تحلیل اثرات اشتغال زنان بر معیشت پایدار خانوارهای روستایی مطالعه موردی: دهستان مکریان غربی شهرستان مهاباد

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه جغرافیا، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران

10.22059/jhgr.2026.390374.1008793

چکیده

امروزه، با توجه به اینکه نیمی از جمعیت جامعه را زنان تشکیل می‌دهند؛ امروزه دستیابی به عدالت جنسیتی به یکی از اهداف مهم توسعه تبدیل شده است. تحقیق حاضر از نظر نوع ﮐﺎرﺑﺮدی و ماهیت، توصیفی- تحلیلی و از نظر روش کمی است. روش گردآوری اطلاعات به صورت کتابخانه‌ای و میدانی است. یافته‌‌های به دست آمده نشان می‌‌دهد بین اشتغال زنان و معیشت پایدار خانوارهای روستایی همبستگی مثبت و مستقیم وجود دارد. یافته‌های به دست آمده از مطلوبیت ابعاد معیشت پایدار با آزمون تی تک‌نمونه ای نشان داد تمامی ابعاد مورد بررسی معیشت پایدار با توجه به آماره t و سطح معناداری در وضعیت مطلوب قرار دارند. جهت تحلیل مطلوبیت ابعاد اشتغال زنان با استفاده از آزمون تی تک‌نمونه ای نشان می‌دهد این میزان برای 8 بعد(اشتغال، دامداری، زراعت، باغداری، درآمد، فردی و آموزش) به ترتیب با آماره ی t، 177/4، 532/11، 272/1، 369/3، 494/8، 066/15، 925/5 و 788/3 دارای مطلوبیت است و دو بعد دارایی و صنایع دستی به ترتیب با آماره ی t، 751/0- و 190/2- کمتر از شرایط مطلوب ارزیابی شده‌است. بررسی‌ها نشان‌داد که سه بعد دارایی، زراعت و صنایع دستی با سطح معناداری بالای 05/0 از وضعیت نامطلوب برخوردارند. همچنین نتایج بدست آمده از مدل عاملی تاییدی نشان داد عوامل شناسایی شده براشتغال زنان و معیشت پایدار روستائیان معنادار و مثبت بوده و تمامی شاخص‌ها نشان از نیکویی برازش مدل می‌دهند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Analysis of the Effects of Women's Employment on Sustainable Livelihoods of Rural Households: A case study of Western Mokrian District, Mahabad County

نویسندگان [English]

  • Pouya Sheikh choopani
  • Mehdi cheraghi
  • Behruoz Mohammadi yeganeh
Department of Geography, Faculty of Humanities, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran
چکیده [English]

ABSTRACT
Today, Given that half of the population consists of women, achieving gender equality has become one of the key goals of development. The present study is applied in nature, descriptive-analytical in approach, and quantitative in method. Data collection was conducted through library-based and field methods. The findings indicate a positive and direct correlation between women's employment and the sustainable livelihood of rural households. The results of the assessment of the desirability of sustainable livelihood dimensions using the one-sample t-test showed that all examined dimensions of sustainable livelihood are in a desirable state based on the t-statistic and significance level. The analysis of the desirability of women's employment dimensions using the one-sample t-test revealed that eight dimensions (employment, livestock rearing, agriculture, horticulture, income, individual, education, and ...) with t-statistics of 4/177, 11/523, 1/272, 3/369, 8/494, 15/066, 5/925, and 3/788, respectively, are desirable, while two dimensions, assets and handicrafts, with t-statistics of -0/751 and -2/190, respectively, were assessed as less than desirable. The findings showed that three dimensions—assets, agriculture, and handicrafts—with a significance level above 0/05, are in an undesirable state. Additionally, the results of the confirmatory factor analysis model indicated that the identified factors significantly and positively affect women's employment and the sustainable livelihood of rural communities, with all indicators demonstrating the model's goodness of fit.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
When it comes to the issue of women’s gender, there exists a historical invisibility that reflects a gender culture that undermines the social role of women. However, analyzing rural developments now requires attention to gender, which is recognized as one of the key objectives of human rights and sustainable development, as well as an essential analytical concept and a fundamental prerequisite for achieving other development goals, including improving food security, child nutrition and education, poverty reduction, and women’s health. A wealth of information has now been gathered about the role and status of women in various societies, particularly in rural areas, making women’s position significantly more visible. This research focuses on the effects of women’s employment on sustainable livelihoods in rural areas, aiming to identify and analyze how women’s employment shapes sustainable livelihoods and its impact on the social and economic development of rural communities.
 
Methodology
The method of data collection was both library-based and field-based (questionnaires and observations), and descriptive and inferential statistics were used for data analysis. The research population comprises households from 6 villages in the Western Mokrian district, with a sample of 337 individuals. For the tests, SPSS was used, and for confirmatory factor analysis, structural equation modeling was performed using Amos Graphics.
 
Results and discussion
The study's findings on the impact of women's employment on rural households' sustainable livelihoods, using the Pearson correlation coefficient with a significance level of 0.000 and a correlation coefficient of 0.392, indicate a positive, direct relationship. In other words, there is a significant relationship between women's employment and the sustainable livelihoods of rural families. The findings regarding the desirability of the dimensions of sustainable livelihoods, assessed using a one-sample t-test, indicate that all dimensions are in a desirable state, as indicated by the t-statistic and significance level. Additionally, the analysis of the desirability of the dimensions of women’s employment, using a one-sample t-test, indicates that this level is desirable for eight dimensions (employment, livestock, agriculture, horticulture, income, individual, and education) with t-statistics of 4.177, 11.532, 1.272, 3.369, 8.494, 15.066, 5.925, and 3.788, respectively. However, the dimensions of assets and handicrafts were evaluated as less than desirable, with t-statistics of -0.751 and -2.190, respectively. The investigations revealed that the three dimensions of assets, agriculture, and handicrafts have a significance level above 0.05, indicating an undesirable status. The findings from the confirmatory factor analysis, based on structural equation modeling statistics, indicate that the goodness-of-fit index (GFI) is significant at 69.524, and the relative indices with a value of 0.040 for the root mean square residual (RMSR) and the comparative fit indices at 0.910 indicate a good fit for the model and confirm the adequacy of the model.
 
Conclusion
In the first section, through the application of inferential statistical tests, it can be concluded that, with the exception of three dimensions (assets, handicrafts, and agriculture), all other eight dimensions of women’s employment significantly impact the aspects of sustainable livelihoods (social, human, natural, physical, and financial) of rural households. Within the studied area, women’s employment in rural settings had the greatest impact on the social dimension of sustainable livelihoods, with a value of 29.465, while the least impact was observed on the financial dimension, with a value of 7.302. In the second part of the research, using confirmatory factor analysis, it can be concluded that women’s employment has a significant, positive impact on household sustainable livelihoods. The model demonstrates adequate power in terms of fit and significance regarding the influence of women’s employment on the sustainable livelihoods of rural communities in the Western Mokrian district.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Rural Development
  • Gender Equality
  • gender
  • Livelihoods
  • West Azerbaijan Province
  1. باقری، الهام. (1395). اثر فعالیت های گردشگری بر معیشت پایدار روستایی، مطالعه موردی: روستای لزور. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، رشته  دانشگاه علم و فرهنگ، تهران.
  2. جلیلیان، نسرین و پاپ‌زن, ‌عبدالحمید. (1398). موانع و محدودیت های موفقیت طرح های خودکفایی و کارآفرینی کمیته امداد امام خمینی (ره) مورد: زنان سرپرست خانوار دهستان هرسم، شهرستان اسلام آباد غرب. اقتصاد فضا و توسعه روستایی، 27(8)، 65-78.‎
  3. چوبدار، مریم. (1395). نقش اشتغال زنان در اقتصاد خانوارهای روستایی، مطالعه موردی شهرستان بیرجند. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بیرجند.
  4. خانی، فضیله. (1389). چارچوب تحلیلی در مطالعات نابرابری های جنسیتی در جهان. زن در توسعه و سیاست، 8 (3)، 3-70.
  5. سازمان برنامه و بودجه کشور. (1399). گزارش اقتصادی، اجتماعی و فرهنگی شهرستان‌های استان آذربایجان غربی.
  6. شریفی، زینب. (1396). تبیین راهبردهای معیشت پایدار روستایی، مطالعه موردی بخش مرکزی ‌شهرستان دنا. رساله دکتری، رشته کشاورزی گرایش توسعه روستایی، دانشگاه یاسوج.
  7. عالی‌زاده، اسماعیل و بهرامی، سارا. (1396). نقش زنان روستایی در ایجاد کسب‌وکار سبز؛(مطالعه موردی دو روستای قلعه قافه بالا و کفش محله استان گلستان). پژوهشنامه مددکاری اجتماعی، 7 (2)، 123-152.‎
  8. گوشه نشین، فاطمه. (1393). نقش زنان در اقتصاد و سکونتگاه های روستایی با تاکید بر اشتغال: مطالعه موردی دهستان وراوی شهرستان مهر. پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، گروه جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی روستایی، دانشگاه زنجان.
  9. لیس، تورس؛ اماری، روزاریو و روزاریو، دل. (1375). جنسیت و توسعه. ترجمه جواد یوسفیان، تهران: نشر بانو.
  10. سواری، مسلم؛ شعبانعلی فمی، حسین و شریف زاده، محمد شریف. (۱۳۹۶). موانع توسعه اشتغال زنان روستایی در صنایع دستی شهرستان دیواندره. فصلنامه اقتصاد فضا و توسعه روستایی، ۶ (۳)، ۳۶-۱۷.
  11. میرک زاده، علی اصغر، خالدی، فخرالدین، شه کرمی ریگی، ضیاء و ادریس اله ویسی، محمد (۱۳۹۶). تحلیل عوامل مؤثر و موانع توسعه ی فعالیتهای غیر کشاورزی با تأکید بر مشاغل خانگی مورد مطالعه دهستان قوی قلعه. مجله تحقیقات اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی ایران، ۲ (۳)، ۵۴۵-۵۳۳.
  12. Ali Zadeh, I., & Bahrami, S. (2017). The role of rural women in creating green businesses: A case study of Qaleh Qafeh Bala and Kafsh Mahaleh villages in Golestan Province. Social Work Research Journal, 7(2), 123-152.[In Persian].
  13. Ali, M. A., & Kamraju, M. (2023). The Role of Women in Rural Development Programs. ASEAN Journal of Community Service and Education, 2(1), 67-84.
  14. Bagheri, E. (2016). The impact of tourism activities on sustainable rural livelihoods: A case study of Lazoor village (Master’s thesis, University of Science and Culture, Tehran).[In Persian].
  15. Baines, D., Cunningham, I., & Shields, J. (2017). Filling the gaps: Unpaid (and precarious) work in the nonprofit social services. Critical Social Policy, 37(4), 625-645. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018317693128.
  16. Barbier, E. B. (2011). Wetlands as natural assets. Hydrological Sciences Journal56(8), 1360-1373. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2011.629787.
  17. Chambers, R., Conway, G., & Brighton Institute of Development Studies. (1992). Sustainable rural livelihoods: practical concepts for the 21st century (Vol. 296). Brighton: Institute of development studies. https://www.ids.ac.uk/download.php?file=files/Dp296.pdf.
  18. Chanfreau, J. (2023). The persistence in gendering: Work-family policy in Britain since Beveridge. Journal of Social Policy, 52(4), 981-998. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279422000125.
  19. Choubdar, M. (2016). The role of women’s employment in the economy of rural households: A case study of Birjand County. (Master’s thesis, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Birjand).[In Persian].
  20. Cunningham, K., Ruel, M., Ferguson, E., & Uauy, R. (2015). Women's empowerment and child nutritional status in S outh A sia: a synthesis of the literature. Maternal & child nutrition11(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12125.
  21. DfID, U. K. (1999). Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets. London: DFID445, 710.  Available at: https://www.livelihoodscentre.org. Accessed 12 June 2020.
  22. Erenstein, O., & Thorpe, W. (2011). Livelihoods and agro-ecological gradients: A meso-level analysis in the Indo-Gangetic Plains, India. Agricultural Systems104(1), 42-53.
  23. Fagan, C., O’Reilly, J., & Rubery, J. (2020). Part-time work: Challenging the “breadwinner” gender contract. In The Gendering of Inequalities (pp. 174-186). Routledge.
  24. Fahad, S., & Wang, J. (2018). Farmers’ risk perception, vulnerability, and adaptation to climate change in rural Pakistan. Land use policy79, 301-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.08.018.
  25. Fahad, S., Alnori, F., Su, F., & Deng, J. (2022). Adoption of green innovation practices in SMEs sector: evidence from an emerging economy. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja35(1), 5486-5501. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2029713.
  26. FAO, IFAD, ILO. (2010). Gender dimensions of agriculture and rural employment: diferentiated pathways out of poverty. http://www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1638e/i1638e00.htm.
  27. Fisher, B., Turner, R. K., & Morling, P. (2009). Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological economics68(3), 643-653.
  28. Ghasemi Rad, B. (2011). The role of women’s employment in the economy of rural households: A case study of the Bajgiran district in Quchan County. (Master’s thesis, Yasouj University).[In Persian].
  29. Goodwin, N. R. (2003). Five kinds of capital: Useful concepts for sustainable development.
  30. Gosheneshin, F. (2014). The role of women in the economy and rural settlements with an emphasis on employment: A case study of the Varavi district in Mehr County. (Master’s thesis, Department of Geography and Rural Planning, Zanjan University).[In Persian].
  31. Henry, P. (2021). Rural women farmers and sustainable livelihoods in guyana. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 9(08), 666-682. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v9i8.sh02.
  32. Hu, G., Wang, J., Fahad, S., & Li, J. (2023). Influencing factors of farmers’ land transfer, subjective well-being, and participation in agri-environment schemes in environmentally fragile areas of China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(2), 4448–4461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22497-6.
  33. Ice, E., Ang, S., Greenberg, K., & Burgard, S. (2020). Women’s work-family histories and cognitive performance in later life. American Journal of Epidemiology, 189(9), 922–930. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaa042.
  34. Idris, A. A., & Abdullahi, A. (2024). Gender livelihood strategies among farmers’ household in Kano State, Nigeria. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, 42(3), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajaees/2024/v42i32385.
  35. International Labour Organization. (2018). Care work and care jobs for the future of decent work. International Labour Organization. No DOI available; access via: https://www.ilo.org/publications/care-work-and-care-jobs-future-decent-work.
  36.   Jalilian, N., & Mohammadi, Y. (2020). Prediction of sustainable livelihood of rural households based on Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index (WEAI) in Hamedan Province. Journal of Rural Research, 11(3), 524–537. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrur.2020.305430.1518.
  37. Jalilian, N., & Papzan, A. (2019). Barriers and limitations to the success of self-sufficiency and entrepreneurship plans of the Imam Khomeini Relief Foundation: A case study of female-headed households in Harsam District, Islamabad-e Gharb County. Spatial Economy and Rural Development, 27(8), 65-78.[In Persian].
  38. Kamaruddin, R., & Samsudin, S. (2014). The sustainable livelihoods index: A tool to assess the ability and preparedness of the rural poor in receiving entrepreneurial project. Journal of Social Economics Research1(6), 108-117.
  39. Kaplan, A. (2022). “Just let it pass by and it will fall on some woman”: Invisible work in the labor market. Gender & Society, 36(6), 838–868. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432221128543.
  40. Kaplan, A., Sabbah-Karkabi, M., & Herzog, H. (2020). “When I iron my son’s shirt, I feel my maternal role”: Making women’s invisible work visible. Journal of Family Issues, 41(9), 1525–1545. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X19894352.
  41. Khani, F. (2010). An analytical framework in studies of gender inequalities in the world. Women in Development and Politics, 8(3), 3-70.[In Persian].
  42. Kosec, K., Doss, C., & Slavchevska, V. (2020). Gender and rural transformation. Intl Food Policy Res Inst.
  43. Krantz, L. (2001). The sustainable livelihood approach to poverty reduction. SIDA. Division for Policy and Socio-Economic Analysis44, 1-38. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269576058_The_sustainable_livelihood_approach_to_poverty_reduction_An_Introduction.
  44. Leavens, M. K., Gugerty, M. K., & Anderson, C. L. (2019). Gender and agriculture in Tanzania. Gates Open Research, 3, 1348. https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.12962.1.
  45. Lis Torres, A. R. D. (1996). Gender and development (J. Yusefian, Trans.). Tehran: Banoo Publications.[In Persian].
  46. McGee, R. W. (2023). Gender Discrimination Arguments and Non Sequiturs: A ChatGPT Essay. Available at SSRN 4413432. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4413432.
  47. Mobasheri Shiri, A., & Asghari Lamejani, S. (2021). Analyzing the effects of handmade carpet production on the livelihoods of rural households in Fasa County. Spatial Planning, 11(3), 25-43.[In Persian].
  48. Núñez, P. G., Michel, C. L., Leal Tejeda, P. A., & Núñez, M. A. (2020). Rural women’s invisible work in census and state rural development plans: The Argentinean Patagonian Case. Land, 9(3), 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9030092.
  49. Organization for Planning and Budget. (2020). Economic, social, and cultural report of the counties in West Azerbaijan Province (p. 300).
  50. Ortiz-Ospina, E., Tzvetkova, S., & Roser, M. (2023). Working women: Key facts and trends in female labor force participation. Our world in data.
  51. Our World in Data. (2023). Women’s employment. Women's Employment - Our World in Data.
  52. Pan, W., Wang, J., Lu, Z., Liu, Y., & Li, Y. (2021). High-quality development in China: Measurement system, spatial pattern, and improvement paths. Habitat international118, 102458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102458.
  53. Perry‐Jenkins, M., & Gerstel, N. (2020). Work and family in the second decade of the 21st century. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 420-453. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12636.
  54. Pramanick, A. (2024). Livelihood Activity Choices, Skills and Labor Markets: A Case Study of Two Villages of Baksa District, Assam. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4699550.
  55. Rand, H. M. (2019). Challenging the invisibility of sex work in digital labour politics. Feminist Review, 123(1), 40-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0141778919879749.
  56. Rola-Rubzen, M. F., Vuong, H. T., Doll, C., Rollins, C., Sarmiento, J. M., Alam, M. J., & Begum, I. A. (2023). Gender and Rural Transformation: A Systematic Literature Review1. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. https://research-repository.uwa.edu.au/en/publications/gender-and-rural-transformation-a-systematic-literature-review.
  57. Sen, A. (1982). Poverty and famines: an essay on entitlement and deprivation. Oxford university press.
  58. Sharifi, Z. (2017). Explanation of sustainable rural livelihood strategies: A case study of the central district of Dena County. (Doctoral dissertation, Department of Agriculture, Rural Development, Yasouj University) .[In Persian].
  59. Siyami, G., & Sattari Vand, M. (2021). Strategic analysis of empowerment strategies for female-headed households in informal settlements with an emphasis on entrepreneurship: A case study of Ansar and Arvand neighborhoods in Shahid Rajaei Town, Mashhad. Women in Development and Politics, 19(3), 405-427.[In Persian].
  60. Song, J., Peng, R., Qian, L., Yan, F., Ozturk, I., & Fahad, S. (2022). Households Production Factor Mismatches and Relative Poverty Nexus: A Novel Approach. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies31(4). https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/146985.
  61. Su, F., Liang, X., Cai, S., Chen, S., & Fahad, S. (2022). Assessment of parent-subsidiary companies’ geographical distance effect on corporate social responsibility: a case of A-share listed companies. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja35(1), 4922-4946. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2021.2013273.
  62. Su, F., Song, N., Shang, H., & Fahad, S. (2022). The impact of economic policy uncertainty on corporate social responsibility: A new evidence from food industry in China. Plos one17(6), e0269165. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269165.
  63. Suharso, W., Karyati, R., Andriyani, V., Achmadi, T. R., & Wibowo, H. (2020). The role of women in improving the income for economic changes in underprivileged families. Jurnal Perempuan dan Anak, 3(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpa.v3i1.11500.
  64. Timire, C., Pedrazzoli, D., Boccia, D., Houben, R. M., Ferrand, R. A., Bond, V., & Kranzer, K. (2023). Use of a Sustainable Livelihood Framework–Based Measure to Estimate Socioeconomic Impact of Tuberculosis on Households. Clinical Infectious Diseases77(5), 761-767. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciad272.
  65. Whitley, H., & Brasier, K. (2020). Women farmers and women farmer’s identities. In Routledge handbook of gender and agriculture (pp. 360-369). Routledge.
  66. World Bank (2019) The world bank annual report 2019: ending poverty, Investing in opportunity.
  67. World Bank (2021) Country Gender Assessment: Georgia.
  68. Yang, K., Fahad, S., & He, H. (2022). Assessing the cooking oil fume exposure impacts on Chinese women health: an influential mechanism analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research29(35), 53860-53872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19637-4.
  69. Zhang, Y., Wu, Y., Yan, J., & Peng, T. (2022). How does rural labor migration affect crop diversification for adapting to climate change in the Hehuang Valley, Tibetan Plateau?. Land Use Policy113, 105928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105928.
  70. Zhong, F., Chen, R., Luo, X., Song, X., & Ullah, A. (2024). Assessing regional resilience in China using a sustainable livelihoods approach: Indicators, influencing factors, and the relationship with economic performance. Ecological Indicators, 158, 111588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111588.