Cultural and social integration in Central Eurasia

Document Type : Research Paper


1 Professor, Department of Regional Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 Doctoral student of regional studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran


One of the most important events of the twentieth century was undoubtedly the disintegration of the Soviet Union, which opened a new phase of multidimensional interaction for both successor states and other countries involved in this historical evolution. The post-Soviet countries are confronted with the consequences and legacies of their historical past that have profound implications for the convergence of regional countries. Russia and other post-Soviet countries have inherited similar institutions from the past, including state institutions, political, social and security mentalities, political culture, the style of government-society relations. The newly independent states were trying to solve their domestic problems with the support of foreign powers, but the initial enthusiasm for integration with the Western countries subsided. Similar problems emerged in countries with similar cultural and ethnic structures. It can be argued that the trend toward convergent policies has taken a long time. Shared values and norms and similar mentalities can help Eurasian convergence. In this paper, the concept of social and cultural integration in Eurasia in the post-Soviet era with regard to the soft power of Russia in the Eurasian region is examined by examining the factors of religion, language, media and education to show the social and cultural integration in Eurasia at the level What has been going on within the region and beyond since 1992? It is hypothesized that social and cultural integration in Eurasia, influenced by Russia's soft power, has a clear perspective on political and economic liberalization and the decline of authoritarianism elsewhere in the region and the process of globalization.
In this article, Russia is considered a hegemonic power in the post-Soviet space. Developments in the post-Soviet period show that Russia is unwilling to back down from its role as a regulatory player in Central Eurasian affairs. Russia's post-collapse foreign policy is based on a combination of pragmatism and a commitment to the traditional desire to have a plan for a great power. The position of Central Eurasia in Russian foreign policy has not changed. Russia seeks to excel in Eurasian integration, including cultural and social integration. When Putin came to power, he put bilateral relations with countries in the region on the agenda. Although the organization has not been successful in terms of member convergence, favorable areas for convergence among its members are notable, including the Russian Monroe religion, the presence of racists in the former Soviet republics, and the region's energy and military dependence on Russia. The monopoly economies of these countries, which have made each other dependent on exports and imports, make Russian the second language of most of the republics that survived the collapse of the Soviet Union, maintain border security, and cooperate in the fight against fundamentalism and drug trafficking. In this article, after a brief look at the fate of national cultures in the world era and culture, the impact on regional convergence under the cultural and social treatment of the Soviet era and the soft power of Russia in the Yeltsin and Putin eras. Then check the usability of the software including Russian language, religion and education system. The method of writing this article is descriptive-analytical and with boron collecting data from authoritative scientific sources: books, scientific-research articles and licensed websites.
In this regard each country achieves the preservation and strengthening of its national, ethnic and religious identity through the better cultural integration of the regions. Thus, cultural convergence is not only a threat to preserve and strengthen the identity of the nations of the region, but also confronts external and threatening factors of national identities, such as extremist currents. While the nations of Central Asia and the Caucasus have many historical, cultural, religious and religious ties, due to negligence, incompetence and unfounded aspirations, today some cultural ties originate. Disagreements have become like disputes over cultural and literary luminaries.
The following conditions are necessary to create regional cultural convergence:
- Understand the importance of the issue of extremism as a serious threat and common challenge, by all countries in the region
- Lack of baseless and destructive synergistic superiority
Explain key and common cultural values among the countries of the region
- Group cohesion of the countries of the region and having the spirit of collective work, interaction and cultural synergy
- Active participation of all countries in the region in designing and implementing a roadmap to counter extremist currents and consensus of member countries on this solution
Adequate preparation and flexibility for quick decisions and the use of new, creative and innovative approaches, methods and tools against extremism. The cultural system was formed in 1920-1930 and continued until 1980 despite some changes. In the mid-1980s, Gorbachev made major changes in Soviet culture with the performance of Glasnost and Perestroika, which eased ideological and media pressure on the media and administrative control of the country's educational and cultural institutions. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Yeltsin undertook fundamental economic reforms and encouraged integration with the Western world. First, steps were taken to regain control of Russia in the region. However, the Russian elite sought to expand Russian-Western relations. From 1993 onwards, Russian elites began to emphasize the importance of post-Soviet geography and soft power policies in the region. These efforts were initially made by Yevgeny Primakov and the Eurasianists, but the policies implemented for convergence were not successful. With the advent of the Putin era, Russia began to develop soft power tools by pursuing policies to maximize its interests in the post-Soviet space. In the post-Soviet space, Russia strengthened its position in Central Eurasia as part of a policy of soft power. This ability is based on two important tools: language and education. Russia began to develop multilateral and bilateral relations, in a preventive manner, with the former Soviet republics. Russia is developing its soft power capabilities, but many of its problems have not yet been resolved so that it can be considered a powerful soft power. . Both soft power and hard power policies are implemented in parallel with creating a favorable environment for the Russian Federation in post-Soviet geography.


Main Subjects

  • Alizadeh, Sh. (2018). Culture as a Ariving Force for Eurasian Integration”، Russia، Pyatigorsk، International Project "School of Economic Diplomacy in the Development of Eurasian Integration, 7-12.
  • Arefyev، (2016). Kak Eto Budet Po-Russkiy? ، Ekspert، 14(9)، 1-15
  • Asgarian, A. Tajik, A. & Noroozi, R. (2018). An Overview of Russian Public Diplomacy in Central Asia. Quarterly journal of political strategy, 2(2), 153-
  • Asgharzadeh، (2017). “In Search of a Global Soul: Azerbaijan and the Challenge of Multiple Identities”، Middle East Review of International Affairs، 11(4), 7-25.
  • Barr، (2004). “Higher Education Funding”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 20(2), 13-27.
  • Belenkeyeva، (2015). “Russia’s Overseas Cultural Ties Body Marks 80th Birthday: Interview with Eleonara Mtrofanova, the Head of Roszarubezhcentr”, Available at:, (Accessed on: 22/9/2019).
  • Bilaniuk، & Melnyk، S. (2008). “A Tense and Shifting Balance: Bilingualismad Education in Ukraine”, International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 11(3), 16-32.
  • Charles K. Vincent. & Katarzyna, K. (2016). “Conservative Soft Power: Liberal Soft Power Bias and the “Hidden” Attraction of Russia", Journal of International Relations and Development, DOI: 10.1057/s41268-017-0100-6.
  • Darczewska، (2015). “The Devil is in The Details: Information Warfare in the Light of Russia’s Military Doctrine”, OSW Point of View، Center for Eastern Studies، Warsaw, Available at:, (Accessed on: 22 /9/2019).
  • Dzvelishvili, N. & Kupreishvili, h. (2015), " Russian Influence on Georgian NGOs and Media"، Available at: https://,
  • Eivazi،, Rahim, A. N., & Ali Mohammadi, F. (2016). The Soft Power of Iran and the Shiite Political Currents in West Asia, Journal of Political Sociology of the Islamic World, 4(2), 1-28.
  • Feklyunina, V. (2008). “Battle for Perceptions: Projecting Russia in the West”, Europe-Asia Studies, 60(4), 605-629.
  • Fierman, W. (2006), “Language and Education in Post Soviet Kazakhstan: Kazakh, The Russian Review, 65(1), 98-116.
  • Giger, M., & Sloboda, M. (20 Nye، (2013) ‘What China and Russia Don’t Get About Soft Power’، Foreign Policy، Available at: soft_power، (Accessed on: 25/5/2020). 08), “Language Management and Language Problems in Belarus: Education and Beyond”, International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 11(3 & 4), 318-343.
  • Government expenditure on education (Worldbank) (2020), Available at: on:23/8/2020)
  • Gradirovski, A. & neli, e. (2008), " Russian Language Enjoying a Boost in Post-Soviet States, Available at:, (Accessed on: 13/9/2019).
  • Gradirovski, S., & Esipova, N. (2008). “Russia’s Language could be Ticket in for, Available at: _e.html، (Accessed on: 22 /10/2019).
  • Khitakhunov،, Bulat, M., & Richard, P. (2017). "Eurasian Economic Union: Present and Future Perspectives". Economic Change and Restructuring, 50(1), 59-77.
  • Kirill, G., Kozievskaya, E., & Yatsenko, E., (2018). “Status and Prospects of the Russian Language in the New Independent States”, Eurasian Home Analytical Resource, Available at: on:13/ 9/2019).
  • Koolaee, E. & Sedaghat, M. (2018). Barriers to Convergence in the Commonwelth of Independent States, Iranian Research Letter of International Politics, 1, 81-94.
  • Koolaee, E. (2020). Politics and Government in Central Eurasia, Tehran: SAMT
  • Kornilov, A., & Andrey, M. (2014)," Russia’s Soft Power in the South Caucasus, Routledge.
  • Kramareva, N. & Grix, J. (2019), ‘War and Peace’ at the 1980 Moscowand 2014 Sochi Olympics: The Role of Hard and Soft Power in Russian Identity, The InternationalJournal of the History of Sport. Russia’s Unique Soft Power Strategy. Available at:'s_Unique_Soft_Power_Strategy (Accessed on: 20/6/2019).
  • Kuzio, T. (2016). “Ukraine is not Russia: Comparing Youth Political Activisim”, SAIS Review, 26(71), 77_90.
  • Lane, D. (2016), "Going Forward: The Eurasian Economic Union، The European Union and the Others", LSE IDEAS - Dahrendorf Forum Special Report, Available at:، (Accessed on: 9/13/2019).
  • Laruelle, M. (2015). "The Russian World, Central on Global Interests", 4(2), 17-48.
  • Libman, A. (2017), "Russian Power Politics and the Eurasian Economic Union: The Real and the Imagined", Rising Powers Quarterly, 2(1), 81-103.
  • Liik, K. (2015). "Russia’s Soft Power: The Case of Moldava and Armenia", Master Thesis, University of Tartu, Euro College.
  • Lough, J. (2014). "Russia and Eurasia Programme", Chatham House، the Royal Institute of International Affairs, 9(3), 2-31.
  • Mäkinen, S. (2016). "In Search of the Status of an Educational Great Power?" Analysis of Russia’s Educational Diplomacy Discourse، Available at on: 9/13/2019).
  • Maliukevicus, N. (2017). “Russia’s Information Policy in Lithuania: The Spread of Soft Power or Information Politics?”, Baltic Security and Defence Review, 9(2), 23-38.
  • Martell, L. (2007), "The Third Wave in Globalization Theory", International Studies Review, 9(2),173-196.
  • Mirzaee, A. (2010). A look at Cultural Policies in Russia. The Institute for Iran & Eurasia Studies, 24, 48-49.
  • Moldashev, K. & Mohamed Aslam G. H. (2017). "The Eurasian Union: Actor in the Making?”, Journal of International Relations and Development, 20(1), 215-237.
  • Monaghan, A. (2018). “An Enemy at the Gates or from Victory to Victory”, International Affairs, 84(4), 726-27.
  • Nagzibekova, M. (2008). “Language and Education Policies in Tajikistan”, International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 11(3), 44-65.
  • Nye, (2004). "Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics". New York: PublicAffairs.
  • Nye, (2013) What China and Russia Don’t Get About Soft Power, Foreign Policy, Available at: soft_power، (Accessed on: 25/5/2020).
  • Patriarchia, R. (2009). "The Speech by His Holiness Patriarch Kirill at The Opening of the Third Assembly of the Russian World", Available at:، (Accessed on: 29/6/2019).
  • Pavlenko, A. (2008). " Russian in post-Soviet countries". Russian Linguistics, 32(1), 250-295.
  • Peyrouse, S. (2008). The Russian Minority in Central Asia: Migration Politics, and Language", Available at:, Washington D.C.: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, (Accessed on: 25/10/2019).
  • Roper, S, D. (2015). “The Politicization of Education: Identity Formation in Moldova and Transnistria”, Post-Communist Studies, 38(4), 85-107.
  • Ross, C. (2013). “Putin’s Federal Reforms and the Consolidation of Federalism in Russia: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back!”, Communist and Post Communist Studies, 36(1), 34-45.
  • Rutland, P., & Andrei, K. (2016), “The Limits of Russia’s ‘Soft Power", Journal of Political Power, 9(3), 31-50.
  • Ryazanova-Clarke, L. (2015). From Commodification to Weaponization: the Russian language as ‘Pride’ and ‘Profit’ in Russia's Transnational Discourses, International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism، ISSN: 1367-0050 (Print) 1747-7522 (Online) Journal homepage: Available at: on: 10/5/2019).
  • Sakwa, R. (2008)."Putin: Russia’s Choice", New York: Routledge.
  • Scholte، A. (2008). Defining Globalization، World Economy, 31(11), 85-125.
  • Seldm Ozertem, H. (2009). " Russia’s Soft Power in the Post Soviet Space", a thesis submitted to the graduate school of science of Middle East Technical University.
  • Sergunin, A. & Leonid, K. (2015)," Understanding Russia's Soft Power Strategy "، pp. 349-57.
  • Simbar, R. & Rezapour, D. (2019). Russia's Soft Power Abroad: Tools and Challenges, 4, ( 104. pp. 67_77.
  • Tafuro, E. (2014). “Fatal Attraction? Russia’s Soft Power in its Neighbourhood-Analysis”, Eurasia Review, Available at:، (Accessed on: 8/10/2019)
  • Eurasian Home Analytical Resource, (2019), the Russian Language in the New Independent States”, Eurasian Home Analytical Resource، Avaliable at:,(Accessed on: 13/9/2019).
  • Tishkov, V. (2008), “The Russian World – Changing Meanings and Strategies”, Carnegie Papers, 4(5), 88-95.
  • Tsygankov, A. P. (2016). "Crafting the State-Civilization Vladimir Putin’s Turn to Distinct Values", Problems of Post-Communism, 63(3),146-158.
  • Utyaganova, M. (2009), “Kyrgyzstan Adopts Russian as Official Language”, CACI Analyst, Available at: on: 9/10/20190).
  • Weitz, R. (2006). “Averting a New Great Game in Central Asia”, The Washington Quarterly, 29(3),163-185.
  • Yazdan, P., Droo, K., & Bayat, H. (2015). Effective Geopolitical Elements in the Convergence between Iran, India, Pakistan and Afghanistan and Its Impact on the Southern Regions (comparative method of using contour theory and SPIEGEL), Quarterly Journal of Geography (Regional Planning), 5 (3), 19-33.
  • Zahrani, M. & Shiravand, S. (2018). The Impact of Strategic Culture on the Foreign Policy of the Russian Federation. Central Eurasia Studies, 97,103-137.