A critical approach to the impact of urbanization of capital on public spaces in the city

Document Type : Research Paper


1 geography and urban planning- Faculty of Planning and Environmental Sciences- tabriz university

2 Department urban planning- Faculty of geography and environment sciences- Tabriz university- tabriz- Iran

3 Faculty of Earth Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran


Introduction: Today, cities are the platform for many role-plays in the world, and day by day, the urban space is undergoing many changes and transformations. Since the 1980s, urban spaces have become a place for capital and capitalist systems to play a role, affecting various aspects of human life. According to Lefebvre, space has become a place for social conflict in which the main actors are the active political economy in these areas. Different approaches have been taken to the impact of urban spaces, which some see as the result of a new form of capitalism. Harvey sees space as an inseparable element. space needs capital for achieving development and capital to accumulate space to survive. Others see space as the source of market freedom and economic competition and capital. It leads to the stimulation of competition among urban spaces and considers space as an object and a tradable commodity, and another group considers the development and evolution of urban space as a result of technology, political, economic conditions. It is not society that is society itself and it cannot be separated. The capitalist system has three main characteristics; The freedom of economic competition, the pursuit of profit through democracy and mass consumption, as well as the freedom of choice of consumers, which have confronted the urban space with many institutional, political, and physical changes. Also, this system has faced the phenomenon of economic accumulation and has led to the transition of the investment process from industry to urban real estate and urban centers and public spaces to the center of social consumption in various areas such as sanitation services, education, housing, The impact of this system on public spaces is also very clear; Spaces where access and presence of all are possible regardless of social characteristics such as class differences, gender, race, age, etc.; Spaces that produce a sense of belonging, identity, and the true meaning of the right to the city have been transformed into public spaces with diverse but inappropriate role-playing for human and social action and reactions. Spaces have been taken away. Today, these spaces have become places for decision-making, wealth, and power, and have pushed urban residents to the margins, and capitalism, in its transition to urbanization has transformed public spaces into commodities, private, multifunctional, isolated and It has formed a class, controlled and secure, with a low degree of democracy and the emergence of consumer products. In this formality, the role of governments should not be overlooked. In the past, governments monopolized the exercise of power and the payment of quasi-tribute and provided order and security, but the capitalist system changed the role of government in the form of the nation-state. have given. Governments, while having relative autonomy, are closely linked to the flow of capital and somehow support the survival of the capitalist system and the cycle of capital accumulation. In the field of economic affairs and issues of spatial empowerment of capital and capitalists, and check and support the principles of public spaces. Of course, globalization to some extent has led governments to try to link cities and different spaces with this global phenomenon and benefit from its positive economic and political effects regardless of social and cultural consequences. Today, public spaces due to the neglect of institutions Public and governmental have lost an important part of their historical nature and identity, which originated from the social and political actions of its inhabitants, and have become places solely for the sake of greater profit and rent and monopoly. Also, such spaces, unlike in the past, are not accessible to all sections of society, and an important part of urban society is gradually pushed from the public spaces of the city to the outskirts of cities and the city is occupied by affluent and upper classes of society. And will take on a variety of maps. This consequence of the urbanization of capital is exactly the opposite of the concept of the right to the city, and advocacy approaches to capital and accumulation have led to the exorbitant social and geographical costs of capital performance for the lower classes of urban society.

Methodology: This the study, with a critical view on the impact of the capitalist system and its second cycle, or in other words, the transfer of capital accumulation from the first cycle (industrial production) to the second cycle of capital accumulation (urban real estate), intends to study the effect by documentary and library methods. Capitalization and the flow of accumulation on the public spaces of cities. The findings of this study, which focuses on this issue, show that in In recent decades, public spaces in the city, which were before a place for social and civic activities, under the influence of the spatial performance of capital in controlling changing public spaces in They are their own identity and this has caused these public spaces to become more and more out of their public function and to become neighborhoods that give profit for the owners of capital and move the majority of urban residents to the outskirts.

Results and discussion: Thus, the urban public space is a scene in which the story of collective life unfolds, and in this space, there is an opportunity for some social boundaries to be broken and unplanned confrontations to occur and for people to communicate in the new social environment and the capitalist system. These spaces will inject civic life into the body of the city by facilitating the flow of citizenship through the sense of human belonging to the environment (space made physically) and to society (by facilitating human interactions with each other).

Conclusion: Therefore capitalist system and accumulation cycle have undergone many changes and transformations


Main Subjects

  1. افراخته، حسن و حججی پور، محمد. (1394). اقتصاد سیاسی فضا و تعادل منطقه‌ای ایران. فصلنامه اقتصاد فضا و توسعه روستایی، 4 (4)، 110-87.
  2. امانپور، سعید و سجادیان، مهیار. (1396). لیبرالیسم و شهر؛ کنکاشی بر نسبت لیبرالیسم و برنامه‌ریزی شهری. فصلنامه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری چشم‌انداز زاگرس، 9 (32)، 119-88.
  3. برنر، نیل؛ مارکوزه، پیتر و مارگیت، مایر. (1396). شهرها برای مردم نه برای سوداگری. ترجمه دکتر محمود عبدالله زاده، تهران: دفتر پژوهش‌های فرهنگی.
  4. پاپلی یزدی، محمدحسین و رجبی سناجردی، حسین. (1392). نظریه‌های شهر و پیرامون. چاپ دوم، تهران: انتشارات سمت.
  5. ترکمه، آیدین. (1395). اقتصاد سیاسی فضا (مطالعه موردی: محله هرندی تهران)، اولین همایش بین‌المللی اقتصاد شهری (با رویکرد اقتصاد مقاومتی، اقدام و عمل).
  6. ستارزاده، داریوش. (1389). فضای شهری، اندیشه‌ای اجتماعی. نشریه علوم و تکنولوژی محیط‌زیست، 12 (4)، 183-173
  7. سرور، رحیم و مسگریان، هومن. (1395). بررسی نقش مؤلفه‌های تأثیرگذار اقتصاد سیاسی بر سازمان‌یابی فضایی شهری با تأکید بر تهران. چهارمین کنگره بین‌المللی عمران، معماری و توسعه شهری، تهران، دبیرخانه دائمی کنفرانس، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی.
  8. شارع­پور، محمود. (1394). حق به شهر و فضاهای عمومی شهری. فصلنامه مردم و فرهنگ، 1 (2)، 66-51.
  9. کلانتری، عبدالحسین و صدیقی کسمایی، مینو. (1396). از مطالبه حق به شهر تا شکل‌گیری انقلاب شهری (شهر تهران. سال 1357). مطالعات جامعه‌شناختی شهری (مطالعات شهری)، 7 (23)، 77-53.
  10. گونورادنا، کانیشکا؛ کیفر، استفان؛ ریچارد، ملیگرام و کریستین، اشمید. (1393). فضا، تفاوت، زندگی روزمره خوانش هانری لوفور. مترجمین: افشین خاکباز، محمد فاضلی، چاپ اول، تهران: انتشارات تیسا.
  11. هاروی، دیوید. (1392). شهری شدن سرمایه چرخه دوم انباشت سرمایه در تولید محیط مصنوع. ترجمه عارف اقوامی مقدم، چاپ اول، تهران: نشر دات.
  12. یوسفیان اهری، حمید و جلالی، صدیقه. (1395). بررسی نقش اقتصاد سیاسی در فضاهای شهری امروزی با تأکید بر شهر تبریز. چهارمین کنفرانس ملی توسعه پایدار در علوم جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی، معماری و شهرسازی، تهران، موسسه آموزش عالی مهر اروند، مرکز راهکارهای دستیابی به توسعه پایدار.
  13. Alvares, L.C. & Barbosa, J.L. (2018). Urban public spaces: From Planned Policies to Everyday Politics (illustrated with Brazilian case studies).
  14. Amanpour, S., & Sajjadian, M. (2016). Liberalism and the city; Exploring the relationship between liberalism and urban planning. Zagros Landscape Geography and Urban Planning Quarterly, 9 (32), 119-88. [in Persian].
  15. Apostol, I. (2007). The production of public spaces: Design dialectics and pedagogy. University of Southern California.
  16. Bauman, Z. (2007). Vida líquida. Jorge Zahar, Rio de Janeiro
  17. Brenner, N. (2004). New state spaces: urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. Oxford University Press.
  18. Brenner, N., Marcuse, P., & Margaret, M. (2016). Cities are for people, not for business. Translated by Dr Mahmoud Abdullahzadeh, Tehran: Cultural Research Office. [in Persian].
  19. Castells, M. (1996). The space of flows. The rise of the network society, 1, 376-482.
  20. Evans, C.M. (2015). Upgrading from below: A collective approach to the right to the city in the Federal District. Mexico (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
  21. Farakhta, H., & Hajjipour, M. (2014). The political economy of space and regional balance of Iran. Journal of Spatial Economics and Rural Development, 4(4), 110-87. [in Persian]
  22. Gonorradena, K., Kiefer, S., Richard, M., & Christian, S. (2013). Space, difference, everyday life reading Henri Lefebvre. Translators: Afshin Khakbaz, Mohammad Fazli, first edition, Tehran: Tisa Publications. [in Persian].
  23. Harvey D. (2012). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution, Verso, London, and New York, 2012. Panoeconomicus, 60(5), 699-705.
  24. Harvey, D. (2006). Space as a keyword(pp. 70-93). na.
  25. Harvey, D. (2012). The urbanization of capital is the second cycle of capital accumulation in producing the artificial environment. Translated by Arif Ohogi Moghadam, first edition, Tehran: Nash Dat. [in Persian].
  26. Hudson, R (2004). Conceptualizing economies and their geographies: spaces, flows and circuits. Progress in Human Geography, 28(4), pp.447-471.
  27. Jagannath, T. (2018). Theories on public spaces: A case study of Trafalgar Square. [online].
  28. Jessop, Bob. (1982). The capitalist state. New York: New York University Press.
  29. Kalantari, A. H., & Sedighi Kasmai, M. (2016). From demanding the right to the city to the formation of the urban revolution (Tehran, 1357). Urban Sociological Studies (Urban Studies), 7(23), 53-77. [in Persian].
  30. Khan, A.Z., Moulaert, F., & Schreurs, J. )2013). Epistemology of space: Exploring relational perspectives in planning, urbanism, and architecture. International Planning Studies, 18(3-4), 287-303
  31. Krätke, S. (2014). Cities in contemporary capitalism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(5), 1660-1677.
  32. Kuymulu, M.B. (2014). Claiming the right to the city: Towards the production of space from below.
  33. Landingin, N. (2013). Capital Spaces: The Multiple Complex Public Spaces of a Global City.
  34. Leary-Owhin, M. (2015). A Fresh Look at Lefebvre’s Spatial Triad and Differential Space: A Central Place in Planning Theory?. In 2nd Planning Theory Conference University of the West of England (pp. 1-8).
  35. Lefebvre, H. (1969). The explosion: Marxism and the French upheaval(Vol. 12). NYU Press.
  36. Lefebvre, H. (2003). The urban revolution. U of Minnesota Press.
  37. Lefebvre, H. and Nicholson-Smith, D. (1991). The production of space(Vol. 142). Blackwell: Oxford.
  38. Lefebvre, H., Kofman, E., & Lebas, E. (1996). Writings on cities(Vol. 63). Oxford: Blackwell.
  39. Madanipour, A. (2003). Public and private spaces of the city. Routledge.
  40. Marušić, B.G., Nikšič, M. & Coirier, L. eds. (2010). Human cities: celebrating public space. Stichting Kunstboek
  41. Massey, D., & Massey, D. B. (2005). For space. Sage.
  42. Mitchell, D. (1995). The end of public space? People's Park, definitions of the public, and democracy. Annals of the association of american geographers, 85(1), 108-133.
  43. Mitchell, D. (2003). The right to the city: Social justice and the fight for public space. Guilford press.
  44. Mitchell, D. (2017). People’s Park again: on the end and ends of public space. Environment and planning A: economy and space, 49(3), 503-518.
  45. Morton, A.D. (2017). Spatial political economy. Journal of Australian Political Economy, The, 79, 1-21.
  46. Papli Yazdi, M. H., & Rajabi Sanajerdi, H. (2012). Theories of the city and surroundings. 2nd edition, Tehran: Somit Publications. [in Persian].
  47. Parkinson, J. (2012). Democracy and public space: The physical sites of democratic performance. Oxford University Press
  48. Poulantzas, N.A. & O'Hagan, T. (1973). Political power and social classes(pp. 195-224). London: NLB.
  49. Rohit, Sh. (2015). David Harvey: City as space for change
  50. Sager, T. (2011). Neo-liberal urban planning policies: A literature survey 1990–2010. Progress in planning, 76(4), 147-199
  51. Santos Junior, O.A.D. (2014). Urban common space, heterotopia and the right to the city: Reflections on the ideas of Henri Lefebvre and David Harvey.  Revista Brasileira de Gestão Urbana, 6(2),146-157.
  52. Sarwar, R., & Mesgarian, H. (2015). Examining the role of influential components of political economy on urban spatial organization with an emphasis on Tehran. The 4th International Congress on Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Development, Tehran, Permanent Secretariat of the Conference, Shahid Beheshti University. [in Persian].
  53. Sarwat J., & Ahmed Saber Mahmud. (2015). What Is Capitalism?. Finance & Development.
  54. Sattarzadeh, D. (2011). Urban space, social thought. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 12 (4), 173-183[in Persian].
  55. Saygın, Y.N. (2006). Commodification’of Cities: Promoting Izmir (Turkiye) as a World City. In 42 ndISoCARP Congress.
  56. Scott, B.R., (2006). The political economy of capitalism.
  57. Sharāpur, M. (2014). The right to the city and public urban spaces. People and Culture Quarterly, 1 (2), 51-66. [in Persian].
  58. Smiley, K.T. and Emerson, M.O (2018). A spirit of urban capitalism: market cities, people cities, and cultural justifications. Urban Research & Practice, 12, 1-18.
  59. Soja, E.W. (1989). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory.
  60. Turkmen, A. (2015). The political economy of space (case study: Harandi neighbourhood of Tehran). the first international conference on the urban economy (with the approach of resistance economy, action and practice). [in Persian].
  61. Yousufian Ahri, H., & Jalali, S. (2015). Investigating the role of political economy in today's urban spaces with an emphasis on Tabriz city. The 4th National Conference on Sustainable Development in the Sciences of Geography and Planning, Architecture and Urban Planning, Tehran, Mehr Arvand Institute of Higher Education, Center for Sustainable Development Solutions. [in Persian].