تحلیل راهبرد فدراسیون روسیه در قبال همسایگان از منظر جغرافیای استراتژیک

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار جغرافیای سیاسی دانشگاه خوارزمی تهران، ایران

2 دکتری جغرافیای سیاسی دانشگاه خوارزمی تهران، ایران

3 دانشیار جغرافیای سیاسی دانشگاه خوارزمی تهران، ایران

4 استادیار جغرافیای سیاسی دانشگاه مطالعات منطقه ای تهران، ایران

چکیده

عوامل جغرافیایی در درازای تاریخ نقش برجسته‏ای در کنش‏ها و پویش‏های سیاسی حکومت‏ها داشته است و کشورها براساس عوارض طبیعی، موقعیت، و اثرهای محیط انسان‏ساخت اهداف راهبردی خود را در قبال همسایگان و دیگر مناطق و مکان‏های استراتژیک طراحی می‏کنند. یکی از مناطق کرة زمین، که موضوعات ژئواستراتژیک و ژئوپولیتیک آن کندوکاو شده، روسیه است. روسیه، به‏دلیل جایگاه ویژة خود در نقشة جغرافیای سیاسی جهان و نیز گستردگی جغرافیایی از کرانه‏های اقیانوس آرام تا شرق اروپا، از جمله کشورهایی است که شرایط جغرافیایی در بقا و دوام آن نفوذ بسزایی داشته و اکنون نیز جغرافیا در راهبردهای استراتژیک آن تأثیرگذار است. این پژوهش در پی پاسخ به این پرسش است که استراتژی جغرافیایی روسیه در قبال همسایگان و دیگر مناطق همجوار چگونه است؟ تحقیق به روش توصیفی- تحلیلی و بر مبنای یافته‏های اسنادی و کتابخانه‏ای است. بررسی نشان می‏دهد از زمان تزارها تاکنون استراتژی‏های بلندمدت و کوتاه‏مدت روسیه تحت تأثیر محدودیت‏ها و فرصت‏هایی بوده که جغرافیا در اختیار این کشور قرار داده است و برنامه‏ریزی برای غلبه بر محدودیت‏های جغرافیایی از ویژگی‏های اصلی استراتژی این کشور است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Analyzing of Russia Federation’s Strategy to the contrary of Neighbors at the point of the Strategic Geography View

نویسندگان [English]

  • hossin rabiei 1
  • Mohammad reza Heyvadi 2
  • Afshin Mottaghi 3
  • Bahram Amirahmadian 4
1 Assistant Professor of Political GeographyKharazmi University
2 عضو هیآت علمی
3 kharazmi
4 دانشگاه تهران دانشکده مطالعات جهان
چکیده [English]

Rabiei, H., Assistant professor of political Geography, Faculty of Geography, Kharazmi University hosseinrabiei@hotmail.com.
Mohammad Heivadi, M., PhD Student of political Geography, Faculty of Geography, Kharazmi University Heivady110@yahoo.com.
Mottaghi, A., Associate professor of political Geography, Faculty of Geography, Kharazmi University a.mottaghi@khu.ac.ir
Amirahmadian, B., Assistant professor of political Geography, Faculty of world Studies, University of Tehran, bahram1329@gmail.com.

Abstract
Geographical factors have a significant role in states political actions and attempts during the whole history. Each state draws up its strategic goals based on natural features, position and effects of human-made environment to the contrary of neighbors and other strategic places. Russia is one of the places on the earth that its geostrategic and geopolitical issues have been studied. Due to its specific position in the world political geography map and to geographical spreading from lines of the Pacific Ocean to the east of Europe, Russia was one of the states that has revised benefits from geography to being survive and steady. Geography has still an undeniable role in Russia’s strategic. Some important geographical features of Russia include variable climate, numerous neighbors, ethnic and human diversity, adjacency to greater and minor powers of Asian, nearness to Europe, etc. The paper has tried to answer to the question that how does Russia make its strategic react against the neighbors and adjacent regions? Methodology of the paper is descriptive-analytical and has accomplished based on librarian-documentary findings. The findings revealed that from the period of Tsardom of Russia up to now, Russia’s long/short term strategies based on the limits and opportunities that brought about by geography. Therefore, planning to overcome to limits is one of the specific strategy of Russia.
Introduction:
After the defeat of the Swedish kingdom from the tsarist empire, Petersburg's most powerful Russian tsar traveling to the leading European countries in technology, The Russian shipbuilding industry paid attention to the navy in Russia. The navy was in the pursuit of Russia's goals beyond its borders and indeed the country first attention to geography strategies that were then designed to achieve the desired and geographic goals, Led to the formation of geo-strategy in Russia. Russia in subsequent periods with the seizure of neighboring territories, it has culminated in strategic geography and institutionalized it.
Methodology
This research done by combining descriptive-analytical method and field-based interview method. The information needed for this research is gathered through a library method and by referring to experts and experts. For this purpose the credible library documents will be scrambled and interviewed and interviewed by experts and experts in the Russian region.
Results and discussion
After his great success his successors pursued his political strategy and with his assault on the lands of Central Asia , Caucasian , Eastern Europe and later to the Far East , Russian geostrategic culminated. However, with the overthrow of the tsarist empire and the emergence of Marxists in this country, in a short period the Communists retreated from the previous geographic strategies of the Russian Federation because of their ideology and the slogan of denied nations and the restoration of their captured lands. However, later the communist rulers of Russia based on the political geography of the world and the look of powerful countries to the imperialist interests based on geography-based political strategies returned to their former policies based on strategic geography. These geopolitical strategies derived from geography during the Soviet era under the domination of other lands gave rise to Russian geostrategy. But at the end of the 1990s , Once again strategic geography went to Russia and the policy of Atlanticism was taking place , Which is not too late and gave way to the authoritarian government of Putin , And he also made geostrategy the head of Russia's strategic policy , It also made it an executive. Putin confronts and defies any political strategy of geography that challenges Russia's security and sphere of influence. Russian president to tackle these aggressive rival strategies , Operation Soft and Military Operations that took place in Eastern Europe and the Ukrainian crisis , Georgia , Presence in Syria , Coping with color revolutions , Strategic Alliance with China and the Establishment of Shanghai Organization , Accompanied by Iran in regional and global issues and in dealing with the West are examples of it. Currently these geopolitical strategies are being pursued , And Russia with serious engagement in regional and international conflicts , On the one hand it seeks to achieve its own national interests based on geography-based political strategies , On the other hand the consolidation of the country's global power is based on the principles of geography and its components and influential variables.
Conclusion .
Russia is a continental country occupying Eurasia. This factor in the history of Russian life has often interfered in strategic and geographic policies and the resulting strategies. This factor in the history of Russian life has often interfered in strategic and geographic policies and the resulting strategies. The country's geographic strategies originally covered the surrounding territories in Central Asia and the Caucasus as well as Eastern Europe. With its country's strength its geographic influence in addition to its neighbors included other areas close to its territory and even included the world. The country retreated from its history of strategic geographic politics in a short time, But again these strategic policies were based on geographic principles. In the current period according to the West's aggressive hegemony, it continues its geopolitical policy; these policies are used in the form of offensive and defensive actions in the adjacent political areas neighbors and even the transnational areas and in its soft form is operational. Therefore, political strategies based on the principles of geography in the period of Russia's emergence and becoming federated, and from its mediocre history so far, It has often been based on and based on geographic strategies except in the short run. In addition, perhaps no country in the world as much as Russia has used its geopolitical strategies to advance its national interests and interests beyond its borders because of its continental constraints.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Keywords: strategic geography
  • Geostrategic
  • Russian Federation
  • Strategy
  • neighbors
رحیمی، حسن، 1392، نظریه‏های ژئوپلیتیکی، انتشارات انتخاب.
سودایی، مجید، 1388، بررسی تأثیر سیاست‏های منطقه‏ای روسیه در قفقاز جنوبی بر امنیت ملی گرجستان، پایان‏‏نامة دورة کارشناسی ارشد، مطالعات منطقه‏ای، دانشگاه تهران.
کرمی، جهانگیر و کرامتی‏نیا رقیه، 1397، دولت روسیه و مسئلة غرب، سدهای اقتباس و مقابله، فصل‏نامة مطالعات آسیای مرکزی و قفقاز، ش 103، صص ۱۳۱-160.
کوشکی، محمدصادق و طاهری بزی، ابراهیم، 1393، حضور روسیه در خاورمیانه در دورة پوتین (احیای نفوذ روسیه در کشورهای زیر نفوذ اتحاد شوروی)، فصل‏نامةمطالعات اوراسیای مرکزی، دورة 7، ش 1، صص ۴۳-62.
کولایی، الهه، 1394، عوامل دگرگونی آیین نظامی فدراسیون روسیه، فصل‏نامة سیاست خارجی، س ۲۹، ش 3، صص ۱۳۳-159.
کولایی، الهه؛ اسلامی، محسن و اصولی، قاسم، 1395، کنشگری امنیتی روسیه در قفقاز جنوبی، فصل‏نامة آسیای مرکزی و قفقاز، ش 95، صص ۹۷-136.
نوری، علیرضا، 1397، ارتقای جایگاه روسیه در عرصة جهانی و تنش با امریکا در دورة پوتین، فصل‏نامة آسیای مرکزی و قفقاز ، ش 61، صص ۹۱-123.
نیاکویی، سید امیر و صفری، عسکر، 1397، الگوی رفتاری روسیه در نظام بین‏الملل: تلاش برای دست‏یابی به موازنة قوای مطلوب (2014-2018)، فصل‏نامة آسیای مرکزی و قفقاز، ش 103، صص ۱۰۱-130.
وثوقی، سعید و خیری، مصطفی، 1395، اوکراین: عرصة تقابل غرب و روسیه، فصل‏نامة آسیای مرکزی و قفقاز، ش 94، صص ۱۳۳–158.
هدایتی شهیدانی، مهدی و رضاپور، دانیال، 1395، جایگاه خارج نزدیک در گفتمان امنیتی نواوراسیاگرایان روسیه، فصل‏نامة آسیای مرکزی و قفقاز، ش 96، صص ۱۲۷-162.
17. Brzeziński, T. and Hajac, P. M., 1999, Coalgebra extensions and algebra coextensions of Galois type. Communications in Algebra, Vol. 27, No. 3, PP. 1347-1367.
18. Chowdhury, S. K. and Hel, K. A., 2015, The Heartland theory of Sir Halford John Mackinder: justification of foreign policy of the United States and Russia in Central Asia. Journal of Liberty and International Affairs, (1 s 2).
19. Chowdhury, S. K. and Kafi, A. H., 2015, The Heartland theory of Sir Halford John Mackinder: justification of foreign policy of the United States and Russia in Central Asia. Journal of Liberty and International Affairs, (1 s 2).
20. Fatemi Nejad, S. A. and Hashemi, M. R., 2016, Russia and Central Asia: Laying the Ground for the International Regional Community, Central Eurasian Studies Quarterly, Vol. 9, No. 2, (19 consecutive), PP. 335-340.
21. Freedman, R. O., 2010, Russia and the Middle East under Putin. Ortadogu EtutleriVol. 2, No.16.
22. Gaddis, J. L., 2005, Strategies of containment: a critical appraisal of American national security policy during the Cold War. Oxford University Press.
23. Hedayati Shahidani, M. and Rezapour, D., 2016, The Near Abroad Position in The New Eurasianists Security Discourse, Journal of Central Asia and Caucasus Studies, No. 96, PP. 127-162.
24. Karami, J. and Keramatinia, R., 2018, The Russian Government and the Western Issue, Adaptation and Confrontation Barriers, Journal of Central Asia and Caucasus Studies, No. 103, PP. 131-160.
25. Kolaei, E., 2015, Factors in The Transformation of Russian federation Military Doctrine, Foreign Policy Quarterly,  Vol. 29, No. 3, PP. 133-159.
26. Kolaei, E.; Eslami, M. and Osuli, Q., 2016, Russian Security Activism in the South Caucasus, Journal of Central Asia and Caucasus Studies, No. 95, PP. 97-136.
27. Koushki, M. S. and Taheri Bezi, E., 2014, Russia's Presence in the Middle East during the Putin Period (Reviving Russia's Influence in Soviet-Influenced Countries), Central Eurasian Studies Quarterly, Vol. 7, No. 1, PP. 43-62.
28. Mosallanejad, A., 2013, Russia's Strategic Balance and Security Policy in the International System, Central Eurasian Studies Quarterly, Vol.  6, No. 2, (13 consecutive), PP. 121-140.
29. Muller, P. O. and Murphy, A. B., 2015, Harm J. de Blij, 1935–2014. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol.105, No. 6, PP. 1324-1329.
30. Niakoei, S, A. and Safari, A., 2018, Russia's Behavioral Pattern in the International System: Trying to achieve the desired balance of power (2014-2018), Journal of Central Asia and Caucasus Studies, No. 103, PP. 101-130.
31. Nouri, A., 2018, Improving Russia's position in the world arena and tensions with the United States during the Putin era. Journal of Central Asia and Caucasus Studies, No. 61, PP. 91-123.
32. Parland, T., 2004, The extreme nationalist threat in Russia: the growing influence of Western rightist ideas. Routledge.
33. Pipes, R., 1990, The Russian Revolution. New York: Vintage Books.
34. Rahimi, H., 2013, Geopolitical Theories, Entekhab Publications.
35. Rashidi, A., 2016, Conflicting Approaches in Russian Foreign Policy, Journal of Central Eurasian Studies, Vol. 9, No. 2, (19 consecutive), PP. 249-267.
36. Rostami, M. R., 2016, Putin, Eurasianism and the Difficulties of reconstructing Russia's Power Position, Foreign Relations Quarterly, Vol. 8, No. 3, PP. 181-212.
37. Sadeghi, S. S., 2012, Russia's Energy Policy Strategy in Eurasia: Opportunities and Barriers, Foreign Relations Quarterly, Vol. 4, No. 1, PP. 219-246.
38. Simmons, T. W., 2008, Gorbachev, Yeltsin and Putin: Soviet-Russian Foreign Relations with the United States from 1990, Through the Fall of 2008: A Strategic Analysis.
39. Sodaei, M., 2009, The Impact of Russian Regional Policies in the South Caucasus on Georgia's National Security, M.Sc. Thesis, Regional Studies, University of Tehran.
40. Vosoughi, S. and Kheiri, M., 2016, Ukraine: The Area of Confrontation between the West and Russia, Journal of Central Asia and Caucasus Studies, No. 94, PP. 133-158.
41. Zargar, A. and Salimi, L., 2017, Russia and the struggle against Terrorism and Extremism in the Caucasus: Achievements and Failures 2001-2015, Research in Arts and Humanities, Vol. 7, No. 4, (consecutive 6), PP. 107-120.