Assessing the Activity of Rural Working Groups Against Corona Virus Epidemic (Case study: Rural district of Khoshab county)

Document Type : Research Paper


1 Associate Professor of Geography and Rural Planning, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran

2 Ph.D. Student in Geography and Rural Planning, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.


Currently the geographical spread of Covid 19 in different parts of the world is continuing rapidly. The spread of coronavirus can have negative consequences at the macro and micro levels of rural communities and involve them in economic, social and even environmental issues.The prevalence of this phenomenon has led institutions, organizations and other bodies, as a group or even individually, to take fundamental steps to prevent its spread. Therefore, with the epidemic of corona in rural areas, the economic, social and environmental dimensions have been severely affected, and the appropriate measures of rural working groups in these areas will alleviate the suffering of some villagers. In the agenda of various working groups,including government and governmental officials,specialized and non-specialized groups and organizations, spontaneous groups of people in real and virtual space, organizations and non-governmental organizations, etc. were placed and all with Intensity and weakness have taken steps towards the realization of this important. The issues that involve all areas and elements of the country are multifaceted issues and the consequences of this phenomenon are crystallized in various social, cultural, political and economic areas, and it is obvious that its management and control require accurate information and cognition. These are the effects and consequences. In this regard, the performance of institutions and organizations in the villages is very important because these are the institutions and organizations that can plan for development and guidance of the rural community in terms of structure-function, or slow or stop the development process with improper performance. There is a great variety of measures to reduce injuries and prevent coronation in rural areas, which seems to be very prominent and extensive in the face of the crisis, the role of institutions and organizations in helping and supporting the government and the people. In fact, the most optimistic ways to limit the spread of the disease (it can be the efforts of working groups) are to encourage people to minimize traffic and voluntary quarantine. Therefore, considering the position of villages, the development of which will contribute to regional and national development, the necessity and importance of examining the performance of institutions and organizations in the economic, social, environmental and physical dimensions of villages are determined.Therefore, measuring the performance of rural working groups (including institutions, organizations, grassroots groups,organizations, etc.) in dealing with the spread of coronavirus in rural areas and its effective dimensions has formed the main research question.

The present research is descriptive-analytical in terms of method and its purpose is applied. Theoretical information is obtained by documentary-library method with reference to articles and other sources and quantitative data is based on first-hand information and through semi-structured interview method And has been collected using a questionnaire tool. Therefore, the instrument used in the survey method was a questionnaire based on the Likert scale, which was prepared and developed after reviewing the studies conducted in this field and interviewing experts. The statistical population corresponds to the rural households of Khoshab city. Due to the large number of villages (70 villages), first a list of villages was prepared and then 4 villages (Bulqanabad, Robat Jaz, Neshib and Qarzi) were selected as a sample based on stratified random sampling based on Cochran's formula. Of these 4 villages with 1600 households, 140 households were determined as the sample size of the study .Continuing the activities of institutions and organizations such as council, Dehyar,Jihad-e-Keshavarzi, natural resources,educational institutions, cultural institutions, rural youth organizations, donors, etc. in social, economic and environmental dimensions according to Likert 5 options It was formed with 14 indicators. All of these institutions and organizations are somehow related to the villages and are effective in counteracting the spread of the coronavirus in the villages. These effects are clear and measurable in the context of their tasks. In order to analyze the collected data according to the objectives and questions of the research, from descriptive statistics and inferential statistics (K-S test and T), from the Vickor model to prioritize villages in terms of the effectiveness of institutions and organizations. Corona was used to deal with the spread of the virus, SPSS software was used for statistical operations and data processing, and GIS software was used to map the study area.

Therefore,the general performance of rural working groups in dealing with the spread of coronavirus, had a significant level of less than 0.05. In summary, the performance of institutions and organizations in the villages of Khoshab city in dealing with the corona outbreak have been effective in social, environmental and economic dimensions, respectively, and their performance has been satisfactory from the perspective of villagers. Then, in order to rank the studied villages in terms of the highest activity of institutions and organizations to deal with the corona virus, the Vicor multi-criteria prioritization model has been used.Therefore, the normalized indices are weighted by Shannon entropy matrix method and the sample rural villages are ranked based on the Victor technique.

According to the question raised at the beginning of the study, the results obtained based on statistical tests indicate that, in all studied indicators, the level of significance (sig) is less than 0.05, which indicates a relatively favorable opinion of respondents about the activities of the working group. The results of the T-test also showed that among the performance indicators of organizations and institutions, the index of social distance in the first place, the index of health care in the second place and the index of infrastructure expansion Internet rankings are ranked third, finally, based on the ranking of villages, in terms of the effectiveness of institutions and organizations in combating the outbreak of coronavirus, studies indicate that the village of Bulqanabad ranks first in the service of institutions and organizations. have been allocated to themselves.


Main Subjects

  1. احدنژاد روشنی، محسن؛ قرخلو، مهدی و زیاری کرامت اله. (1387). مدل‌سازی آسیب‌پذیری ساختمان‌های شهرها در برابر زلزله با استفاده از روش فرآیند تحلیل سلسله مراتبی در محیط سیستم اطلاعات جغرافیایی (نمونه موردی: شهر زنجان)، مجله جغرافیا و توسعه، 8 (19)، 171 - 198.
  2. افراخته، حسن. (1399). تحول پارادایمی در اقتصاد فضا (عبور از رویکرد تحلیل فضایی)، فصلنامه اقتصاد فضا و توسعه روستایی، 9 (31)، 1-20.
  3. انجمن علمی توسعه روستایی ایران، بیماری کووید 19، 1399.
  4. ایرنا، کرونا و تأثیر آن بر روستا و کشاورزی اردبیل، 1399، اردیبهشت.-گزارش: پژوهشگاه فرهنگ، هنر و ارتباطات، 1399، مطالعه کشوری دیدگاه شهروندان در خصوص کرونا-موج اول. گروه افکار سنجی و مطالعات افکار عمومی دفتر طرح‌های ملی.
  5. ایمانی جاجرمی، حسین. (1399). پیامدهای اجتماعی شیوع ویروس کرونا در جامعه ایران. فصلنامه علمی و تخصصی، ارزیابی تأثیرات اجتماعی، شماره دوم: ویژه‌نامه پیامدهای شیوع ویروس کرونا-کووید 19، 1، 87 - 103.
  6. تاجری مقدم، مریم، زبیدی، طاهره و یزدان پناه، مسعود. (1399). تحلیل رفتارهای پیشگیرانه در مقابله با ویروس کرونا (مورد نواحی روستایی شهرستان دشتستان)، فصلنامه اقتصاد فضا و توسعه روستایی، 9 (پیاپی 33)، 1-24.
  7. جعفری، علی‌اکبر و فروغی، نسرین. (1394). بررسی و تحلیل پراکندگی بیماری‌های وبا و طاعون در ایران و تأثیر آن‌ها بر گسترش بحران‌های اجتماعی 1210-1264 ه.ق. تاریخ‌نامه ایران بعد از اسلام (نشریه دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی دانشگاه تبریز)، 6 (11)، 71-100.
  8. دانش پور، زهره. (1399). از بحران کرونا، نوع جدیدی از برنامه ریزی شهری باید متولد شود: برنامه ریزی شهری و منطقه‌ای پس از همه‌گیری و درس‌هایی که می‌توان از همه‌گیری کروناویروس 2020 آموخت، پیش چاپ.
  9. دهقان نژاد، مرتضی و مسعود کثیری، 1389، مروری بر تاریخچه مشکلات ایجاد قرنطینه در ایران در دوره ناصرالدین‌شاه (1264-1313 ه.ق/1847-1896 م). پژوهش‌های تاریخی دانشگاه اصفهان. 2(4)، 1-13.
  10. ذوالفقاری، ابوالفضل؛ صابردمبرچی، حسین و باقری، عبدالرضا. (1396). بازنمایی جامعه مدنی در مطبوعات (تحلیل گفتمان جامعه مدنی در مطبوعات ایران در دوره 1393-1388)، جامعه‌شناسی نهادهای اجتماعی، 3، 43-77.
  11. رکن‌آبادی، مرتضی، 1399، فرصت‌های کرونا برای جامعه ایرانی با نگاهی به آینده، نشستی از نشست‌های دکتر ظفری، آینده‌پژوه، نویسنده و عضو هیئت‌علمی دانشگاه، وب‌سایت خبرگزاری صداوسیما.
  12. روزنامه ایران، دهیاران در خط مقدم مدیریت بحران کرونا در روستاها، 1399، فروردین.
  13. سازمان مدیریت پیشگیری، بیماری کووید 19، 1399، فروردین.
  14. شمسینی غیاثوند، حسن. (1399). تأثیرات کرونا بر حکمرانی در ایران، فصلنامه مطالعات منافع ملی، 5(19)، 47-67.
  15. عبدالهی، عادل و رحیمی، علی. (1399). بر ساخت اجتماعی کرونا و سیاست‌های مقابله با آن، مطالعه موردی: کاربران فضای مجازی. فصلنامه علمی و تخصصی، ارزیابی تأثیرات اجتماعی، 1، 43-63.
  16. عزیزپور فرهاد، ریاحی، وحید و عزیزی، سمیه. (1399). تحلیل فضایی شیوع کرونا در ناحیه روستایی دماوند، نشریه تحلیل فضایی مخاطرات محیطی، 7 (4)، 40 –
  17. علینی، محسن. (1379). بررسی نقش محوری جهاد سازندگی در توسعه کشاورزی و عمران روستایی، چاپ اول. تهران: نشر وزارت جهاد سازندگی.
  18. گزارش: خبرگزاری تسنیم،1399، کرونا با اقتصاد ایران و جهان چه می‌کند؟ قابل‌دسترس در
  19. محمودی، محمد. (1382). نقش سیستم‌های اطلاعاتی در مدیریت بحران: مجله فرهنگ مدیریت، 1 (4)، 59-92.
  20. مرکز افکار سنجی ناجا، 1399، طرح افکار سنجی نگرش‌های عمومی در مورد شیوع ویروس کرونا-موج سوم. موسسه فرهنگی و هنری سنجش افکار امین.
  21. مرکز آمار ایران، نتایج سرشماری عمومی،1395.
  22. مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس شورای اسلامی، کرونا با روستاها چه کرده؟ 1399، اردیبهشت.
  23. مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس شورای اسلامی، مقابله با شیوع ویروس کرونا «تحلیل اجمالی بر چالش‌های کسب‌وکار روستایی و عشایری در دوره شیوع کرونا»، 1399، اردیبهشت.
  24. میرزایی، خلیل. (1399). علت‌ها و پیامدهای همه‌گیری و عالم‌گیری ویروس کرونا-کووید 19. فصلنامه علمی و تخصصی، ارزیابی تأثیرات اجتماعی، 2 ، 13 - 41.
  25. Abdollahi, A., & Rahimi, A. (2020). on the social construction of Corona and policies to deal with it, a case study: cyberspace users. Scientific and Specialized Quarterly, Social Impact Assessment, Issue 2: Special Issue on the Consequences of Corona-Covid Virus Outbreak 19, 1, 43-63. [in Persian].
  26. Afrakhteh, H. (2020) Paradigm shift in space economics (passing the spatial analysis approach), Journal of Space Economics and Rural Development, 9(31), 1-20. [in Persian].
  27. Ahadnejad Roshani, M., Gharkhloo, M., & Ziari K. (2008). Modeling the Vulnerability of Urban Buildings to Earthquake Using Hierarchical Analysis Process Method in GIS (Case Study: Zanjan City), Journal of Geography and Development, 19( 8), 171 - 198. [in Persian].
  28. Akter, J. (2020). Human Behavior toward COVID-19. Available on the VID-19. [in Persian].
  29. Alini, M. (2000). A Study of the Pivotal Role of Jihad-Building in Agricultural and Rural Development, First Edition, Published by the Ministry of Jihad-Building, Tehran. [in Persian].
  30. Azizpour, F., Riahi, V., & Azizi, S. (2020). in spatial analysis of corona outbreak in rural Damavand, Journal of Spatial Analysis of Environmental Hazards, 7(4), 40 - 21. [in Persian].
  31. Bennett, K., & Phillipson, J, (2004). A Plague Upon their Houses: Revelations of the Foot and Mouth Disease Epidemic for Business Households. Sociol. Rural, 44(3), 261-284. [in Persian].
  32. Butler, j. (2020). on à Covid-19: O capitalismo tem seuss limits. redebrasilatual [in Persian].
  33. -Daneshpour, z., (2020). out of the coronavirus crisis, a new kind of urban planning must be born: post pandemic urban and regional planning and the lessons that can be learned from coronavirus pandemic 2020,preprint. [in Persian].
  34. Dehghannejad, M., & Kathiri, M. (2010). a review of the history of quarantine problems in Iran during the reign of Nasser al-Din Shah (1213-1413 AH / 1847-1896 AD). Historical Research, University of Isfahan, 2(4), 1-13. [in Persian].
  35. Hartley, D. (2004). Rural health disparities, population health, and rural culture. American Journal of Public Health, 94(10), 1675-1678.
  37. coronavirus-doesn’t-care.
  38. html.
  39. Hutt, R. (2020). the economic effects of COVID-19 around world; economy -trade-travel.
  40. Imani Jajarmi, H. (2020). Social Consequences of Coronavirus Outbreak in Iranian Society. Scientific and Specialized Quarterly, Social Impact Assessment, Issue 2: Special Issue on the Consequences of Corona-Covid Virus Outbreak 19, 1, 87-103. [in Persian].
  41. Institute of Culture, Arts and Communications (2020), a national study of citizens' views on the corona - the first wave. Opinion Poll and Public Opinion Studies Office of the National Planning Office. [in Persian].
  42. IRNA, Corona and its impact on the village and agriculture of Ardabil, 2020, May.
  43. (2020). coronavirus outbreak –Roles & Responsibilities of planning, https:// activities/ wuf10/ coronavirus.
  44. Jafari, A. A., & Foroughi, N. (2015). Study and analysis of the spread of cholera and plague in Iran and their impact on the spread of social crises 1210-1264 AH. History of Iran after Islam (Journal of the Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Tabriz), 6(11), 71-100. [in Persian].
  45. Jenkins, W.D., Bolinski, R., Bresett, J., Van Ham, B., Fletcher, S., Walters, S., & Ouellet, L. (2020). COVID-19 during the Opioid Epidemic-Exacerbation of Stigma and Vulnerabilities. The Journal of Rural Health, 00, 1–3.
  46. Kavookjian, J. (2020). Learning Healthy Habits is Vital in the Time of COVID-19. Available on the -coronavirus.html.
  47. Litman, T. (2020). planners and pandemics: Identifying problems and providing solutions, identifying -problems-and-providing-solutions.
  48. Mahmoudi, M. (2003). The Role of Information Systems in Crisis Management: Journal of Management Culture, 1(5), 59-92. [in Persian].
  49. Majhi, N. (2020).The Sociology of COVID-19 Pandemic. Tathapi(UGC Care Journal), e19: 210-216.
  50. Mirzaei, K. (2020). Causes and Consequences of Coronavirus-Covid Epidemic and Globalization 19. Scientific and Specialized Quarterly, Social Impact Assessment, Issue 2: Special Issue of Coronavirus-Covid Outbreak Outcomes 19, May, pp. 13 Up to 41. [in Persian].
  51. Mitra, S. )(The implications of COVID-19 for rural India, IDR 25 (2020). March,
  52. Morens, D.M., Folkers, G.K., & Fauci, A.S., (2004). The challenge of emerging and reemerging infectious diseases. Nature, 430(6996), 242-249.
  53. Mphande, F.A. (2016). Infectious diseases and rural livelihood in developing countries. Springer, Singapore.
  54. Nelson Michael, A. (2021). The timing and aggressiveness of early government response to COVID-19: Political systems, societal culture, and more. J World Development, 146 (105550), PP: 1-11.
  55. Olaniyi, E. (2020). Socio-economic impacts of novel coronavirus: The policy solutions. ResearchGate, 7, 3-12.
  56. Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.H. (2007). Extended VIKOR method in comparison.
  57. Phillipson, J., Bennett, K., Lowe, P., & Raley, M. (2004). Adaptive responses and asset strategies: The experience of rural micro-firms and Foot and Mouth Disease,Journal of Rural Studies, Vol. 20, No 2, pp. 227-243. .2003.08.006.
  58. Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly, Countering the CoronaVirus Outbreak "Overview of Rural and Nomadic Business Challenges in the Corona Outbreak", May 2020. [in Persian].
  59. Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly,What has Corona done to the villages? May 2020. [in Persian].
  60. Reynolds, M. (2020). What is coronavirus and how close is it to becoming a pandemic? Wired UK. ISSN0978-1357. Archived from the original on 5 March 2020. Retrieved 5March 2020.
  61. Scientific Association of Rural Development of Iran, Covid disease 19, 2020[in Persian].
  62. Shamsini Ghiasvand, H. (2020). The Effects of Corona on Governance in Iran, Quarterly Journal of National Interest Studies, 5(19), 47-67. [in Persian].
  63. Wise, T., Zbozinek, T. D., Michelini, G., & Hagan, C. C. (2020). Changes in risk perception and protective behavior during the first week of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. 1-13.
  64. World Economic Forum. (2020). Strategic Intelligence:COVID-19; https: //intelligence.
  65. Zhu, N., Zhang, D., Wang, W., Li, X., Yang, B., Song, J. & Niu, P. (2020). A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. New England Journal of Medicine, 382, 727-733.
  66. Zolfaghari, A., Saberd Damberchi, H., & Bagheri, A., (2017). Representation of Civil Society in the Press (Analysis of Civil Society Discourse in the Iranian Press in 2009-2010), Sociology of Social Institutions, 3, 43-77. [in Persian].                                                                                                                 
Volume 54, Issue 4
December 2022
Pages 1435-1452
  • Receive Date: 16 August 2020
  • Revise Date: 16 November 2021
  • Accept Date: 23 November 2021
  • First Publish Date: 23 November 2021