The effects of tourism development on the emission of environmental pollutants in top tourist destination countries

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Geography, Faculty of Social Sciences, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Geography, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

10.22059/jhgr.2026.387237.1008773

Abstract

BSTRACT
A
In recent decades, tourism development has been recognized as one of the most important drivers of economic growth in many countries. However, the expansion of its activities can have consequences such as increased resource consumption, waste generation, and pollutant emissions. The purpose of this research is to predict the effects of tourism development on environmental pollution emissions in the world’s leading tourist destination countries. Data for the study were obtained from the World Bank databases and the Global Footprint Network, covering an eight-year period (2010–2017). For data analysis, penalized regression models, including Linear Regression, Ridge Regression, Lasso Regression, and Elastic Net Regression, were employed. The results revealed that the levels of environmental pollution were highest in China (2.46), Mexico (0.946), and Thailand (0.857), while the average CO₂ emissions in the United States and China were 0.74336 and 0.21523, respectively. Furthermore, analysis of MSE and R² values showed that the Lasso model performed better than its competing models. Specifically, the predicted value for PM₂.₅ was 1.014, and for CO₂, 0.726 in the Lasso model. A slight improvement in the performance of penalized regression models compared to the standard linear regression was also observed. The model comparison indicated that Ridge and Elastic Net regressions selected a greater number of predictive indicators compared to Lasso, while Lasso demonstrated superior predictive accuracy in estimating environmental pollutants (PM₂.₅, CO₂). Overall, the findings confirm that penalized regression models serve as effective and powerful tools that significantly enhance the accuracy and reliability of predictions regarding the impacts of tourism development on environmental pollution in the examined countries.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
The tourism industry has been cited as a key strategy in boosting global economic development, increasing foreign exchange, and increasing exports. The importance of this industry in the areas of employment and local income, and promoting cultural and environmental values in developed and underdeveloped countries, is essential. According to statistics published by the World Travel and Tourism Council (2019), the tourism industry contributed US$8.8 trillion to global GDP and created one-tenth of all jobs in the world in 2018.
 
Methodology
To examine the indicators of tourism development and environmental pollution, data from (2010 to 2017) has been extracted from (https://databank.worldbank.org,) and (https://data.footprintnetwork.org). To examine this issue, we considered two dependent variables (output), namely CO2 and PM2.5 environmental pollution. Also, from 10 tourism development indicators (predictor variables), including the number of international tourist arrivals (A1), international tourism expenditure (total imports) (A2), international tourism expenditure (current US dollars) (A3), passenger transportation costs (current US dollars) (A4); international tourism travel item costs (current US dollars) (A5), number of international tourist departures (A6); International tourism revenue (total exports) (A7), international tourism receipts (current US dollars) (A8), international tourism passenger transport item receipts (current US dollars) (A9), and international tourism travel item receipts (current US dollars) (A10) have been used. Also, MSE (mean square error), RMSE (root mean square error), and R-square (coefficient of determination) values were used to measure performance. With n as the total number of observations, it should be noted that the analyses mentioned were performed in R 4.0 (R Core Team, 2020) using different packages.
 
 
Results and discussion
In order to answer the purpose and question raised in this research, penalized regression methods were used. One of the methods is the ordinary linear regression (OLS) model, which is the simplest algorithm that outperforms other fancy and complex models. The OLS method can only determine the factors affecting the dependent variable and has serious analytical deficiencies in predicting related variables and groups, and its results are unstable. Therefore, to overcome some of the weaknesses of this method in improving the performance of variables, penalized regression models (Ridge, Lasso, and ElasticNet) were used. The advantages of penalized models can be stated as follows: first, they manage and select the multicollinearity of the models; second, these models allow testing a large number of predictor variables; third, they introduce biases in the estimation of the models and reduce the mean square error of the responding variable.
In this study, we have shown how ML algorithms can be more reliable in estimating production process parameters than classical statistical models. The use of ML models can help in planning environmental pollution reduction in top tourism destination countries, to reduce both economic costs and biological damage.
In this study, it was shown how a wide range of tourism development indicators, including the number of tourist arrivals, transportation costs, travel item costs, number of departures, total export revenue costs, passenger transport item costs, and receipts costs, affect environmental pollution and there is evidence of their positive effects on the emission of environmental pollutants (PM2.5, CO2). In addition, we showed how tourism development has increased environmental pollution in the top tourism destination countries.
 
Conclusion
The results of the study showed that the average PM2.5 emissions in China, Mexico, and Thailand are 2.46, 0.946, and 0.857, and the average CO2 emissions in the United States and China are 0.74336 and 0.21523. The prediction results of the models were also compared using the root mean square error (RMSE), mean square error (MSE), and coefficient of determination (R2). The RMSE results and prediction accuracy for PM2.5 and CO2 values obtained from all competing models are very close. However, overall, the MSE and R2 results showed that the Lasso model performed better than the other competing models. In this model, the value of the PM2.5 index is 1.014, and the CO2 index is 0.726. Although this model showed its potential superiority over other models and is better compatible with training data, its use in selecting indices and prediction methods to achieve high accuracy is accompanied by flexibility. In addition, Elastic Net and RR can play an important role in tourism development and pollution emission, which have a large number of parameters. In such cases, these techniques, used to analyze tourism development on pollution emission, are the best choice for modeling and forecasting such research. In this study, we have shown how ML algorithms can be more reliable in estimating production process parameters than classical statistical models. The use of ML models can help in planning environmental pollution reduction in top tourism destination countries, to reduce both economic costs and biological damage.
 
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not for profit sectors.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved the content of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
 We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Abbruzzo, A., Brida, J. G., & Scuderi, R. (2014). Scad-elastic net and the estimation of individual tourism expenditure determinants. Decision support systems66, 52-60.
  2. Adedoyin, F. F., Alola, U. V., & Bekun, F. V. (2021). On the nexus between globalization, tourism, economic growth, and biocapacity: evidence from top tourism destinations. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-11.
  3. Adedoyin, F. F., Nathaniel, S., & Adeleye, N. (2021). An investigation into the anthropogenic nexus among consumption of energy, tourism, and economic growth: do economic policy uncertainties matter?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(3), 2835-2847. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10638-x
  4. Atasoy, B. S. (2017). “Testing the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis across the US: Evidence from Panel Mean Group Estimators.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 77:731–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.050
  5. Azam, M., Alam, M. M., & Hafeez, M. H. (2018). Effect of tourism on environmental pollution: Further evidence from Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand. Journal of cleaner production, 190, 330-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.168
  6. Balli, E., Sigeze, C., Manga, M., Birdir, S., & Birdir, K. (2019). The relationship between tourism, CO2 emissions and economic growth: a case of Mediterranean countries. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 24(3), 219-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2018.1557717
  7. Becerra-Pérez, L. A., Ramos-Álvarez, R. A., DelaCruz, J. J., García-Páez, B., Páez-Osuna, F., Cedeño-Laurent, J. G., & Boldo, E. (2021). An Economic Analysis of the Environmental Impact of PM2. 5 Exposure on Health Status in Three Northwestern Mexican Cities. Sustainability13(19), 10782. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910782.
  8. Bojanic, D.C., Warnick, R.B., 2019. The relationship between a country's level of tourism and environmental performance. J. Travel Res., 0047287519827394 (Article in press). DOI:10.1177/0047287519827394.
  9. Chaichaloempreecha, A., Chunark, P., & Limmeechokchai, B. (2019). Assessment of Thailand’s energy policy on CO2 emissions: Implication of National Energy Plans to Achieve NDC Target. International Energy Journal, 19(2).
  10. Chen, C. M., Lin, Y. L., & Hsu, C. L. (2017). Does air pollution drive away tourists? A case study of the Sun Moon Lake National Scenic Area, Taiwan. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 53, 398–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.04.028
  11. Cheng, L., & Zhang, J. (2020). Is tourism development a catalyst of economic recovery following natural disaster? An analysis of economic resilience and spatial variability. Current Issues in Tourism, 23(20), 2602-2623. DOI:10.1080/13683500.2019.1711029
  12. Chili, N. S., & Xulu, N. (2015). The role of local government to facilitate and spearhead sustainable tourism development. Problems and perspectives in management, (13, Iss. 4), 27-31.
  13. Chomkhamsri, K., Mungcharoen, T., & Yuvaniyama, C. (2017). 10-year experience with the Thai national LCI database: case study of “refinery products”. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 22(11), 1760-1770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1160-3
  14. Churchill, S. A., Pan, L., & Paramati, S. R. (2020). Air Pollution and Tourism: Evidence from G20 Countries. Journal of Travel Research, 0047287520977724. DOI:10.1177/0047287520977724
  15. Endo, K. (2006). Foreign direct investment in tourism—flows and volumes. Tourism management, 27(4), 600-614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2005.02.004
  16. Farhadi, Z. F. Z., Belaghi, R. A., & Alma, O. G. (2019). Analysis of penalized regression methods in a simple linear model on the High-Dimensional data. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics8(5), 185-192. DOI:10.11648/j.ajtas.20190805.14
  17. Gao, J., & Zhang, L. (2021). Exploring the dynamic linkages between tourism growth and environmental pollution: new evidence from the Mediterranean countries. Current Issues in Tourism, 24(1), 49-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2019.1688767
  18. Gonzalez-Abraham, R., Chung, S. H., Avise, J., Lamb, B., Salathé Jr, E. P., Nolte, C. G., ... & Streets, D. G. (2015). The effects of global change upon United States air quality. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 15(21), 12645-12665. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12645-2015
  19. Gunes, F. (2015). Penalized regression methods for linear models in SAS/STAT®. In Proceedings of the SAS Global Forum 2015 Conference. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. http://support. sas. com/rnd/app/stat/papers/2015/PenalizedRegression_LinearModels. pdf. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Penalized-Regression-Methods-for-Linear-Models-in-Gunes/01bfe8fd6824ec8ad9fbe0661f6b69c37c35b293
  20. Habibi, F., Rahmati, M., & Karimi, A. (2018). Contribution of tourism to economic growth in Iran's Provinces: GDM approach. Future Business Journal, 4(2), 261-271.
  21. Hastie, T. R., Tibshirani, R., and Friedman, J. (2009). Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference and Prediction. 2nd Edn. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
  22. Holik, A. (2016). Relationship of economic growth with tourism sector. JEJAK: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebijakan, 9(1), 16-33.
  23. IPCC. (2014). Summary for policymakers. In C. B. Field, V. R. Barros, M. D. Mastrandrea, K. J. Mach, M. K. Abdrabo, N. Adger, & V. R. Burkett (Eds.), Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (pp. 1–32). London: Cambridge University Press. DOI:10.15294/jejak.v9i1.6652
  24. Katircioglu, S., Katircioğlu, S., & Altinay, M. (2018). Interactions between tourism and financial sector development: evidence from Turkey. The Service Industries Journal, 38(9-10), 519-542. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2017.1406479
  25. Katircioglu, S.T., (2014). International tourism, energy consumption, and environmental pollution: the case of Turkey. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev, 36, 180–187. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.058
  26. Le, T. H., & Nguyen, C. P. (2021). The impact of tourism on carbon dioxide emissions: insights from 95<? A3B2 show $132#?> countries. Applied Economics, 53(2), 235-261.
  27. Nguyen, C. T., Downes, N. K., Sitthi, A., & Losiri, C. (2025). Tourism-Induced Land Use Transformations, Urbanisation, and Habitat Degradation in the Phu Quoc Special Economic Zone. Urban Science, 9(1)11. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci9010011
  28. Roumiani, A., & Mofidi, A. (2022). Predicting ecological footprint based on global macro indicators in G-20 countries using machine learning approaches. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(8), 11736-11755. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-16515-5
  29. Saint Akadiri, S., Alola, A. A., & Akadiri, A. C. (2019). The role of globalization, real income, tourism in environmental sustainability target. Evidence from Turkey. Science of the total environment, 687, 423-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.139
  30. Sr, M. V., & Croes, R. R. (2003). Growth, development and tourism in a small economy: Evidence from Aruba. International Journal of Tourism Research, 5(5), 315-330. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.441
  31. Sun, Y. Y., Faturay, F., Lenzen, M., Gössling, S., & Higham, J. (2024). Drivers of global tourism carbon emissions. Nature Communications, 15(1), 10384. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-54582-7
  32. Tibshirani, R. (1996). Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 58(1), 267-288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x
  33. Waldmann, P., et al. (2013). Evaluation of the lasso and the elastic net in genome-wide association studies. Frontiers in genetics, 4, 270. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2013.00270
  34. Wang, C. M., & Wu, T. P. (2021). Does tourism promote or reduce environmental pollution? Evidence from major tourist arrival countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-22. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01568-w
  35. World Data Atlas, (2019). https://www.snowflake.com/datasets/knoema-tourism-data-atlas/
  36. WTTC. (2019). Travel & tourism economic impact 2019 European Union LCU. London: World Travel & Tourism Council. Retrieved from http://travelbi.turismodeportugal.pt/pt-pt/Documents/An%C3%A1lises/Economia/economicimpact analysiseuropeanunion2017.pdf.
  37. WTTC. (2019). World Travel & Tourism Council Economic impact 2019 Mediterranean. Retrieved from http://www.wttc. org/media/files/reports/economic%20impact%20research/regional%202015/mediterranean2019.pdf
  38. Xu, D., Huang, Z., Hou, G., & Zhang, C. (2020). The spatial spillover effects of haze pollution on inbound tourism: Evidence from mid-eastern China. Tourism Geographies22(1), 83-104. DOI:10.1080/14616688.2019.1612464
  39. Yu, L., Ma, X., Wu, W., Wang, Y., & Zeng, B. (2021). A novel elastic net-based NGBMC (1, n) model with multi-objective optimization for nonlinear time series forecasting. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 96, 105696. DOI 10.1016/j.cnsns.2021.105696
  40. Zhang, L., & Gao, J. (2016). Exploring the effects of international tourism on China's economic growth, energy consumption and environmental pollution: Evidence from a regional panel analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53, 225-234. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.040
  41. Zikirya, B., Wang, J., & Zhou, C. (2021). The Relationship between CO2 Emissions, Air Pollution, and Tourism Flows in China: A Panel Data Analysis of Chinese Provinces. Sustainability13(20), 11408. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011408
  42. Monazzam Ismailpour, A., Roumiani, A., & Dehban Nejadian, A. (2022). Analysis of the Attitudes and Expectations of Women Tourists from Rural Tourism Attraction Spaces, Case Study: Eastern Rudpi Rural District, Sari County. Human Geography Research, 54(3)999-1019. https://doi.org/10.22059/JHGR.2021.313033.1008198[In Persian]
  43. Pourbafarani, F., Vafaei, A., & Mazrouei, I. (2024), Presenting the key factors of success of creative tourism, case study: Nain city. Human Geography Research, 57(3)36-15. https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2024.374776.1008684 [In Persian]
  44. Fan, L., Chen, S., Li, Q., & Zhu, Z. (2015, December). Variable selection and model prediction based on lasso, adaptive lasso and elastic net. In 2015 4th International Conference on Computer Science and Network Technology (ICCSNT) (Vol. 1, pp. 579-583). IEEE.
  45. Cao, Q., Rui, G., & Liang, Y. (2018). Study on PM2. 5 pollution and the mortality due to lung cancer in China based on geographic weighted regression model. BMC public health18(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5844-4