Evaluation of residential quality components in historical districts of Sabzevar. Case Study: Sardeh Historical neighborhood

Document Type : Research Paper


1 Faculty of geography and environmental science, university of Hakim Sabzevari

2 Hakim Sabzevari University

3 faculty of geography science, university of Kharazmi, Tehran


Urban developments in Iran over the past few decades have made significant changes in the construction of the city and the quality of urban spaces. These changes, especially in historical cities, have had a profound impact on urban relations, social, economic, cultural, physical and spatial characteristics, more than other cities; So as to isolate the more ancient fabric and have been spatial and social segregation. One of the current problems is the issue of environmental quality or the quality of life in historical neighborhoods. In Iran, in addition to the above-mentioned, the challenge facing urban planners and politicians in many historic towns and cities is that of balancing the demand for increasing social, cultural and and economic issues, with the need to respect the environment and provide an acceptable quality of life for all citizens. The emphasis of the study is knowing and analysis of existing parameters in historic neighborhoods and assessment of impacts on quality of life and environment. Since 1970, extensive research projects in measuring the quality of urban life that utilizes various model from both a conceptual and empirical perspective has been launched in assessment of the urban quality of environment and life. Several of the key issues affecting the quality of the environment and in our towns and cities, likes, traffic and heavy motor traffic, poor air quality, health care and security, accessibility to the service, unacceptable levels of noise and a weakened sense of neighborhood and local community. In addition, in adequate construction of buildings and natural hazards that threaten them, has been caused historic neighborhoods be turned a continuous problem for urban management. According to the articles mentioned in this research in this study we have made an endeavor to answer the following questions:
• What is the level of quality in terms of urban and subjective and objective?
• In terms of inhabitants, what are the factors affecting the quality of urban environment in Srdeh neighborhood?

The historical fabic of Sabzevar, which is now located in the new divisions inside the 3rd district, has 11 neighborhoods including: the Neighborhood of the Citadel, the Syerde Neighborhood, the New Alley neighborhood, the Hajikoglu Quarter, Al-Daghi Neighborhood, the Neqashk Nebashk Neighborhood, the Hamm Hakim Neighborhood, Qazi Alley or Aqa neighborhood, Zargar neighborhood, Sabzeh neighborhood and Mazar-e-Sabz neighborhood. Seredeh (Syrdeh) neighborhood from the north to the Farmandari square, from the south to Beyagh Street, from east to Qa'im Street and from the West to Fadayian Islami Street. This neighborhood has very low latitudes, which are the last relics and old towns. Socially, the Sardeh area is a part of urban historic core with an estimated population of 2,500 people and an area of 9.9 hectares.
This research is a survey based on the research method. In this study, the data collection tool was a questionnaire whose validity was confirmed by the advice of the professors and relevant specialists as the referee. In order to achieve the acceptable reliability, a pre-test with a sample of 50 and using Cronbach's alpha, alignment and internal consistency of the questionnaire were provided. The statistical population of this research is the residents of Sabzevar Sardeh neighborhood, which are in the range of 18 to 70 years old. After collecting data in the form of a questionnaire, these data were entered into the software environment and then encoded and analyzed. In this research, factor analysis has been used to examine the relationship between variables.

Results and Discussion
Results indicate that factor analysis is one of the most suitable ways to solve problems in ranking indexes in urban planning. In this paper, this model was used to indicate and categorize the effective indicators. However, the result of this study was to reduce the 59 primary variables to the 9 most important factors by turning the varimax in total mental-mental dimensions, 4 factors in the objective dimension and 9 significant factors in the mental dimension. Load indexes constitute one factor and indicators that cannot accumulate with them are another factor; therefore, the sum of the variables of the nine factors is 52.18%, the highest of which is with 9.52% in the first factor and under the title is the space-physical structure. According to the presented materials, in response to the research question regarding the factors affecting the quality of urban environment in the study area, the spatial structure-physical structure with 5/734% is not possible; the sense of belonging with 3 786/3; the satisfaction of housing space 132 / 3%; satisfaction with life (personal health and wellbeing) 2.672; accessibility of 439.2%; family relationships and social solidarity; 2.31%; security; 1.25%; urban and urban landscape; 903.1%; Ultimately, participation and a sense of collective represented 275.1% as the main factors that are a combination of the mental and objective dimension of the quality of the environment.

Regarding field surveys, it was found that residents are dissatisfied with some of the characteristics that affect the quality of urban environments or face many problems and problems. Considering the theoretical foundations and research findings, it can be said that the way of approaching the quality of the urban environment in the context of both objective and subjective views can provide two different interpretations of the quality of the urban environment and ultimately satisfaction levels. Therefore, it would not be possible to make more practical and rational decisions for the improvement of the quality of the urban environment unless through close contact with residents and attracting popular participation based on good urban governance in order to survey residents about the quality of the urban environment of their place of residence and consultation with them. Relationship with actions that can improve the quality of the urban environment of their place of residence and, ultimately, the level of satisfaction.


Main Subjects

  1. اکبریان رونیزی، س.، 1397، ارزیابی رضایتمندی شهروندان از کیفیت محیط سکونتی، مطالعة موردی: شهر زرقان، پژوهش‏‏‏های جغرافیایی برنامه‏ریزی شهری، دورة ۶، ش ۱، صص 113-127.
  2. ایوبی، ر. و جعفری قوام‏آبادی، ن.، 1393، نما، سیمای بافت تاریخی، و منظر فضای عمومی در قوانین ملی، ضوابط و مقررات محلی، و وظایف مدیریت شهری، انجمن علمی معماری و شهرسازی ایران، 1-16.
  3. بحرینی، ح.، 1386، فرایند طراحی شهری، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
  4. پورسراجیان، م.، 1394، ارزش‏های محلة تاریخی و معیارهای تغییر در آن از نظر ساکنان، فصل‏نامة باغ نظر، ش ۳۵، صص 39-52.
  5. تقوایی، م. و شفیعی، پ.، 1388، کاربرد تحلیل عاملی و خوشه‏ای در ارزیابی مکانی و فضای مناطق روستایی استان اصفهان، فصل‏نامة اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه، 17(68)، ۵۷-76.
  6. خادم‏الحسینی، ا.؛ منصوریان، ح. و ستاری، م. ح.، 1389، سنجش کیفیت ذهنی زندگی در نواحی شهری، فصل‏نامة جغرافیا و مطالعات محیطی، ۱(۳)، ۴۵-۶۰.
  7. رضایی، م.؛ رحمانی، م. و ذاکر حقیقی، ک.، 1394، طرح احیا و سامان‏دهی محلات تاریخی با تأکید بر ایجاد امنیت و ارتقای کیفیت محیط نمونة مورد مطالعه دولت‏آباد ملایر، همایش بین‏المللی معماری، عمران، و شهرسازی در هزارة سوم، تهران.
  8. رضایی، م.: مؤذن، س. و نفر، ن.، 1393، تحلیل رضایتمندی از شاخص‏های کیفیت محیط در شهرهای جدید، مطالعة موردی: شهر جدید پرند، پژوهش‏های جغرافیایی شهری، ش 21، صص 31-47.
  9. رهنما، م، ر.: حسینی غفاری، ط.؛ اشنویی، ا. و روستا، م.، 1391، سنجش میزان رضایتمندی گردشگران داخلی از کیفیت خدمات هتل‏داری، مطالعة موردی: کلان‏شهر مشهد، مجلة مطالعات گردشگری، ش 1 2، صص ۶۸-89.
  10. رهنورد، ف.، 1382، توانمندسازی کارکنان، گامی به سوی مشتری‏مداری، فصل‏نامة فرایند مدیریت و توسعه، ش 17، صص ۴۶-53.
  11. زنگنه، ی.؛ حسین‏آبادی، س.؛ روشندل، ت. و نبی‏پور، ر.، 1393، تأثیر تعلق مکانی و سرمایة اجتماعی بر به‏سازی مشارکتی محلات قدیمی، نمونة موردی محلة سرده سبزوار، مجلة پژوهش و برنامه‏ریزی شهری، س 519، صص ۱۱۱-128.
  12. زیویار، پ.؛ درودی، م، ر. و رمضان‏پور، ا.، 1393، کیفیت زندگی در محیط سکونتی فرسوده، محلة قیام، منطقة 12 شهر تهران، فصل‏نامة رفاه اجتماعی، س ۱۴، ش 54، صص 85-110.
  13. سجادزاده، ح.؛ ایزدی، م، س. و حقی، م، ر.، 1395، راهبردهای ارتقای کیفیت محیطی سکونتگاه‏های غیررسمی بر مبنای نظرات ساکنین، نمونة مورد مطالعه: محلة حصار در شهر همدان، محیطشناسی، دورة 42 1، صص 81-96.
  14. سلیمانی، ل. و دارابی، م. 1393، ارزیابی کیفیت محیط در محله‏های تاریخی شهرها، مطالعة موردی: محلة نفرآباد شهر ری، پژوهش‏های جغرافیای انسانی، ش 483، صص 429-439.
  15. شهرداری سبزوار، 1376، طرح جامع سبزوار، وزارت مسکن و شهرسازی.
  16. طبیبیان، م. و منصوری، ی.، 1392، ارتقای کیفیت محیطی و رضایتمندی از زندگی در محلات جدید با اولویت‏بندی اقدامات بر اساس نظرهای ساکنان، نمونة موردی: کاشان، مجلة محیطشناسی، ش 4، صص ۱-16.
  17. ضرابی، ا. و علی‏زاده، ج.، ارزیابی سطح رضایت شهروندان از کیفیت محیط شهری، نمونة موردی، مناطق شهری ده‏گانة کلان‏شهر تبریز، نشریة جغرافیا و برنامه‏ریزی، س ۱۹، ش 51، صص 193-219.
  18. ضرابی، ا.؛ رخشانی‏نسب، ح. ر. و سرگلزایی، ط.، 1395، تحلیل فضایی شاخص‏های کیفیت زندگی در محله‏های پیرامونی شهر زاهدان با استفاده از مدل تصمیم‏گیری چندمعیارة ویکور، نشریة جغرافیا، س ۶، ش 23، صص ۴۵-64.
  19. فرهادنژاد، ح.، 1387، مدیریت رضایتمندی مراجعان در سازمان‏های دولتی، ماهنامة تدبیر، س 19، ش 197، صص ۲۹-33.
  20. فنی، ز. و واحدی یگانه، ف.، 1396، تحلیل شاخص‏های کیفیت زندگی فردی- اجتماعی در فضاهای شهری با تأکید بر جنسیت، مطالعة موردی: شهر سنندج، مطالعات برنامه‏ریزی سکونتگاههای انسانی، س ۱۲، ش 38، صص 83-102.
  21. قربی، م.؛ اسماعیل‏پور، ن. و نقوی، م.، 1396، سنجش رضایتمندی کیفیت محیط سکونت و واحد مسکونی در محلات شهری با تأکید بر اصول نوشهرگرایی مورد نمونه: محلة شهید همتی‏فر شهر کرمان، نشریة پژوهش و برنامه‏ریزی شهری، س ۸، ش ۳۱.
  22. کلانتری، خ.، 1391، پردازش و تحلیل داده‏ها در تحقیقات اقتصادی و اجتماعی، تهران: فرهنگ صبا.
  23. گلکار، ک.، 1393، مؤلفه‏های سازندة کیفیت محیط شهری، نشریة صفه، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، ش 32، صص ۳۸-68.
  24. لنگ، ج.، 1388، آفرینش نظریه‏های معماری- نقش علوم رفتاری در طراحی محیط، ترجمة علیرضا عینی‏فر، چ ۴، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
  25. محمدی، م.، 1381، فرهنگ اماکن و جغرافیای تاریخی بیهق سبزوار، سبزوار: آژند.
  26. مرکز آمار ایران، 1395، سرشماری نفوس و مسکن، استان خراسان رضوی.
  27. مسرور، ا. و رضایی، ص.، 1394، ارزیابی میزان رضایت شهروندی از کیفیت‏های سکونتی در مجتمع‏های مسکونی؛ موردپژوهی: مجتمع‏های مسکونی شهر همدان، مدیریت شهری، ش ۴، صص 41-80.
  28. وجدانی درستکار، ن.، 1391، سنجش و مقایسة کیفیت محیط سکونت در بافت‏های قدیمی و جدید شهری، نمونۀ موردی: شهر مشهد)، پایان‏نامۀ کارشناسی ارشد، به راهنمایی دکتر حسن ایزدی، دانشگاه شیراز.
  29. مشکینی، ا.؛ سجادی، ژ. و تفکری، ا. 1390. تأثیر سیاست‏های واگذاری زمین و مسکن دولتی در گسترش کالبدی شهرهای ایران، نمونة موردی شهر کرمانشاه، مجلة جغرافیا و توسعه، ش 23، صص ۴۷-67.
  30. Akbarian Ronizi, Saeed, 2018, Evaluation of Citizens' Satisfaction with the Quality of Residential Environment, Case Study: Zarghan City, Geographical Survey of Urban Planning, Vol. 6, No. 1, PP. 113-127.
  31. Ayyoubi, R. and Jafari Qavam Abadi, N ., 2014, Facade, Historical Texture and Landscape Perspectives of Public Space in National Law, Local Rules and Regulations and Urban Management, Iranian Scientific Society of Architecture and Urban Development, PP.1-16.
  32. Bahrain, H., 2007, Urban Design Process, Tehran: Tehran University Press.
  33. Poursrajian, M., Historical Neighborhood Values and its change variables in Residents's Perspectives, Journal of Bagh-e-Nazar, No. 35, PP. 39-52.
  34. Taghvayi, M. and Shafiee, P., 2009, Application of Factor and Cluster Analysis in Spatial Assessment of Rural Areas of Isfahan Province, Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 17(68), 57-76.
  35. Khadem Al-Husseini, A., Mansourian, H. and Sattari, M.H., 2010, Measurement of Subjective Quality of Life in Urban Areas, Journal of Geography and Environmental Studies, 1(3), 45-60.
  36. Rezaei, M.; Rahmani, M. and Zaker haghigh, K., 2015, Restoration of historical neighborhoods with referring on security and promoting the quality of environment. Case study: Dolat Abad, Malayer, International Conference on Architecture, Civil Engineering and Urban Development in the Third Millennium, Tehran.
  37. Rezaei, M.; Mouzen, S. and Nafar, N., 2013, Satisfaction Analysis of Environmental Quality Indicators in New Cities Case Study: Parand New Town, Urban Geographic Research, No. 21, PP. 31-47.
  38. Rahnama, M.R.; Hosseini Gh., T.S.; Ashnewi, A. and Rosta, M., 2011, Measurement of satisfaction of domestic tourists from the quality of hotel services. Case study: Mashhad metropolitan, Journal of Tourism Studies, No. 2, PP. 68-89.
  39. Rahnavard, F., 2003, Empowerment of Employees: A Step to Customizing, Journal of Management and Development Process, No, 17, PP. 46-53.
  40. Zanganeh, Y.; Hossein Abadi, S.; Roshandel, T. and Nabi Pour, R., 2014, The effect of spatial belonging and social capital on participatory improvement of old neighborhoods of Sabzevar neighborhood, Journal of Urban Planning and Research, Vol. 519, PP. 111-128.
  41. Ziviar, Parvaneh; Dorodi, Mohammad Reza and Ramazanpour, Azam, 2013, Quality of Life in a Deteriorated Settlement, Qiyam Neighborhood, District 12, Tehran, Social Welfare Quarterly, Vol. 14. No. 54, PP. 85-110.
  42. Sadeghzadeh, H.; Saeed Izadi, M.S. and Haghi, M.R., 2015, Strategies to promote the quality of the environment of informal settlements based on the residents' opinion. Case study: Hesar neighborhood in Hamedan, Journal of Environment Studies, Vol. 42, No. 1, PP. 81-96.
  43. Suleimani, L. and Darabi, M., 2014, Environmental Quality Assessment in Historical Neighborhoods of cities Case Study: Nahabat Neighborhood City Ray, Human Geography Research, No. 483, PP. 429-439.
  44. Sabzevar Municipality, 1997, Sabzevar Master Plan, Department of Housing and Urban Development.
  45. Tabibian, M. and Mansouri, Y., 2013, Improvement of environmental quality and living satisfaction in new neighborhoods with prioritization of measures based on residents' opinion. Case study: Kashan, Journal of Environmental Studies, No. 4, PP. 1-16.
  46. Zarraby, Asghar and Alizadeh, Jaber, 2015, Evaluation of Citizen's Satisfaction with the Quality of Urban Environment, Case Study, Tabriz Metropolitan Area Ten, Journal of Geography and Planning, Vol. 19, No. 51,PP. 193-219.
  47. Zarraby, Asghar; Rakhshani Nasab, Hamid H. R. and Tombstone, Taybeh, 2016, Spatial Analysis of Quality of Life Indicators in Suburbs of Zahedan Using VIKOR Multi-Criteria Decision Model, Geography Journal, Vol. 6, No. 23, PP. 45-64.
  48. Farhadnejad, H., 2008, Satisfaction Management of Clients in Government Organizations, Tadbir, Vol. 19, 197, PP. 29-33.
  49. Fanni, Zohreh and Vahedi yeganeh, Farid, 2016, Analysis of Individual-Social Quality of Life Indicators in Urban Spaces with Emphasis on Gender, Case Study: City of Sanandaj, Planning Studies of Human Settlements, Vol. 12, No. 38, PP. 83-102.
  50. Ghorbi, Mitra; Ismail Pur, Najma and Naqvi, Maryam, 2016, Satisfaction Assessment of Urban Environment and Residential Units with Emphasis on Neo-urbanism Principles Case Study: Shahid Hemmatifar City of Kerman, Journal of Urban Research and Planning, Vol. 8, No. 31.
  51. Kalantari, Kh., 2011, Processing and Analysis of Data in Economic and Social Researches, Tehran, Farhang-e- Saba Publication.
  52. Golkar, Kuorosh, 2001, Components of Urban Environmental Quality, Soffeh Journal, Shahid Beheshti University, No. 32, PP. 38-68.
  53. Lang, John, 2009, Creating Architectural Theories - The Role of Behavioral Sciences in Environmental Design, Alireza Einfar, Fourth Edition, Tehran University Press, Tehran.
  54. Mohammadi, M., 2002, Encyclopedia of Places and Historical Geography of Beyhagh Sabzevar, Sabzevar: Ajand.
  55. Iranian Statistics Center, 2016, Population and Housing Census, Razavi Khorasan Province.
  56. Masruor, Abulqasim and Rezayi, Sadegh, 2015, Evaluation of Citizen Satisfaction with Residential Qualities in Residential Complexes, Case Study: Residential Complexes of Hamadan, Urban Management, No. 40, PP. 41-80.
  57. Vojdani drostkar, Nazanin, 2011, Measuring and comparing the quality of living environment in old and new urban contexts. Case Study: City of Mashhad, Master Thesis, Supervisor: Dr. Hassan Izadi, Shiraz University.
  58. Meshkini, Abolfazl; Sajjadi, Jila and Tafakkori, Akram, 2011, The Impact of Land and Government Housing Policies on Physical Expansion of Iranian Cities Case Study of Kermanshah, Journal of Geography and Development, No. 23, PP. 47-67.
  59. Appleyard, D., 1979, The Environment as a Social Symbol, Journal of American Planning Association, Vol. 45, No. 2, PP. 143-153.
  60. Bonaiuto, M.; Fornara, F. and Bonnes, M., 2003, Indexes of perceived residential environment quality and neighborhood attachment in urban environments: a confirmation study on the city of Rome. Landscape and urban planning, 65(1), 41-52.
  61. Bonaiuto, M., 2004, Residential Satisfaction and Perceived Urban Quality, Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology, Vol. 3, PP. 267-272.
  62. Bramley, G. and Power, S., 2009, Urban Form and Social Sustainability: The Role of Density and Housing Type. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol. 36, No. 1, PP. 30-48.
  63. Bentley, I.; Alcock, A.; Murrain, P.; McGlynn, S. and Smith, G., 1985, Responsive Environments: A Manual for Designers, London: The Architectural Press.
  64. Węziak-Białowolska, D., 2016. Quality of life in cities–Empirical evidence in comparative European perspective. Cities, 58, pp.87-96.
  65. Carmona, M.; Heath, T.; Oc, T. and Tiesdell, S., 2006, Public Spaces- Urban Spaces, Architectural press, UK.
  66. Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Ali, S., Beer, C., Bond, L., Boumans, R., Danigelis, N.L., Dickinson, J., Elliott, C., Farley, J. and Gayer, D.E., 2007. Quality of life: An approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being. Ecological economics, 61(2-3), pp.267-276.
  67. Das, D., 2008. Urban quality of life: A case study of Guwahati. Social Indicators Research, 88(2), pp.297-310.
  68. Dorota, Węziak-Białowolska, 2016, Quality of life in cities – Empirical evidence in comparative European perspective, Cities, 58 (2016), 87-96.
  69. Foo, T. S., 2000, Subjective Assessment of Urban Quality of Life in Singapore 1997- 1998, Habitat International, Vol. 24, No. 1.
  70. Ge, J. and Kazunori Hokao, 2006, Research on Residential Lifestyles in Japanese Cities from the Viewpoints of Residential Preference, Residential Choice and Residential Satisfaction, Landscape and Urban Planning, 78, No. 3, PP. 165-178.
  71. Hamam, Serag El Din; Ahmed Shalaby; Hend Elsayed Farouh and Sarah A. Elariane, 2013, Principles of urban quality of life for a neighborhood, Housing and Building National Research Center
    HBRC Journal
    , 9, 86-92. http://elsevier.com/hbrcj
  72. Ibem, E. O., & Aduwo, E. B. 2013. Assessment of residential satisfaction in public housing in Ogun state, Nigeria. Habitat International, 40, 163-175.
  73. Jacobs, A. and Appleyard, D., 1987, Toward an Urban Design Manifesto, JAPA, 531, 112-120.
  74. Kaklauskas, A.; Zavadskas, E.K.; Radzeviciene, A.; Ubarte, I.; Podviezko, A.; Podvezko, V.;
    Kuzminske, A.; Banaitis, A.; Binkyte, A. and Bucinskas, V., 2019, Quality of city life multiple criteria analysis, Cities, 72 (2018), 82-93.
  75. Kline E. 2001. Indicators for sustainable development in urban areas. In: Devuyst D, Hens L, De Lannoy W, editors. How green is the city? USA: Columbia; p. 275–98.
  76. Lansing, J. B., and R. W. Marans.1969. Evaluation of Neighborhood, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 195-199.
  77. MacLean, Laura and Salama, Ashraf M., 2019, Towards A Context Specific and Multidimensional Quality of Urban Life Model, Open House International, 44 (1), 25-33. ISSN 0168-2601.
  78. Marais, L. and Ntema, J., 2013, The upgrading of an informal settlement in South Africa: Two decades onwards, Habitat Habitat International, 39, 85-95.
  79. Marans, R. W. and Couper, M., 2000, Measuring the quality of community life: a program for longitudinal and comparative international research, In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Quality of Life in Cities, Vol. 2, Singapore.
  80. Michelsone, W., 1966, An empirical analysis of urban environmental preferences: j. of the Amer, institute of planner, Vol. 31.
  81. Moser, Gabriel, 2009, Quality of life and sustainability: Toward person–environment congruity, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 351-357.
  82. Nichol, J. and Wong, M. S., 2005, Modeling urban environmental quality in a tropical city, Landscape and urban planning, 731, 49-58.
  83. Owen, K. and Wong, D., 2013, An approach to differentiate informal settlements using spectral, texture, geomorphology and road accessibility metrics, Applied Geography, Vol. 38, PP. 107-118.
  84. Sedaghatnia, S. et al., 2013, An Evaluation of Residents Quality of Life through Neighborhood Satisfaction in Malaysia, Environmental Management and Sustainable Development, Vol. 2, No. 1, PP. 114-125.
  85. Usamah, M.; Handmer, J.; Mitchell, D. ans Ahmed, I., 2014, Can the vulnerable be resilient? Co-existence of vulnerability and disaster resilience: Informal settlements in the Philippines, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Vol. 10, PP. 178-189.
  86. Van Kamp, I.; Leidelmeijer, K.; Marsman, G. and De Hollander, A., 2003, Urban environmental quality and human well-being: towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts; a literature study, Landscape and urban planning, 651, 5-18.




Volume 54, Issue 1
January 2022
Pages 21-43
  • Receive Date: 20 May 2018
  • Revise Date: 01 June 2020
  • Accept Date: 01 June 2020
  • First Publish Date: 21 March 2022