تحلیل رابطة سطح انتظارات از دولت و تمایل جوامع محلی به اقدامات پیشگیرانه در برابر مخاطرات (مطالعة موردی: نواحی روستایی شهرستان نیشابور)

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه جغرافیا، دانشکدة ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

2 دانشیار گروه جغرافیا، دانشکدة ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

3 دانشجوی دکتری رشتة جغرافیا و برنامه‏ریزی روستایی، دانشکدة ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

چکیده

امروزه، تأکید بر مدیریت ریسک و اجرای اقدامات پیشگیرانه به ‏عنوان اساسی ‏ترین رویکرد در ادبیات مدیریت بحران مطرح است. اما تحقق این فرایند، به‏ویژه در جوامع روستایی و با جلب مشارکت جوامع محلی به انجام‏دادن اقدامات پیشگیرانه تحت ‏الشعاع عوامل و موانع بسیاری است که سطح انتظارات جوامع محلی از دولت و وابستگی به آن برای مدیریت بحران و اثرهای آن یکی از مهم‏ترین این عوامل است. بنابراین، در پژوهش حاضر به تحلیل تأثیر انتظارات از دولت بر میزان تمایل جوامع محلی به مشارکت در انجام‏دادن اقدامات پیشگیرانه در برابر سوانح طبیعی با روش توصیفی- پیمایشی و با ابزار پرسش‏نامه پرداخته شده ‏است. به ‏منظور سنجش هدف و تحلیل داده ‏ها، از آزمون‏ های تی تک ‏نمونه ‏ای، همبستگی پیرسون، آزمون رگرسیون خطی، و آزمون تحلیل واریانس یک ‏طرفه استفاده شده ‏است. پژوهش حاضر به لحاظ ماهیت کاربردی و از لحاظ نوع تحقیقات توصیفی- تحلیلی است. بر اساس نتایج به‏ دست‏ آمده، در منطقة مورد مطالعه میزان تمایل روستاییان به اقدامات پیشگیرانه پایین ‏تر از سطح متوسط است. در حالی که سطح انتظارات مردم از دولت در برابر سوانح طبیعی بسیار بالاست. همچنین، ضمن تأیید ارتباط بین این دو متغیر، تأثیرگذاری متغیر انتظارات روستاییان از دولت بر عدم تمایل جوامع محلی به اقدامات پیشگیرانه در برابر سوانح طبیعی با میزان ضریب 38 درصد تبیین و تأیید می‏شود. از سویی، بر اساس نتایج به‏دست‏آمده، تمایل به اقدامات پیشگیرانه در بین روستاییانی که واکنش ترجیحی آن‏ها در برابر سوانح بر اساس مستندات و آرشیو تجربة آن‏هاست بیشتر از سایر روستاییان است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Analyzing the impact of expectations from government on the willingness to take precautionary measures against natural hazards (Case Study: Rural of Neyshabur County)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Tahereh Sadeghloo 1
  • Khadijeh Bouzarjomehri 2
  • Zahra Soleimani 3
1 Mashhad University
2 department of Geography, ferdowsi university of mashhad,IRAN
3 department of geography, ferdowsi university of mashhad, iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: As a whole, the world is experiencing an increase in the intensity and abundance of natural hazards, which it is a major threat to all regions. Basically, natural hazards can be recognized as a potential hazard because of the combination of disasters, vulnerability conditions and inadequate measures to mitigate the negative consequences. In fact, the natural hazard is an unexpected event that disrupts the normal functioning of a society and generally leading to loss of life, livelihoods and damage to the infrastructure of communities. Therefore, take preventive measures and preparedness for these events can greatly reduce costs. For this reason, Emphasis on risk management and to take preventive measures today is one of the most fundamental approaches in the crisis management literature. But the realization of this process, especially in rural communities and the attract of local communities to take precautionary measures, is overshadowed by many factors and obstacles, that the level of local communities' expectations of the government for crisis management and its effects is one of the most important. In communities where the government participates in all levels of risk planning and accountability and the local government has the primary responsibility for emergency response to the hazard, most people believe that "the government must take responsibility of coping with the problems due the risks". Likewise, they expect the government to be prepared and responsive to natural hazards. There is widespread agreement among economists that expectations influence people's behavior and actions. So that even if residents are aware of the environmental risk, they may believe that government planning and preparation is sufficient for risk management. So they do not feel the need to take home preparedness measures.
Methodology: the present study analyzes the impact of expectations from the government on the extent of local community interest to take precautionary measures against natural hazards. A descriptive - survey method and a questionnaire were used for this purpose. In this study, the level of analysis is rural and its unit of analysis are rural households. Fazl has been selected as the study area, which is one of the districts of Neyshabur County in Khorasan Razavi province. At first, 15 villages were selected for field study through Formula N0 and then, sample villages were selected based on the location of the villages in the hazardous areas. Research indicators and variables have been compiled according to the theoretical foundations and review of previous studies. Variable of expectations level of local communities about intervention and the role of government in the risk process have been measured the following two types of structural and non-structural approaches and variable of propensity to take preventive measures by local communities have been measured the following economic, social, skill-individual and physical-environmental dimensions. One-sample t-test, Pearson correlation, linear regression test, and one-way ANOVA were used to measure the purpose and data analysis. The present study has applied nature and is a descriptive-analytical research.
Results and discussion: According to the results, in the study area the tendency to preventive measures in all economic, social, skill-individual and physical-environmental dimensions is lower than the average level. The level of expectations of the sample communities from the government against risk indicates that these expectations are very high in both structural and non-structural sectors as well as before, during and after the risks. The results of the Pearson correlation test indicate that there is a significant relationship between the two variables of rural expectations of government and the reluctance of local communities to take precautionary measures against natural hazards. On the other hand, the results of the regression test also confirm the variable impact of rural expectations of the government on the reluctance of local communities to take precautionary measures against natural hazards. Based on the results, Willingness to take preventive measures are more prevalent among villagers whose their preferential reaction to risk is based on the documentation and archive of their experience.
Conclusion: In general, the emphasis on preventive measures before the occurrence of hazards and to take the process of risk management by local communities is one of the priorities of many governments in the process of risk management. In the meantime, the reliance on the government, or the high level of expectations of the people from government on risk management measures, has led to a significantly decrease in their reluctance and participation in preventive measures. Perhaps this level of expectation from the government about risk management can be largely attributed to the inaccurate timely management of the risk management process by government agencies and crisis management authorities, So that if the costs of rebuilding and repairing the damage are shifted to participatory preventive measures, Increasing the readiness of local communities to deal with the effects of hazards and mitigating the damages, Their level of expectations and views on government duties and the scope of these tasks were made clearer. However, one should not neglect the small villagers' financial ability to preventive measures and the status of supervisory levers. Encouraging people to take precautionary measures and be prepared for natural hazards, existence strict rules for people who have built their homes in hazardous areas, Raising public awareness of preventive measures and preparedness for natural hazards, forming voluntary and mobilizing groups from local communities and training them in emergencies to respond quickly, create funds by local people to raise funds for emergencies, these include suggestions to increase the willingness of local communities to take preventive measures In line reduce public dependence on government action. According to the results, in the study area the tendency to preventive measures in all economic, social, skill-individual and physical-environmental dimensions is lower than the average level.the present study analyzes the impact of expectations from the government on the extent of local community interest to take precautionary measures against natural hazards

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Expectation from Government
  • Local communities
  • Preventive measures
  • Natural hazards
  • Neyshabur County
  1. سایت سازمان مدیریت بحران، 1398، ndmo.ir
  2. رفیعیان، مجتبی و مطهری، زینب‏السادات، 1391، طراحی مدلی برای مطالعة رویکرد مدیریت ریسک بحران اجتماع‏محور مطالعة موردی: طرح دوام (داوطلبین واکنش اضطراری محلات)، دو فصل‏نامة علمی- پژوهشی مدیریت بحران، ش 5، صص 5-12.
  3. دفتر پژوهش‏های مجلس شورای اسلامی، 1383، مبانی نظری دخالت دولت در اقتصاد معاونت برنامه و بودجه، معاونت پژوهشی، تهران.
  4. عزیزپور، فرهاد؛ حمیدی، محمدسعید و چابک، جمشید، 1394، تحلیل مشارکت محلی در مدیریت مخاطرة سیل در نواحی روستایی مورد مطالعه: روستاهای حوضة آبخیز رودخانة بشار شهرستان بویراحمد، تحلیل فضایی مخاطرات محیطی، س ۲، ش 4، صص 77-94.
  5. Ahrens, J. and Rudolph, P. M., 2006, The importance of governance in risk reduction and disaster management. Journal of contingencies and crisis management, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 207-220.‏ https://org/10.1111/j.1468-5973.2006.00497.x ‏
  6. Aini, M. S. and Fakhrul-Razi, A., 2010, Development of socio-technical disaster model. Safety science. Vol. 48, No. 10, pp. 1286-1295.‏ https://org/10.1016/j.ssci.2010.04.007
  7. Arceneaux, K. and Stein, R. M., 2006, Who is held responsible when disaster strikes? The attribution of responsibility for a natural disaster in an urban election. Journal of Urban Affairs. Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 43-53.‏ https://org/10.1111/j.0735-2166.2006.00258.x
  8. Ashraf, S.; Iftikhar, M.; Shahbaz, B.; Khan, G. A. and Luqman, M., 2013, Impacts of flood on livelihoods and food security of rural communities: a case study of southern Punjab, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences. Vol. 50, No. 4,‏ 751-758.
  9. Bang, H. N., 2013, Governance of disaster risk reduction in Cameroon: The need to empower local government. Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies. Vol. 5, No. 2, pp.1-10.‏ http://doi.org/10.4102/ jamba.v5i2.77
  10. Basolo, V.; Steinberg, L. J.; Burby, R. J.; Levine, J.; Cruz, A. M. and Huang, C., 2009, The effects of confidence in government and information on perceived and actual preparedness for disasters. Environment and behavior. Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 338-364.‏ https://org/10.1177/0013916508317222
  11. Briefing, S., 2002, Local government in Scotland Bill: power of well-being [online]. Scotland, The Scottish Parliament. Available from: http://scottish.parliament.uk/business/research/pdf_res_brief/sb02-69.pdf [Accessed 01 April 2010].
  12. Chamlee-Wright, E. and Storr, V. H., 2010, Expectations of government’s response to disaster. Public choice. Vol. 144, No. 1-2, pp. 253-274.‏ https://org/10.1007/s11127-009-9516-x
  13. Chang, V.; Walters, R.J. and Wills G., 2015, Delivery and adoption of cloud computing Services in Contemporary Organizations. IGI Global.‏ 166-197.
  14. Chapagain, T. and Raizada, M. N., 2017, Impacts of natural disasters on smallholder farmers: gaps and recommendations. Agriculture & Food Security. Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 39.‏
  15. Davies, M.; Guenther, B.; Leavy, J.; Mitchell, T. and Tanner, T., 2009, Climate change adaptation, disaster risk reduction and social protection: complementary roles in agriculture and rural growth?. IDS Working Papers. Vol. 2009, No. 320, pp. 10-37.‏
  16. Djalante, R.; Holley, C. and Thomalla, F., 2011, Adaptive governance and managing resilience to natural hazards. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science. Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 1-14.‏ https://org/10.1007/s13753-011-0015-6
  17. Donahue, A. K.; Eckel, C. C. and Wilson, R. K., 2014, Ready or not? How citizens and public officials perceive risk and preparedness. The American Review of Public Administration. Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 89-111.‏ https://org/10.1177/0275074013506517
  18. Drabek, T. E., 2012, Human system responses to disaster: An inventory of sociological findings. Springer Science & Business Media.‏
  19. Erickson, P. A., 1999, Emergency response planning: For corporate and municipal managers. Elsevier.‏
  20. Firdhous, M. F. M. and Karuratane, P. M., 2018, A Model for Enhancing the Role of Information and Communication Technologies for Improving the Resilience of Rural Communities to Disasters. Dalam: Procedia Engineering. Vol. 212, pp. 707-714.‏ https://org/10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.091
  21. Fischhoff, B., 2013, Risk perception and communication. Section 8 of environmental and occupational health sciences, pp. 940-954.
  22. Haigh, R. and Amaratunga, D., 2010, An integrative review of the built environment discipline's role in the development of society's resilience to disasters. International journal of disaster resilience in the built environment, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 11-24.‏ https://org/10.1108/17595901011026454
  23. Hayles, C. S., 2010, An examination of decision making in post disaster housing reconstruction. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment. Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 103-122.‏ https://org/10.1108/17595901011026508
  24. Janssen, D., 2006, Disaster Planning in Rural America. Public Manager. Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 40-43.
  25. Jigyasu, R., 2004, Sustainable post disaster reconstruction through integrated risk management–the case of rural communities in South Asia. Journal of research in architecture and planning, Vol. 3, pp. 32-43.‏
  26. Kapucu, N.; Hawkins, C. V. and Rivera, F. I., 2013, Disaster preparedness and resilience for rural communities. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy. Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 215-233.‏
  27. Kartez, J. D. and Lindell, M. K., 1990, Adaptive planning for community disaster response. Cities and disaster: North American studies in emergency management. No. 101, pp. 5-33.
  28. Kirsch, T. D.; Wadhwani, C.; Sauer, L.; Doocy, S. and Catlett, C., 2012, Impact of the 2010 Pakistan floods on rural and urban populations at six months. PLoS currents.
  29. Klein, R., 2018, The Role of Government in Managing the Risks of Natural Disasters. 10.13140/2.2.30959.69285.
  30. Kunreuther, H., 2006, Disaster mitigation and insurance: Learning from Katrina. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. Vol. 604, No. 1, pp. 208-227.‏ https://org/10.1177/0002716205285685
  31. Lebel, L.; Anderies, J. M.; Campbell, B.; Folke, C.; Hatfield-Dodds, S.; Hughes, T. P. and Wilson, J., 2006, Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems.‏ https://library.umaine.edu/ers_facpub/129
  32. Malalgoda, C. I.; Amaratunga, R. D. G. and Pathirage, C. P., 2010, Role of local governments in disaster risk reduction. Conference or Workshop Item (Paper).‏ http://salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/9742.
  33. Manning, N., 2001, The legacy of the New Public Management in developing countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences. Vol. 67, No. 2, pp. 297-312.‏ https://org/10.1177/0020852301672009
  34. Matsimbe, Z., 2003, The role of local institutions in reducing vulnerability to recurrent natural disasters and in sustainable livelihoods development. University of Cape Town http:// fao. org/docrep/007/ae079e/ae079e00. htm# Contents.‏
  35. McGuire, S. and Sperling, L., 2013, Making seed systems more resilient to stress. Global Environmental Change. Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 644-653.‏
  36. Mohamed Shaluf, I., 2007, Disaster types. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal. Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 704-717.
  37. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 2013, Risk Communication Basics: Social Science Tools For Coastal Programs. Guide Book.
  38. National Report of the I.R. Iran on Disaster Reductio, 2005, World Conference on Disaster Reduction. Kobe, Japan.
  39. Noll, R. G., 1996, The complex politics of catastrophe economics. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. Vol. 12, No. 2-3, pp.141-146.‏ https://org/10.1007/BF00055790
  40. O'Brien, G.; O'Keefe, P.; Rose, J.; Wisner, B., 2006, Climate change and disaster management. Disasters. Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 64-80.‏
  41. Pynoos, R. S.; Goenjian, A.; Tashjian, M.; Karakashian, M.; Manjikian, R.; Manoukian, G.; ... and Fairbanks, L. A., 1993, Post-traumatic stress reactions in children after the 1988 Armenian earthquake. The British Journal of Psychiatry. Vol. 163, 2, pp. 239-247.‏
  42. Russell, L. A.; Goltz, J. D. and Bourque, L. B., 1995, Preparedness and hazard mitigation actions before and after two earthquakes. Environment and behavior. Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 744-770.‏ https://org/10.1177/0013916595276002
  43. Schneider, Sandra K., 1990, Disaster relief: The politics of intergovernmental relations. by R. M. Stratton. Publius: The Journal of Federalism. Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 170-71.
  44. Shreve, C. M. and Kelman, I., 2014, Does mitigation save? Reviewing cost-benefit analyses of disaster risk reduction. International journal of disaster risk reduction. No. 10, pp. 213-235.‏ https://org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.08.004
  45. Sperling, F. and Szekely, F., 2005, Disaster risk management in a changing climate. Vulnerability and Adaptation Resource Group (VARG).‏
  46. Sperling, L., 2008, When disaster strikes: a guide to assessing seed system security (No. 363). CIAT.‏
  47. Sojasi Qeidari, H.; Mahmoodi, H. and Jafari, F., 2017, An Analysis of Entrepreneurial Skills of Women in Rural Areas: A Case Study of Villages in Central District of Fariman (Persian). Journal of Rural Research, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 242-263. http://doi.org/10.22059/JRUR.2017.62679
  48. Suda, C. A., 2000, Natural disaster preparedness, environmental degradation and sustainable development in Kenya. African Study Monographs. Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 91-103. https://org/10.14989/68197
  49. Uitto, J. I. and Shaw, R., 2016, Sustainable development and disaster risk reduction. Tokyo: Springer.‏
  50. UN/ISDR, 2005, “Hyogo framework for 2005-2015: Building the resilience of the nations and communities to disasters.” unisdr.org/wcdr/intergover/ official-docs/Hyogo- framework action- English .pdf, accessed, January 04, 2007, 3.
  51. UNISDR, 2010, Local Governments and Disaster Risk Reduction: Good Practices and Lessons Learned.‏ Report, United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UN/ISDR).‏
  52. Wolensky, R. P. and Miller, E. J., 1981, The everyday versus the disaster role of local officials: Citizen and official definitions. Urban Affairs Quarterly, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 483-504.‏ https://org/10.1177/107808748101600406
  53. World Bank, 2010, Financial Protection against Natural Disasters: From Products to Comprehensive Strategies. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Internet: worldbank.org
  54. Wright, J. D. and Rossi, P. H., 1981, Social science and natural hazards. Cambridge. MA: Abt Books.
  55. Yorke, D.A., 2007, The local government in England and Wales. European Journal of Marketing. Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 10-16.