Urban Quality of Life Survey by Localizing Eurobarometer Indexes (Case Study: the City of Qazvin)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate in Futures Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Political Science, Department of Futures Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction: Cities are copying with growing populations and an expanding infrastructure need to accommodate growth and at the same time, Governments have to satisfy the changing needs of their existing populations. The challenge is particularly formidable for policy makers and planners. Also, it has been widely recognized that measuring progress in terms of GDP is not sufficient. While, Quality of life (QoL) has been the domain of development discourse for the past decade. QoL Survey can be a certain way for determining and needs assessing in urban planning and helps on developing roadmap in urban management, for achieving desired urban situation. Quantifying QoL is faced by numerous debates such as those concerning what aspects should be measured, the relative weight of different aspects, and the average vs. real citizen’s QoL and objective vs. subjective indicators. There are a number of indices claiming to measure and rate QoL in different cities or countries and Eurobarometer is one of the popular ones. The Eurobarometer (Quality of life in European cities) has been conducted to get a snapshot of people’s opinions on a range of urban issues in 2004, 2006, 2009, 2012 and 2015. It has some common indexes with those have been used in cities of IRAN. Then in this paper, localizing the Eurobarometer for Qazvin city in the form of a new statistically analyzable measuring scale is done and QoL in three regions of Qazvin city is depicted. In fact, the main purpose of this paper is to measure the Urban QoL in Qazvin city. It uses subjective indicators in measurement.
Methodology: This quantitative research was a descriptive-field study and developed a measurement scale for QoL Survey in Qazvin city on summer 2018. In this research, some indexes of Eurobarometer no. 419, were selected and localized according to the literature. By performing a questionnaire base survey and questioning 420 people of the residuals of Qazvin city, 393 filled questionnaire were used for analyzing in SPSS. Here, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) was measured 0.869 and the sig. of Bartlett's test was measured 0.000, then exploratory factor analysis by Principal Component Analysis method was done. For achieving the extractions upper than 0.5, some questions were omitted respectively. The rotated matrix of 8 components described 63.1 percent of their variations. In this step, according to the loading score of component rotated matrix and literature, new measuring scale was developed. In this research, by applying Cronbach's alpha, the reliability of factors came out. The total Cronbach's alpha for the whole 8 factors of the questionnaire was measured 0.92. But the Cronbach's alpha for each factor showed that 6 out of 8 factors are reliable (have gotten upper 0.7). In this step the factors Health care services and City administrative services, were omitted and the 6 remaining ones were used in T one-sample test for measuring QoL in Qazvin.
Results and discussion: In this research, the factors: life satisfactory (satisfaction of living in the city and individual living situation), Cleanliness, urban physical environment (situation of streets and buildings, public places, green spaces and availability of retail shops), Safety and trust, respectively got the most total satisfactory marks. On the other hand, the most total unsatisfactory marks, respectively belonged to the economic situation (Employment/job opportunities, Financial situation of household and individual financial situation) and educational and Welfare services (situation of Educational, Sports and Cultural facilities) factors. In this research, satisfactory measurement is marked between 1 to 5, then the region no. 1 takes almost 2.971 and the region no. 2 and 3 take the scores 3.156 and 3.145 and totally the satisfaction level is very low. Also, these results are confirmed through the field visit of the researcher. As the region no. 1 is the oldest part of the city and famous old markets and religious places are located in. it is faced with crowded traffics and weak infrastructure for transportation and also needs enhancements in Welfare services, green spaces and even Health care services. Also, people who are living in this part of the town are poorer than the other parts. On the other hand, the residuals of regions no. 2 and 3, are somehow the same in Urban QoL. They both need developments in educational and welfare services. Finally it needs to mention that, the economical unsatisfactory is dispread all over the city, as the country is facing with economic problems especially in lack of job opportunities, increases in the prices and rents of houses and mainly increases in consumer goods which are related to united states new sanctions at late 2018.
Conclusion: Urban QoL is a concept that has the challenge to solve the problems of urban areas, to control urban sprawl and to prevent environmental deterioration. It has the objective to restore existing urban areas and control the development of new communities. This paper tried to apply a modified and localized version of Eurobarometer in Qazvin city of IRAN, which is a common model for assessing QoL in European cities, while in the quest to rate cities and countries according to their QoL, numerous attempts by various organizations can be found. This research measures the level of QoL in certain dimensions and through the geography of the certain city, aiming at enhancing QoL in each region according to the main factors. This study provides a big picture of QoL in Qazvin city and can be used by urban authorities, regional municipalities and city councils for urban planning. Also, since reliability of these factors are passed by Cronbach's alpha, then can be used in the next researches and help on developing a common QoL model in Iranian cities and it must not limited to the existing needs but lead to strategic foresight in urban planning.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. آقایاری هیر، محسن؛ کریم‏زاده، حسین و خالقی، عقیل، 1396، تحلیل شاخص‏های ذهنی مؤثر بر سنجش کیفیت زندگی در مناطق روستایی (مطالعة موردی: دهستان سینا- شهرستان ورزقان)، برنامه‏ریزی و آمایش فضا، س 21، ش 4، صص 1-34.
  2. احمد آخوندی، عباس؛ برک‏پور، ناصر؛ خلیلی، احمد؛ صداقت‏نیا، سعید و صفی‏یاری، رامین، 1393، سنجش کیفیت زندگی شهری در کلان‏شهر تهران، نشریة هنرهای زیبا – معماری و شهرسازی، س ۱۹، ش ۲، صص 5-22.
  3. پوراحمد، احمد؛ عمو، ابراهیم؛ حاجیان، محمد و رئوفی، اصغر، 1396، سنجش کیفیت زندگی در سکونتگاه‏های غیررسمی (مطالعة موردی: محلة اسلام‏آباد تهران)، جغرافیای اجتماعی شهری، س 4، ش 2، صص 1-22.
  4. حاتمی‏نژاد، حسین؛ زیاری، کرامت‏اله؛ پارسا (پشاه‏آبادی)، شهرام و حاجی، مهسا، 1397، ارزیابی کیفیت زندگی در محلۀ سیروس تهران، پژوهش‏های جغرافیای انسانی، س 50، ش 3، صص 513-535.
  5. حسنی‏نژاد، آسیه؛ مسیبی، سمانه و حسنی‏نژاد، اردلان، 1395، ارزیابی و سنجش شاخص‏های کیفیت زندگی در محلات شهری (مطالعۀ موردی: حاجی‏آباد فارس)، مجلة جغرافیا و توسعة ناحیه‏ای، س 14، دورة 2، ش 32، صص 165-184.
  6. رضوانی، محمدرضا؛ متکان، علی‏اکبر؛ منصوریان، حسین و ستاری، محمدحسین، 1388، توسعه و سنجش شاخص‏های کیفیت زندگی شهری (مطالعة موردی: شهر نورآباد، استان لرستان)، مطالعات و پژوهش‏های شهری و منطقه‏ای، س 1، ش 2، صص 87-110.
  7. رفیعیان، مجتبی؛ مولودی، جمشید و پورطاهری، مهدی، 1390، سنجش کیفیت محیط شهری در شهرهای جدید مطالعة موردی: شهر جدید هشتگرد، برنامه‏ریزی و آمایش فضا، س ۱۵، ش ۳، صص ۱۹-۳۷.
  8. دانایی، علی؛ ولی‏ شریعت‏پناهی، مجید و مهدوی، مسعود، 1397، سنجش ‏کیفیت ‏زندگی ‏در ‏نواحی ‏روستایی (دهستان ‏بهمئی ‏گرمسیری ‏جنوبی ‏در ‏شهرستان ‏بهمئی ‏از ‏توابع ‏استان ‏کهکیلویه ‏و ‏بویراحمد)، پژوهش‏های جغرافیای انسانی، س 50، ش 3، صص 727-747.
  9. سجادیان، ناهید؛ نعمتی، مرتضی؛ شجاعیان، علی و قنواتی، طاهره، 1394، تحلیل نابرابری اجتماعی بر اساس متغیرهای منتخب در شهر اهواز (نمونة موردی: شهرک نفت، گلستان، حصیرآباد)، برنامه‏ریزی و آمایش فضا، س 19، ش 2، ۶۰-۳۳.
  10. سعیدی‏ رضوانی، نوید و حاجی‏نوروزی، فتانه، بی‏تا، سنجش کیفیت زندگی شهری در بافت فرسودة محلة سپه شهر قزوین از دیدگاه ساکنین به کمک تحلیل AHP، اولین همایش ملی شهرسازی و معماری در گذر زمان.
  11. سکاران، اوما، 1390، روش‏های تحقیق در مدیریت، ترجمة محمد صائبی و محمود شیرازی، چ ۹، تهران: مرکز آموزش مدیریت دولتی ریاست جمهوری.
  12. صفایی‏پور، مسعود و احمدی، زهرا، 1393، ارزیابی و سنجش شاخص‏های کیفیت زندگی در منطقة 4 شهر اهواز، فصل‏نامة توسعة اجتماعی (توسعة انسانی سابق)، س 9، ش 2، صص 63-84.
  13. عنابستانی، علی‏اکبر و عنابستانی، زهرا، 1391، تأثیر عملکرد مدیریت شهری بر ارتقای کیفیت زندگی شهروندان (مطالعۀ موردی: شهر جدید گلبهار)، مجلة مطالعات توسعة اجتماعی ایران، س 4، صص 23-34.
  14. فنی، زهره؛ حیدری، سامان و آقایی، پرویز، 1394، سنجش کیفیت زندگی شهری با تأکید بر جنسیت، مطالعة موردی: شهر قروه، دو فصل‏نامة پژوهش‏های بوم‏شناسی‏شهری، س 6، ش 12، صص 65-78.
  15. قالیباف، محمدباقر؛ روستایی، مجتبی؛ رمضان‏زاده لسبویی، مهدی و طاهری، محمدرضا، 1390، ارزیابی کیفیت زندگی شهری (مطالعة موردی: محلة یافت‏آباد)، جغرافیا، س 9، ش 31، صص 33-53.
  16. لطفی، صدیقه، 1388، مفهوم کیفیت زندگی شهری: تعاریف، ابعاد، و سنجش آن در برنامه‏ریزی شهری، فصل‏نامة علمی‏- پژوهشی جغرافیای انسانی، س 1، ش 4، صص 65-80.
  17. مشکینی، ابوالفضل؛ لطفی، صدیقه و احمدی، فرزانه، 1393، تحلیل عملکرد مدیریت شهری در عدم تعادل فضایی میان نواحی شهری (مطالعة موردی شهر قائم‏شهر)، برنامه‏ریزی و آمایش فضا، س 18، ش 2، صص ۱۷۲-۱۵۳.
  18. مؤمنی، منصور و فعال‏قیومی، علی، 1389، تحلیل‏های آماری با استفاده از SPSS، تهران: کتاب نو.
  19. نجفی‏کانی، علی‏اکبر؛ خواجه‏شاهکوهی، علیرضا و مهدوی، شهرام، 1394، سنجش شاخص‏های توسعه در مناطق شهری با تأکید بر کیفیت زندگی (مطالعۀ موردی: شهر کاشان)، مجلة آمایش جغرافیایی فضا، س 5، ش 16، صص 211-224.
  20. نظم‏فر، حسین؛ آفتاب، احمد؛ نظام‏پور، ناهید و مجنونی ‏توتاخانه، علی، 1395، ارزیابی و اولویت‏بندی مناطق شهری بر اساس شاخص‏های شهر خلاق (نمونة موردی: شهر سنندج)، برنامه‏ریزی و آمایش فضا، س 20، ش 4، صص ۲۸۶-۲۵۹.
  21. نقدی، اسداله و بابایی، حیدر، 1394، مروری بر شاخص‏ها و مؤلفه‏های کیفیت زندگی شهری (مورد مطالعه شهر همدان)، فصل‏نامة مطالعات مدیریت شهری، س 7، ش 23، صص 1-14.
  22. وب‏سایت شهرداری تهران، اطلس کلان‏شهر تهران، دسترسی 03/03/97 از http://atlas.tehran.ir/
  23. وب‏سایت شهرداری قزوین، دسترسی در 06/04/1397 از http://www.qazvin.ir
  24. وب‏سایت مرکز آمار ایران، سرشماری سال 1395، دسترسی در 06/04/1397 از https://www.amar.org.ir
  25. وب‏سایت همشهری استان قزوین، تعامل برای ارتقای کیفیت زندگی در قزوین 1396، دسترسی در 06/04/1397 از http://ostani.hamshahrilinks.org

26. Aghayari Hir, Mohsen, Karimzadeh, Hossein, Khaleghi, Aghil, 2018, Analysis of Mental Indicators Effective in Measuring the Quality of Life in Rural Areas (Case Study: Sina District - Varzaghan County), MJSP, Vol. 21, No. 4, PP. 1-34. (in Persian)

27. Ahmad Akhoundi, Abbas, Barakpur, Naser, Khalili, Ahmad, Sedaghatnia, Saeed, Safiyari, Ramin, 2014, Measuring Quality of Urban Life in Tehran Metropolitan, Honar–ha–ye–Ziba-Memari-Va-Shahrsazi, Vol. 19, No. 2, PP. 5-22, 2014. DOI: 10.22059/jfaup.2014.55385. (in Persian)

28. Ali Akbari, Esmaeel and Akbari, Majid, 2017, Interpretive-Structural Modeling of the Factors that Affect the Viability of Tehran Metropolis, MJSP, Vol. 21, No. 1, PP. 1-31. URL: http://journals.modares.ac.ir/article-21-3785-fa.html (in Persian)

29. Anabestani, Aliakbar and Anabestani, Zahra, 2012, The Effect of Urban Management Function on Improving the Quality of Citizens’ Life (Case of Study: Golbahar New City). Journal of Iranian Social Development Studies, Vol. 4, No. 4, PP. 23-34. (in Persian)

30. Biagi, Bianca; Ladu, Maria Gabriela and Meleddu, Marta, 2018, Urban Quality of Life and Capabilities: An Experimental Study, Ecological Economics, No. 150, PP. 137-152. (Doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.011)

31. Cabrera-Barona, Pablo F. and Merschdorf, Helena, 2018, A Conceptual Urban Quality Space-Place Framework: Linking Geo-Information and Quality of Life, Urban Science, Vol. 2, No. 73, PP. 1-14; (doi: 10.3390/urbansci2030073)

32. Cicirelli,  Franco; Guerrieri, Antonio; Mastroianni, Carlo; Spezzano, Giandomenico and Vinci, Andrea, 2019, The Internet of Things for Smart Urban Ecosystems, Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature, (doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96550-5)

33. Crockerl, Thomas F.; Brown1, Lesley; Clegg, Andrew; Farley, Katherine; Franklin, Matthew; Simpkins, Samantha and Young, John, 2019, Quality of life is substantially worse for community-dwelling older people living with frailty: systematic review and meta-analysis, Quality of Life Research, No. 28, PP. 2041-2056, (doi:10.1007/s11136-019-02149-1)

34. Danaee, Ali; Vali Shariatpanahi, Majid and Mahdavi, Masood, 2018, Quality of Life in Rural Areas of Bahmaei District, Kohgiluyeh and Boyer Ahmad, Iran. Human Geography Research, Vol. 50, No. 3, PP. 727-747. Doi: 10.22059/jhgr.2017.60579 (in Persian)

35. Ebrahimzadeh, Issa; Shahraki, Aziz; Abdol, Shahnaz; Myandoab, Ali Akbar and Manouchehri, Ayoub, 2016, Progressing urban development and life quality simultaneously, City, Culture and Society, No. 7, PP. 186-193. (Doi: 10.1016/j.ccs.2016.03.001)

36. Estoque, Ronald C.; Togawa, Takuya; Ooba, Makoto; Gomi, Kei; Nakamura, Shogo; Hijioka, Yasuaki and Kameyama, Yasuko, 2019, A review of quality of life (QOL) assessments and indicators: Towards a “QOL-Climate” assessment framework. Ambio, No. 48, PP. 619-638, (doi: 10.1007/s13280-018-1090-3)

37. Eurobarometer. Flash Eurobarometer 419-Quality of Life in European Cities. European Commission, pp. 1e172, 2016. Access 20 June 2018, Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/regional

38. Fanni, Zohreh; Heydari, Saman and Aghaei, Parviz, 2016, The evaluation of Urban Life quality, with emphasis on gender, Case Study: Ghorveh City, Journal of Urban Ecology Researches, Vol. 6, No. 12, PP. 65-78. (in Persian)

39. Faria, Patrícia A.M.; Ferreira, Fernando A.F.; Jalali, Marjan S.; Bento, Paulo; António, Nelson J.S., 2018, Combining cognitive mapping and MCDA for improving quality of life in urban areas, Cities, No. 78, PP. 116-127. (Doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.006)

40. Ghalibaf, Mohamad Bager; Roustaie, Mojtaba; Ramezanzadeh Lasboyee, Mahdi and Taheri Mohamad Reza, 2012, Assessment Urban Quality of Life (case study: Yaft Abad), Geography, Vol. 9, No. 31, PP. 3-53. (in Persian)

41. Hataminejad, Hossein; Ziari, Keramatollah; Pashabadi, Shahram and Haji, Mahsa, 2018, Assessment of Quality of Life in Syroos Neighborhood in Tehran. Human Geography Research, Vol. 50, No. 3, PP. 513-535. (Doi: 10.22059/jhgr.2017.33919.1006519) (in Persian)

42. Hosninejad, Asieh; Mosaiebi, Samaneh and Hosninejad, Ardalan, 2017, Assessing the Quality of Life Indicators in Urban Neighborhoods (Case Study: Haji Abad, Fars), Journal of Geography and Regional Development (Peer-eviewed), Vol. 14, No. 1, PP. 165-184. https://doi.org/10.22067/geography.v14i1.42347 (in Persian)

43. Kaklauskas, Artūras; Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras; Radzeviciene, A.; Ubarte, I.; Podviezko, Askoldas; Podvezko, Valentinas; Kuzminske, Agne; Banaitis, Audrius; Binkyte, Arūnė and Bucinskas, Vytautas, 2018, Quality of city life multiple criteria analysis, Cities, No. 72, PP. 82-93. (Doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.002)

44. Khalil, Heba Allah and Essam E., 2012, Enhancing quality of life through strategic urban planning, Sustainable Cities and Society, No. 5, PP. 77-86. (Doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2012.06.002)

45. Lotfi, Sedigheh, 2010, The concept of urban quality of life: Definitions, dimensions and measuring in urban Planning, Quarterly Journal of Human Geography, Vol. 1, No. 4, PP. 65-80. (in Persian)

46. Macke, Janaina; Casagrande, Rodrigo M.; Sarate, João Alberto R.; Silva, Kelin A., 2018, Smart city and quality of life: Citizens’ perception in a Brazilian case study, Journal of Cleaner Production, No. 182, PP. 717-726, (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.078)

47. Marans, Robert W., 2015, Quality of urban life & environmental sustainability studies: Future linkage opportunities, Habitat International, Vol. 45, No. 1, PP. 47-52. (doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.06.019)

48. Martinez, Javier, 2019, Mapping Dynamic Indicators of Quality of Life: a Case in Rosario, Argentina. Applied Research Quality Life, No. 14, PP. 777-798. (doi.org/10.1007/s11482-018-9617-0)

49. Massam, H. Brayn, 2002, Quality of Life: Public Planning and Private Living, Progress in Planning, No. 58, PP. 141-227. (DOI: 10.1016/S0305-9006(02)00023-5)

50. Meshkini, Abolfazl; Lotfi, Sedigheh and Ahmadi, Farzaneh, 2014, Investigating urban management in creating a spatial imbalance among urban districts (a case study of Qaemshahr), MJSP, Vol. 18, No. 2, PP. 153-172. (in Persian)

51. Momeni, Mansour and Faeal Ghayumi, Ali, 2009, Statistical Analysis with SPSS, Tehran: New Book press. (in Persian)

52. Naghdi, Asadollah and Babaei, Hiedar, 2015, Urban quality of life as human development indicatores: Dimensions, elements, Urban Management Studies, Vol. 7, No. 23, PP. 2-14. (in Persian)

53. Najafi Kani, Ali Akbar; Kajeh Shahkohi, AliReza and Mahdavi, Shahram, 2015, Assessment of Development Indicators in Urban Areas with an Emphasis on Quality of Life. Case Study: Kashan City, Geographical Planning of Space, Vol. 5, No. 16, PP. 211-224. (in Persian)

54. Nazmfar, Hosein; Aftab, Ahmad; Nazampour, Nahid and Majnoony Tootakhane, Ali, 2016, Evaluation and prioritization of urban areas Based on parameters creative city (Case Study: Sanandaj City), MJSP, Vol. 20, No. 4, PP. 259-286. (in Persian)

55. Okulicz-Kozaryn, Adam, 2017, Unhappy metropolis (when American city is too big), Cities, No. 61, PP. 144-155. (DOI: 10.7282/T3Z03B76)

56. Papachristoua, Ioanna Anna and Rosas-Casalsa, Marti, 2019, Cities and quality of life. Quantitative modeling of the emergence of the happiness field in urban studies, Cities, No. 88, PP. 191-208, (doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.10.012)

57. Pourahmad, Ahmad; Amoo, Ebrahim; Hajian, Mohammad and Raoufi, Asgar, 2018, Measurement of quality of life in informal settlements. Case study: Islamabad neighborhood of Tehran, Journal of Urban Social Geography, Vol. 4, No. 2, PP. 1-22. Doi: 10.22103/JUSG.2018.1950. (in Persian)

58. Rafiian, Mojtaba; Molodi, Jamshid and Pour Taheri, Mahdi, 2011, Quality of Urban Environment Assessment in New Cities (case study: Hashgerd New City), MJSP, Vol. 15, No. 3, 19-37. URL: http://journals.modares.ac.ir/article-21-471-fa.html (in Persian)

59. Rezvani, Mohammad Reza; Metkan, Ali Akbar; Mansourian, Hosein and Sattari Mohammad Hosein, 2009, Development and Assessment of indicator of Urban Life Quality, Journal of Urban - Regional Studies and Research, Vol. 1, No. 2, PP. 87-110. (in Persian)

60. Saeedi Rezvani, Navid; Haji Norozi, Fattaneh, -, Quality of Life Assessment in Old Part of Sepah Neiberhood of Qazvin City from Residents' Point of View by AHP, First national convention of Urbanism and Architecture over time, (in Persian)

61. Safaeipor, Masoud and Ahmadi, Zahra, 2015, Assessing and Measuring of the Quality of Life Indicators in the Region of 4 in Ahvaz City, Social Development, Vol. 9, No. 2, PP. 63-84. (in Persian)

62. Sajadian Nahid; Nemati, Morteza; Shojaeianm Ali and Ghanavati, Tahereh, 2015, Study of social inequality based on selected variables in Ahvaz city (Case Study: Shahrak Naft, Golestan, Hasir Abad), MJSP, Vol. 19, No. 2, PP. 33-60, (in Persian)

63. Sckaran, Uma, 2012, Research methods for business, Translated by Mohamad Saebi & Mahmood Shirazi), Tehran, Governmental Management Training Center. (in Persian)

64. Turkoglu, Handan, 2015, Sustainable Development and Quality of Urban Life. Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, No. 202, PP. 10-14.

65. United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN - Habitat). Global Urban Indicators Database, Version 2, 1998, accessed at 24 October 2018, from www.unhabitat.org

66. Wann-Ming, Wey, 2019, Constructing urban dynamic transportation planning strategies for improving quality of life and urban sustainability under emerging growth management principles, Sustainable Cities and Society, No. 44, PP. 275-290, (doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.015)

67. Website of Asian Development Bank (ADB), Accessed at 24 October 2018, from https://www.adb.org

68. Website of Economist. The Economist Intelligence Unit’s Quality-of-Life Index, 2005. Accessed at 24 October 2018, from www.economist.com

69. Website of Hamshahri of Qazvin Province, Quality of Life in Qazvin 1396, accessed 27 June 2018, from: http://ostani.hamshahrilinks.org (in Persian)

70. Website of Mercer Human Resource Consulting. Vienna Tops Mercer’s 20TH Quality OF Living Ranking, 2018. Accessed at 24 October 2018, from https://www.mercer.com/newsroom/2018-quality-of-living-survey.html

71. Website of Qazvin Municipality, Accessed 27 June 2018, from: http://www.qazvin.ir (in Persian)

72. Website of Statistical Center of IRAN, Accessed 27 June 2018, from: https://www.amar.org.ir (in Persian)

73. Website of Tehran Municipality, Atlas of Tehran metropolis, Accessed 24 May 2018, from: http://atlas.tehran.ir/Default.aspx?tabid=179 (in Persian)

74. Węziak-Białowolska, Dorota, 2016, Quality of life in cities – Empirical evidence in comparative European perspective, Cities, No. 58, PP. 87-96. (DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.016)

75. Website of World Health Organization, WHOQOL: Measuring Quality of Life, Accessed at 24 October 2018, from http://www.who.int/healthinfo/survey/whoqol-qualityoflife/en/

Human Geography Research
Volume 53, Issue 2
July 2021
Pages 579-597

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 28 September 2019
  • Revise Date: 19 March 2020
  • Accept Date: 19 March 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics