, M., & safari gharibvand, K. (2023). Foresight of the Water Issue in Isfahan. Sustainable city, 5(4), 53-71. doi: 10.22034/jsc.2021.236478.1265. [in persian].
  104. Taghavi, S., Nazmfar, H., & Mansourian, H. (2022). Ranking of Sari city areas in terms of the level of livability indicators. Human Geography Research, 54(4), 1379-1375. doi: 10.22059/jhgr.2021.320615.1008284. [in persian].
  105. Taheri, M., & Yazdani, S. (2022). Investigating the status of walkability criteria in urban neighborhoods (Case study: Shamsabad neighborhood, Malayer city). Urban and Regional Policy, 1(2), 1–18, [in persian].
  106. Zhianpour, M., Khademolfogharae, M., Naji Isfahani, Z. & Jalali, M. (2023). Urban Quality of Life in Isfahan: Priorities and Constructive Themes. Journal of Applied Sociology, 34(2), 27-44. doi: 10.22108/jas.2023.135391.2333, [in persian].
  107. Ziari, K., Hatami, A., & Safarpoor, A. (2021). Evaluation of dimensions and components of livability in urban areas with a sustainable development approach (Case study of Khorramabad urban areas). Journal of Future Cities and Villages, 2(2), 33–50. [in persian].
Human Geography Research
Volume 57, Issue 3
November 2025
Pages 115-139

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics