Explaining impacts of state land use policies on physical growth of metropolitan suburbs (case study: Pardis and Rudehen)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

University of Isfahan

Abstract

Introduction
Urban physical growth and its pattern is one of the key issues in the field of urban planning because of its relation to the management of land as a scarce resource in cities. Analysis of urban physical expansion in metropolitan regions around the world shows the important direct and indirect impacts s of state policies on the city expansion. With regard to the city expansion, two different patterns are recognizable, including sprawl and compact (or continuous) expansion. State land use policies, along with rapid transformations in technology (i.e. transportation and information) have stimulated urban sprawl significantly in these regions. To explain the impacts s of state land use policies on metropolitan physical growth entails a spatiotemporal framework of analysis. In this article, we are to evaluate these impacts s in the Tehran metropolitan region. The city of Tehran as the centre of the region has experienced significant socio-political transformation over the past century, resulting in different social and economic changes in its surrounding settlements. These intensifying centre-surrounding relationships have led to shaping a particular pattern of physical expansion of cities in the region. This article aims to explain the pattern of city physical expansion in the surrounding area in relation to state urban land use policies.
Methodology
As noted above, this article as a descriptive-analytical study attempts to analyze the impact of state urban land policies on the eastern cities of the Tehran metropolitan region, including Rudehen and Pardis. To do this, it analyses legal urban land use regulations and satellite data to explain, predict and simulate how these cities expand spatially in the region.
Discussion
Rapid urbanization is an influential force to change the face of the earth. Then, it is necessary to explore and manage the spatial pattern of urbanization, especially in metropolitan regions. In recent years, there is an increasing interest to investigate land use change, urban expansion and related socio-economic processes in the Tehran metropolitan region. The city of Tehran has experienced a variety of socio-economic changes after the modernization period in Iran. Especially, after the 1970s when continuous expansion of Tehran has replaced with sprawl, socio-spatial landscape of its surrounding cities such as Rudehen and Pardis has also changed significantly. Diffusion of growth from the centre, i.e. from Tehran to its periphery, i.e. to its surrounding cities took place without any integrated, comprehensive regional planning. During 1966-1996, there were only two cities, including Tehran and Karaj, where the processes of urban land use and urban expansion were being managed through master plan. This article argues that while the region was experiencing rapid process of urbanization and physical expansion during this period, there was no will to manage and plan it regionally. The Physical growth of both Rudehen and Pardis is a function of macro policies of urban land use in the region. Pardis as a new town was established by state regulations to facilitate decentralization of population from the city of Tehran to its surrounding region. Pardis is, in fact, the embodiment of maximum intervention of the state into the production of the metropolitan region to the extent that the whole of urban planning process, from designing to selling, is essentially led by the state. The state is the owner of the city, and then it facilitates its physical expansion and growth because of economic benefits from land business. In the case of Rudehen, two different forces are working to stimulate urban physical expansion: first, low-income immigrants who are not able to reside in the city of Tehran because of high-value rent decide to reside in Rudehen; second, high-income immigrants who are seeking natural landscapes for pleasure find it a suitable place. The former creates the spaces of slums while the latter spaces of second homes. In general, we can interpret growth of the two cities as a reaction to socio-economic forces of the city of Tehran itself. Rudehen is expanded at both sides of Tehran road. In the case of Rudehen, its growth follows sprawl expansion, and Tehran road acts as a local force to control the pattern of urban sprawl. In other words, the urban sprawl decreases with increase in distance from the road. The northern part of the city has experienced more expansion than the southern part. With respect to Pardis, three different stages of physical growth are recognizable. First, the city continued to expand in a compact pattern of expansion until 1987. During this stage, Pardis, like Rudehen, expanded along Tehran road in a linear pattern. At the second stage, i.e. from 1987 to 2003, the expansion of the city gradually shifted towards sprawl pattern. Tehran road conditions this kind of expansion too. The city, at the third stage, has expanded along two main axes. One runs along the south-north corridor, the other along east-west corridor. The former axis shows the compact pattern of expansion while the latter axis exhibits sprawl. Analysis of data showed that in both cities, the dominant geographical orientation of expansion is similar. In other words, the dominant geographical orientation of the expansion is toward the west, i.e. toward the city of Tehran. Furthermore, the western part of the two cities is more compact than their eastern part, indicating the powerful gravity of the city of Tehran on the physical growth of its surrounding cities.
Conclusion
Results showed that the physical growth of cities (i.e. Rudehen and Pardis) in the Tehran metropolitan region follows a different and complicated pattern in comparison with pre-modern urbanization of the region. This article argues that the spatiotemporal processes and patterns of peripheral urban expansion are a spatial reaction to dominant socio-economic structures and relations of the city of Tehran itself. Analysis of spatial and temporal trends of urban physical growth enables planners to prevent or reduce urban sprawl in the region. For this, strategies related to urban land use should be modified to shift from maximum intervention of the state to its minimum intervention. This entails that urban growth strategies should encourage public participation in the process of urban land use planning

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. درابکین، درآین، 1384، حومه، ترجمة عباس کیانی، تهران، س ۶۵، ش 65.
  2. زبیری، م. و مجد، ع.، ۱۳۷۵، آشنایی با فن سنجش از دور و کاربرد در منابع طبیعی، تهران: دانشگاه تهران.
  3. شالین، ک.، 1372، دینامیک شهری یا پویایی شهرها، ترجمة اصغر نظریان، مشهد: انتشارات آستان قدس رضوی.
  4. شکویی، ح.، 1373، دیدگاه‌های نو در جغرافیای شهری، تهران: سمت.
  5. فیضی‏زاده، بختیار و حاجی میررحیمی، سیدمحمود، ۱۳۸۷، آشکارسازی تغییرات کاربری اراضی با استفاده از روش طبقه‏بندی شیء‏گرا (مطالعة موردی: شهرک اندیشه)، همایش ژئوماتی، تهران، سازمان نقشه‏برداری کشور، https://www.civilica.com/Paper-GEO87-GEO87_050.html
  6. طرح مجموعه شهری تهران، خلاصه گزارش اقتصادی، (1377)، وزارت مسکن و شهرسازی
  7. طرح تفصیلی دماوند، (1393) مهندسین مشاور پاسارگاد
  8. محمودزاده، ح.، ۱۳۸۳، کاربرد داده‏های ماهواره‏ای چندزمانه در محیطGIS  با هدف بررسی تغییرات کاربری اراضی شهر تبریز، دانشگاه تبریز، پایان‏نامة کارشناسی ارشد جهت در رشتة سنجش از دور و سیستم اطلاعات جغرافیایی.
  9. مشکینی ، ا. و رحیمی ، ح.، 1392، تحلیل مفاهیم فضا و دولت در نظریة دولت و شهرنشینی در ایران، نشریة برنامه‌ریزی و آمایش فضا، ش 4.
  10. مشکینی، ا.؛ نورمحمدی، م.؛ رکن‌الدین افتخاری، ع. و صرافی، م.، 1394، الگوی سیاست‌گذاری مداخلة دولت  در مدیریت زمین در ایران، نشریة برنامه‌ریزی و آمایش فضا، دورة نوزدهم، ش 1.
  11. منصوریان ، حسین؛ 1393، تبیین الگوهای رشد شهری درمنطقه کلان شهری تهران، رساله دکتری جغرافبا وبرنامه ریزی شهری، دانشکده جغرافیا، دانشگاه تهران.
  12. وحیدی، محمدجواد و همکاران، ۱۳۸۸، بررسی تغییرات پوشش و کاربری اراضی حوضة آبریز لیقوان در استان آذربایجان شرقی، نشریة فضای جغرافیایی، دورة 15، ش 49.

13. Anderson, W. and Kanaroglou, P., 1995, U rban form, energy and the environment: a review of issues, evidence and policy, Urban Studies, Vol. 33, No. 1, PP. 7-35.

14. Cohen, 2004, Growth at Fringe: The Influence of Political Fragmentation in United State Metropolitan Areas, Papers in Regional Science, Vol. 82.

15. Drabkin, In Ain, 2005,  Suburbs, translated by Abbas Kiani, Vol.6,  No. 65, Tehran.

16. Detailed plan of Damavand, (2014) Pasargad Consulting Engineers.

17. Feizizadeh, B. and Haji Mirrahimi, S. M., 2008, Detection of land use changes using object-oriented classification method (Case study: Andisheh town), Geomatics Conference, Tehran, Iran Mapping Organization, https: //www.civilica.com/Paper-GEO87-GEO87_050.html.

18. Listokin, D., 2002, A national perspective on landuse policy alternative and consequences prepared for the farm foundation.Mahmoudzadeh, H., 2004, Application of Multi-Time Satellite Data in GIS Environment with the Aim of Investigating Land Use Changes in Tabriz, University of Tabriz, M.Sc. Thesis in the Field of Remote Sensing and GIS.

19. Mahmoudzadeh, H., 2004, Application of Multi-Time Satellite Data in GIS Environment with the Aim of Investigating Land Use Changes in Tabriz, University of Tabriz, M.Sc. Thesis in the Field of Remote Sensing and GIS

20. Meshkini, A. and Rahimi, H., 2014, Analysis of Space and State Concepts in State and Urbanization Theory of Iran, Vol. 17, No. 4.

21. Meshkini, A.; Noor Mohammadi, M.; Rokanuddin Eftekhari, A. and Sarrafi, M., 2015, Model for Policy Making regarding Government Intervention in urban land management of Iran (Case study: Tehran), Vol. 19, No. 1.

22. NASA)، https://landsat.gsfc.nasa.gov/about

23. Mansoorian، Hossein، 2014، Explaining the patterns of urban growth in the metropolitan area of Tehran، PhD thesis in Geography and Urban Planning، Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran.

24. Shakoei,H., 1994, New Perspectives in Urban Geography publication samt75-1..

25. Shalin, K., 1993, Urban Dynamics or Dynamics of Cities, translated by Asghar Nazarian, Mashhad: Astan Quds Razavi Publications.

26. Torrens, P., 2000, How cellular models of urban system work(Paper28). Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, Vol. 2, No. 1, PP. 1-68.

27. Tehran Urban Complex Plan, Economic Report Summary, (1998), Ministry of Housing and Urban Development.

28. USGS: https://landsat.usgs.gov/about-landsat

29. Vahidi, M. J. et al., 2009, Study of Land Use and Land Cover Change in Lighvan Watershed, East Azerbaijan Province., Journal of Geographical Space, Vol. 15, No. 49.

30. White, R. E. G. U. I., 1997, The use of constrained cellular automata for high-resolution modelling of urban land-use dynamics. Environ. Plann. B: Plann.Design, Vol. 24, PP. 323-343.

31. White, R. E. G., 2002, High resolution modelling of the spatial dynamics of urban and regional systems. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, Vol. 24, PP. 383-400.

32. Wolfram, S., 1984. Cellular automata as models of complexity. Nature, Vol. 31, PP. 419-424.

33. Wu, F., 1998, SimLand: a prototype to simulate land conversion through the integrated GIS and CA with AHP-derived transition rules. int. j. geographical information science, Vol. 12, No. 1, PP. 63-82.

34. Yang, Q. L. X. S. X., 2008, Cellular automata for simulating land use changes based on support vector machines. Computers & Geosciences, Vol. 34, PP. 592-602.

35. Yeh, A.-O. L. X., 2003, Simulation of development alternatives using neural networks, cellular automata, and GIS for urban planning. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, Vol. 69, No. 9, PP. 1043-1052.

36. Zellner, A. and Highfield, R., 1988, Calculation of maximum entropy distributions and approximation of marginalposterior distributions. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 37, No. 2, PP. 195-209.

37. Zobeiry, M. and Majd, A. R.,1996، An introduction to remote sensing technology and its application in natural resources.

Human Geography Research
Volume 52, Issue 3
October 2020
Pages 903-919

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 09 June 2018
  • Revise Date: 27 April 2019
  • Accept Date: 27 April 2019

Share

How to cite

Statistics