Land-Use Planning in the Face of Earthquakes in Worn-Out Texture (Case Study: Abdulabad, Tehran, Iran)

Document Type : Research Paper


1 PhD Candidate in Geography and Urban Planning, Islamic Azad University, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

2 Professor of Urban Planning, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

3 Associate Professor of Urban Development, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

4 Assistant Professor of Urban Planning, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran


As an influential tool for urban authorities, land use planning plays an important role in the increased resilience of urban communities. Given the importance of the subject in different aspects and diverse conditions in the pursuit of justice, land use planning with equitable distribution of resources and services has been ignored by scholars, policy makers and urban planners and managers with no worthwhile results. As the problems of these areas are disregarded, worn-out textures can cause various types of damage. Physical development and rapid growth of cities during recent decades led to poor distribution of urban canters resulting in lack of equal enjoyment of services by the citizens. 
Studying land use resilience during the earthquakes in vulnerable textures, with minimum use of facilities, this paper seeks to provide a land use planning and other effective components in order to propose best reaction and least damage during critical conditions. In terms of the method and type, this is descriptive- analytical study, i.e. the issue is handled systematically and its components are analysed. Identifying the variables affecting a problem through descriptive and library methods, an effective pattern and appropriate indicators for the components analysis were provided using expert’s ideas. A hierarchical structure of the factors was provided in AHP to determine, prioritize and take optimal components. The AHP was calculated by Microsoft Choice and Microsoft Excel for components rating and prioritization.
Results and discussion 
Results of Expert Choice indicate that, among the measured components, management is in the first place with undeniable role in the evolution of the city and its canter. Meanwhile, the important point is that a manager should be able to make a relationship between their goals in worn-out areas and urban system as a whole. Economy (0.112), also, is in second place impacting the formation and urban texture content regarding the indicators such as job, income, various activities and services. Distribution of poverty and wealth and creating an average level of life for the residents, appropriate distribution of accessible urban services around the city results in the integration and flow of life in all urban areas and their renewal and prosperity. Citizen’s involvement in revival and renewal process is the third component. According to this component, despite community cohesion and strong social text a result of its position is compared with other urban areas, worn-out texture suffers from problems beyond construction methods and similar issues. Accordingly, physical intervention in these textures is ineffective and other solutions such as public involvement need to be considered. 
Fabric and land use (0.093) were in fourth place that indicates theirs importance compared with other components. This type of planning with resilience management to counter natural disasters increases the safety of the spaces used by citizens and easy access by rescue groups. Functioning was in fifth place (0.084) in Expert Choice. Today, creating user diversity in urban space is an important issue. In real life, when working space predominates, compared with residential and touristic spaces, many social and spatial problems occur in that area. Environment was the sixth component (0.082) in which production and emission of land and air pollutions result in declined quality of urban texture, migration, stopped renovation and thereupon, worn-out textures. Population was seventh component (0.081) with considerations such as high population density, high number of children, elderlies, women and disabled people and high household density in housing units result in increased vulnerability. As the eighth component, culture had a great impact on neighbourhoods; especially during earthquakes for preserving and effectiveness during critical situations, factors such as increased social communications, strengthened sense of community, participation in periodical events and ceremonies, satisfaction measurement, reduced social and cultural disorders in the texture are considered. Therefore, the more homogenous the community in terms of culture, the less the vulnerability will occur. Ninth component was society (0.076) according to Expert Choice, indicating positive relationship between emotional satisfaction of people and physical environment. Place attachment depends on people’s participation in environment and their cultural interactions considered more important than fabric by some experts. The last component was traffic and transportation considering its unimportant place among other components; it concerns normal conditions of the society.
According to the explanations, the factors resulting in increased risk include: population growth, unplanned urban development, rapid development of informal residencies, overflow of the population of urbanized areas, degraded ecosystem, etc. Therefore, urban planners should attempt to create a quiet, safe and healthy place for residents.


Main Subjects

  1. امینی، الهام، فرح حبیب و غلامحسین مجتهدزاده. (1389). «برنامه‌ریزی کاربری زمین و چگونگی تأثیر آن در کاهش آسیب‌پذیری شهر در برابر زلزله». فصلنامة علوم و تکنولوژی محیط‌زیست. دورة 12. شمارة 3. ص 174-161.
  2. بدری، سید‌‌علی و جمعی از نویسندگان. (1392). «نقش مدیریت محلی در ارتقای تاب‌‌آوری مکانی در برابر بلایای طبیعی با تأکید بر سیلاب». فصلنامة علمی و پژوهشی مدیریت بحران. شمارة سوم3.
  3. پورمحمدی، محمد. (1394). برنامه‌‌ریزی مسکن. تهران: انتشارات سمت.
  4. دیودونیه‌ تن، برگ. (1383). 24 ساعت اول: مدیریت بحران. ترجمة محمد‌علی ذوالفقاری‌اصل. تهران: نشر حدیث.
  5. زیاری،کرامت‌ الله. (1387). برنامه‌ریزی کاربری اراضی شهری. چاپ دوم. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
  6. سلمانی‌‌مقدم، محمد. (1393). «کاربرد برنامه‌‌ریزی کاربری اراضی در افزایش تاب‌‌آوری شهری در برابر زمین‌‌لرزه با استفاده از سیستم اطلاعات جغرافیایی (GIS) (مطالعة موردی: شهر سبزوار)». مجلة مطالعات جغرافیایی مناطق خشک. سال پنجم. شمارة 17. ص 34-17.
  7. شادی‌‌طلب، ژاله. (1381). بررسی آسیب‌‌پذیری شهر تهران در برابر زلزله. تهران: مرکز بین‌‌المللی زلزله‌‌شناسی و مهندسی زلزله.
  8. شیراوژن، سارا و صمد محمدابراهیم‌زاده. (1385). «کاهش اثر بلایا در محله‌های شهری واجد بافت فرسوده». فصلنامة مدیریت شهری. شمارة 22. ص 34.
  9. صابری‌‌فر، رستم. (1378). «نقد و تحلیل برنامه‌‌ریزی کاربری اراضی شهری شهر مشهد». رسالة دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه‌‌ریزی شهری. تهران: دانشگاه تربیت مدرس.
  10. صفری، عباس، علی شکوهی و یاشار اصلانیان. (1391). «تأثیرات برنامه‌‌ریزی شهری و مدیریت بحران در کاهش خسارت‌های زلزله». ماهنامة شهر و منظر. شمارة 28. ص 19.
  11. ضیایی‌ ثانی، ابراهیم. (1385). «بافت فرسوده». مجلة معماری و ساختمان. شمارة 9.
  12. طاهر‌‌خانی، حبیب‌الله. (1385). «مدیریت بافت تاریخی شهرهای ایران (چالش‌ها و راهبرها)». فصلنامة مدیریت شهری. ص133-96.
  13. عزیزی، محمد‌‌مهدی. (1382). تراکم در شهرسازی. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
  14. عسکری، علی. (1389). «در جست‌و‌جوی اصول مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی بحران». دومین کنفرانس بین‌المللی مدیریت جامع بحران در حوادث غیرمترقبة طبیعی. تهران.
  15. غفاری، سیدرامین، سیروس شفقی و نگین صالحی. (1389). «ارزیابی سازگاری کاربری اراضی شهری با استفاده از مدل تصمیم‌‌گیری چند‌‌معیارة فازی». مطالعات و پژوهش‌های شهری و منطقه‌ای. سال اول. شمارة 4. ص 76-59.
  16. قنواتی، عزت‌الله و موسی شیخی. (1389). «نقش برنامه‌ریزی در کاهش خطر زلزله در بافت‌های فرسوده (مطالعة موردی: منطقة 12 تهران)». فصلنامة جغرافیایی طبیعی. سال سوم. شمارة 9. پاییز 1389.
  17. قنواتی، عزت‌الله، شبنم قلمی و اصغر عبدلی. (1388). «توانمند‌‌سازی مدیریت بحران شهری در جهت کاهش بلایای طبیعی (زلزله)». فصلنامة جغرافیای طبیعی لارستان. دورة 2. شمارة 4. ص 24.
  18. مسائلی، صدیقه. (1375). «برنامه‌‌ریزی کاربری زمین در مناطق زلزله‌‌خیز (نمونة موردی: منجیل، لوشان و رودبار)». مجلة برنامه‌‌ریزی و پژوهش.
  19. مهدی‌زاده، جواد. (1389). «برنامه‌‌ریزی کاربری زمین، تحول در دیدگاه‌ها و روش‌ها». فصلنامة مدیریت شهری. شمارة 4.
  20. موسوی، محمد. (1391). «فرم باثبات از عدالت اجتماعی». پژوهشگاه جغرافیای انسانی. شمارة 80. ص 192-177.
  21. ناطقی الهی، فریبرز. (1379). مدیریت بحران زمین‌لرزة ایران. تهران: پژوهشگاه بین‌المللی زلزله‌شناسی و مهندسی زلزله.

22. Asgari, Ali. (2010). “In Search of the crisis management and planning”. the second international conference on natural disaster crisis management. Tehran.

23. Azizi, MohammadMehdi. (2003). urban density. Tehran: University of Tehran Press.

24. Badri, Ali and a group of authors. (2012). “the role of local management in place to improve resilience against natural disasters. focusing on floods”. the third issue of Journal of Research and crisis management.

25. Berge, Dieudonnee Ten. (2004). the first 24 hours of crisis management. translated by Mohammad Ali ZolfaghariAsl. Tehran: Hadith.

26. Cohen, J.M & N.T. (2010). “Uphoff, Participation's place in rural development”. seeking clarity Social Sciences and Humanities Series. 11(2): PP. 58-70

27. Cooper-Marcus, C & Sarkissian,W. (1996). Housing As If People Mattered. Berkeley: University of California Press.

28. Mahdizade, Javad. (2010). “land use planning, development of ideas and methods”. Journal of Urban Management. Issue 4.

29. Masaeli, Sedighe, (1996). “land use planning in earthquake-prone areas (Case Study: Network, LoShan and Roodbar)”. Journal of Planning and Research.

30. Mousvi,Mohammad. (2013). “a stable form of social justice”. human geography Institute of numbers in 177. PP. 80-192.

31. Nateghi Elahi, Fariborz. (2000). “Iran Earthquake Administration”. International Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering.

32. Pourmohammadi, Mohammad. (2016). housing planning. Tehran: Samt.

33. Qafari, Ramin. (2010). “Urban Land Use Compatibility assessment using fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making models”. Urban and Regional Studies and Research. First Year. Issue IV. PP. 59-76.

34. Qanavati, Ezatollah. (2010). “the role of planning in earthquake risk reduction in aging tissues. Case Study: District 12 of Tehran”. natural geographical Quarterly. Issue 9. Autumn.

35. Rastan, Sohaila & Elizabeth Robertson. (2005). "Rosa Susan Penelope Beddington”. 23 March 1956 – 18 May 2001: Elected F.R.S.

36. Saberifar, Rostam. (2008). “the critical analysis of urban land use planning in Mashhad”. Geography and Urban Planning PhD thesis. Tehran: Tarbiat Modarres University.

37. Salmani moqadam , Mohammad. (2013). “The use of urban land-use planning in promoting resilience against earthquakes using geographic information system (GIS) (Case Study: Sabzevar)”. Geographical Studies of Arid Zones. Issue seventeenth. PP.17-34.

38. Shaditalab, jale. (2002). “vulnerability scanning in Tehran against earthquakes”. the International Centre of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering.

39. Taherkhani, Habibollah. (2006). “Management in the historical context of Iran (challenges and leadership)”. Journal of Urban Management. PP. 13-9.

40. ZiaeeSani, Ebrahim. (2006). “worn texture”. Journal of Architecture and Building. No. 9.

41. Ziari, Keramatallah. (2008). urban land use planning. Second Edition. Tehran: Universityof Tehran Press.

42. Robertson E (2001)

Volume 51, Issue 2
July 2019
Pages 269-290
  • Receive Date: 13 March 2017
  • Revise Date: 11 June 2017
  • Accept Date: 11 June 2017
  • First Publish Date: 22 June 2019