نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی روستایی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد
2 استادیار جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی روستایی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد
3 استاد جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی روستایی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
For many decades’ public places as living spaces have been considered important in planning and designing human physical settlements which also include rural living areas. If our major goals of rural planning are people’s health, relaxation and beauty of environments, thus achieving these main objectives require accuracy, patience, and correct planning of rural Furniture. However, during recent years’ inappropriate development, the increasing growth of cities, huge amount of migration from villages into big cities without any prior infra structural preparations had various negative outcomes on different areas of the country. organizing rural areas and arranging their public applications including rural Furniture would be a suitable appropriate strategy resulting in better quality of physical environments and satisfying various rural needs such as people’s security, physical, psychological and mental health issues to improve the attractiveness of rural places and villages.In the present study we have tried to analyze the effects of rural elements, equipments and Furniture in improving the quality of physical environment.
Research questions are as follows:
1. How much is rural Furniture effective in providing a better physical environment?
2. Is there a relationship between rural Furniture and the increase in applicational–operational, conceptual–semantic, formic–aesthetic and environmental quality of villages?
Methodology:
The purpose and the type of this research is applied and descriptive-analytical in nature and methodology. It is done through field study and using a questionnaire. We used a simple, random sampling approach with 237 rural families which accounted for error level of 0.06 using a Chokran formula. Ultimately by maximizing samples in less populated villages to an appropriate level, the statistical population came to 258 rural families. They were interviewed
and asked to fill the questionnaire.
We used both analytical and inferring methods to analyze the data. To make the study operational, we designed the research variables in a 39 indexes with 4 dimensions about physical environment. In all 4 dimensions, we applied Lickert Scale Format for each question. Validity of indexes was confirmed by a specific academic panel. Using α-Chroback coefficient, we got 0.89 for reliability which shows high applicability of the questionnaire. After gathering the data, we analyzed it using Chi square test, correlation and sequential regression models.
Findings and Discussion:
Analyzing the data including referential statistics resulted from Chi Square Test showed an average satisfaction of villagers for Furniture (2.56) and proved that only communicative Furniture among all various components is lower than the hypothetical average.
So we can conclude that rural Furniture is suitable. We can also find that among 4 variables, the average vote of participants for effectiveness of rural facilities in physical environment is high regarding the hypothetical average (2.5) showing that the least impact of rural Furniture is for applicational–operational dimension. It is meaningful in the level of 0.05 and is positive regarding different components of numerical desirability of the test.
The results of Spearman coefficient show a meaningful relationship between rural Furniture and 4 dimensions of quality of physical environment. So the applicational-operational dimension and Formic-aesthetic dimension show VERY STRONG and STRONG correlation coefficients. Results from simple linear regression model show a relationship between independent variable (rural Furniture) and 4 dimensions of physical environment (sig=0.000) which is lower than 0.005 and is meaningful.
Rural facilities and Furniture has a meaningful influence on improving the quality of physical environment in applicational-operational, conceptual-semantic, formic-aesthetic, and environmental dimensions. Regarding standardized β, we can infer that rural Furniture is effective on 4 dimensions of environment more than %80.
Analyzing comprehensive results of route analysis, we acknowledge that infrastructural Furniture had the highest impact on quality of physical environment and actually was the most important factor in it.
Results:
The results obtained show that regarding standardized β, rural Furniture has the most impressive effect on environmental dimension first and then on applicational-operational, conceptual-semantic and finally on formic-aesthetic dimensions. So we can conclude that rural Furniture influences the increasing quality of physical environment, so that among all rural facilities and Furniture, the most important factor on quality of physical environment is infrastructural facilities.
Thus appropriate planning for other Furniture to have more effects on physical environment is necessary. In the end, we propose performing social studies regarding rural needs, interests, and behavioral patterns of various people in villages including the youth, the old, the healthy, and the handicapped in designing and applying rural Furniture in order to improve the quality of physical environment.
For many decades’ public places as living spaces have been considered important in planning and designing human physical settlements which also include rural living areas. If our major goals of rural planning are people’s health, relaxation and beauty of environments, thus achieving these main objectives require accuracy, patience, and correct planning of rural Furniture. However, during recent years’ inappropriate development, the increasing growth of cities, huge amount of migration from villages into big cities without any prior infra structural preparations had various negative outcomes on different areas of the country. organizing rural areas and arranging their public applications including rural Furniture would be a suitable appropriate strategy resulting in better quality of physical environments and satisfying various rural needs such as people’s security, physical, psychological and mental health issues to improve the attractiveness of rural places and villages.In the present study we have tried to analyze the effects of rural elements, equipments and Furniture in improving the quality of physical environment.
Research questions are as follows:
1. How much is rural Furniture effective in providing a better physical environment?
2. Is there a relationship between rural Furniture and the increase in applicational–operational, conceptual–semantic, formic–aesthetic and environmental quality of villages?
Methodology:
The purpose and the type of this research is applied and descriptive-analytical in nature and methodology. It is done through field study and using a questionnaire. We used a simple, random sampling approach with 237 rural families which accounted for error level of 0.06 using a Chokran formula. Ultimately by maximizing samples in less populated villages to an appropriate level, the statistical population came to 258 rural families. They were interviewed
and asked to fill the questionnaire.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
33. Ahmadi Simab, M.; Mafi, E. and Motammadi, M. (2013). A Survey on Urban Furniture in Mashhad with an Emphasis on Sidewalks: (Case Study: Differences between Ahmad Abad and Imam Reza Streets), The First Conference on National Geography, Urban Planning and Consistent Development, Tehran,pp. 1-19. (In Persian)
34. Akbarian Ronizi, S.R. and Sheikh Beigloo, R. (2015). Assessment of Environment quality of Villages' tourism Case: Asara County, Journal of Rural Research, 6(2): 433-457. (In Persian)
35. Ali Pour, R.; Khademi, M.; Senemari, M.M. and Rafieyn, M. (2012). Surveying Environment Quality Indicators in Detection of Interfering Priorities in the Deteriorated Fabric of Bandar Lengeh city, Bagh-e Nazar Journal, 9(20): 13-22. (In Persian)
36. Azad Khani, P. and Akbari, T. (2013). Evaluation of Role of Urban Furniture on Satisfaction of Residents in Ilam, The First National Conference on Sustainable Architecture and Urban Spaces, pp. 1-11. (In Persian)
37. Azad Khani, P. and Tahmasbikia, Z. (2016). Examine the role and function of urban furniture urban environment and enhance the quality of citizens' satisfaction (Case Study: Kermanshah Municipal District 4), Journal of Urban Studies and Planning, 7(27): 93-110. (In Persian)
38. Azizi Pour, G.; Lotfi, Z.; Mohhamad Zadeh, S. and Hasanvand, B. (2014). Evaluation of Design of Urban Furniture and Equipment in Enghelab Street of Khorramabad, The First National Conference on Urbanization, Urban Management and Sustainable Development, Tehran, pp.1-9. (In Persian)
39. Bakhtiari Kamari, J. and Ardalani, H. (2016). Effects of Aesthetics and Arrangement of Urban Furniture and Elements on Improved Quality of Urban Spaces (Case Study: MardomPark in Hamadan), The Third Conference of Modern Horizons in Geography, Architecture & Urbanization in Iran, Tehran, Society of developing and improving fundamental Sciences, pp. 1-13. (In Persian)
40. Bekri Zadeh, H.; Abdol Hosseini, A.; Almasi, M.; Bastami, H. and Faraji Darabkhani, M. (2010). Analysis of Urban Furniture in Center of Ilam, Cultural Journal of Research, Quarterly, 3(28 & 29): 37-62. (In Persian)
41. Bulut, Y. and Atabeyoglu, O. (2007). Fountains as Urban Furniture in Historical Urban Structure and Usage Culture: Erzurum City Case, Building and Environment, 42(6): 2432-2438.
42. Feng, B. and Xia, P. (2014). Study on the Method of Landscape Ecological Design for Urban Furniture, Applied Mechanics and Materials, 522-524, 1645-1648 Online: 2014-02-06 (2014), www.scientific.
43. Gokcen, F.Y. (2013). Design of Street Furniture and Amenities, the User-oriented Urban Landscape, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Istanbul Aydin University.
44. Golkar, K. (2000). Constructive Components of Quality in Urban Design, Soffeh Journal, 11(32): 38-65. (In Persian)
45. Golkar, K. (2008). Visual Views of Cities; History Of Development from Ornamental to Sustainable Approaches, Journal of Environmental Sciences, 5(4): 95-113. (In Persian)
46. Journal of Village Coordinators (2011). Rural Furniture: Grading of Rural Coordinators, Journal of Village Coordinators, 26: 31. (In Persian)
47. Kalantari, H. and Ensafian, P. (2011). Urban Furniture, Tehran, Rahdan, Organization of Iranian Municipalities and Villages . (In Persian)
48. Lahmian, R.; Obori, M. and Berari, M. (2013). The Role of Urban Furniture in Tourism Expanding Case Study: Sari City, Journal of Geographical Planning of Spaces Quarterly, 3(10): 102-121. (In Persian)
49. Linch, Q. (1995). Face of the City, Translated by Manouchehr Mazini, Tehran, University of Tehran. (In Persian)
50. Malek Hosseini, A. and Dargahi, M.M. (2010). Designing and Fitting Rural Furniture, Journal of Geography and Urban Planning: View of Zagros, 2(6): 151-163. (In Persian)
51. Mirzaee Moghadam, D. (2013). Balcony, Tehran, Raye Mehr Andisheh. (In Persian)
52. Mohandesi, M.; Shirazi, H. and Heidari, M.M. (2013). Evaluation of Addressee Needs in Design of Urban Furniture in Ancient Structure of Shiraz (Case Study: Sang Siah District), The First Conference of National Architecture, Urbanization and Environment, pp. 1-12. (In Persian)
53. Pourjafar, M.; Taghvaei, A. and Sadeghi, A. (2009). The effect of improving visual art on improving the urban public environments, case study: Tehran- Azadi Street, Urban Management, 7(24): 66-80. (In Persian)
54. Rahmani Firoozjah, A. and Sohrabi, S. (2016). A Sociological Study on the Relationship between urban furniture and quality of life, Journal of Urban Sociological Studies, 5(16):179-200. (In Persian)
55. Sadeghloo, T.and Johari, L. (2017). Performance measurement of visual comfort components to improve quality of urban environment, using VIKOR technique (Case study: Mashhad Metropolitan), Journal of Human Geography Research, 1(49): 167-183. (In Persian)
56. Saeednia, A. (1999). Green Book of Municipalities, Tehran, Iran, Municipality Organization of Iran. (In Persian)
57. Sandogh Abadi, M.; Fathollahi, G. and Mansouri, R. (2014). Effects of Urban Furnitureon Social Relationships, The First International Conference of Niaresh, Sustainable City, Safiran Mobin Cultural Institute, Tehran,Vol.Summer, pp. 4-17. (In Persian)
58. Shafaati, A. (2008). Assessment of Civil Streets with an Emphasis on Sidewalks: a Master’s Thesis, University of Tabriz, Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences, Geography Department. (In Persian)
59. Shamaei, A. and Pourahmad, A. (2005). Improvisation and Innovation from Geographical Viewpoint, Tehran, University of Tehran. (In Persian)
60. Shekari, N. and Shams, M. (2014). Urban Furniture and Its Effect on Improved Urban Environments, and Hygiene and Satisfaction of Citizens (Case Study: Khorramabad), National Conference on Urbanization, Urban Management and Development, Tehran, pp. 1-14. (In Persian)
61. Sojasi Qeidari, H. (2016). Guide Plan Implementation Impact Assessment on Environmental Quality in Rural Area (Case Study: North and South Fendresk Rural district, Journal of Geography and Planning, 20(57): 151-173. (In Persian)
62. Sojasi Qeidari, H.; Sadeghloo, T. and Mahdavi, D. (2015). Explanation the role of destination environmental quality on improving of tourist intellectual imaging (Case study area: tourism destination rural of Rood bar- Ghasran rural district), Journal of Spatial Planning, 19(2): 61-88. (In Persian)
63. Sojasi Qeidari, H.,.;Shayan, H., & and Nurbakhsh Razmi, Z., (2015)., The Analysis of Non-Farm Entrepreneurship in Improving the Quality of Life in the Villages Case: Villages Located in Shandiz Area, Binaloud County, Journal ofSpaces Economy & Rural Development, Vol. 4 No.(12): 12, pp. 55-76. (In Persian)
64. Suri, J., (2011)., Role of Urban Furniture in Improved Functional and Visual Quality of Rural Environments, Educational and Research Journal of Information Technology, No.62, pp.: 19-23. (In Persian)
65. Torino, H. (2006). Street Furniture, chapter Five, Available at www.haringey.Gov.uk.
66. Vatan Parast, M, .; Hosseini, M. & and Rashidi, M,. (2014)., Eevaluation of Rural Furniture (Case Study: District Five in Mashhad), The First International Conference on Environmental Engineering, Center for Achieving Consistent Development, Tehran, pp. 1-8. (In Persian)
67. Yücel, G. F., (2013). Street Furniture and Amenities: Designing the User-Oriented Urban Landscape. In: Advances in Landscape Architecture, book edited by Murat Özyavuz, Chapter 23: 623-644.
68. Zahedi Yeganeh, A., & and Ghadr Jani, R., (2011)., Effects of Urban Furniture on Identity of Cities and Citizens, Educational and Research Journal of Information Technology, No.62, pp.: 24-28. (In Persian)
69. Zangi Abadi, A. and Tabrizi, N. (2007). Spatial Analysis of Urban Furniture in Tourist Places in Center of Isfahan, Research Journal of Isfahan University, 22(1): 45-66. (In Persian).
)