سنجش اثرگذاری نهادهای محلی بر گفتمان نوآوری اجتماعی تحول‌گرا در راستای توسعه پایدار روستایی مطالعه موردی: شهرستان ری

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه جغرافیای انسانی و آمایش، دانشکده علوم زمین، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

مفهوم نوآوری اجتماعی تحول‌گرا دربرگیرنده گروهی از راهبردها، مفاهیم، اندیشه‌ها و سازمان‌های نوینی است که تأمین‌کننده نیازهای اجتماعی است. این مفهوم یکی از عناصری بنیادین در راستای توسعه پایدار روستایی است؛ بنابراین، سنجش اثرگذاری نهادهای محلی بر نوآوری اجتماعی تحول‌گرا در راستای توسعه پایدار روستایی با بهره‌گیری از شاخص‌هایی همچون: شبکه و روابط اجتماعی، آموزش و آگاهی اجتماعی، نهادهای اجتماعی و عامل همدلی و انسجام اجتماعی، برای رسیدگی به ناسازگاری‌ها، هدف این پژوهش است. در این پژوهش که از بعد شیوه گردآوری داده‌ها از نوع توصیفی ـ پیمایشی؛ و برحسب ماهیت داده‌ها از نوع پژوهش‌های کمی است که به سنجش شاخص‌های اثرگذار و اثرپذیر پژوهش در 43 سکونتگاه روستایی نمونه و 400 خانوار نمونه تصادفی شهرستان ری انجام شد. یافته­ها نشانگر آن است که میان همه شاخص‌های اثرگذار نهادهای محلی بر نوآوری اجتماعی تحول‌گرا در راستای توسعه پایدار روستایی از دیدگاه پاسخ­گویان همبستگی مستقیم و مثبت وجود دارد. ارزیابی اثرگذاری نهادهای محلی بر نوآوری اجتماعی با بهره‌گیری از دیدگاه پاسخگویان روستایی نشان می‌دهد که هرچند، گفتمان نوآوری اجتماعی، نقش بنیادین در همکنشی و همکاری مدیریت محلی و دیگر نهادها و سازمان‌های محلی همچون تشکل‌های مردم‌نهاد، با دستگاه‌های بالادست ایجاد می‌کند؛ اما به دلیل اتخاذ رویکرد از بالا به پایین در ایران و ناحیه موردمطالعه و برآمده از رویکرد حکومت مبنا و در شرایط «قدرت بر» و چیرگی، نهادهای محلی به‌مثابه نوعی از مدیریت که برای پاسخگویی به نیازهای مردم در اندازه کوچک شکل‌گرفته است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Measuring the Impact of Local Institutions on Transformative Social Innovation Discourse for Rural Sustainable Development: the case study of Rey County

نویسندگان [English]

  • Naser Shafiei Sabet
  • Sogand Khaksar
Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Faculty of Earth Science, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

ABSTRACT
The concept of transformative social innovation encompasses a set of novel strategies, concepts, ideas, and organizations that address societal needs. This concept is a fundamental element in the pursuit of rural sustainable development. Therefore, this research aims to assess the impact of local institutions on transformative social innovation in the context of rural sustainable development, utilizing indicators such as social networks and relationships, social education and awareness, social institutions, and the factors of social cohesion and solidarity to address disparities. This descriptive-survey research, based on quantitative data analysis, evaluated the impact of influential and affected indicators in 43 sample rural settlements and 400 randomly selected households in Ray County. The findings indicate a direct and positive correlation between all indicators of the impact of local institutions on transformative social innovation in rural sustainable development from the respondents' perspective. The evaluation of the impact of local institutions on social innovation, based on the perspectives of rural respondents, reveals that although the discourse of social innovation plays a fundamental role in the interaction and cooperation between local management and other local institutions and organizations, such as non-governmental organizations, with higher-level agencies, the adoption of a top-down approach in Iran and the study area, stemming from a government-centric approach and in conditions of 'power over' and dominance, local institutions, as a type of management formed to address the needs of people on a small scale, have been limited in their capacity
Extended Abstract
Introduction
The concept of transformative social innovation encompasses a set of novel strategies, concepts, ideas, and organizations that address social needs. This concept is a fundamental element in achieving rural sustainable development. Although social innovation plays a pivotal role in connecting local governance with higher-level organizations, government-centric, top-down approaches employed in several developing countries (such as Iran) have led to challenges such as the lack of delegation of authority to local institutions, interference by various government agencies in local affairs, lack of transparency in responsibilities, and consequently, the failure to improve rural sustainable development indicators. The convergence and intertwining of the discourse on transformative social innovation with the fields of planning and management further complicates this domain. Consequently, social renewal and transformation can be seen as developing novel collaborative approaches to achieving social goals. Therefore, the objective of this research is to assess the impact of local institutions on transformative social innovation for rural sustainable development, using indicators such as social networks and relationships, social education and awareness, social institutions, and the factor of social cohesion and solidarity to address inconsistencies.
 
Methodology
This research, in terms of data collection method, is descriptive-survey; and in terms of data nature, it is a quantitative study. It aimed to measure the influential and influenced indicators of the research in 43 sample rural settlements and 400 randomly selected households in Ray County. To ensure the compatibility of the questions derived from previous researches with the research variables and to reveal the face validity of these indicators and their compatibility with the conditions of Iran and the villages of the study area, the degree of importance of the indicators of the influential and influenced components of the research was evaluated by 12 university professors and researchers related to the subject and based on their research works. Also, 35 expert specialists who had conducted researches close to the subject of the study were evaluated. After receiving their opinions, the indicators of the first influential component (local institutions), the mediating influential component (social innovation), and the influenced component (rural sustainable development) were identified.
 
Results and discussion
The findings indicate a direct and positive correlation between all the influential indicators of local institutions on transformative social innovation towards sustainable rural development, from the perspective of the respondents. The evaluation of the impact of local institutions on social innovation, utilizing the viewpoint of rural respondents, reveals that although the discourse of social innovation plays a fundamental role in the interaction and cooperation of local management and other local institutions and organizations, such as non-governmental organizations, with higher-level authorities, due to the adoption of a top-down approach in Iran and the studied region, stemming from a government-centric approach and in conditions of "power over" and dominance, local institutions, as a type of management formed to address the needs of people on a small scale, have been affected. From the perspective of respondents, social institutions and social networks and relationships, with the highest correlation, and subsequently, empathy and social cohesion, and education and social awareness have been most effective in improving the dimensions of sustainable rural development.
 
Conclusion
Based on a review of the literature and the research background, if the internal shortcomings and constraints of local institutions (local governance) that hinder the growth and development of transformative social innovation are adequately addressed, and the concept of bottom-up governance is implemented with reduced hierarchical power, it can be recognized as an opportunity to pay attention to the needs and demands of local people and villagers. This can lead to the advancement of policies with the acceptance and legitimacy of local people and villagers. Consequently, it reduces the adverse impact of government control. Moreover, it contributes to the success and progress of programs and projects in the rural sustainable development process. Therefore, based on the literature and the findings of this research, addressing the challenges of the effectiveness of local institutions by utilizing the role of transformative social innovation is essential for improving the dimensions of rural sustainable development. Additionally, improving the dimensions of rural sustainable development requires enhancing the effectiveness of local institutions. This two-way relationship itself serves as an opportunity that highlights the value and necessity of considering local institutions and increasing the participation and cooperation of villagers in the rural sustainable development process.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
 We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Bottom-Up Management
  • Social Capital
  • Social Change
  • Rural Sustainable Development Management
  • Local Management Challenges
  1. جندقی، غلامرضا؛ زراعی، متین؛ مرشدی اصطهباناتی، سید مهدی؛ فیروز نیا، علی. (۱۳۹۸). طراحی الگوی موفقیت نوآوری اجتماعی در کمیته امداد امام خمینی (ره) با رویکرد نظریه داده بنیاد. پژوهش‌های مدیریت منابع سازمانی، 4(9)، ۹۰-۶۹.
  2. حیدری ساربان، وکیل و مؤمنی، احمد. (۱۳۹۹). اثرات حکمروایی خوب بر بهبود شاخص‌های رفاه اجتماعی مناطق روستایی مطالعه موردی شهرستان فریدون، راهبردهای توسعه روستایی، 7(4)، ۴۸۸-۴۷۱.
  3. سعدآبادی، علی‌اصغر و رحیمی راد، زهره. (۱۳۹۹). کاربست نوآوری اجتماعی جهت مشارکت اجتماعی در اسناد بالادستی عمل و فناوری: مطالعه موردی نقشه جامعه علمی کشور، سیاست‌گذاری عمومی، 6(2)، ۷۳-۵۱.
  4. شفیعی ثابت، ناصر، خاکسار، سوگند، و حسینی، فاطمه سادات. (1394). حکمروایی خوب و رابطه آن با پایداری اجتماعی-اقتصادی سکونتگاه‌های روستایی (مورد: دهستان‌های شهرستان تویسرکان). کنگره پیشگامان پیشرفت.
  5. کشت‌کار، مهران (۱۳۹۹). مدل مفهومی رابطه بین نوآوری اجتماعی و مدیریت دانش با رویکرد فراترکیب. فصلنامه علمی مطالعات بین‌رشته‌ای دانش راهبردی، 10(39)، ۴۵۲-۴۲۱.
  6. Avelino, F. (2021). Theories of power and social change. Power contestations and their implications for research on social change and innovation. Journal of Political Power, 14(3), 425-448. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2021.1875307
  7. Baker, S., & Mehmood, A. (2015). Social innovation and the governance of sustainable places. Local Environment, 20(3), 321-334. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2013.842964
  8. Bock, B. B. (2012). Social innovation and sustainability; how to disentangle the buzzword and its application in the field of agriculture and rural development. Studies in agricultural economics, 114(2), 57-63. doi:10.7896/j.1209
  9. Bund, E., Gerhard, U., Hoelscher, M., & Mildenberger, G. (2015). A methodological framework for measuring social innovation. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 48-78. doi:10.12759/hsr.40.2015.3.48-78
  10. Bund, E., Hubrich, D.-K., Schmitz, B., Mildenberger, G., & Krlev, G. (2013). Blueprint of social innovation metrics: contributions to an understanding of opportunities and challenges of social innovation measurement.
  11. De Wijk, R., Kaneko, D., Dijksterhuis, G., van Bergen, G., Vingerhoeds, M., Visalli, M., & Zandstra, E. (2022). A preliminary investigation on the effect of immersive consumption contexts on food-evoked emotions using facial expressions and subjective ratings. Food Quality and Preference, 99, 104572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104572
  12. Del Giovane, P., Nobili, A., & Signoretti, F. M. (2013). Supply tightening or lack of demand? An analysis of credit developments during the Lehman Brothers and the sovereign debt crises. An Analysis of Credit Developments During the Lehman Brothers and the Sovereign Debt Crises (November 22, 2013). Bank of Italy Temi di Discussione (Working Paper) No, 942. RePEc:bdi:wptemi:td_942_13
  13. Di Iacovo, F., Moruzzo, R., Rossignoli, C., & Scarpellini, P. (2014). Transition management and social innovation in rural areas: Lessons from social farming. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 20(3), 327-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2014.887761
  14. Douglas, L. A., Varlinskaya, E. I., & Spear, L. P. (2003). Novel-object place conditioning in adolescent and adult male and female rats: effects of social isolation. Physiology & behavior, 80(2-3), 317-325. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2003.08.003
  15. Figueroa-Navarro, C., Molinar-Tabares, M. E., Castro-Arce, L., & Campos-García, J. C. (2014). Numerical Tribute to Achievement of Euler. APS March Meeting Abstracts. dbi:2014APS..MAR.C1279F
  16. Friedman, S. (2016). Habitus clivé and the emotional imprint of social mobility. The sociological review, 64(1), 129-147. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12280
  17. Heydari Sarban, Vakil and Momeni, Ahmad. (2019). T The Effects of Good Governance on Improving Social Welfare Indicators in Rural Areas Case Study of Frieden County. Rural Development Strategies, 7(4), 488-471. https://doi.org/10.22048/rdsj.2021.243593.1866. [In Persian].
  18. Hochgerner, J. (2011). The analysis of social innovations as social practice. Die Analyse sozialer Innovationen als gesellschaftliche Praxis. Vienna and Berlin: Zentrum für Soziale Innovation (ed.). Pendeln zwischen Wissenschaft und Praxis. ZSI-Beiträge zu sozialen Innovationen.
  19. Jandaghi, G., Zaraei, M., Morshedi-Estahbanati, S. M., & Firouznia, A. (2019). Designing a model of social innovation success in Imam Khomeini Relief Committee (RA) with a data-based theory approach. Organizational Resource Management Research, 4(9), 69-90. [In Persian].
  20. Jandaghi, Gholamreza; Zaraei, Matin; Morshedi-Estahbanati, Seyed Mahdi; Firouznia, Ali. (2019). Designing Social Innovation Success Modelin Imam Khomeini Relief Foundation: Grounded Theory Approach. Organizational Resource Management Research, 4(9), 69-90. [In Persian].dor: 20.1001.1.22286977.1398.9.4.4.9
  21. Jenkins, D., & Hernandez-Hernandez, V. (2015). Advances in the understanding of the BBSome complex structure and function. Research and Reports in Biology, 6, 191-201. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRB.S65700
  22. Kashtkar, M. (2012). Conceptual model of the relationship between social innovation and knowledge management with a meta-synthesis approach. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies of Strategic Knowledge, 10(39), 452-421. [In Persian].
  23. Kolosov, A., Glinkowska-Krauze, B., Chebotarov, I., Savchenko, O., & Chebotarov, V. (2020). Forming the capability of rural and settlement united territorial communities in Ukraine: using the experience of Poland. Agricultural and Resource Economics, 6(4), 12-20. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2020.06.04.07
  24. Komatsu, T., Deserti, A., Rizzo, F., Celi, M., & Alijani, S. (2016). Social innovation business models: Coping with antagonistic objectives and assets. In Finance and economy for society: Integrating sustainability. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.11, 315-347. doi:10.1108/S2043-905920160000011013
  25. Loorbach, D., Frantzeskaki, N., & Avelino, F. (2017). Sustainability transitions research: transforming science and practice for societal change. Annual review of Environment and Resources, 42(1), 599-626. 10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340
  26. McGowan, K., Westley, F., Moore, M.-L., Alexiuk, E., Antadze, N., Geobey, S., & Tjornbo, O. (2021). The importance of systems thinking and transformation for social innovation research: the evolution of an approach to social innovation. In A Research Agenda for Social Innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  27. McManus, M. (2018). The Singular Universe and the Reality of Time: A Proposal in Natural Philosophy. By Roberto Mangabeira Unger and Lee Smolin. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2014; 566 pp.; ISBN-10: 1107074061, ISBN-13: 978-1107074064. In: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.
  28. Meyer, C. (2022). Social Innovation Governance in Smart Specialisation Policies and Strategies Heading towards Sustainability: A Pathway to RIS4?. Social Sciences, 11(4), 150. doi: 10.3390/socsci11040150
  29. Moulaert, F., & MacCallum, D. (2019). Advanced introduction to social innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  30. Mueller, J., & Yin, Y. (2021). Unraveling the bias against novelty: guiding the study of our tendency to desire but reject the new. In Handbook of Research on Creativity and Innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  31. Novy, A. (2012). Preliminary reflections on an eco-social civilization model for the 21st century. Ensaios FEE, 33(1). doi: 10.1080/14615517.2019.1685807
  32. Ostrom, K. F., LaVigne, J. E., Brust, T. F., Seifert, R., Dessauer, C. W., Watts, V. J., & Ostrom, R. S. (2022). Physiological roles of mammalian transmembrane adenylyl cyclase isoforms. Physiological reviews, 102(2), 815-857. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00013.2021
  33. Paré, P. E., Liu, J., Beck, C. L., Nedić, A., & Başar, T. (2021). Multi-competitive viruses over time-varying networks with mutations and human awareness. Automatica, 123, 109330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2020.109330
  34. Phills, J. A., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(4), 34-43.
  35. Pradel, M., & Aissani, L. (2019). Environmental impacts of phosphorus recovery from a “product” Life Cycle Assessment perspective: Allocating burdens of wastewater treatment in the production of sludge-based phosphate fertilizers. Science of the Total Environment, 656, 55-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.356
  36. Pribadi, U., & Iqbal, M. (2022). Pivotal Issues of Democratic Governance: A Literature Review. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 25(3), 255-276. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.63435
  37. Rapaport, L. G., & Brown, G. R. (2008). Social influences on foraging behavior in young nonhuman primates: learning what, where, and how to eat. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews: Issues, News, and Reviews, 17(4), 189-201. 10.1002/evan.20180
  38. Ruffo, G., Semeraro, A., Giachanou, A., & Rosso, P. (2021). Surveying the research on fake news in social media: a tale of networks and language. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.07909. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2109.07909
  39. Saadabadi, A-A., & Rahimi-Rad, Z. (2019). Application of social innovation for social participation in upstream documents of practice and technology: a case study of the country's scientific community map. Public Policy, 6(2), 51-73. doi: 10.22059/jppolicy.2020.77613 [In Persian].
  40. Shafieisabet, N., Khaksar, S., & Hosseini, F. S. (2015). Good governance and its relationship with the socio-economic sustainability of rural settlements (Case: villages of Tuyserkan County). Congress of Pioneers of Progress. [In Persian].
  41. Slee, B., Burlando, C., Pisani, E., Secco, L., & Polman, N. (2021). Social innovation: a preliminary exploration of a contested concept. Local Environment, 26(7), 791-807. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2021.1933404
  42. Spijker, S., Koskinen, M.-K., & Riga, D. (2020). Incubation of depression: ECM assembly and parvalbumin interneurons after stress. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 118, 65-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.07.015
  43. Stefani, U., Schiavone, F., Laperche, B., & Burger-Helmchen, T. (2019). New tools and practices for financing novelty: a research agenda. European Journal of Innovation Management. doi:10.1108/EJIM-08-2019-0228
  44. Unit, E. I. (2016). Old problems, new solutions: Measuring the capacity for social innovation across the world. In: London: Economic Intelligence Unity Study.
  45. Van Kley, D. K. (2018). Reform Catholicism and the international suppression of the Jesuits in Enlightenment Europe. In Reform Catholicism and the International Suppression of the Jesuits in Enlightenment Europe. Yale University Press.
  46. Wamuchiru, E., & Moulaert, F. (2018). Thinking through ALMOLIN: the community bio-centre approach in water and sewerage service provision in Nairobi's informal settlements. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 61(12), 2166-2185. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2017.1389699