Explaining the factors affecting the efficiency, effectiveness of management and rural participation in the development of the villages of Soomehsara city with a good governance approach

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate in Geography and rural planning, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran

2 Professor, Dep. of Geography, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Dep. of Geography, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Rural governance is an approach against the rural government in the system of administration and control of rural affairs and is a process that is formed based on the interaction between organizations and official institutions of rural administration and organizations and problems of civil society and private sector. Good governance as a new concept in management Rural is important because in recent years the country has sought to implement a significant role for people's participation at all levels, including rural, and to create management mechanisms such as rural councils and rural councils. Good governance is one of the new approaches of the General Directorate of Rural Affairs in the transnational, national and local spheres. One of the regional dimensions of governance is local governance or rural management in both dimensions of supervisory management (councils) and executive management (Dehyar), which refers to the quality of rural affairs management. To analyze and evaluate the factors affecting the efficiency and effectiveness of rural management. In both supervisory and executive oversight, this study seeks to analyze in detail the relationships between what is happening (activities, decisions, and arrangements) and what we expect to achieve (goals and values). There were features that both explained the resources and processes and included the effective result, which can be used to find the unknown and obscure aspects in practice, at which time we can say that good rural governance is a means to one or more goals. It is desirable that it can play an irreplaceable role in the life of rural communities.

Methodology
In this research, first, the required data have been collected, classified and organized, and then the obtained information has been analyzed using descriptive tables, graphs and statistics. In this study, the following statistical methods have been used:
1) Methods of statistics Description: In the description of the collected data and information, the methods used are: frequency, mean, standard deviation.
2) Inferential statistical methods: In this section, according to the research hypotheses, first from Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (to determine whether the data is normal or abnormal) and if normal, Pearson correlation coefficient and paired t-test. , Was used by SPSS statistical software to prove the hypotheses.
Library studies were used by Soomehsara Governor's Office regarding the information of the city's rural districts and rural management experts, statistical yearbooks, articles, specialized books, and information available in government organizations, including the Management and Planning Organization.

Result and Discussion
Evaluation of performance and effectiveness variables in order to study rural management and good management shows that more than 70% of respondents averaged the amount of donors to the tasks of their organizational structures in relation to villages, 59.3% of respondents use the correct usage Dehyaran averages the available resources of the village, more than 48% of the respondents moderate the role of the effectiveness of Dehyaran's actions and activities and continuous reduction of village expenses by Dehyaran in institutionalizing culture, more than 40% the role of village managers in preserving natural resources And highly evaluated its optimal use. More than 70% of rural investment attraction, participation in paying attention to the deprived, pursuing development projects and informing the people are moderate and high. On the other hand, more than 65% of the people have commented on the opinions and suggestions of the villagers, the opinion of the people in choosing Dehyar and the existence of a long-term financial outlook for the village, contrary to the opinions of many middle and high managers.
The results generally show that the presence and follow-up of villagers and other rural managers from the perspective of managers between 40 and 70 percent has a direct impact on the efficiency and effectiveness of rural management and good management.
More than 77% of the respondents moderated their contribution to the tasks of the organizational structures towards the villages, more than 70% of the respondents the effect of continuous reduction of village expenses by villagers in institutionalizing culture, improving the work process of the village and the satisfaction of the villagers was considered moderate and high. The standard deviation of less than one and the opinions of the villagers vary from very low to very high in terms of efficiency and effectiveness.
From the perspective of managers in increasing the participation of villagers in good governance management and improving it in the village, more than 55% of the role of managers in encouraging and paying attention to women's participation in the village, attention to the deprived, pursuing development plans and informing the public And more than 50 percent of them have considered the impact of paying attention to the opinions and suggestions of the villagers, the opinion of the people in choosing Dehyar and the existence of a long-term financial outlook for the village.
According to Pearson correlation test, there is a significant relationship between the efficiency and effectiveness of rural management and good governance and improving management and governance. The relationship between these two variables is direct and the coefficient of t-test. Since the error rate of the relationship is less than 0.05 and according to the coefficient of determination of the relationship, which is considered to be 95% in this research, the research hypothesis is thus confirmed.
According to Couple sample test there is a significant relationship between the efficiency and effectiveness of rural management and good governance and improving management and governance.

Conclusion
The results on the efficiency and effectiveness variables of rural management show that the factors of the amount of villagers' assistance to the tasks of their organizational structures in relation to villages are average, the extent of proper use of rural resources by villagers, Dehyaran has an important role in institutionalizing culture, the role of village managers in maintaining natural resources and its optimal use from the perspective of managers and villagers as effective factors for the efficiency and effectiveness of rural management and good governance. There is a relationship between increasing the efficiency of rural management and good management and improving good management and good management in the study area.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. بدری، سیدعلی؛ اکبریان رونیزی سعیدرضا و قصابی، محمدجواد، 1392، نقش مدیریت محل در توسعة کالبدی سکونتگاه‌های روستایی (مطالعة موردی: شهرستان آران و بیدگل)، پژوهش های روستایی، 4 (2)، 249-276.
  2. بدری‏زاده، زهرا؛ مهدوی، داوود و نوروزی، اصغر، 1396، ارزیابی عملکرد دهیاری‌ها در چارچوب شاخص‌های حکمروایی خوب روستایی) مورد مطالعه: بخش مرکزی شهرستان اصفهان، پژوهش‏های روستایی، 32، 649-662.
  3. جمشیدی، علیرضا؛ جمینی، داود؛ صیدایی، سیداسکندر و جمشیدی، معصومه، 1393، بررسی و تحلیل عملکرد مدیران نوین روستایی در توسعة روستایی (مطالعة موردی: منطقة اورامانات استان کرمانشاه)، برنامه‌ریزی فضایی، 4(4)، 1-24.
  4. حسام، مهدی؛ رضوانی، محمدرضا و آشور، حدیثه، 1393، سنجش رضایتمندی روستاییان از عملکرد دهیاری‏ها با رویکرد حکمروایی خوب روستایی (مطالعة موردی: روستاهای دهستان جنوبی شهرستان گرگان)، آمایش جغرافیایی فضا، 4 (14)، 99-128.
  5. حسینی حاصل، صدیقه؛ رهبری، مهناز و شفیعی ثابت امرئی، ناصر، 1397، سنجش مدیریت روستایی، توانمندسازی ذی‌نفعان محلی و تحولات کالبدی سکونتگاه‌های روستایی (مطالعة موردی: استان سمنان)، مسکن و محیط روستا، 169، 113-128.
  6. حیدری ساربان، وکیل؛ عزیزی، سالار و صائب، شراره، 1397، بررسی تأثیر حکمروایی خوب بر توسعة اقتصاد، اجتماعی روستایی (مطالعة موردی دهستان نازلو چای ارومیه)، ششمین همایش ملی مطالعات و تحقیقات نوین در حوزة علوم جغرافیا، معماری، و شهرسازی ایران.
  7. رحمانی فضلی، عبدالرضا؛ علیپوریان، جهانبخش؛ منشی‌زاده، رحمت‌الله و رحمانی، بیژن، 1395، مدیریت روستایی مبتنی بر رهیافت حکمروایی خوب، ششمین کنفرانس بین‌المللی توسعة پایدار و عمران شهری.
  8. رضایی، محمدرضا؛ علیان، مهدی و خاوریان، امیررضا، 1391، نقش و جایگاه حکمروایی خوب روستایی و ضرورت آن در مدیریت روستایی، همایش ملی توسعة روستایی.
  9. رضایی، حمیدرضا و داوری، علی، 1383، دولت الکترونیک. ماهنامه تدبیر، 146، 17-22.
  10. رکن‌الدین افتخاری، عبدالرضا، 1393، مدیریت توسعة روستایی (بنیان‌های نظری)، تهران: سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی دانشگاه‏ها (سمت) مرکز تحقیق و توسعة علوم انسانی.
  11. رکن‌الدین افتخاری، عبدالرضا، 1382، جایگاه روستا در فرایند توسعة ملی، تهران: انتشارات مؤسسة توسعة روستایی ایران.
  12. رکن‌الدین افتخاری، عبدالرضا؛ عظیمی آملی، جلال؛ پورطاهری، مهدی و احمدی‌پور، زهرا، 1391، ارائة الگوی مناسب حکمروایی خوب روستایی در ایران، ژئوپلوتیک، 26، ‏1-28.
  13. سربرقی مقدم، تکتم؛ بوزرجمهری، خدیجه و قاسمی، مریم، 1395، ارزیابی عملکرد دهیاران در فرایند توسعة پایدار روستایی از دیدگاه روستاییان (مورد مطالعه: بخش طرقبه شهرستان بینالود)، آمایش جغرافیایی فضا، 19، 119-136.
  14. شفیعی ثابت، ناصر؛ خاکسار، سوگند و حسینی، فاطمه‏سادات، 1394، تبیین نقش حکمروایی خوب در پایداری اجتماعی اقتصادی سکونتگاه‌های روستایی (مطالعة موردی: دهستان‌های شهرستان تویسرکان)، دومین همایش ملی افق‌های نوین در توانمندسازی و توسعة پایدار معماری عمران، گردشگری، و محیط زیست شهری و روستایی.
  15. طالشی، مصطفی؛ دربان آستانه، علیرضا و موسوی، سیدعارف، 1396، تبیین الگوی فضایی حکمروایی خوب روستایی پیرامون کلان‌‌شهر کرج، پژوهش‌‌های جغرافیایی برنامه‌ریزی شهری، 5 (4)، 585-606.
  16. عظیمی آملی، جلال و رکن‏الدین افتخاری، عبدالرضا، 1393، حکمروایی روستایی (مدیریت پایدار)، تهران: سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی دانشگاه‏ها (سمت) مرکز تحقیق و توسعة علوم انسانی.
  17. مرادی، ماریا؛ نظری، محمد؛ فتحی، محسن و صادقی، تورج، 1395، مردم‌سالاری و حکمروایی خوب زمینه‌ساز توسعه با تأکید بر جامعة روستایی، نهمین کنگرة پیشگامان پیشرفت.
  18. مرآتی، داوود، ۱۳۹۴، نقش مدیریت دانش در افزایش عملکرد (کارایی و اثربخشی) کارکنان سازمان های دولتی، چهارمین کنفرانس بین المللی حسابداری و مدیریت.
  19. مطیعی لنگرودی، حسن، ۱۳۹۳، برنامه‌ریزی روستایی با تأکید بر ایران، تهران: انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی.
  20. مولایی هشجین، نصراله؛ آمار، تیمور و حاجعلی زاده، احمد، 1393، چالش های مدیریت روستایی از دیدگاه شوراهای اسلامی در ماندگاری جمعیت در روستاهای ناحیه مرکزی اردبیل، جغرافیا، 12(40)، 73-91.
  21. مولایی هشجین، نصراله و حاج علیزاده، احمد، 1397، درآمدی بر آسیب‌شناسی مدیریت روستا در ایران، رشت: انتشارات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی.
  22. مولایی هشجین، نصراله، ۱۳۹۲، برنامه‏ریزی توسعة کالبدی سکونتگاه‌های روستایی در گیلان، رشت: انتشارات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد رشت.
  23. مولایی هشجین، نصراله، ۱۳۹۴، امکان‌سنجی و ارائة مدل مدیریت مجموعه روستایی در روستاهای کوهپایه‌ای و کوهستانی فاقد دهیاری و شورای اسلامی استان گیلان، طرح پژوهشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد رشت، صص ۱۴۲-۱۰۰.
  24. نوروزی، اصغر و ابراهیمی، الهه، 1397، تحقق‏پذیری شاخص‏های حکمروایی خوب در نواحی روستایی شهرستان لنجان، برنامه‌ریزی توسعة کالبدی، 10، 93-109.
  25. Badri, Seyed Ali; Akbarian Ronizi, Saeed Reza and Qasabi, Mohammad Javad, 2013, The role of local management in the physical development of rural settlements (Case study: Aran and Bidgol cities). Rural Research, 4 (2), 249-276.
  26. Bjärstig, T. and Sandström, C., 2017, Public-private partnerships in a Swedish rural context-A policy tool for the authorities to achieve sustainable rural development? Journal of Rural Studies, 49, 58-68.
  27. Bjärstig, T. and Sandström, C., 2017, Public-private partnerships in a Swedish rural context-A policy tool for the authorities to achieve sustainable rural development?, Journal of Rural Studies, 49, 58-68.
  28. Diemuodeke, E. O. and Briggs, T. A., 2018, Policy pathways for renewable and sustainable energy utilisation in rural coastline communities in the Niger Delta zone of Nigeria. Energy Reports, 4, 638-644.
  29.  
  30. Douglas, D. J., 2005, The restructuring of local government in rural regions: A rural development perspective. Journal of Rural Studies, 21(2), 231-246.
  31. Douglas, D. J., 2005, The restructuring of local government in rural regions: A rural development perspective. Journal of Rural Studies, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 231-246.
  32. O. and Briggs, T.A., 2018, Policy pathways for renewable and sustainableenergy utilisation in rural coastline communities in the Niger Delta zone of Nigeria. Energy Reports, 4, 638-644.
  33. Globerman, S. and Shapiro, D., 2002, Global foreign direct investment flows: The role of governance infrastructure. World development, 30(11), 1899-1919.
  34. Globerman, S. and Shapiro, D., 2002, Global foreign direct investment flows: The role of governance infrastructure. World development, 30(11), 1899-1919.
  35. Heidari Sarban, Vakil; Azizi, Salar and Saeb, Sharareh, 2018, Investigating the effect of good governance on rural economic and social development (case study of Nazlu Chai village of Urmia). 6th National Conference on New Studies and Research in Geography, Architecture and Urban Planning, Iran.
  36. Hesam, Mehdi; Rezvani, Mohammad Reza and Ashour, Haditha, 2014, Assessment of villagers' satisfaction with the performance of villagers with a good rural governance approach (Case study: villages of the southern part of Gorgan city), Geographical Planning of Space, 14, 99-128.
  37. Hosseini Hasel, Sedigheh; Rahbari, Mahnaz and Shafi'i Sabet Amrai, Nasser, 2019, Assessment of rural management, empowerment of local stakeholders and physical developments of rural settlements (Case study: Semnan province). Housing and Environment of the Village, 169, 113-128.
  38. Hwang, J.; Park, J. and Lee, S., 2018, The impact of the comprehensive rural village development program on rural sustainability in Korea. Sustainability, 10(7), 24-36.
  39. Hwang, J.; Park, J. and Lee, S., 2018, The impact of the comprehensive rural village development program on rural sustainability in Korea. Sustainability, 10(7), 24-36.
  40. Kaufmann, D.; Kraay, A. and Mastruzzi, M., 2006, Governance matters V: aggregate and individual governance indicators for 1996-2005. The World Bank.
  41. Leclert, L.; Nzioki, R. M. and Feuerstein, L., 2016, Addressing governance and management challenges in small water supply systems–the integrity management approach in Kenya. Aquatic Procedia, 6, 39-50.
  42. Lyon, P., 2000, Partnership for good governance in the 21st century. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 59(3), 87-93.
  43. Lyon, P., 2000, Partnership for good governance in the 21st century. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 59(3), 87-93.
  44. Lyon, P., 2000, Partnership for good governance in the 21st century. Australian Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 87-93.
  45. Matie Langroudi, Hassan, 2003, New management for rural renewal, European and North American experience. Geography and Regional Development, 1.
  46. Mawlawi Hashjin, Nasrallah, 2013, Physical development planning of rural settlements in Gilan. Rasht: Islamic Azad University Press, Rasht Branch.
  47. Mawlawi Hashjin, Nasrallah, 2015, Feasibility study and presentation of the management model of the rural complex in the foothill and mountainous villages without villages and the Islamic Council of Gilan province. Research Project, Islamic Azad University, Rasht Branch, pp. 100-142.
  48. Molaei Hashjin, Nasrallah and Haj Alizadeh, Ahmad, 2018, An Introduction to the Pathology of Rural Management in Iran, Islamic Azad University Press, Rasht.
  49. Rahmani Fazli, Abdolreza; Alipourian, Jahanbakhsh; Manshizadeh, Rahmatollah and Rahmani, Bijan, 2016, Rural Management Based on Good Governance Approach. 6th International Conference on Sustainable Development and Urban Development.
  50. Rezaei, Mohammad Reza; Alian, Mehdi and Khavarian, Amir Reza, 2012, The Role and Position of Good Rural Governance and Its Necessity in Rural Management, National Conference on Rural Development.
  51. Rokanuddin Eftekhari, Abdolreza, 2003, The position of the village in the national development process, Iran Rural Development Institute Publications, Tehran.
  52. Rokanuddin Eftekhari, Abdolreza, 2014, Rural Development Management (Theoretical Foundations), Organization for the Study and Compilation of University Humanities Books (Samt) Research Center for Humanities Research and Development, Tehran.
  53. Rokanuddin Eftekhari, Abdolreza; Azimi Amoli, Jalal; Pourtaheri, Mehdi and Ahmadipour, Zahra, 2012, Presenting a suitable model of good rural governance in Iran, Zhetoplotik, 26, 1-28.
  54. Sharifian Thani, Maryam, 2001, Citizen Participation, Urban Governance and City Management, Urban Management, No. 8.
  55. Stenseke, M., 2009, Local participation in cultural landscape maintenance: lessons Taleshi, Mostafa; Darban Astaneh, Alireza and Mousavi, Seyed Aref, 2018, Explaining the spatial pattern of good rural governance around the metropolis of Karaj. Geographical Research of Urban Planning, 5(4), 585-606.

 

 

 

Human Geography Research
Volume 53, Issue 4
January 2021
Pages 1523-1541

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 02 June 2020
  • Revise Date: 10 January 2021
  • Accept Date: 10 January 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics