Investigating the consequences of the construction of the Turkish border wall on the activities of the border residents of the Islamic Republic of Iran

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Command and Control, Air Defense University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Department of Political Geography, Central Tehran Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Extended Abstract
Introduction
As a spatial-geographical phenomenon, the border is one of the important geopolitical factors in the political management of space in any country in the direction of development, stable security, and power generation. Optimal and intelligent management of border areas is directly related to economic and social development as well as sustainable security. Modern governments needed clear boundaries for their sphere of authority in a land. Borders are producers of multiple opportunities and threats, and recognizing opportunities and reducing threats based on national interests and security in border areas is the way to achieve sustainable development and create a bridge between the core of the country and border areas in order to create coherence and balance in development.
Meanwhile, the borders of the Southwest Asia region in general and the borders of Iran as a regional power with a sensitive geopolitical position, in particular, are more sensitive due to the role of the colonial powers in drawing the political geography of the region regardless of the ethno-cultural and historical perspectives. The sense of divergence in border areas is strongly affected by the presence of complex and nested borders in mental and objective dimensions. In the meantime, Iran's geography in Southwest Asia has an important strategic and geopolitical position in regional and global geopolitical equations. As mentioned above, recognizing opportunities and reducing threats based on national interests and security in border areas is the way to achieve sustainable development and create a bridge between the core of the country and border areas in order to create coherence and balance in the activities of border residents in the development of these regions.
 
Methodology
The researcher designed the questionnaire in various meetings with expert professors and provided it to experts related to the subject to answer. The type of research is applied, and its method is descriptive-analytical with a mixed approach.
 
Results and discussion
The construction of a border wall is always done with the more or less tacit approval or consent of the public opinion of the building country. It has rarely happened that the people of the country building the wall have resolutely and seriously opposed the construction of the wall and prohibited the government from doing so. Perhaps this passivity or refraining from action is due to the propaganda that the government made to justify its action or that the construction of the wall has really guaranteed the security of the country and the interests of its residents. The government of the Islamic Republic of Iran, with a positive approach, believes that the construction of the Turkish wall on the border between the two countries is, to some extent, providing security, preventing illegal traffic, and controlling the smuggling of fuel, goods, and drugs in the region and the country. However, with a deeper look, we will see other problems such as a sharp decrease in economic prosperity, border dwellers' income, poverty, and socio-economic deprivation, the decline in agriculture and lack of water resources, environmental change, and destruction, expansion of rural migration to cities, increase in unemployment and theft in the region. which lead to dissatisfaction of border villagers.
 
Conclusion
The results of this research confirm the fact that the construction of the border blocking wall in Turkey has had a negative impact on the activities of border dwellers in economic, environmental, social and political indicators. And it has a positive effect on the security index related to their activities. Also, according to the experts' statements in this research, one of Turkey's goals for building a border wall is to convince European countries to join the European Union. And in order to achieve this goal, preventing the illegal passage of nationals of different countries through the territory of Iran, fighting and suppressing terrorists brings this country closer to its goal. In this situation, where Turkey is trying to satisfy the European countries and even America, maintaining relations with Turkey and strengthening relations are among the most important options for Iran, because the most important bridge between Iran and European countries is Turkey. If Iran opposes the construction of the wall, this will help media attacks that Iran cooperates with opposition groups and terrorists, and will ultimately lead to Iran phobia.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
 We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

Keywords

Main Subjects


اخباری، محمد و نامی، محمدحسین. (1388). جغرافیای مرز: با تأکید بر مرزهای ایران. تهران: سازمان جغرافیایی نیروهای مسلح، 195.
ایلکا، شهاب و دین‌پناه، غلام‌رضا. (1390). پهنه‌بندی سکونت‌گاه‌های مرزی کشور از طریق تکنیک رتبه‌بندی بر اساس تشابه به حل ایده آل. مجله پژوهش‌های ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی،4(3)، 61-9.
پورموسوی، سید موسی؛ میرزاده کوهشاهی، مهدی و رهنما قره‌خانبگلو، جهانبخش. (1387). سازمان‌دهی سیاسی فضا و نواحی فرهنگی و کارکردی در ایران. فصلنامه ژئوپلیتیک، 4(13)، 101-75. dor: 20.1001.1.17354331.1387.4.13.4.8
جان پرور، محسن؛ صالح‌آبادی، ریحانه و حسینی، سیده سمیره. (1396). تبیین مخاطرات محیطی ناشی از احداث دیوارهای مرزی (مرزهای ایران در استان سیستان و بلوچستان). فصلنامه جغرافیا و مخاطرات محیطی،6(4)، 146-121.
doi: 10.22067/geo.v6i4.51480
چوخاچی زاده مقدم، محمدباقر و امینی قشلاقی، داوود. (1389). بسترهای ایجاد ناامنی در مناطق مرزی استان آذربایجان غربی از منظر جغرافیای نظامی امنیتی. فصلنامه بین‌المللی ژئوپلیتیک،6(19)، 186-201.
توسلی، باهره. (1399). ارزیابی اثرات دیوارهای مرزی با تأکید بر دیوار انسداد مرزی ترکیه با ایران. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی تهران مرکزی.
طیب‌نیا، سید هادی؛ محمدی، سعدی و منوچهری، سوران. (1395). تحلیلی بر تأثیر انسداد مرزها بر امنیت پایدار نواحی روستایی پیرامون (مطالعه موردی: روستاهای مرزی شهرستان مریوان). برنامه‌ریزی و آمایش فضا،20(1)، 126-97.
قاسمی، محمد و صفی‌پور، محسن. (1392). بررسی اقدامات انسداد مرزی استان سیستان و بلوچستان بر امنیت استان از دیدگاه صاحب‌نظران. پژوهشنامه جغرافیای انتظامی،1392(4)، 56-34.
حافظ نیا، محمدرضا. (1392). جغرافیای سیاسی ایران. ویراست دوم. تهران: سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی دانشگاه‌ها (سمت)، مرکز تحقیق و توسعه علوم انسانی، 300.
حافظ نیا، محمدرضا. (1386). تأثیر خودگردانی کردهای شمال عراق بر کشورهای همسایه. تحقیقات جغرافیایی ،6(17)، 148-112.
رمضانی، مرتضی. (1397). قدمت و کارکرد دیوارهای مرزی در روابط بین‌المللی. اداره کل حقوقی بین‌المللی. وزارت امور خارجه ایران، 21.
سارانی سماط، مریم. (1391). بررسی و تحلیل اثرات اقتصادی اجتماعی احداث دیوار مرزی ایران و افغانستان در نواحی روستایی مطالعه موردی روستاهای مرزی شهرستان هیرمند. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد. گروه علوم انسانی. دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی. دانشگاه پیام نور استان خراسان جنوبی، 32.
نجف موسوی، میر؛ سادات کهکی، فاطمه و ویسیان، محمد. (1395). تبیین کارکرد مرز در تأمین امنیت استان آذربایجان غربی. فصلنامه علمی علوم و فنون مرزی،1395(16)، 54-34.
وب‌سایت مرکز آمار ایران. (1393). https://www.amar.org.ir/default.aspx/1393
وب‌سایت مرکز آمار ایران. (1397). https://www.amar.org.ir/default.aspx/1397
 
References
Akbari, M., & Nami, M. H. (2006). Border geography: with an emphasis on Iran's borders. Tehran: Geographical Organization of the Armed Forces. [In Persian]
Carter, D. B., & Poast, P. (2020). Barriers to Trade: How Border Walls Affect Trade Relations. International Organization, 74(1), 165–185. doi:org/10.1017/S0020818319000353
Carter, D. B., & Poast, P. (2020). Barriers to Trade: How Border Walls Affect Trade Relations. International Organization, 74(1), 165–185. doi:org/10.1017/S0020818319000353[In Persian]
Chokhachizade Moghadam, M. B., & Amini Qashlaghi, D. (2010). The foundations of creating insecurity in the border areas of West Azarbaijan province from the point of view of military and security geography. International Quarterly of Geopolitics,6(19), 186-210. dor: 20.1001.1.17354331.1389.6.19.6.6 [In Persian]
Gavrilis, G. (2009). The Dynamics of Interstate Boundaries. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1002/j.1538-165X.2009.tb01903.x
Ghasemi, M., & Safipour, M. (2012). Investigating the border blockade measures of Sistan and Baluchistan province on the security of the province from the point of view of experts. Police geography research paper, 2012(4), 34-56. doi: 10.22067/geo.v6i4.51480. [In Persian]
Gravelle, T. B. (2018). Politics, time, space, and attitudes toward US–Mexico border security. Political Geography, 65(1), 107–116. doi:org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.05.012
Hafez Nia, M. R. (2010). The impact of self-government of northern Iraqi Kurds on neighboring countries.Geographical Research,6(17),112-148. [In Persian]
Hafez Nia, M. R. (2012). Political geography of Iran. Second edition. Tehran: Humanities Research and Development Center, Humanities Research and Development Center. [In Persian]
Ilka, Sh., & Din Panah, G. R. (2011). Zoning of border settlements in the country through ranking technique based on similarity to ideal solution, Journal of Agricultural Extension and Education Research, 4(3),39-61. [In Persian]
Jan Paror, M., Saleh Abadi, R., & Hosseini, S. S. (2016). Explanation of environmental risks caused by the construction of border walls (borders of Iran in Sistan and Baluchistan province). Geography and Environmental Risks Quarterly,6(4),121-146. doi: 10.22067/geo.v6i4.51480 [In Persian]
Jones, R. (2016), Borders and Walls: Do Barriers Deter Unauthorized Migration?, Migration Information Source. The Online Journal of the Migration Policy Institute.
Konrad, V. A., & Nicol, H. N. (2008). Beyond walls: Re-inventing the Canada-United States borderlands. Border regions series. Aldershot:Ashgate. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9787.2008.00709_14.x
Meeuwen, M. V. (2017). Walled Friends?! The Peculiar Coexistence of NAFTA and the U.S.-Mexico Wall. (Master's thesis). Leiden University. International Relations. Faculty of Humanities. The Netherlands.
Mousavi, M. N., Kohki, F., & Waysian, M. (2015). Explaining the function of the border in ensuring the security of West Azarbaijan province. Quarterly of Frontier Sciences and Techniques,2015(16), 35-54. [In Persian]
Olejárová, B. (2018). The Great Wall of Turkey: From ‘The Open-Door Policy” to Building Fortress? Pogranicze. Polish Borderlands Studies, 6(2), 117-133. doi: org/10.25167/ppbs55
Pormusavi, S. M., Mirzadeh Kohshahi, M., & Rahnama Qarakhanbeglu, J. (1387). Political organization of space and cultural and functional areas in Iran. Geopolitics Quarterly, 4(13),75-101. dor: 20.1001.1.17354331.1387.4.13.4.8 [In Persian]
Ramezani, M. (2017). The history and function of border walls in international relations. General Directorate of International Law. Iranian foreign ministry,21. [In Persian]
Sarani Samat, M. (2011). Investigating and analyzing the socio-economic effects of the construction of the Iran-Afghanistan border wall in the rural areas, a case study of the border villages of Hirmand city. Master's thesis. Humanities. Faculty of Literature and Humanities. Payam Noor University of South Khorasan Province,32. [In Persian]
Tavasli, B. (2019) Evaluation of the effects of border walls with an emphasis on the blocking wall between Turkey and Iran. Master's thesis, Central Tehran,75-105. [In Persian]
Tayyabnia, S. H., Mohammadi, S., & Manochehri, S. (2015). An analysis on the effect of blocking the borders on the stable security of surrounding rural areas (case study: border villages of Marivan city). Planning and preparation of space,20(1), 97-126. [In Persian]
Van Houtum, H. (1998). The development of cross-border economic relations: A theoretical and empirical study of the influence of the state border on the development of crossborder economic relations between firms in border regions of the Netherlands and Belgium. Zugl.: Tilburg, Katholieke Univ. Brabant, Diss., 1998. CentER dissertation: Vol. 40. Tilburg.