نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار گروه شهرسازی، دانشکدة معماری و شهرسازی، واحد قزوین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قزوین، ایران
2 کارشناس ارشد برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد قزوین، دانشکدة معماری و شهرسازی
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Introduction
Welfare of the citizens is one of the most important foundations to create a growing and dynamic community. This is a minimal level of well-being and social protection without current means to support basic needs, sometimes referred to as public aid. In most of the developed countries, the welfare is provided by the government from tax income and, to a lesser extent, by charities, informal social groups, religious groups and inter-governmental organizations. Welfare and social plans supported by social justice can reduce poverty and social inequality in urban societies. It is effective to resort to smaller-scale plans to bring about justice in the cities in order to achieve social welfare. Welfare can take a variety of forms, such as monetary payments, subsidies and vouchers, or housing assistance. Welfare systems differ from country to country, but are commonly provided to individuals who are unemployed, those with illness or disability, the elderlies, and those with dependent children, and veterans. A person's eligibility for welfare may also be constrained by means of testing or other conditions.
According to the egalitarian, justice can exist within the parameters of equality. This basic view can be elaborated in many ways, according to what goods are to be distributed—wealth, respect, opportunity—and who or what they are to be distributed equally among—individuals, families, nations, and species. Egalitarian theories are typically less concerned about who exactly will do the distribution or what effects their recommended policies will have on the production of the goods, services, or resources they wish to distribute. In this paper, the term “Welfare” is mainly investigated in relation with the concept of “Justice”.
Methodology
This is an applied descriptive and static cross-sectional survey study because it focused on development of practical knowledge in a particular field. This research is a cross sectional one because it deals with the current status of the urban areas. At first, the conceptual model of the research has been prepared. In this model, welfare has been divided into four dimensions: economic, social, sanitation and physical. The data have been collected through field study and library survey methods. The level of social welfare is assessed using T-Test and the indicators are prioritized using the Friedman Test in SPSS.
Results and discussion
The social welfare indicators in the current study are divided into several dimensions including economic, social, sanitary, and physical aspects due to opinions of experts. The questionnaire results together with status quo indicated that in the economic aspect, the indicators such as unemployment, job satisfaction, per capita income, purchasing power, and housing value were affected by the employment index. In the social aspect, the largest proportion was allocated to the emigration of non-Iranian persons and individuals with low income and cultural level. The factor of weakness was effective in reducing family stability as well as increasing the sense of class differences in most of the economic indicators. In the sanitary aspect, access to health care centers as well as the personal, social, and environmental health is not very satisfactory because it mainly affected the young and economically active individuals. In the physical aspect, the quality of housing in the District 1, Qazvin, indicated the maximum percentage of building restoration and in the educational centers, the education and buildings were desirable in terms of quality. However, the job skills and the type of provided trainings were not very compatible. The leisure centers of the district indicated a lack of equal access to sport facilities and green spaces. Furthermore, despite the concentration of service and commercial uses, there was not a growing trend in the diversity of users according to the residents.
Conclusion
The demands of people are the main determinants of social welfare indicators introduced according to the situations as there is not a fixed definition of them in terms of quantity. The purpose of the current study is to assess and investigate the effects of these indicators in urban areas with an emphasis on the social justice approach in order to identify the most important indicators. In this study, the social welfare indicators establishing the social justice were determined in four aspects of economic, social, sanitary, and physical. The study hypotheses were tested after collecting the data from the status quo and questionnaires using the statistical Student’s T-Test and Friedman Test in SPSS software. In the first hypothesis, the unfair distribution of social welfare indicators in district one of Qazvin was accepted using the Single-Sample T-Test. It indicated the unwillingness of the respondents to the fair distribution of these indicators. In the second hypothesis, the Friedman Test indicated that employment is a determining factor in creating social justice for the welfare of the residents. The third hypothesis was rejected based on the favorable distribution of social welfare in the area of Imamzadeh Ali compared with Imamzadeh Hussein using Two Independent Sample T-Test. Finally, according to the results and findings, the weaknesses of each index were separately represented. These could be used for taking necessary measures such as injecting or strengthening the indicators in order to reach a fair and suitable level of urban life on a micro level. In general, the unfair distribution of welfare in urban areas could be generalized due to the various perceptions of individuals regarding the favorable level of access to social welfare. Moreover, the economic aspect indicators, especially employment, significantly affected the indicators of other aspects which could be identified as the establishing indicators of social justice in the urban areas.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Statistics Qazvin, 2011, the Qazvin governorship.
Statistics Qazvin, 2012, the Qazvin governorship.
Statistics Qazvin, 2013, the Qazvin governorship
Barry, N., 2010, Social Welfare, translated by: Seyyed Akbar Mir-Hosseini, SeyedMorteza Nour bakhsh, Tehran, samt.
5. بمانیان، محمدرضا و هادی محمودی‌نژاد، 1387، شهرسازیرفاه‌گرابه جانبارتقایکیفیتزندگی، سازمان شهرداری‌ها و دهداری‌های کشور، مؤسسة فرهنگی اطلاع‌رسانی و مطبوعاتی تهران.
Bemanian, M.R and Mahmoudi nezhad, H., 2008, Urban Welfare Oriented Towards Improving the Quality Of Life, organizations municipalities and cultural institutions to inform the press of the country Dehdari, Tehran.
6. رفیعیان، مجتبی، 1391، اطلس جامع شهر قزوین، سازمان خدمات طراحی شهرداری قزوین.
Rafieian, M., 2012, Comprehensive Atlas of The City of Qazvin, Qazvin municipality of design services.
7. زاهدی مازندرانی، محمدجواد، 1386، توسعه ونابرابری، انتشارات مازیار، تهران.
Zahedi Mazandarani, M.J, 2007, Development and Inequality, Tehran: Maziar Publication, Fourth Edition.
8. شرکت مهندسی آتیه‌ساز و شرکت مهندسی آرمان تردد پارس، 1390، طرح جامع حمل‌ونقل ترافیک مجموعة شهری قزوین، کارفرما: شهرداری قزوین.
Atiyehsaz engineering company and arman taradodpars engineering company, 2011, The City of Qazvin Traffic Transport Master Plan, Employer: Qazvin Municipality.
9. شکوئی، حسین، 1377، جغرافیای کاربردی و مکتب‌های جغرافیایی، آستان قدس رضوی، مشهد.
Shakuie, H., 1998, Applied Geography and Geographic School, Astan Quds Razavi Publication, Fourth Edition, Mashhad.
10. صانعی، صدیقه، 1391، بررسی میزان کیفیت زندگی مردم شهر اهواز و عوامل مؤثر آن، پایان‌نامة کارشناسی ارشد، علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران.
Sanei, S., 2012, Evaluation of The Factors That Influence The Quality of Life of People in Ahwaz, Master's thesis, Social Sciences, University of Allameh TabaTABAEI, Tehran.
11. غفاری، غلامرضا و رضا امیدی، 1387، کیفیت زندگی، شاخص توسعة اجتماعی، شیرازه، تهران.
Ghaffari, G., and omidi, R., 1997, Quality of Life, social development indicators, Tehran: Shirazeh.
12. لطیفی، غلامرضا و مجید سجاسی قیداری، 1390، رتبه‌بندیسطحرفاه اجتماعیشهرستان‌هایاستانزنجانبااستفاده ازفنTopsis، علوم اجتماعی، برنامه‌ریزی رفاه و توسعة اجتماع، شمارة 7، صص 165-190.
Latifi, G. and SOJASI Kedar, M.,2011, Ranking Level of Social Welfare City of Zanjan Province Techniques Using TOPSIS, Social Sciences, Social Welfare and Development Planning, No. 7, PP. 165- 190.
13. محمودی‌نژاد، هادی و علیرضا صادقی، 1388، طراحی شهری: از روان‌شناسی محیطی تا رفاه اجتماعی، هله: طحان، تهران.
Mahmoudi nezhad, H., and Sadeghi, A.R., 2009, Urban Design: From Environmental Psychology to Social Welfare, Helle: Tahan, Tehran.
14. مدنی، سعید، 1379، به سوی نظام جامع رفاه اجتماعی، سازمان بهزیستی کشور و دانشگاه علوم بهزیستی و توان‌بخشی، تهران.
Madani, S., 2000, Towards a Comprehensive System of Social Welfare, Welfare Organization and University of Welfare and Rehabilitation, Tehran.
15. مردوخ روحانی، احسان، 1388، بررسی رابطة رفاه اجتماعی و سرمایة اجتماعی در شهر سنندج، پایان‌نامة کارشناسی ارشد علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران.
Rohani Murdokh, E., 2002, The Relationship Between Social Welfare and Funds Community in The City Of Sanandaj, Social Sciences, Allameh Tabatabaei University,Tehran.
16. مرکز آمار ایران، سرشماری 1390.
Statistical Center of Iran, Census 2011.
17.مهندسین مشاور شهر و برنامه، 1390، طرح توسعه و عمران و حوزة نفوذ شهر قزوین.
Consulting Engineers citizens program, 2011, Development plan and sphere of influence in Qazvin.
18. مهندسین مشاور شهر و برنامه، 1390، طرح تفصیلی شهر قزوین.
Consulting Engineers citizens program, 2011, Detailed Project of Qazvin.
19. میجلی، جیمز، 1378، رفاه اجتماعی در جهان، ترجمة محمدتقی جغتایی، دانشگاه علوم بهزیستی و توان‌بخشی، تهران.
Myjly, J., 1999, Social Welfare in The World, translated by: Mohammad Taghi Chagatai, Tehran University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation.
20. نوغانی، محسن، 1387، کیفیت زندگی شهروندان و رابطة آن با سرمایة اجتماعی در شهر مشهد، مجلة علوم اجتماعی دانشکدة ادبیات و علوم انسانی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، دورة 5، شمارة 1، صص 111-140.
Noghani, M., 2008, Quality of Life and its Relationship With Social Capital in The City of Mashhad, Mashhad Ferdowsi University Journal of Social Sciences Faculty of Literature and humanities, No.1, pp.111-140.
21. وارثی، حمیدرضا، زنگی‌آبادی علی و حسین غفوری، 1387، بررسی تطبیقی توزیع خدمات عمومی شهری از منظر عدالت اجتماعی، زاهدان: جغرافیا و توسعه، شمارة 11، صص 139-156.
Warsi, H, R, Zangi Abadi, A. and Yghfory, H., 2008, A Comparative Study of The Distribution of Urban Public Services From The Perspective of Social Justice, Zahedan: Geography and Development, No. 11, PP.139-156.
22. هاروی، دیوید، 1376، عدالت اجتماعی و شهر، مترجمان: فرح حسامیان و دیگران، شرکت پردازش و برنامه‌ریزی شهری تهران.
Harvey, D., 1997, Social Justice and City, translators: Hsamyan Farah, et al., processing and urban planning,Tehran
23. هزارجریبی، جعفر، 1390، بررسی احساس عدالت اجتماعی و عوامل مؤثر بر آن (مطالعة موردی: شهر تهران)، جامعه‌شناسی کاربردی، سال بیست و دوم، شمارة 3، صص 41-62.
Hezarjaribi, J., 2012, To Investigate the Factors Influencing Sense of Social Justice (Case Study of Tehran), Applied Sociology, Vol. 23, No. 3, PP.41-62.
24. هاشمی، امیرارسلان، 1391، بررسی رابطةرفاه اجتماعی با مشارکت اجتماعی و اقتصادی شهروندان (مورد: شهر زنجان)، پایان‌نامة کارشناسی ارشد علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد زنجان.
Hashemi, A., 2012, Investigate the Relationship Between Social and Economic Welfare With the Participation of The Citizens (of The City), Master's thesis, Social Sciences, Islamic Azad University of Zanjan.
Alla A. K., and Evgeniya V. S., 2015, Justice as an Indicator of Well-Being in Modern Society, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 166, PP.122- 126.
Gordon, R., 2000, an Introduction to Social Policy: Values in Social Policy, the Robert Gordon University, UK.
Gray, R., 2002, The Social Accounting Project and Accounting Organization and SocietyPrivileging Engagement, Imaging New Accounting, Accounting Organization and Society, the Centre for Social and Environmental Accounting Research, University of Glasgow, 65–71 Southpark Avenue, Glasgow G12 8LE, UK, PP. 687-708.
Hewstone, B. and strobe, W., 2001, Introduction to Social Psychology, Blackwell publishers, Third edition.
Larke, M., and Sardar, M.N., Islam, 2003, Measuring Social Welfare: Application Of Social Choice Theory, journal of socio- Economics, Vol. 32, PP. 1-15.
Lubov, I., and Tatjana, L. 2015, Modern Social Welfare in The Light of The Sustainability Model, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 166, PP. 111–115.
Osman, M. M., Bakri, N. I. M., Bachok, S., Ibrahim, M., & Mohamed, M. Z. (2015). Assessing social welfare department service delivery system towards vulnerable and disadvantages group in Malaysia: case study of Perak. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 28, 418-426
Runciman, W.G., 1966, Reletive Deprivation and Social Justice, London.
Steven L., 1991, Essays in Soci Theory, Macmillan, 1978, P. 1890.
Vouvaki, D. and Anastasios E., 2008, Changesin Social Welfare and Sustainability: Theorietical Issues and Empirical Evidence, Ecological Economics, Vol. 67, PP. 473- 484.
)