Land suitability assessment and hospital waste management using quantitative methods Case study: Kerman city

Document Type : Research Paper


1 PhD Student in Environment, Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Environment, Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

3 Professor of Environment, Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran


Extended Abstract


Nowadays, the problems of solid waste, which is the natural output of human daily activities, have become one of the most important issues. The amount of solid waste generated has increased significantly over the past three decades, and the characteristics of the waste have changed due to changes in people's lifestyles, developments in the environmental industry, and significant population growth. In many developing countries, inappropriate management of hospital and health care waste has direct adverse effects on community health and the environment. Solid and hospital wastes are mixed and complex subjects and at the same time critical for cities. It is predicted that waste production will increase from 1.3 billion tons per year to 2.2 billion tons by 2020. As a result, many cities in developing countries face many problems in landfill management. The city of Kerman, like other cities in the third world, has experienced population growth in different periods of time and this growth and development of urban planning in most developing countries has become an uncontrollable process. Hospital waste disposal machines in Kerman are operating with limited capacity and identifying a suitable location for the establishment of the main hospital waste disposal center of medical, medical and laboratory centers seems necessary. The main purpose of this research is to find the safest place and the most efficient scenario for disposing of hospital waste in Kerman.


In this research, information has collected through library, field studies and descriptive-analytical methods. Scope of the study is the political border of Kerman city. In the first step, the most effective criteria and data identified; Data related to communication routes, waterways, rural urban areas have removed from the 1: 25000 topographic map as the main research tool. The slope layer also has extracted from the Aluss-Palsar. The geological layer extracted from the 1: 100000 scale geological map. Land use maps and protected areas extracted from Landsat 2020 satellite imagery. After classifying the available indicators, valuable questionnaires 1 to 9 provided to experts to prioritize the indicators. At this stage, each layer evaluated and prepared based on how it affects the determination of suitable land for sanitary burial. Then, using GIS software and AHP-Fuzzy model, the optimal location was determined to determine the landfill of hospital waste in Kerman. In order to evaluate the scenarios of hospital waste management in Kerman, Fuzzy- RIAM method used. In the fuzzy Riam method,first the activities of each project are identified and then their effects on each of the environmental components, including physical / chemical, biological / ecological, social / cultural, economic / technical parameters, are determined.

Results and discussion

In the AHP model, the slope criterion with a score of 0.218 has the highest weight among the studied indicators, followed by lithology and distance from the waterway. The location of landfills due to issues such as water pollution, air pollution, pests, dust, fire, traffic and noise, as well as the economic cost of the surrounding areas cause dissatisfaction of urban and rural residents. Accordingly, in the distance index from the city, the distance of 35-45 km has gained the most weight. The most desirable distance for rural areas according to the obtained weights is 5-10 km. According to Figure 10, the density of villages in the western and southwestern parts of the city has reached a maximum. Waterways and rivers are very sensitive to the entry of pollutants into their systems. According to the results, the distance from the waterways should be at least 3 km. Figure 12 shows the distance of waterways at the city level. The Protected Area is located in the southwest of the region, which is of great ecological importance. According to the results, the most appropriate distance from protected areas is more than 4 km. Among all the land uses in Kerman city, the highest weight related to barren lands and then poor pastures. The most unsuitable places for landfilling are located in the western and southern parts of the region, which mainly include agriculture and orchards. The most suitable slope for landfilling is less than 5 degrees and the aftermath is 5 to 10 degrees. Geologically, in the city of Kerman, the western and northwestern parts are in an unfavorable situation, because these parts are the location of young bed alluvium and alluvial fans, which provide agricultural land. The density of the fault in the western part of the region and parallel to the eastern heights of Kerman has made this area unsuitable for locating landfills. According to the criteria studied in this study, waste landfills are located more than 35 km from the city of Kerman and more than 5 km from the surrounding villages. In the study area, suitable places for disposal of hospital waste cover an area of about 17,000 square kilometers, which covers 37% of the area. Evaluation of waste management scenarios showed that plasma method in hospital waste management has the least negative environmental impact in terms of physical-chemical components and in terms of biological-ecological components and the most negative effect in terms of economic-technical components is related to plasma.


The results of the AHP-Fuzzy model showed that the most unsuitable places for landfilling of hospital waste in Kerman city for reasons such as location on permeable formations, proximity to fault lines, high groundwater level, proximity to protected areas and proximity to residential centers in the western parts of the region and the central part of the region is studied. In case of financing the plasma method, this method recommended for hospital waste management in Kerman. The least negative effect in terms of economic-technical (operational) components related to the landfill.


Main Subjects

  1. آدینه‌وند، احمد؛ کریمی، حاجی و آزادخانی، پاکزاد. (1395). تحلیل مکان‌یابی دفن پسماند شهری با استفاده از GIS (مطالعه موردی: شهر قیر)، فصلنامه برنامه‌ریزی منطقه‌ای، 8 (30)، 138-127.
  2. صمیمیان، مهدی؛ محمدرضا زندمقدم. (1396). مکان‌یابی محل دفن پسماند زباله‌های شهری با رویکرد زیست‌محیطی (مطالعه موردی: قائم‌شهر)، مجله کاربرد سیستم اطلاعات جغرافیایی و سنجش‌ازدور در برنامه‌ریزی، 8 (2)، 10-1.
  3. Adeofun, C. O., Achi, H. A., Ufoegbune, G. C., Gbadebo, A. M., & Oyedepo, J. A. (2012). Application of remote sensing and geographic information system for selecting dumpsites and transport routes in Abeokuta, Nigeria. COLERM Proceedings, 1, 264-278.
  4. Adinevand, A., Karimi, H., Azadkhani, P. (2015). Location analysis of municipal waste landfill using GIS (Case study: Qir city), Regional Planning, N30T 127-138
  5. AlHumid, H. A., Haider, H., AlSaleem, S. S., Shafiquzamman, M., & Sadiq, R. (2019). Performance indicators for municipal solid waste management systems in Saudi Arabia: selection and ranking using fuzzy AHP and PROMETHEE II. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 12(15), 1-23.
  6. Ali, S. A., & Ahmad, A. (2020). Suitability analysis for municipal landfill site selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and geospatial technique. Environmental Earth Sciences, 79, 1-27.
  7. Babalola, A., & Busu, I. (2011). Selection of landfill sites for solid waste treatment in Damaturu Town-using GIS techniques. Journal of Environmental Protection, 2(01), 1.
  8. Babanyara, Y., Poor Medical Waste Management (MWM) practices and its risks to human health and the environment: a literature review. Int J Environ Ealth Sci Eng, 2013. 11(7): p. 1-8.
  9. Badi, I., & Kridish, M. (2020). Landfill site selection using a novel FUCOM-CODAS model: A case study in Libya. Scientific African, 9, e00537.
  10. Balasooriya, B. M. R. S., Vithanage, M., Nawarathna, N. J., Zhang, M., & Herath, G. B. B. (2014). Solid waste disposal site selection for Kandy District, Sri Lanka integrating GIS and risk assessment.
  11. Davami, A. H., Moharamnejad, N., Monavari, S. M., & Shariat, M. (2014). An urban solid waste landfill site evaluation process incorporating GIS in local scale environment: a case of Ahvaz city, Iran. International Journal of Environmental Research, 8(4), 1011-1018.
  12. Ebistu, T. A., & Minale, A. S. (2013). Solid waste dumping site suitability analysis using geographic information system (GIS) and remote sensing for Bahir Dar Town, North Western Ethiopia. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 7(11), 976-989.
  13. Estay-Ossandon, C., Mena-Nieto, A. and Harsch, N. (2018). Using a fuzzy TOPSIS-based scenario analysis to improve municipal solid waste planning and forecasting: a case study of Canary archipelago (1999–2030). J. Cleaner Prod., 176(12); 1198-1212.
  14. Ghasemzade R, Pazoki M (2017), Estimation and modeling of gas emissions in municipal landfill (Case study: Landfill of Jiroft City), Pollution 3 (4), 689-700
  15. Givargis, S., Dabiri, A., Hakiminejad, N.,Mahmoodi, M. and Semiromi, F. B. (2018).Comparing Mamdani And Sugeno hierarchical fuzzy systems for environmental impact assessment: a pipeline project case study. Environ. Eng. Manage. J., 17(7); 114-126.
  16. Güler, D., & Yomralıoğlu, T. (2017). Alternative suitable landfill site selection using analytic hierarchy process and geographic information systems: a case study in Istanbul. Environmental Earth Sciences, 76(20), 1-13.
  17. Javaheri, H., Nasrabadi, T., Jafarian, M. H., Rowshan, G. R., & Khoshnam, H. (2006). Site selection of municipal solid waste landfills using analytical hierarchy process method in a geographical information technology environment in Giroft. Journal of environmental health science & engineering, 3(3), 177-184.
  18. Kabir, Z., & Khan, I. (2020). Environmental impact assessment of waste to energy projects in developing countries: General guidelines in the context of Bangladesh. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 37, 100619.
  19. Kabir, Z., & Khan, I., 2020. Environmental impact assessment of waste to energy projects in developing countries: General guidelines in the context of Bangladesh. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 37, 100619.
  20. Kharat, M. G., Kamble, S. J., Raut, R. D., Kamble, S. S., & Dhume, S. M. (2016). Modeling landfill site selection using an integrated fuzzy MCDM approach. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2(2), 53.
  21. Le Hoang, S. O. N. (2014). Optimizing municipal solid waste collection using chaotic particle swarm optimization in GIS based environments: a case study at Danang city, Vietnam. Expert systems with applications, 41(18), 8062-8074.
  22. Leao, S., Bishop, I., & Evans, D. (2001). Assessing the demand of solid waste disposal in urban region by urban dynamics modelling in a GIS environment. Resources, conservation and recycling, 33(4), 289-313.
  23. K.Mondal, Rashmi, B.V.Dasgupta (2010). EIA of municipal solid waste disposal site in Varanasi using RIAM analysis, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54(9), 541-546
  24. Mahdad, F., & Lanjabi, F. (2016). Application RIAM in Environmental Impact Assessment of solid waste management in Nur city, Iran. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology.
  25. Malakahmad, A., Bakri, P. M., Mokhtar, M. R. M., & Khalil, N. (2014). Solid waste collection routes optimization via GIS techniques in Ipoh city, Malaysia. Procedia Engineering, 77, 20-27.
  26. Mănoiu, V., Fontanine, I., Costache, R., Prăvălie, R., & Mitof, I. (2013). Using GIS techniques for assessing waste landfill placement suitability. Case study: Prahova County, Romania. Geogr Tech, 8(2), 47-56.
  27. Markku Kuitunen, Kimmo Jalava, Kimmo Hirvonen (2008). Testing the usability of the Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix (RIAM) method for comparison of EIA and SEA results, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 28, 312–320
  28. Melo, A. L., Calijuri, M. L., Duarte, I. C., Azevedo, R. F., & Lorentz, J. F. (2006). Strategic decision analysis for selection of landfill sites. Journal of Surveying Engineering, 132(2), 83-92.
  29. Mourhir, A., Rachidi, T., Papageorgiou, E. I., Karim, M., & Alaoui, F. S. (2016). A cognitive map framework to support integrated environmental assessment. Environ. Modell. Software, 77(15); 81 -94.
  30. Oyinloye, M. A. (2013). Using GIS and remote sensing in urban waste disposal and management: A focus on Owo LGA, Ondo State, Nigeria. European International Journal of Science and Technology, 2(7), 106-118.
  31. Pasalari, H., Nodehi, R. N., Mahvi, A. H., Yaghmaeian, K., & Charrahi, Z. (2019). Landfill site selection using a hybrid system of AHP-Fuzzy in GIS environment: A case study in Shiraz city, Iran. MethodsX, 6, 1454-1466.
  32. Samal, B., Mani, S. and Madguni, O. (2020). Open dumping of waste and its impact on our water resources and health—a case of New Delhi, India. Recent Dev. Waste Manage, 26(5);127-154.
  33. Samimian, M., Zandmoghadam,M.R. 2016. Location of municipal waste landfill with environmental approach (Case study: Ghaemshahr), Geographic Information and Remote Sensing in Planning, N 2, PP 1-10.
  34. Şener, Ş., Sener, E., & Karagüzel, R. (2011). Solid waste disposal site selection with GIS and AHP methodology: a case study in Senirkent–Uluborlu (Isparta) Basin, Turkey. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 173(1), 533-554.
  35. Sharholy, M., Ahmad, K., Vaishya, R. C., & Gupta, R. D. (2007). Municipal solid waste characteristics and management in Allahabad, India. Waste management, 27(4), 490-496.
  36. Shayesteh AA, Koohshekan O, Khadivpour F, Kian M, Ghasemzadeh R, Pazoki M (2020). Industrial waste management using the rapid impact assessment matrix method for an industrial park, Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management 6 (2), 261-274
  37. Soltani, A., Hewage, K., Reza, B., & Sadiq, R. (2015). Multiple stakeholders in multi-criteria decision-making in the context of municipal solid waste management: a review. Waste Management, 35, 318-328.
  38. Sule, J. O., Aliyu, Y. A., & Umar, M. S. (2014). Application of GIS in Solid Waste Management in Chanchaga Local Government Area of Niger State, Nigeria. IOSR J. Environ. Sci. Toxicol. Food Technol, 8, 17-22.
  39. Sumathi, V. R., Natesan, U., & Sarkar, C. (2008). GIS-based approach for optimized siting of municipal solid waste landfill. Waste management, 28(11), 2146-2160.
  40. Wang Shen J. YeXu D. YujingZhang Y., Yang W., Xinwu L., Wang J., Zhang L., Pan L., (2020). Disinfection technology of hospital wastes and wastewater: Suggestions for disinfection strategy during coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in China, Environmental Pollution, 262, 114665
  41. Yildirim, V. (2012). Application of raster-based GIS techniques in the siting of landfills in Trabzon Province, Turkey: a case study. Waste Management & Research, 30(9), 949-960.
Volume 54, Issue 4
December 2022
Pages 1453-1471
  • Receive Date: 03 November 2021
  • Revise Date: 22 November 2021
  • Accept Date: 23 November 2021
  • First Publish Date: 23 November 2021