Evaluation of Institutional Bases for Integrated Management in Sustainable Urban Regeneration of Outweared Textures (Case study: City of Ahvaz(

Document Type : Research Paper


1 Associate Professor of Geography and Urban Planning, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

2 PhD Student of Geography and Urban Planning, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran


Integrated management in the context of sustainable urban regeneration in Outweared Area is out of the capacity of the existing institutions and institutional bases among players in order to make the decision making illogical. Reforming procedural aspects of urban management as hotbeds of institutional and based on the interaction between the various actors role based tasks and their performance in the field of integrated management of the realization of sustainable urban regeneration. Therefore, the objective of this research is evaluation of urban management in Metropolitan Ahvaz using indicators of integrated management and the necessity of integrated management of sustainable urban regeneration in outweared areas.
In this research, we have used a descriptive and analytical approach to the Method of data collection – by questionnaires. According to the studies carried through field withdrawals, mental documents and interviews with residents and questionnaire, benefited from the statistical tests, average variance analysis, multivariate regression analysis, route institutional challenges between the main actors of urban management according to the Metropolitan Ahvaz variables affecting the dominant component in the main index 4, 12 and 53 have integrated management, how to achieve sustainable urban regeneration. Finally, using a test average variance multivariate regression analysis, the data obtained Cranach’s coefficient of 0.79 for questionnaire.
Results and discussion
Research findings indicated that the public and private sectors diffusivity in urban management structure and urban management function are mainly controlled by public and private sectors. Variance of the data also showed that the majority of characteristics tend to the variance of zero - at least that the response of the self - similarity in statistical population. It seems that in the presence of the management system of urban regeneration, private and public institutions in this process and intervention can lead to an inefficiency of interventions regeneration of the urban tissue. The component of integration and coordination (social capital within and between the institutional base) in the first priority titled period renaissance and institutional arrangements in the face of the tissue - worn out in the second period as a priority, growth of knowledge and learning the institutional and institutional development capacity in the third period. The life cycle of achieving sustainable management of urban regeneration of the tissue in Iran show the average priority and scored the index.
One of the complex issues in urban planning for the realization of integrated management of urban regeneration in the city of Ahvaz is related to the structural constraints, social, cultural, economic and management. According to a survey in this study of urban management function in the context of sustainable urban regeneration process, the weared texture has a view to integrated management of the Ahvaz city and has no performance attitude. The realization of sustainable urban regeneration of the integrated management of the current situation in the city of Ahvaz represents the realization of integrated management of the actors in this process that mutual relations with other players are conscious.


Main Subjects

  1. Andrew, C., Goldsmith, M., 1998, From Local Government to Local Governance – and beyond? International Political Sciences Review, PP. 101-117.
  2. Ansel, C., and Gash, A., 2008, Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, No. 18, PP. 543-571.
  3. Ayo, M., and Taylor, M., 2001, Partnerships and Power in Community Regeneration, In: S. Balloch and M. Taylor (Eds) Partnership Working, Bristol: The Policy Press.
  4. Bahaghvan, M, and Virgin, I., 2004, Generic Aspects of Institutional Capacity Development in Developing Countries, Stockholm Environment Institute.
  5. Colantonio, A., and Dixon, T., 2011, Urban Regeneration and Social Sustainability: Best Practice from European Cities, Wiley-Blackwell.
  6. Couch, C., Fraser, C, and Percy, S., 2003, Urban Regeneration in Europe, Blackwell.
  7. DiGaetano, A., and Storm, E., 2005, Comparative Urban Governance, an Integrated Approach, Urban Affairs Review, Vol. 38, No. 3, PP. 356-395.
  8. Enemark, J., 2004, Urban Social Planning, Australia, Vilz University, Australia Press.
  9. Gotham, K. F., 2010, “Urban Theory”, Encyclopedia of Urban Studies, SAGE Publication, California, PP. 39- 94..

10. Healey, P., 2004, Creativity and Urban Governance, Policy Studies, Vol. 25, No. 2, PP. 87-102.

11. Healey, P. (2006), Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies, London: Taylor and Francis.

12. Healey, P., Cars, G., Madanipour, A., and Magalhaes, C., 2002, Transforming Governance, Institutional Analysis and Institutional Capacity, In: Cars, G., Healey, P., Madanipour, A., Magalhaes, C., Urban Governance, Institutional Capacity and Social Milieux, Aldershot, PP. 6-28.

13. Hudson, R., 2004, Conceptualizing economies and their geographies: Spaces, Flows and Circuits, Progress in Human Geography 28, No. 4, PP. 447-471.

14. Hull City Council, 2000, Urban Regeneration, To Promote Urban Regeneration and Anti-Poverty Strategies.

15. Imrie, R., Lees, L., and Raco, M., 2010, Regenerating London: Governance, Sustainability and Community in a Global City, Routledge.

16. Izadi, M. S., 2006, A Study on City Enter Regeneration: A Comparative Analysis of Two Different Approaches Soothe Revitalization of Historic City Centrism Iran, Newcastle University.

17. Kearns, A., and Paddison, R., 2000, New Challenges for Urban Governance, Urban Studies, and Vol. 37, No. 5-6, PP. 845-850.

18. Kjaer, A. M., 2004, Governance, Cambridge, Polity Press.

19. Lombardi, D. R., et al., 2011, Conceptualizing Sustainability In UK Urban Regeneration: A Discursive Formation, Urban Studies, Vol. 48, No. 2, PP. 273-296.

20. Lowndes, V., 2001, Taking Institutional Theory Seriously in Urban Politics, Studies 38, No. 11, PP. 1953-1971.

21. Lowndes, V., 2002, Institutionalism, In: Marsh, D., Stoker, G., Theory and Methods in Political Science, Houndmills, PP. 90-108.

22. Masum, F., 2011, Strengthening Individual and Institutional Capacity and Developing Framework for Good Governance: The Need for an Integrated Approach for Proper Land Administration, Bridging the Gap between Cultures Marrakech, Morocco, 18-22 May.

23. McCarthy, J., 2007, Partnership, Collaborative Planning, and Urban Regeneration, Ashgate: London.

24. McDonald, S., Naglis, M., and Vida, M., 2009, Urban Regeneration for Sustainable Communites: A Case Study, Baltic Journal on Sustainability, Vol. 15, No. 1, PP. 49-59.

25. Murayama, A., 2009, Toward the Development of Plan-Making Methodology for Urban Regeneration, in Horita, M., Koizumi, H. Innovations in Collaborative Urban Regeneration, Springer, Japan.

26. Noon, D., Smith-Canham, J., and Eagland, M., 2000, Economic Regeneration and Funding, In: P. Roberts and H. Sykes (Eds) Urban Regeneration: A Handbook, London, PP. 61-85.

27. North, D., 1990, Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

28. Pierre, J., 2005, Comparative Urban Governance, Uncovering Complex Causalities, Urban Affair Review, Vol. 40, No. 4, PP. 446-462.

29. Richards, D., and Smith, M. J., 2002, Governance and Public Policy in the UK, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

30. UNECE. 2007, Guidebook on Promoting Good Governance in Public Private Partnerships, United Nation Economic Commission for Europe.

Volume 51, Issue 4
January 2020
Pages 891-909
  • Receive Date: 22 April 2017
  • Revise Date: 06 March 2018
  • Accept Date: 06 March 2018
  • First Publish Date: 22 December 2019