تبیین تأثیر پیاده‌راه بر پویایی اجتماعی ـ اقتصادی و پایداری محیطی در چارچوب رشد هوشمند شهری در هسته مرکزی شهر، مطالعه موردی: شهر خوی

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد مرند، مرند، ایران

چکیده

رشد هوشمند شهری به‌عنوان رویکردی نوین در برنامه‌ریزی شهری، بر ارتقای کارایی فضایی، کاهش وابستگی به خودرو و تقویت فضاهای انسان‌محور تأکید دارد پژوهش حاضر با هدف تبیین ارتباط میان کیفیت پیاده‌مداری و تحقق رشد هوشمند شهری در شهر خوی انجام‌شده است. این پژوهش از نظر هدف کاربردی و از نظر ماهیت توصیفی ـ تحلیلی است. داده‌های موردنیاز با استفاده از پرسشنامه محقق ساخته شامل ۲۴ گویه در قالب هشت شاخص دسترسی و اتصال شبکه، جذابیت کالبدی، ایمنی و راحتی حرکت، سرزندگی شهری، پایداری زیست‌محیطی، کارایی شهری، کیفیت زندگی و تعاملات اجتماعی گردآوری شد. روایی سازه ابزار با تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی (KMO=0.892؛ Sig=0.000) و پایایی آن با ضریب آلفای کرونباخ ۰/۹۱ تأیید شد. تحلیل داده‌ها با بهره‌گیری از آزمون تی تک نمونه‌ای، همبستگی کندال، آزمون کروسکال ـ والیس و رگرسیون چندگانه انجام شد. نتایج نشان داد میانگین ارزیابی تمامی شاخص‌ها بالاتر از حد متوسط (۳/۴۱ تا ۳/۷۴) قرار دارد و میان ابعاد پیاده‌مداری و مؤلفه‌های رشد هوشمند شهری روابط مثبت و معناداری (Sig=0.000؛ ۰/۶۳≥τ≥۰/۳۹) مشاهده می‌شود که قوی‌ترین آن میان سرزندگی شهری و تعاملات اجتماعی به دست آمد (τ=۰/۶۳). نتایج مدل رگرسیونی نیز نشان داد شاخص‌های کیفیت پیاده‌مداری توانسته‌اند ۶۱/۴ درصد از تغییرات رشد هوشمند شهری را تبیین کنند (Sig=0.000؛ R²=۰/۶۱۴؛ R=۰/۷۸۴) که در این میان سرزندگی شهری با ضریب استاندارد β=۰/۳۵ قوی‌ترین پیش‌بین محسوب می‌شود. بر این اساس، تقویت کیفیت و سرزندگی فضاهای پیاده‌محور در کنار ارتقای دسترسی، جذابیت محیطی و ایمنی حرکت می‌تواند به‌عنوان راهبردی مؤثر در جهت تحقق رشد هوشمند شهری در شهر خوی عمل کند

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Explaining the Impact of Pedestrianization on Socio Economic Vitality and Environmental Sustainability within the Framework of Smart Urban Growth in the Central Urban Core: A case study of Khoy City

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Sadeqnezhad
  • Bashir Beygbabaye
  • Bakhtyar Ezatpanah
Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Mara.C., Islamic Azad University, Marand, Iran
چکیده [English]

ABSTRACT
Urban smart growth, as a modern approach to urban planning, emphasizes enhancing spatial efficiency, This study aims to explain the relationship between walkability quality and the realization of urban smart growth in the city of Khoy. The research is applied in purpose and descriptive-analytical in nature. Required data were collected using a researcher-developed questionnaire comprising 24 items across eight indicators: network access and connectivity, physical attractiveness, safety and ease of movement, urban vitality, environmental sustainability, urban efficiency, quality of life, and social interactions. The construct validity of the instrument was confirmed through exploratory factor analysis (KMO=0.892; Sig=0.000), and its reliability was established with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.91. Data analysis was conducted using one-sample t-test, Kendall's correlation, Kruskal-Wallis test, and multiple regression. Results indicated that the mean scores of all indicators were above the moderate level (3.41 to 3.74), and positive, significant relationships were observed between walkability dimensions and urban smart growth components (0.39≤τ≤0.63; Sig=0.000), with the strongest found between urban vitality and social interactions (τ=0.63). The regression model revealed that walkability quality indicators explained 61.4 percent of the variance in urban smart growth (R=0.784; R²=0.614; Sig=0.000), wherein urban vitality emerged as the strongest predictor with a standardized coefficient of β=0.35. Accordingly, enhancing the quality and vitality of pedestrian-oriented spaces, alongside improving accessibility, environmental attractiveness, and safety of movement, can serve as an effective strategy for realizing urban smart growth in the city of Khoy.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
In recent decades, rapid urbanization and automobile-oriented development have created major environmental, social, and spatial challenges for cities. In response, the concept of smart urban growth has emerged as an approach to promote sustainable urban development through compact urban form, efficient land use, reduced car dependency, and more livable urban environments. A central element of this approach is walkability, which emphasizes pedestrian-friendly environments that improve accessibility, safety, social interaction, and environmental quality. Walkable environments not only facilitate mobility but also enhance urban vitality, public health, environmental sustainability, and community cohesion. Previous studies have shown that accessibility, urban design quality, safety, and social vitality significantly affect residents’ willingness to walk and interact in urban spaces. However, empirical studies examining the multidimensional relationship between walkability and smart urban growth, especially in medium-sized cities of developing countries, remain limited. In Iran, many cities continue to experience dispersed urban growth, car dependency, and insufficient pedestrian infrastructure. Khoy, an important medium-sized city in northwestern Iran, has undergone significant spatial and demographic changes in recent decades, increasing the need for sustainable mobility and human-centered urban planning. Therefore, this study investigates the relationship between walkability quality and the realization of smart urban growth in Khoy city, focusing on dimensions such as accessibility, environmental quality, safety, urban vitality, environmental sustainability, urban efficiency, quality of life, and social interaction.
 
Methodology
This study adopts an applied research approach using a descriptive–analytical method. The statistical population consisted of residents of Khoy city. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire designed according to theoretical foundations and previous studies on walkability and smart urban growth. The questionnaire contained 24 items measured on a five-point Likert scale and organized into eight indicators: accessibility and connectivity, physical attractiveness, safety and walking comfort, urban vitality, environmental sustainability, urban efficiency, quality of life, and social interaction.
To assess validity, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted. The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) value was 0.892, indicating strong sampling adequacy, while Bartlett’s test was statistically significant (Sig = 0.000), confirming the suitability of the data structure. Reliability was examined using Cronbach’s alpha, which yielded a value of 0.91, demonstrating high internal consistency. Data analysis included one-sample t-tests to evaluate walkability indicators, Kendall’s tau correlation analysis to examine relationships between variables, Kruskal–Wallis tests to identify differences among demographic groups, and multiple regression analysis to determine the predictive power of walkability indicators on smart urban growth.
 
Results and Discussion
The one-sample t-test results showed that the mean values of all indicators were above the moderate level, ranging from 3.41 to 3.74. This indicates that residents generally perceive the pedestrian environment in Khoy as relatively acceptable, although improvements are still needed in several dimensions.
Kendall’s tau analysis revealed significant positive relationships between all dimensions of walkability and components of smart urban growth (0.63 ≥ τ ≥ 0.39; Sig = 0.000). The strongest relationship was found between urban vitality and social interaction (τ = 0.63), emphasizing the role of vibrant pedestrian environments in strengthening social engagement and community life. This finding supports urban design theories suggesting that lively public spaces encourage informal social encounters and improve urban attractiveness.
Regression analysis demonstrated that walkability indicators significantly predict smart urban growth. The regression model explained 61.4% of the variance in smart urban growth (R = 0.784; R² = 0.614; Sig = 0.000), indicating substantial explanatory power. Among the variables, urban vitality was the strongest predictor (β = 0.35), followed by accessibility, environmental quality, and pedestrian safety. These findings indicate that not only physical infrastructure but also the social and experiential qualities of pedestrian environments are crucial for sustainable urban development.
The results are generally consistent with previous international studies highlighting the importance of walkable environments in promoting sustainable and smart urban growth. However, this study shows that urban vitality has a particularly strong influence in the context of Khoy. Therefore, strategies aimed at enhancing street activity, mixed land use, and attractive public spaces can significantly strengthen walkability-oriented urban policies.
 
Conclusion
This study examined the relationship between walkability quality and smart urban growth in Khoy city. The findings confirm that walkability is a multidimensional concept involving accessibility, safety, environmental quality, social interaction, and urban vitality, all of which contribute to more sustainable and livable cities. Statistical analyses identified significant positive relationships between all walkability indicators and smart urban growth components. Regression results further showed that these indicators collectively explain a considerable proportion of the variance in smart urban growth, with urban vitality emerging as the most influential factor.
The findings suggest that pedestrian-oriented planning strategies can play an important role in guiding sustainable urban development in medium-sized cities. From a policy perspective, strengthening pedestrian infrastructure, improving accessibility and connectivity, enhancing environmental attractiveness, and ensuring pedestrian safety are essential. In addition, urban planners and decision-makers should focus on creating active and vibrant public spaces that encourage social interaction and community participation. Such integrated approaches can significantly contribute to smart urban growth and improve urban quality of life in Khoy. Overall, the study demonstrates that promoting high-quality pedestrian environments is not only a transportation strategy but also a comprehensive urban development approach that enhances sustainability, social vitality, and urban resilience.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Pedestrianization
  • Socio‑Economic Vitality
  • Environmental Sustainability
  • Smart Urban Growth
  • Central Urban Core
  • Khoy City
  1. احمدی، حسن و مهرجو، مهرداد. (۱۴۰۱). بررسی اهمیت احساس امنیت در کیفیت فضاهای شهری و عوامل مؤثر بر آن؛ مطالعه موردی: پیاده‌راه مرکزی شهر همدان و محلات پیرامون. پژوهش‌های جغرافیای انسانی، ۵۴ (۳)، ۱۰۳۷-۱۰۵۸. https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2021.318827.1008252
  2. آروین، محمود؛ فرجی، امین و قانع، مهسا. (۱۳۹۷). ارزیابی ابعاد سرزندگی در پیاده راه‌های شهری از دیدگاه شهروندان (موردمطالعه: پیاده‌راه فرهنگی رشت). توسعه محلی (روستائی-شهری)، ۱۰ (۲)، ۲۵۳-۲۷۶. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrd.2019.71201
  3. اکبرزاده مقدم لنگرودی، امیر؛ احمدی، حسن، و آزاده، سیدرضا. (۱۳۹۵). ارزیابی مطلوبیت پیاده راه‌های شهری بر اساس مؤلفه‌های کیفی؛ مطالعه موردی: پیاده‌راه علم‌الهدی شهر رشت. فصلنامه پژوهش و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، ۷ (۲۵)، ۱۲۵-۱۴۰ https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22285229.1395.7.25.7.6
  4. تقی‌پور، علی‌اکبر؛ حسن‌زاده باغی، بنیامین و احمدی دهرشید، پارسا. (۱۴۰۲). ارزیابی عوامل تأثیرگذار بر کیفیت پیاده‌راه‌ها بر اساس دیدگاه شهروندان (مطالعه موردی: دو فاز اجراشده پیاده‌راه شهر رشت). جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی، ۲۷ (۸۳)، ۲۷-۳۸. https://doi.org/10.22034/gp.2023.15142
  5. زنگنه شهرکی، سعید؛ عباس‌نژاد جلوگیر، محسن؛ جوشن‌پور، محمد و عظمتی، حسین. (۱۴۰۱). سنجش میزان انطباق محلات شهری با اصول رشد هوشمند شهری مطالعه موردی: شهر مشهد. مجله شهر پایدار، ۵ (۴)، ۲۷-۵۱. https://doi.org/10.22034/jsc.2022.284684.1463
  6. زیاری، کرامت‌الله؛ حاجی بابایی، سعید و ذاکر حقیقی، کیانوش. (۱۴۰۰). تحلیل کالبدی- فضایی مناطق شهری همدان بر اساس تلفیق شاخص‌های رشد هوشمند. مجله آمایش جغرافیایی فضا، ۱۱ (۴۲)، ۱۲۷-۱۴۲. https://doi.org/10.30488/gps.2020.227234.3227
  7. ساسان‌پور، فرزانه؛ اسدزاده، هانیه و حاتمی، افشار. (۱۴۰۳). شهرهای فراگیر، رویکرد نوین شهرهای آینده. پژوهش‌های جغرافیای انسانی، ۵۶ (۲)، ۱۷-۳۴ https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2023.266196.100777
  8. ساکت حسنلوئی، میثم؛ نقیبی، فریدون و اسدی، هیوا. (۱۴۰۱). واکاوی قابلیت پیاده‌مداری؛ جنبشی در تقویت هویت‌بخشی و انسجام اجتماعی شهرها مطالعه موردی: تحلیل تطبیقی بافت مرکزی شهرهای نقده و قروه. پژوهش‌های جغرافیای انسانی، ۵۴ (۲)، ۶۳۳-۶۵۲.  https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2021.313584.1008201
  9. سعیدی رضوانی، نوید و محمدی، سنا. (۱۴۰۴). ارزیابی تأثیر پیاده‌راه‌ها بر افزایش تعاملات اجتماعی (نمونه موردی: مقایسه پیاده‌راه فردوسی سنندج با پیاده‌راه فرهنگی رشت). جغرافیا و روابط انسانی، ۸ (۴)، ۶۲۸-۶۴۲. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/10.22034/gahr.2024.465712.2195
  10. شیخ حسنی، حسین؛ مرادی فر، امیر و پورخداداد، بهناز. (۱۴۰۰). ارزیابی اثرات پیاده‌راه‌سازی بر بهبود ارتباطات و تعاملات اجتماعی شهروندان، موردمطالعه: پیاده‌راه شهر رشت. فصلنامه پژوهش‌های بوم‌شناسی شهری، ۱۲ (۳)، ۱۲-۳۸. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.25383930.1400.12.24.2.9
  11. قربانی، رامین؛ پوراحمد، احمد؛ زیاری، کرامت‌اله؛ زنگنه شهرکی، سعید و حبیبی، کیومرث. (۱۴۰۴). تبیین چارچوب فلسفی ـ کارکردی کاربست شهر هوشمند در مطالعات بازآفرینی بافت مرکزی شهری بر اساس رویکرد تحلیل مضمون. مجله آمایش جغرافیایی فضا، ۱۵ (۴)، ۵۷-۸۱. https://doi.org/10.30488/gps.2025.440489.3726
  12. قربانی، رامین؛ پوراحمد، احمد؛ زیاری، کرامت‌اله؛ زنگنه شهرکی، سعید و حبیبی، کیومرث. (۱۴۰۳). مطالعه و تحلیل آینده‌نگری کاربرد بازآفرینی هوشمند در احیای بافت مرکزی کلان‌شهر تهران. اقتصاد و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، ۵ (۳)، ۸۰-۱۰۵. https://doi.org/10.22034/uep.2024.471885.1525
  13. مختاری ملک‌آبادی، رضا و بابادی، سمیه. (۱۴۰۴). بررسی تأثیر شاخص‌های رشد هوشمند شهری بر اجتماع‌پذیری فضاها و محیط‌های شهری؛ نمونه مطالعاتی: شهر اصفهان. برنامه‌ریزی فضایی، ۱۵ (۴)، ۲۳-۴۴. https://doi.org/10.22108/sppl.2025.144335.1832
  14. منصوری مقدم، منصور و گوهری، طراوت. (۱۴۰۴). ارزیابی تأثیرات اجتماعی- فرهنگی پروژه‌های پیاده‌راه‌سازی بر تجربه شهری (موردمطالعه: پیاده‌راه طالقانی شهر ایلام). نامه انسان‌شناسی، ۲۲ (۴۰)، ۲۹۹-۳۲۸. https://doi.org/10.22034/jasi.2026.2079495.1594
  15. Ahmadi, H., & Mehrjou, M. (2022). Investigating the importance of the feeling of security in the quality of urban spaces and its effective factors; Case study of the central sidewalk of Hamedan and surrounding neighborhoods. Human Geography Research, 54(3), 1037-1058. https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2021.318827.1008252 [In Persian]. 
  16. Akbarzadeh, A., Ahmadi, H., & Azadeh, R. (2016). Evaluation the desirability of urban sidewalk based on qualitative factors: Case study of Alam al-Hoda sidewalk in Rasht city. Journal of Urban Studies, 7(25), 125-140. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22285229.1395.7.25.7.6 [In Persian]. 
  17. Alahi, M. E. E., Sukkuea, A., Tina, F. W., Nag, A., Kurdthongmee, W., Suwannarat, K., & Mukhopadhyay, S. C. (2023). Integration of IoT-enabled technologies and artificial intelligence (AI) for smart city scenario: Recent advancements and future trends. Sensors, 23(11), 5206. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23115206
  18. Anthony, B. (2024). The role of community engagement in urban innovation towards the co-creation of smart sustainable cities. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15, 1592–1624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01176-1
  19. Arvin, M., Faraji, A., & Ghane, M. (2018). Evaluation of the dimensions of vitality of urban walkways from point of view of citizens (Case of study: Rasht cultural walkway).  The Journal of Community Development (Rural-Urban), 10 (2), 253-276. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrd.2019.71201 [In Persian]. 
  20. Askarizad, R., Lamíquiz Daudén, P. J., & Garau, C. (2024). The application of space syntax to enhance sociability in public urban spaces: A systematic review. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 13 (7), 227. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi13070227
  21. Bento, P., & Allegri, A. (2025). Exploring sustainable dynamics in urban commerce. In P. S. Brito, J. R. da Costa Sanchez Galvão, H. Almeida, L. C. Rosa Ferreira, & P. E. Alves Flores de Oliveira Gala (Eds.), ICoWEFS 2024 sustainability proceedings. ICoWEFS 2024. Lecture notes on multidisciplinary industrial engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-80330-7_5
  22. Boricha, J., Sarkar, S., & Prasad, P. (2025). Reclaiming streets of an inner urban core area with the place-making approach: Case of Surat City. In P. K. Sahu, N. Saboo, B. B. Majumdar, & A. Pani (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of Transportation Research Group of India (CTRG 2023), volume 1. CTRG 2023. Lecture notes in civil engineering (Vol. 417). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-9654-0_16
  23. Dinesh, H., Trivikram, T. N., Surekha, K. C., et al. (2026). Accessibility as a factor in assessing urban public spaces: A case of Kannur, Kerala. City, Territory and Architecture, 13, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40410-026-00301-2
  24. Fazio, M., et al. (2023). The “15-minutes station”: A case study to evaluate the pedestrian accessibility of railway transport in Southern Italy. Transportation Research Procedia, 69, 536–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2023.02.205
  25. Gehl, J. (2011). Life between buildings: Using public space. Island Press.
  26. Gehl, J. (2018). Cities for people. Island Press. https://islandpress.org/books/cities-people#desc
  27. Ghorbani, R., Pourahmad, A., Ziari, K., Zanganeh Shahraki, S., & Habibi, K. (2024). The study and analysis of the future prospects of smart regeneration applications in revitalizing the central fabric of Tehran metropolis. Urban Economics and Planning, 5(3), 80-105. https://doi.org/10.22034/uep.2024.471885.1525 [In Persian]. 
  28. Ghorbani, R., Pourahmad, A., Ziari, K., Zanganeh Shahraki, S., & Habibi, K. (2025). Elucidating a philosophical-functional framework for smart city applications in urban central fabric regeneration studies: A thematic analysis approach. Geographical Planning of Space Quarterly Journal, 15(4), 57-81. https://doi.org/10.30488/gps.2025.440489.3726 [In Persian]. 
  29. Godwyll, J. M., Buzinde, C. N., Glover, T. D., White, D. D., Frazier, A. E., & Manuel-Navarrete, D. (2024). When perception is reality: Examining perceived accessibility of recreational public spaces through social space production. World Leisure Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/16078055.2024.2365223
  30. Jennings, V., Rigolon, A., Thompson, J., Murray, A., Henderson, A., & Gragg, R. S. (2024). The dynamic relationship between social cohesion and urban green space in diverse communities: Opportunities and challenges to public health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(6), 800. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21060800
  31. Kalaiarasan, A. (2025). Health-conscious cities: Embracing comprehensive sustainable approaches for urban well-being. In H. T. Vien, G. M. Pomeroy, & N. Ngoc Hieu (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th Asian Urbanization Conference (AUC 2024). Advances in 21st century human settlements. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-9924-7_23
  32. Kwilinski, A., Lyulyov, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2023). The effects of urbanization on green growth within sustainable development goals. Land, 12(2), 511. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020511
  33. Liang, D., De Jong, M., Schraven, D., & Wang, L. (2021). Mapping key features and dimensions of the inclusive city: A systematic bibliometric analysis and literature study. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 29(1), 60–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2021.1911873
  34. Mansouri Moghadam, M., & Gouhari, T. (2025). Assessing the socio-cultural impacts of pedestrianization projects on urban experience (Case study: Taleghani pedestrian street in Ilam City). Iranian Journal of Anthropology, 22(40), 299-328. https://doi.org/10.22034/jasi.2026.2079495.1594 [In Persian]. 
  35. Mokhtari Malekabadi, R., & Babadi, S. (2025). Investigating the impact of smart urban growth indicators on the sociability of urban spaces and environments (Case study: Isfahan City). Spatial Planning, 15(4), 23-44. https://doi.org/10.22108/sppl.2025.144335.1832 [In Persian]. 
  36. Omwamba, J., Puntel, S., Rotaris, L., et al. (2025). Evaluating last-mile access in the 15-minute city. Discover Cities, 2, 90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44327-025-00119-6
  37. Qi, J., Mazumdar, S., & Vasconcelos, A. C. (2024). Understanding the relationship between urban public space and social cohesion: A systematic review. International Journal of Community Well-Being. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-024-00204-5
  38. Saeidi Rezvani, N., & Mohammadi, S. (2026). Evaluating the impact of sidewalks on the increase of social factors (Case example: Comparing the Ferdowsi sidewalk in Sanandaj with the cultural sidewalk in Rasht). Geography and Human Relationships, 8(4), 628-642. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/10.22034/gahr.2024.465712.2195 [In Persian]. 
  39. Saket Hasanlouei, M., Naghibi, F., & Asadi, H. (2022). Investigating the pedestrian capability, kinetic in strengthening the identity and social cohesion of cities: Case study – Comparative analysis of the central context of Naqadeh and Qorveh cities. Human Geography Research, 54(2), 633-652. https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2021.313584.1008201 [In Persian]. 
  40. Sasanpour, F., Asadzadeh, H., & Hatami, A. (2024). Ubiquitous city: New perspective in the planning of future cities. Human Geography Research, 56(2), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2023.266196.1007777 [In Persian]. 
  41. Shekh Hasani, H., Moradifar, A., & Pourkhodadad, B. (2021). Assessment sidewalks effects on improving communications and social interactions of citizens: Case study – Rasht sidewalks. Journal of Urban Ecology Researches, 12(24), 12-38. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.25383930.1400.12.24.2.9 [In Persian]. 
  42. Shi, F., Shi, W., & Zhang, A. (2024). A new smart city index based on urban origin theory. Urban Informatics, 3, 32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44212-024-00065-5
  43. Taghipour, A. A., Hasanzadeh Baghi, B., & Ahmadi Dehrashid, P. (2023). Evaluation of the influencing factors on the quality of pedestrian zones from the perspective of citizens (Case study: Two phases of pedestrian zone in Rasht). Journal of Geography and Planning, 27(83), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.22034/gp.2023.15142 [In Persian]. 
  44. Tuffour, J. P., & Anokye, P. A. (2025). Accessibility matters, but for inner suburbs too: Unpacking the impact of accessibility levels on land value and transportation management in the Kumasi Metropolitan Area, Ghana. Transportation in Developing Economies, 11, 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40890-024-00228-8
  45. Zanganeh, S., Abbasnejad Jelogir, M., Joshanpour, M., & Azemati, H. (2023). Assessment of the compatibility of urban neighborhoods with smart urban growth principles: The case study of city Mashhad. Journal of Sustainable City, 5(4), 27-51. https://doi.org/10.22034/jsc.2022.284684.1463 [In Persian]. 
  46. Zayyari, K., Hajibabaei, S., & Zakerhaghighi, K. (2022). Analysis of smart urban growth indicators using TOPSIS multi-criteria decision making model (Case study: Hamadan City). Geographical Planning of Space Quarterly Journal, 11(42), 127-142. https://doi.org/10.30488/gps.2020.227234.3227 [In Persian]. 
  47. Zhu, X., Li, D., Zhou, S., et al. (2024). Evaluating coupling coordination between urban smart performance and low-carbon level in China’s pilot cities with mixed methods. Scientific Reports, 14, 20461. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-68417-4