مقایسۀ تطبیقی و تحلیل کیفیت زندگی شهری در محله‌های جدید و قدیم (محلۀ جدید ظفریه و محلۀ قدیمی قطارچیان سنندج)

نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشگاه تربیت‌مدرس

2 دانشیار برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشگاه کردستان

3 کارشناس ارشد شهرسازی، دانشگاه کردستان

چکیده

هدف اصلی این پژوهش، مقایسة کیفیت زندگی در دو بافت قدیمی (محلة قطارچیان) و جدید (محلة ظفریه) شهری سنندج و شناسایی مؤلفه‌های مؤثر بر بهبود کیفیت زندگی در هردو بافت است. در این پژوهش، با تأکید بر بعد ذهنی کیفیت زندگی، میزان رضایتمندی ساکنان دو محلۀ انتخاب­شده با استفاده از شاخص‌های کیفیت زندگی ارزیابی می­شود. مدل نظری ارائه‌شده، براساس چارچوب دیدگاه تحقیقات تجربی و با توجه به میزان رضایتمندی بنا شده است. به‌منظور ساختاربندی و ایجاد درخت ارزش کیفیت زندگی، از روش کل به جزء (بالا به پایین) استفاده شده که در چهار سطح تنظیم شده است. برمبنای سنجه‌های سطح آخر، پرسشنامه­ای با 45 سؤال تدوین شد و کیفیت زندگی شهری، براساس طیف پنج­گزینه‌ای لیکرت توسط ساکنان ارزیابی شد. میزان آزمون آلفای کرونباخ (91/0) نیز روایی پرسشنامه را تا حد زیادی تأیید می‌کند. اطلاعات استخراج­شده از پرسشنامه، به روش تحلیل رگرسیون چندمتغیره، آزمون تی و آزمون همبستگی پیرسون تجزیه و تحلیل شد. براساس نتایج، فرضیة پژوهش مبنی­بر مطلوب‌تربودن کیفیت زندگی در بافت جدید تأیید شد و میانگین امتیاز رضایتمندی ساکنان محلة قطارچیان (با میانگین 2/72) و محلة ظفریه (با میانگین 3/44)، میزان تفاوت رضایتمندی ساکنان دو محله را آشکار ساخت. در بررسی سایر فرضیه­ها، معناداری تأثیر دو عامل کیفیت محله و مسکن بر میزان رضایت از کیفیت زندگی، تأیید و معناداری تأثیر وضعیت اجتماعی- اقتصادی ساکنان بر میزان رضایتمندی از کیفیت زندگی‌شان رد شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Comparative Analysis of Quality of Life in Old and New Quarters, Zafarieh and Qatarchian Quarters, Sanandaj

نویسندگان [English]

  • Abolfazl Meshkini 1
  • Kyoumars Habibi 2
  • Arman Rahimi Kakejob 3
  • Mohamad Hamed Abdi 3
1 Assistant Professor of Geography and Urban Planning, Tarbiat Modares University, Iran
2 Associate Professor of Urban Planning, University of Kurdistan, Iran
3 M.A. in Urban Planning, University of Kurdistan, Sannandaj, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction
In Iran, after cities expansion and urban population growth, the issue of Quality of Life (QOF) has been concerned in our cities. There is great difference between urban neighborhoods regarding to QOF level. In the recent decades, the old area of the city with peripheral growth around it as new quarters has concentrated population and many of services and facilities with infrastructures and utilities deficiency. This rapid physical growth has changed and destructed the old quarters. Meanwhile, lack of some novel facilities and population demand exist in these areas. On the other hand, it is essential to evaluate urban plans and implementations success in new quarters for the future planning. It must promote existing challenges. Nowadays, disregarding the QOF in urban areas has led to ecological segregation, marginal settlement, poor and social inequality, environmental, moral and human issues, gap and dispersion between different neighborhoods and segregation from each other. This paper with assessment of QOF in two old and new quarters of Sanandaj attempts to find the factors that can be used to promote QOF in each quarter. For this, one quarter selected from old ones (Qatarchian quarter) and another is new (Zafarieh).
 
Methodology
This research has an analytical-descriptive method based on survey and questionnaire distribution among the residents. Other data collected by field surveys of researchers. Regarding the aims of this research, main parameters are derived from literatures, practices and field survey in the quarters and structured by a hierarchy from top to down (analytical). The obtained model is based on the tree diagram that has four levels including criteria, parameters and items. For assessment of QOF, a questionnaire with 45 questions has been designed which reflects experiences and mentalities of the residents about QOF. The questions are based on Likert spectrum (the minimum score is 1, maximum is 5 and mean is 3). For validity of the tool, we used the Cronbach's Alpha method. Based on the result of this method, Alpha value is 0.916 that confirms their validity well. For analysis of data, we have used SPSS software based on the multiple Regression, t-test and Pearson correlation coefficient.
 
Results and Discussion
In this paper, satisfaction of residents has been evaluated in term of assessment of QOF regarding to economic, social and physical aspects of urban life. These aspects are specialized on two quarters as old and new ones. To do this, the mentioned criteria have been derived from various theoretical and practical studies around the world. Also, the manuscript is taylored to the study area conditions. Each of the above criteria including social, economic and physical have been divided into some parameters. These parameters have been used for QOF assessment in the quarters. The results of the studies related to each aspect (Physical, Economic and Social) are mentioned in following section.
 
Physical dimension
In physical criterion, five factors including the housing, the quarter, the transportation, the green space and solid waste collection have been selected as the parameters. Regarding to the residents score dedicated to these parameters for the two quarters, the average scores of Zafarieh quarter in the five parameters are above theoretical average and more than mean limit. But about Qatarchian these are lower than theoretical average.
 
Social dimension
For evaluating this, we select four parameters including individual security, health situation, sense of place and relationship with neighbors. Investigation of average scores shows that satisfaction of Zafarieh residents about four factors are more than theoretical average. Resident scores of Qatarchian quarter shows level of satisfaction for individual security parameter is lower than moderate level which is because of lack of good lighting in the quarter, crimes and lack of security and safety for women and children.
 
Economic dimension
This criterion has been evaluated based on five parameters including economic situation, health facilities, recreational facilities, educational centers, and commercial centers in the two quarters. Average of the scores related to the resident of the quarters indicated that satisfaction level of Zafarieh quarter for some factors such as economic situation, recreational facilities, educational and commercial centers is more than moderate. About Qatarchian quarter, the maximum average of the resident satisfaction is related to commercial centers. This may be because of vicinity of this quarter to the city center and good access to commercial centers.
 
Conclusion
The study of QOF in the two old and new quarters of Sanandaj indicates that QOF in new fabrics of the city is better than old ones. Examination of average of the scores confirmed that while in Zafarieh quarter maximum satisfaction is related to the physical dimension, in Qatarchian it is related to the social dimension. This can mainly occur because of great social capital phenomenon in the Qatarchian where the oldest structures, social relationships and sense of cooperation affect this factor. Results of T test in Zafarieh shows that three factors including the quarter, sense of place and the transportation have the highest rate of resident satisfaction and three parameters including commercial cores, sanitary facilities and neighbor relationships have the lowest level of satisfaction. The highest level of resident satisfaction in Qatarchian is based on the results of T test and related to health situation, commercial centers and neighbor relationships and the lowest rate because of low permeability for cars to crossing in the quarter is related to the transport, housing and solid waste collection parameters.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • quality of life
  • Qatarchian quarter
  • regression analysis
  • urban quality of life
  • Zafarieh Quarter

پوراحمد، احمد، فرهودی، رحمت‌الله، حبیبی، کیومرث و مهناز کشاورز، 1389، بررسی نقش کیفیت محیط سکونتی در مهاجرت‌های درون‌شهری (مطالعۀ موردی: بافت قدیم خرم‌آباد)، پژوهش‌های جغرافیای انسانی، سال چهل­وسوم، شمارۀ 75، صص 17- 36.

غفاری، غلامرضا و رضا امیدی، 1387، کیفیت زندگی در برنامه‌های عمرانی و توسعۀ ایران، فصلنامۀ رفاه اجتماعی، سال هشتم، شمارۀ 30- 31، صص 9- 33.

رضوانی، محمدرضا و حسین منصوریان، 1387، سنجش کیفیت زندگی: بررسی مفاهیم، شاخص‌ها و مدل‌ها و ارائۀ مدل پیشنهادی برای نواحی روستایی، فصلنامۀ روستا و توسعه، سال یازدهم، شمارۀ 3، صص 1- 26.

گروسی، سعیده و علی نقوی، 1387، سرمایة اجتماعی و کیفیت زندگی در شهر کرمان، فصلنامة رفاه اجتماعی، سال هشتم، شمارۀ 30- 31، صص 61- 82.

Bramston, P., Pretty, G. and Chipuer, H., 2002, Unraveling Subjective Quality of Life:An Investigation of Individual and Community Determinants, Social Indicators Research, 59.

Brereton, F., Clinch, J. P. and Ferreira, S., 2008, Happiness, Geography and the Environment, Ecological Economics, Vol. 65, No. 2, PP. 386-396.

Costanzo, R., 2007, Quality of Life:An Approach Integrating Opportunities, Human Needs and Subjective Well-Being, Ecological Economics, Vol. 61, No. 2-3, PP. 267-276.

Das, D., 2008, Urban Quality of Life:A Case Study of Guwahati, Social Indicators Research, No. 88.

Foo, T. S., 2000, Subjective Assessment of Urban Quality of Life in Singapore (1997-1998(, Habitat International, Vol. 24, No. 1, PP. 21-49.

Gafari, G. and Omidi, R., 2008, Quality of Life in Iranian Development Plans, Social Welfare Quarterly, No. 30 and 31, PP. 9-33. (In Persian)

Garoussi, S. and Nagavi, A., 2008, Social Capital an Quality of Life in Kerman, Social Welfare Quarterly, No. 30 and 31, PP. 61-82. (In Persian)

Geelen, L., Huijbregts, M., Den Hollander, H., M.J. Ragas, A., van Jaarsveld, H. A., De Zwart, D., 2009, Confronting Environmental Pressure, Environmental Quality and Human Health Impact Indicators of Priority Air Emissions, Atmospheric Environment, 43, PP. 1613-1621.

Hafeznia, M. R., 2010, An Introduction to Methodology in Social Science, Samt Press, Tehran. (In Persian)

Ibrahim, M. and Chung, W., 2003, Quality of Life of Residents Living Near Industrial Estates in Singapore, Social Indicators Research, Vol. 61, PP. 203-225.

Kamp, I. K, Van Leidelmeijer, K., Marsman, G. and De Hollander, A., 2003, Urban Environmental Quality and Human Well-Being:Towards a Conceptual Framework and Demarcation of Concepts; A Literature Study, Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 65, No. 1-2.

Lee, Y. J., 2008, Subjective Quality of Life Measurement in Taipei, Building and Environment, Vol. 43, No. 7.

Li, G. and Weng, Q., 2007, Measuring the Quality of Life in City of Indianapolis by Integration of Remote Sensing and Census Data, International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 28, No. 2.

Marans, R., 2012, Quality of Urban Life Studies:An Overview and Implications for Environment-Behaviour Research, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 35, PP. 9-22.

McCrea, R., Shyy, T. K. and Stimson, R., 2006, What is the Strength of the Link Between Objective and Subjective Indicators of Urban Quality of Life, Applied Research in Quality of Life, Vol. 1, No. 1.

Moro, M., Brereton, F., Ferreira, S. and Clinch, J. P., 2008, Ranking Quality of Life Using Subjective Well-Being Data, Ecological Economics, Vol. 65, No. 3.

Pacione, M., 2003, Urban Environmental Quality and Human Well-Being a Social Geographical Perspective, Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 65, No. 1-2.

Pourahmad, A., Farhoudi, R., Habibi, K. and Keshavarz, M., 2010, Study the Role of Residential Quality in Urban Migration (The Case of Khoramabad Old Texture), Human Geography Researches Quarterly, Vol. 43, No. 75, PP. 17-36. (In Persian)

Rezvani, M. R. and Mansourian, H., 2008, Assessment of Quality of Life: Conceptual Survey, Indexes, Models and Presentation the Offering Model for Village’s District, Village and Development Quarterly, Vol. 11, No. 3, PP. 1-26. (In Persian)

Rinner, C. 2007, A Geographic Visualization Approach to Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Urban Quality of Life, International Journal Geographic Information Science, Vol. 21, No. 8.

Rojas, M., 2008, Experienced Poverty and Income Poverty in Mexico:A Subjective Well-Being Approach, World Development, Vol. 36, No. 6.

Ryashchenko, S. V. and Gukalova, I. V., 2010, Public Health in the System of Regional Indicators of the Quality of Life in Russia and Ukraine, Geography and Natural Resources, 31.

Santos, L. and Martins, I., 2007, Monitoring Urban Quality of Life:The Porto Experience, Social Indicators Research, 80.

Wang, B. L. X. Stanton, B. and Fang, X., 2010, The Influence of Social Stigma and Discriminatory Experience on Psychological Distress and Quality of Life among Rural-to-Urban Migrants in China, Social Science and Medicine.

Whitehead, T., Simmonds, D. and Preston., J., 2006, The effect of Urban Quality Improvements on Economic Activity, Journal of Environmental Management, 80.

Zainal, N., Kaur, G., Aisha, A. and Khalili, 2012, Housing Conditions and Quality of Life of the Urban Poor in Malaysia, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 50, PP. 827-838.