ماهیت و عوامل مؤثر بر شکل‌گیری دوگانگی فضایی در نواحی شهری ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

10.22059/jhgr.2026.398957.1008821

چکیده

چکیده
گسست فضایی در شهرهای ایران به بازتولید نابرابری‌های دامن زده و شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر آن، به روشن شدن سیاست‌گذاری‌های مؤثر کمک می‌کند. اما تاکنون هیچ مطالعه مروری چه سیستماتیک و چه روایی به بررسی گسست فضایی از منظر مفهوم «بالا شهر-پایین‌شهر» و عوامل مؤثر بر شکل‌گیری آن در شهرهای ایران نپرداخته است. درحالی‌که هر یک از مطالعات پیشین عوامل خاصی را ایجادکننده این شکاف می‌دانند. به همین منظور این پژوهش به شناسایی و تحلیل عوامل مؤثر بر شکل‌گیری گسست فضایی در قالب دوگانگی «بالا شهر-پایین‌شهر» در شهرهای ایران می‌پردازد. با تلفیق روش‌های مرور روایی و تحلیل ساختاری، داده‌های کیفی جمع‌آوری و تحلیل‌شده است. یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد گسست فضایی در ایران ناشی از پنج دسته عامل اجتماعی-فرهنگی، اقتصادی، کالبدی-زیرساختی، مدیریتی و محیطی است. در میان ۱۴ عامل شناسایی‌شده، «اختلافات طبقاتی و فاصله بین دهک‌های اقتصادی»، «توزیع نابرابر خدمات و تسهیلات شهری» و «تفاوت‌های فضایی در سواد و اشتغال» پرتکرارترین و مهم‌ترین عوامل محرک هستند. تحلیل ساختاری نیز چهار گروه عامل را آشکار ساخت: (۱) عوامل تأثیرگذارِ کلیدی شامل اختلافات طبقاتی، هویت ذهنی بالا/پایین‌شهر و شکاف پایگاه اجتماعی؛ (۲) عوامل تأثیرپذیر مانند قیمت زمین و تقاضای مسکن؛ (۳) عوامل مستقل؛ و (۴) عوامل دووجهی. این پژوهش برای نخستین بار در ادبیات داخلی، عوامل محرک گسست فضایی را سیستماتیک شناسایی و سلسله‌مراتب تأثیرگذاری آن‌ها را مشخص کرده است. نتایج نشان می‌دهد که کاهش گسست فضایی مستلزم مداخله هدفمند در عوامل تأثیرگذارِ کلیدی به‌ویژه کاهش نابرابری‌های اقتصادی و اصلاح الگوهای توزیع خدمات شهری است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Nature and factors affecting the formation of Urban dualism in Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Khatereh Moghani rahimi
  • Hashem Dadashpoor
Department of Urban planning and Design, Faculty of Arts and Architecture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

ABSTRACT
No systematic or qualitative review has examined the spatial discontinuity from the perspective of the "uptown-downtown" concept and the factors that shape its formation in Iranian cities, while previous studies identify specific factors that create this gap. This research identifies and analyzes the factors that shape spatial fragmentation in the form of the "uptown-downtown" dichotomy in Iranian cities. By combining narrative review methods and structural analysis, qualitative data from previous studies and the opinions of 18 urban experts have been collected and analyzed. The findings show that spatial fragmentation in Iran is caused by five categories of socio-cultural, economic, physical-infrastructural, managerial, and environmental factors. Among the 14 identified factors, "class differences and the gap between economic deciles", "unequal distribution of urban services and facilities", and "spatial differences in literacy and employment" are the most frequent and important driving factors. Structural analysis also revealed four groups of factors as key influencing factors, including class differences, uptown/downtown subjective identity, and social status gap; influencing factors such as land prices and housing demand; independent factors; and bimodal factors. This study, for the first time in the domestic literature, has systematically identified the driving factors of spatial fragmentation and determined their hierarchy of influence. The results show that reducing spatial fragmentation requires targeted intervention in key influencing factors, especially reducing economic inequalities and reforming urban service distribution patterns.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Iranian cities, especially metropolitan cities, have long witnessed the formation of complex and diverse spatial structures that reflect the big social, economic, and cultural differences among their residents. These structures manifest as the “uptown” and “downtown” phenomena, where the more affluent and developed areas (uptown) contrast with and are spatially separated from the less developed and deprived areas (downtown). This spatial and class separation not only reflects differences in income and living standards, but also indicates social and cultural segregation that has been consolidated and deepened over time. The spatial discontinuity created in these cities has widespread consequences in various areas, including limiting equitable access to urban facilities and services such as education, health, transportation, and green spaces. This inequality in access, in turn, reproduces social and economic inequalities and deprives parts of society of equal opportunities for growth and progress. As a result, this spatial disconnection is not only a physical and urban issue, but also a profound challenge to social cohesion, spatial justice, and sustainable development in Iranian cities. In Iranian cities, the factors driving spatial disconnection have not been accurately and comprehensively identified, which makes effective planning and policymaking difficult. Until a deep, scientific understanding of the factors that influence the formation of this phenomenon is achieved, it is not possible to properly analyze the main reasons for the emergence of spatial gaps and to provide efficient, reality-based solutions to address them. Identifying the factors influencing spatial disconnection is essential for understanding its roots more accurately and for developing policies that can reduce inequalities and enhance spatial justice in Iranian cities. In fact, without this recognition, any intervention or planning will likely remain superficial and unsustainable and will not help to solve the problem fundamentally. Given that identifying the factors that shape this spatial duality helps better understand how urban development and effective policies are designed to reduce spatial gaps, no study has examined this issue to date. For this purpose, this research aims to answer three questions:
-"What studies have examined the issue of spatial discontinuity in the concept of uptown and downtown in Iran so far?"
- "What are the factors that create this concept in previous studies and according to experts?"
 - "What are the most key factors affecting the formation of this concept in Iranian cities?"
 
Methodology
This fundamental research, with an inductive-explanatory approach, has used a combination of qualitative (validity review, content analysis, interviews) and quantitative (structural-interpretive analysis) methods to answer the research question. First, previous studies were identified and screened in several stages using the validity review method; then, these studies were examined, and effective factors were identified using content analysis; and finally, the key factors affecting the spatial gap in Iranian cities were identified using structural analysis.
 
Results and discussion
The findings of this research show that previous studies and experts in this field consider the phenomenon of spatial discontinuity between uptown and downtown in Iranian cities to be primarily due to social and cultural factors, economic factors, physical and infrastructural factors, managerial factors, and environmental factors. Moreover, the factors of class differences and the gap between economic deciles, unequal distribution of activities, urban services and facilities, unbalanced environmental quality in the city including housing and roads, differences in the quantity and quality of employment, spatial differences in the level of literacy and education, differences in land and housing prices, etc. are respectively the most frequent or, in other words, the most important factors affecting the gap between uptown and downtown in Iran in previous studies and from the experts in this field.
Conclusion
As a result, by controlling the factors identified in this study, especially class differences and the gap between economic deciles, branding and mental identity of the upper and lower city, and the gap in social base and cultural differences, the spatial gap between the upper and lower city in Iran can be significantly reduced. However, cultural, social, environmental, etc. differences between different urban areas of Iran can affect how these factors are planned and prioritized. While this issue was not considered in this study due to information limitations, the authors' limited knowledge of different cities in Iran, and the standard volume of research. Future studies should likely use both quantitative and qualitative methods simultaneously to identify factors across different cities, thereby providing greater depth to analyses of spatial discontinuity. Also, research can help better understand the factors that cause spatial discontinuity by comparing different urban areas in Iran and other countries. In addition, developing conceptual and operational models to predict and control spatial fragmentation across cities can help policymakers design targeted, effective solutions.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Spatial fragmentation
  • Urban dualism
  • Uptown
  • Downtown
  • Spatial inequality
  • Urban areas
  1. Azam Azadeh, M. (1382). How to choose residential segregation in Tehran city. Al-Zahra Human Sciences, 12-13(44-45), 25-50. [In Persian].
  2. Azhdari, A., Taghvaei, A. A., & Zahirinajad, A. (2015). Analyzing Socio-spatial Segregation of Educational and Occupational Groups in Shiraz Metropolitan Area. Motaleate Shahri, 4(16), 67-80. [In Persian].
  3. Balali, E., & Makhdoomi, K. (2021). Spatial Segregation or Social Segregation? A Comparative Study of Marriage Patterns of Women in the High and Low-Class Regions of Hamadan Province. Journal of Applied Sociology, 32(2), 129-150. doi: 10.22108/jas.2021.122682.1896. [In Persian].
  4. Dadashpoor, H., & Ghazaie, M. (2019). Exploring the consequences of segregation through residents' experiences: Evidence of a neighborhood in the Tehran metropolis. Cities, 95, Article 102391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102391
  5. Ghazaie, M., Rafieian, M. & Dadashpoor, H. (2022). Making the invisible segregation of diverse neighbourhoods visible. J Hous and the Built Environ, 37, 459–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-021-09850-z
  6. Imani Shamloo, J., Rafiean, M., & Azhdari, A. (2022). Explaining of the Socio-Occupational Segregation in Space Organization of Tehran Metropolis (From the Perspective of Neoliberal Restructuring of Space). Human Geography Research, 54(2), 437-456. doi: 10.22059/jhgr.2020.258095.1007703. [In Persian].
  7. Izadi, M. S., Masoud, M., & Moazezi Mehr-e-Tehran, A. M. (2016). Designing a holistic framework in studying urban segregation. Motaleate Shahri, 5(20), 79-91. [In Persian].
  8. Khairuddin, R. (2012). A research on spatial-physical translation of Islamic concept of justice with cartographic analysis of spatial balance in 112 districts of Tehran metropolis. Islamic Architecture Research, 1 (1), 41-56. Dor:20.1001.1.22286020.1389.2.42.7.6. [In Persian].
  9. Kheyroddin, R. (2010). A geo-referenciel analysis on urban governance policies in Tehran metropolis (The years 1993-2007) Toward urban integration or spatial segregation?. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 2(42), 71-82. [In Persian].
  10. mahdnejad, H., & Gholami, A. (2021). Geographical analysis of social polarization in Isfahan metropolis. Geography, 19(69), 115-130. [In Persian].
  11. Meshkini, A., Rahimi, H. (2010). Spatial separation in the mother cities: an analysis of the social geography of the mother city of Tehran. Planning and preparation of space. 15 (4): 87-107. [In Persian].
  12. Moghani Rahimi, K. & Dadashpoor, H. (2024). Explaining the theoretical model of the relationship between social-spatial segregation and the formation of gated communities in Iranian cities. Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR), 12(2), 135-159. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2024.380520.1974. [In Persian].
  13. Mohammadi, M., Hosseini Dehaghani, M., & Fadaei, I. (2015). An Introduction to the Concepts of "Bala-Shahr" and "Paeen-Shahr"By Studies of Semantic Fields and Content Analysis of People’s Opinions. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 12(33), 107-116. [In Persian].
  14. Rafieian, M., Alizadeh, A., & Taghvayee, A. A. (2016). Analysis of Spatial Fragmentation in the Spatial Organization of Yazd Using Network Analysis and Space Syntax. Human Geography Research, 48(3), 441-459. doi: 10.22059/jhgr.2016.51998. [In Persian].
  15. Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2018). The revenge of the places that don’t matter. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(1), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsx023
  16. Sheydayi, A., & Dadashpoor, H. (2023). Conducting qualitative content analysis in urban planning research and urban studies. Habitat International, 139, 102878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102878
  17. Tulaei, N., & Yari, J. (2012). Investigating factors affecting the tendency to migrate within the city in Tehran with an emphasis on the feeling of spatial inequality. Social analysis of order and social inequality, 2012(2), 79-110. [In Persian].
  18. Vaziri Zadeh, A., & Haghshenas, N. (2024). Housing Social Policy in Iran: Analyzing the Impact of the Maskan-I-Mehr Program on Socio-Spatial Segregation in the Metropolitan Area of Tehran. Journals of Urban and Regional Development Planning, 9(30), 199-244. doi: 10.22054/urdp.2024.79022.1628. [In Persian].
  19. yazdani, M., jami odluo, M., & Abbasi Taghi Dizaj, R. (2023). Analyzing segregation in rural-urban areas with an emphasis on inclusive development (case study: rural-urban areas of Ardabil city). Geography and Human Relationships, 5(4), 715-741. doi: 10.22034/gahr.2023.394286.1856. [In Persian].
  20. Zahirnejad, A., & Dadashpoor, H. (2018). Examining socio-spatial segregation of educational and occupational groups in Isfahan metropolitan region. Physical Social Planning, 5(1), 25-44. doi: 10.30473/psp.2018.4829. [In Persian].