ارزیابی میزان توانمندی زنان روستایی شهرستان کرمانشاه

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران

چکیده

موضوع توانمندسازی زنان گامی ضروری برای قرارگرفتن در مسیر توسعه انسانی و مدیریت استعدادها محسوب می‌گردد. توانمندسازی زنان روستایی در راستای عدالت جنسیتی بوده و از عوامل اساسی توسعه پایدار محسوب می‌شود. بنابراین آگاهی از میزان توانمندی زنان برای برنامه‌ریزی توسعه ضروری می‌باشد. این پژوهش علی با هدف بررسی میزان توانمندی زنان روستایی شهرستان کرمانشاه و شناسایی متغیرهای تأثیرگذار بر آن انجام گرفت. جامعه آماری پژوهش، جمعیت فعال زنان روستایی (64-15 سال) در شهرستان کرمانشاه بودند (41267=N) و نمونه‌ها با روش نمونه‌گیری چندمرحله‌ای انتخاب شدند. ابزار جمع‌آوری داده‌ها پرسشنامه‌ای محقق ساخته بود که بر اساس مدل گیتس و گیتس (2017) طراحی و ابعاد منابع (رفاه جسمی و روحی، آگاهی انتقادی و دارایی‌ها)، عاملیت (تصمیم‌گیری، رهبری و اقدام جمعی) و ساختارهای نهادی (حمایت خانواده، جامعه، بازار و دولت) را شامل می‌شد. بر اساس یافته‌ها، میانگین توانمندی زنان روستایی شهرستان کرمانشاه کمتر از حد متوسط بود. میزان توانمندی زنان روستایی در مؤلفه‌های منابع و عاملیت در سطح پایین‌تر از متوسط و بیشترین میزان توانمندی مربوط به ساختارهای نهادی بود. از بین متغیرهای مورد بررسی، حمایت خانواده از زنان روستایی و رفاه جسمانی نیز بالاترین میانگین‌ها را کسب کردند. نتایج تحلیل رگرسیون چندگانه نشان داد که سه متغیر سطح تحصیلات، امکان شرکت در کلاس‌های آموزشی و امکان داشتن پس‌انداز سهم عمده‌ای در تبیین واریانس توانمندسازی زنان روستایی ایفا می‌کنند. پیشنهاد می‌شود در طراحی و اجرای پروژه‌های توانمندسازی زنان روستایی تقویت و انسجام سازمانی بین نهادهای دست‌اندرکار در راستای مدیریت یکپارچه توانمندسازی زنان روستایی صورت پذیرد. در این بین توسعه آموزش‌های غیررسمی و تأمین اعتبارات خرد تأکید گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Assessing rural women’s empowerment in Kermanshah Township

نویسندگان [English]

  • narges azimi
  • Amirhossein Alibaygi
  • Abdolhamid papzan
Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agriculture, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
چکیده [English]

Extended Abstract



Introduction

Rural women make up Forty percent of the agricultural workforce in developing countries, however, due to limited access to resources, especially land, limited access to inputs and credit, insufficient technical competence, and poor participation in decision-making. Restricted access to mass media and lack of media coverage do not have a good socio-economic status, especially in developing countries. Also, rural women are from poor and disadvantaged sections of society who have job opportunities. And do not have independent income. The situation of women, especially rural women, indicates the unfavorable trends of the past and the failure to achieve the goals of the development program in the field of women. Therefore, one of the main weaknesses in developing development strategies is not considering the role and capabilities of women in the economic, social and cultural development of society, while women are not only the subject and goal of any kind of development. Empowerment is a process that helps women gain greater access to resources, participate in decision-making, and achieve independence and self-reliance. Therefore, considering the importance of women's empowerment and their role in development, the question arises whether rural women in Kermanshah are capable?



Methodology

This descriptive correlation study was conducted to evaluate the empowerment of rural women and the factors affecting it. The statistical population was active rural women in Kermanshah (women aged 15 to 64 years) which according to the statistical yearbook of 2016, was determined as 41267 people. The sample size was 381 using Krejcie and Morgan table, but 400 questionnaires were collected. Sampling was performed using a multi-stage method. In the first stage, a village was selected from each of the four geographical locations of the north, south, west and east of Kermanshah city (four villages in total). In the second stage, 3 villages and a total of 12 villages were randomly selected from each village, and finally, samples from 12 villages were randomly selected by proportional assignment.

Data collection was a researcher-made questionnaire based on the dimensions of Gates model

(2017). Gates model Resource dimensions (physical well-being (9 items related to insurance, leisure time and leisure activities), critical awareness (13 items related to the importance of recognizing rights, pursuing rights, defending rights and awareness) Legal) and assets (financial and productive resources (14 items related to ownership, access to financial and credit resources, productive resources and inputs, income, sources of income, savings, borrowing and loan repayment capacity), Knowledge and skills (63 items related to participation in training courses, skill level, and level of different knowledge), time (3 items related to empowerment-related activities) and social capital (15 items)), Agency (decision making (13 items), leadership (9 items) and collective action (6 items related to membership in collective institutions and activities)) and institutional structures (family support (6 items), community (7 items)) , The market (9 items) and the government (6 items)) In general, the range of questions included open-ended, two-sided, multiple-choice and Likert questions. A panel of experts in rural sociology, agricultural extension and rural development was used to validate the questionnaire. Cranach's alpha coefficient was calculated to estimate the reliability of the research instrument and to evaluate the internal consistency of the items. This amount of 0.72 Up to 0. 85 A questionnaire was obtained for different structures. After evaluating each component and total capability, stepwise multiple regressions was used to investigate the effect of independent variables on rural women's empowerment.



Conclusion

The results showed that the average resources available to rural women in Kermanshah are lower than average. They are inferior to men in terms of access to resources, and this has been confirmed in many studies. Vital awareness is one of the resources that women can use to empower themselves. The results showed that the average vital knowledge of rural women in Kermanshah is moderate. The average is. The assets of rural women in Kermanshah were below average. This is the result of various issues such as the very low ownership of women by basic sources of production, including land and water. According to the findings, the leadership power of rural women is low. Leadership requires characteristics such as self-confidence, self-efficacy, awareness and dominance and active participation in society. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen these characteristics and skills among rural women. The findings showed that the highest level of support for women by the family and the lowest level of support by the government and the market. According to the findings, the level of education accounted for the largest share in women's empowerment, and the education of rural women increased their control over various aspects of their lives. Participation in non-formal education classes is also an individual variable that had a high impact on women's empowerment in rural areas, but due to various reasons, the presence of women and girls in these classes is low. Women's financial power is one of the dimensions of their empowerment, which increases women's economic self-confidence by playing more economic roles in life. It can be said that women's bargaining power increases with earning, and according to gender literature. Women who are in control of their income are more likely to be empowered. I n the experience of the International Labor Organization, when access to women is limited, their increasing access to information is the most beneficial option for empowerment. The results indicate that the women studied had limited membership in various organizations such as cooperatives, credit funds, etc. Membership in organizations can help women become more aware of social roles by increasing their connections. Most rural women do not have direct access to the market to sell their products, and most of them are forced to sell their products through intermediaries.



Keywords: Village, Rural Empowerment, Rural Women, Empowerment, Kermanshah.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Village؛ Rural Empowerment؛ Rural Women؛ Empowerment
  • kermansha
  1. آستین فشان، ثریا؛ علی بیگی، امیرحسین؛ کرمی دهکردی، اسماعیل و غلامی، مصیب. (1396). واکاوی تأثیر آگاهی‌های اجتماعی بر مقدار توانمندی زنان روستایی (بخش زنجان‌رود شهرستان زنجان). زن و جامعه، 8 (4)، 124-103.
  2. آقابخشی، حبیب‌اله و محتشمی، مهرنوش. (1389). بررسی جایگاه زنان در محتوای برنامه‌های توسعه بعد از انقلاب. نشریه پژوهش‌های اجتماعی، 3 (7)، 71-47.
  3. ابوالفتح‌زاده، زهرا؛ یوسفی، علی و مظفر امینی، امیر. (1395). ارزیابی عوامل مؤثر در توانمندسازی زنان روستایی شهرستان اصفهان. پژوهش‌نامه زنان، 7 (1)، 27-1.
  4. بوزرجمهری، خدیجه و معصومی، مهدی. (1397). بررسی موانع و چالش‌های پیش روی زنان در بازاریابی فرآورده‌های لبنی (مطالعه موردی: مناطق روستایی دهستان سرچهان، شهرستان بوانات). برنامه‌ریزی فضایی (جغرافیا)، 8 (3)، 18-1.
  5. خسروی، محمدعلی؛ دهشیار، حسین و ابطحی، صفی ناز سادات. (1391). چگونگی توانمندسازی زنان در عرصه تصمیم‌گیری سیاسی در ساختار تصمیم‌گیری ملی و بین‌المللی. فصلنامه مطالعات روابط بین‌الملل، 5 (20)، 99-132.
  6. رضایی، پژمان. (1397)، ارزیابی میزان پایداری گردشگری روستایی: مطالعه موردی دهستان هوره، استان چهارمحال بختیاری. فصلنامه روستا و توسعه، 21 (4)، 159-135.
  7. روشن‌نیا، داود؛ خادمی، رقیه؛ کردی، لیلا و صلحی فام اصل، ژیلا. (1394). بررسی نقش زنان روستایی در توسعه و موانع و محدودیت‌های آن. ماهنامه کار و جامعه، 190، 98-82.
  8. شکوری، علی؛ رفعت جاه، مریم و جعفری، معصومه. (1386). مؤلفه‌های توانمندی زنان و تبیین عوامل مؤثر بر آن‌ها. زن در توسعه و سیاست، 5 (1)، 26-1.
  9. صفوی، عیسی؛ ضمیران، بهار؛ معارف وند، معصومه و عرشی، ملیحه. (1393). توانمندسازی اقتصادی دختران و زنان جوان در کشورهای آفریقایی آمریکای لاتین و حوزه دریای کارائیب. فصلنامه مددکاری اجتماعی، 3 (4)، 12-3.
  10. عباس‌زاده، محمد؛ بوداقی، علی و اقدسی علمداری، فرانک. (1390). توانمندسازی زنان سرپرست خانوار با تأکید بر راهکارهای بومی. مجموعه مقالات برگزیده همایش ملی توانمندسازی با رویکرد جهاد اقتصادی در کمیته امداد امام خمینی(ره).
  11. علی‌بیگی، امیرحسین؛ زرافشانی، کیومرث و اولایی، سعیده. (1386). تحلیل جنسیتی فعالیت‌های کشاورزی در روستاهای شهرستان کرمانشاه: توصیه‌هایی برای عاملان توسعه روستایی. مطالعات زنان، 5 (2)، 111-89.
  12. فرجی سبک‌بار، حسنعلی؛ نعمتی، مرتضی و خاکی، افشین. (1391). بررسی سازوکار تأثیر فناوری اطلاعات بر توانمندی زنان روستایی بر مبنای مدل DEA (مطالعه موردی: روستای قرن‌آباد). زن در توسعه و سیاست، 10 (1)، 138-125.
  13. فقیری، مژگان؛ زرافشانی، کیومرث و علی بیگی، امیرحسین. (1390). بررسی اثربخشی صندوق‌های اعتبارات خرد در توانمندسازی زنان روستایی استان کرمانشاه. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد مهندسی ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشگاه رازی کرمانشاه.
  14. قلی‌پور، آرین؛ رحیمیان، اشرف و میر زمانی، اعظم. (1387). نقش تحصیلات رسمی و اشتغال سازمانی در توانمندسازی زنان تهران. مجله پژوهش زنان، 6 (3)، 132-113.
  15. لالیان‌پور، نوشین؛ دوستی، ناهید و محمدزاده، آزاده. (1390). مفهوم توانمندسازی و تعهد سازمانی کارکنان (مورد مطالعه: یک شرکت بیمه‌ای). تازه‌های جهان بیمه، 14 (163)، 39-24.
  16. مرکز آمار ایران. (1395). سالنامه آماری استان کرمانشاه. https: //www.amar.org.ir
  17. ملکی، طاهره؛ شاه‌مرادی، مهنا؛ میرک زاده، علی‌اصغر؛ نجفی کاکاوند، الهام و چام چام، جیران. (1394). بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر وضعیت اجتماعی اقتصادی زنان روستایی. مجله پژوهش‌های اقتصاد روستا، 2 (5)، 18-1.

 

References

  1. Abbaszadeh, M., Budaghi, A., & Aghdasi Alamdari, F. (2012). Empowerment of women heads of households with emphasis on indigenous solutions. Proceedings of the National Conference on Empowerment with the Approach of Economic Jihad in the Imam Khomeini Relief Committee, 139-163. [In Persian].
  2. Abolfathzadeh, Z., Yousefi, A., & Mozaffar Amini, A. (2016). Evaluation of Factors Affecting Rural Women Empowerment in Isfahan Township. Women Studies, 7 (1), 1-27. [In Persian].
  3. Agbo, F. O., & Isa, A. A. Muluku. (2017). Scientific Skills and Concept Learning by Rural Women for Personal and National Development. Science Education International, 28 (2), 128-135.
  4. Aghabakhshi, H., & Mohtashami, M. (2010). Investigating the position of women in the content of post-revolutionary development programs. Social Research, 3 (7), 47-71. [In Persian].
  5. Alibaygi, A. H., Zarafshani, K., & Owlaei, S. (2007). Gender Analysis of Agricultural Tasks among Rural Residents of Kerrnanshah Township: Implications for Rural Development Practitioners. Women's Studies, 5 (2), 89-111. [In Persian].
  6. Alkire, S., Meinzen-Dick, R., Peterman, A., Quisumbing, A., Seymour, G., & Vaz, A. (2013). The Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index. World Development, 52, 71-91.
  7. Arellano-Hernandez, M., & Theresa, H. (2018). Women’s Economic Empowerment: Factors Affecting Women’s Participation In Micro- Enterprises. International Journal of Advanced Research and Publications, 2 (12), 85-90.
  8. Astinfeshan, , Alibaygi, A. H., Karami Dehkordi, E., & Gholami, M. (2018). The Effect of Social Awareness on Empowerment Level of Rural Women (Zanjanrood District, Zanjan Township). Journal of Woman & Society, 8 (4), 103 – 124. [In Persian].
  9. Bouzarjomehri, K., & Masoumi, M. (2018). Surveying the Barriers and Challenges Faced by Women in the Marketing of Dairy Products (Case Study: Sarchehan vill, Bavanat County). Spatial Planning, 8 (3), 1-18. [In Persian].
  10. Cattaneo, L. B., & Chapman, A. (2010). The Process of Empowerment A Model for Use in Research and Practice. American Psychologist Association, 65 (7), 646–659.
  11. Choudhry, A. N., Mutalib, R. A., & Ismail, Nur. S. A. (2019). Socio-Cultural factors affecting women economic empowerment in Pakistan: A Situation Analysis. International Journal of Academic Research Business and Social Sciences, 9 (5), 90–102.
  12. Dhanamalar, M., Preethi, S., and Yuvashree, S. (2020). Impact of Digitization on Women’s Empowerment: A Study of Rural and Urban Regions in India. Journal of International Women's Studies, 21 (5), 107-112.
  13. Dutta, P., & Adhikary, M. (2014). Study of women’s empowerment in the district of Bankura. PhD thesis, the University of Burdwan. https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/121527/2/02_synopsis.pdf
  14. El-Sayed Mohamed El-Sayed, H., Fouad Mohammed, Sh., & Ibrahim Hamdy Aboraiah, M. (2021). Assessment of Women's Reproductive Empowerment in Rural and Urban Areas: A Comparitive Study. Egyptian Journal of Health Care, 12 (2), 149-164.
  15. Faghiri, M., Zarafshani, K., & Alibaygi, A. (2012). A study of the effectiveness of microcredit funds in rural women empowerment in Kermanshah province. Master Thesis in Agricultural Extension and Education, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran. [In Persian].
  16. (2014). Rural Women’s Economic Empowerment.
  17. Faraji Sabokbar, H.A., Nemati, M., & Khaki, A. (2012). Reviewing the Mechanism of Information Technology on Rural Women's Empowerment Based on Model DEA (case study: the village of Gharn Abad). Women in Development & Politics, 10 (1), 125-138. [In Persian].
  18. Gates, B., & Gates, M. (2017). A Conceptual Model of Women and Girls` Empowerment. Foundation /Prashant Panjiar, 1-11.
  19. Gholipour, A., Rahimian, A., & Mirzamani, A. (2008). The Impact of Education and Organizational Employment on Empowerment of Women in Tehran. Women in Development & Politics, 6 (3), 113-132. [In Persian].
  20. Huis, Marloes. A., Hansen, N., Otten, S., & Lensink, R. (2017). A Three-Dimensional Model of Women’s Empowerment: Implications in the Field of Microfinance and Future Directions. Frontires in Psychology, 8, Article. 1678, 1-14.
  21. Hunt, A., & Samman, E. (2016). Women’s economic empowerment Navigating enablers and constraints. Development progress, September. https://cdn.odi.org/media/documents/10683.pdf
  22. International Food Policy Research Institute. (2012). Women's empowerment in agriculture index.
  23. Janghorban, R., Taghipour, A.,  Latifnejad Roudsari, R., & Abbasi, (2014). Women’s empowerment in Ira: a review based on the related legislations. Glob J Health Sci, 6 (4), 226-235.
  24. Khosravi, M. A., Daheshyar, H., & Abtahi, S.N. S. (2013). The Empowerment of Women in Making Political Decisions in National and International Decision Makings Structure. Research Letter of International Relations, 5 (20), 99-132. [In Persian].
  25. Lalianpour, N., Dousti, N., & Mohammadzadeh, A. (2011). The concept of empowerment and organizational commitment of employees (Case study: an insurance company). News of the World Insurance, 14 (163), 24-39. [In Persian].
  26. Mackey, A., & Petrucka, P. (2021). Technology as the key to women’s empowerment: a scoping review. BMC Women’s Health, 1-12.
  27. Maleki, T., Shahmoradi, M., Mirakzadeh, A. A., Najafi Kakavand, E., & ChamCham, J. (2016). Factor affecting the rural woman's socio-economic status. Journal of Rural Economics Research, 2 (5), 1-18. [In Persian].
  28. Menon, S., Ranjitha, M., & Sharma, Sh. (2020). A Study on the Status of Women’s Empowerment in urban Bangalore, India. Journal of International Women's Studies, 21 (5), 54-64.
  29. Musonera, A., & Heshmati, A. (2016). Measuring Women’s Empowerment in Rwanda. IZA Discussion Paper, No. 10131, August. https://docs.iza.org/dp10131.pdf
  30. Nayak, P., & Mahanta, B. (2009). Women Empowerment in India. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI:2139/ssrn.1320071. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/23795416_Women_Empowerment_in_India
  31. Nikbakhsh, A. (2011). Empowering rural women in agricultural activities. Researcher, 3 (7), 46-49.
  32. Reshadat, S., Rajabi Gilan, N., Ghasemi, S. R., & Jamshidinazar, F. (2014). Assessment of Rural Women Empowerment Level and its Relation with Demographic and Structural Factors in Kermanshah, Iran, 2012. Life Science Journal, 11 (4), 86-93.
  33. Rezaei, P. (2019). Assessing the Rural Tourism Sustainability: A Case Study of Horeh Sub-district in Chahar-Mahal & Bakhtiyari Province of Iran. Village and Development, 21 (4), 135-159. [In Persian].
  34. Roshannia, D., Khademi, R., Kurdi, L., & Solhi Fam Asl, J. (2016). Investigating the role of rural women in development and its barriers and limitations. Labor and Society, 190, 82- 98. [In Persian].
  35. Safavi, E., Zamiran, B., Maarefvand, M., Arshi, M. (2015). Economic Empowerment of Young Women and Girls in Africa and Latin America and Caribbean. Social work, 3 (4), 3-12. [In Persian].
  36. Sell, M., & Minot, N. (2018). What factors explain women's empowerment? Decision-making among small-scale farmers in Uganda. Women's Studies International Forum, 71, 46-55.
  37. Shakoori, A., Rafaat Jah, M., & Jafari, M. (2007). An Analysis of Factors Affecting Women's Empowerment Components. Women in Development & Politics, 5 (17), 1-26. [In Persian].
  38. Soharwardi, M. A., Nazir, R., & Akhtar, M. (2020). Do Socio-Economic Factors Stimulate Womens Empowerment At Household Level? Evidence From South, South East Asia. Research Article, 21 (3), 1-14.
  39. Statistics Center of Iran. (2016). Kermanshah Statistical Yearbook. [In Persian].
  40. Taresa, A., & Gadisa, A. (2021). Magnitude and Factors Affecting Women’s Economic Empowerment for Participation in Decision making among Married Women at Reproductive Age in Assosa, Western Ethiopia. Journal of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, 9 (2), 2698-2706.
  41. Thandar, M., Naing, W., & Moe, H. (2019). Women’s Empowerment in Myanmar: An Analysis of DHS Data for Married Women. Age 15-49. DHS Working Papers No. 143. Rockville, Maryland, USA: ICF.
  42. Venkadesh, A. (2012). Rural Women Empowerment in India. Department of Management Sciences.https://www.mbainfoline.com/Articles%20on%20Management/-%20New%20Folder/Rural%20Women%20Empowerment%20in%20India.htm
  43. World Bank. (2016). Women’s Empowerment in Rural Community-Driven. Development Projects. https://base.socioeco.org/docs/lp_genderincdd_01272017.pdf